Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Feedback and Administration > Shroomery News Service
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Banning Drug Offenders from Food Stamps Ended Up Backfiring, New Study Finds
    #25242913 -

https://theintercept.com/2018/06/01/food-stamps-drug-conviction-snap-welfare/

AN OFTEN OVERLOOKED provision in the 1996 welfare reform act barred felons with drug convictions from obtaining welfare — including participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps) — unless states actively waived those restrictions.

Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, who was responsible for adding this provision to the bill, argued at the time that he was merely “asking a higher standard of behavior of people on welfare.”

But Cynthia Godsoe, writing in the Berkeley Women’s Law Journal two years after the law’s passage, objected: “This comment reflects the opinion that people are completely morally responsible for using and selling drugs, rather than influenced by addiction, poverty, and other health-related and social factors.” She then added, “It also reflects a misguided belief that denial of benefits will reduce drug abuse and drug-related crime.”

Twenty-two years later, a Ph.D student in the economics department at the University of Maryland has been able to test the actual effects of the ban. Cody Tuttle, whose paper was released earlier this spring, found that at least in Florida, the law had the opposite intended effect — increasing recidivism among drug traffickers, rather than reducing it.


Tuttle looked at a sample of around 1,000 Florida drug traffickers who committed offenses within 240 days of August 23, 1996 — the day the ban went into effect. His study focused on drug traffickers because in Florida, the ban was limited to that population. “What I find is that for those people that are banned from SNAP … they’re more likely to go back to prison,” Tuttle told The Intercept. In fact, his report shows that individuals who committed drug trafficking offenses after the SNAP cutoff date were “nine percentage points more likely” to return to prison.

Tuttle also found that the crimes that resulted in recidivism were primarily financially motivated. “A lot of them are going back for selling drugs again, or committing theft, so these are crimes they’re going to earn money for committing. I don’t see that they’re going back [to prison] for crimes that are not going to earn them money,” he said.

Because policing and jailing people comes at an expense, this increase in recidivism also means that the food stamp ban has cost the state of Florida. “I find the societal cost of the ban in Florida,” which includes both incarceration costs and victimization costs, “is about $3,700 per banned offender,” Tuttle concluded in his paper. “With approximately 19,000 banned offenders, this implies the ban has cost Florida over 70 million dollars to date, a number that grows with every new trafficker who resorts to crime to make up for the lost benefits.” By comparison, the average single man on SNAP receives between $80 and $150 per month from the federal government.  SNAP benefits are collected for a median spell of 10 months, meaning that providing SNAP in the first instance not only avoids human costs — it’s more cost-effective strategy for the state and costs less overall.

Currently, four states and Guam have total bans on SNAP benefits for drug felons, while 22 additional states have maintained some limited restrictions, for example, conditioning SNAP on drug test results.

Edited by tdubz (06/01/18 03:34 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning Drug Offenders from Food Stamps Ended Up Backfiring, New Study Finds [Re: tdubz]
    #25244228 -

Shiiit of course they sold more drugs, now they gotta pay for groceries and the rent.


--------------------
I don't know shit.
And the more I know,
The more I realize it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning Drug Offenders from Food Stamps Ended Up Backfiring, New Study Finds [Re: Zyiadem] * 3
    #25245875 -

Conservatives don't care. It was never about cost-effectiveness or what is best for society, the "moral victory" is worth the waste of taxpayer money and further harm to society.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning Drug Offenders from Food Stamps Ended Up Backfiring, New Study Finds [Re: Coolwhip GA]
    #25246095 -

it gives their us and them perspective more credence when the them is of a different color primarily and in prison/on parole. it's all about them and protecting their world view, the actual problems with society be damned as long as they are in the white castle.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning Drug Offenders from Food Stamps Ended Up Backfiring, New Study Finds [Re: Coolwhip GA] * 1
    #25246242 -

Coolwhip GA said:
Conservatives don't care. It was never about cost-effectiveness or what is best for society, the "moral victory" is worth the waste of taxpayer money and further harm to society.


This.  ^










--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month: Wild Things- Another Colored Ink Drawing (A.C.I.D.)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning Drug Offenders from Food Stamps Ended Up Backfiring, New Study Finds [Re: Learyfan]
    #25250093 -



--------------------
http://bunkpolice.com/basic-test-kit/
Vienna Declaration
Salvia Divinorum The Docudrahma

Edited by Konyap (06/05/18 01:32 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Feedback and Administration > Shroomery News Service
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Drug War Goes Up in Smoke (lengthy but worthwhile read) Demiurge 5,647 2 08/14/03 06:17 AM
by TheHobbit
* Animal Lovers Favor Drug Legalization motamanM 2,068 3 12/27/03 10:49 PM
by Revelation
* Teenager dies after being mistakenly shot by US drug agents TinMan 3,932 10 03/30/03 09:51 PM
by cheesenoonions
* No Kidding: In Iowa, They're Taxing Illegal Drugs motamanM 2,392 3 06/04/03 12:45 PM
by
* Discoverer of LSD Urges Medical Use of the Drug baraka 5,739 7 09/20/20 09:26 PM
by nektar61
* Rally Protests N.Y. Drug Laws motamanM 2,578 3 06/06/03 06:19 PM
by Learyfan
* Ephedra ban OK'd motamanM 2,091 2 05/18/03 05:44 AM
by cybrbeast
* Experts debate benefits, risks of hallucinogenic drugs motamanM 3,052 1 12/01/03 06:49 PM
by DailyPot

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: motaman, veggie, Alan Rockefeller, Mostly_Harmless
1,631 topic views. 2 members, 56 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.