Arctic W. Fox said:

There are around 40000 new laws, rules and restrictions the USA passes every year. I suppose we could sneak in another

Thou shalt not bump uglies, if both people are dummies.

It's got my vote.

---

ballsalsa said:

the population issue is a non-issue.  I'm not the first person in this thread to point out that fertility rates are below replacement in many western countries.  For instance, the fertility rate in the U.S. is 1.88 children per woman.  it requires 2 people to make a child, therefore there is a fertility deficit in the U.S. of .22 children per mating pair.  This is not an isolated trend.  Brazil is at 1.81 children per woman. in 2000, Brazil was at 2.36. 2.81 in 1990. Mexico is at 2.22, barely above replacement.  In 2000 mexico was at 2.66.  you guys get the idea i'm sure.

---

Envix said:

killing is scary. but mass-sterilization i'm totally down for

---

Shroom Kitty said:

I see what your talking about. People could make the argument that how would you feel If you were the first one one the chopping block. Instead of genocide how how making laws that restrict births. I believe thus would help on so many levels . People don't like to think this way but it truly would cut down on a shit ton of thing. Resources ,welfare,world hunger you name it

---

Coincidentiaoppositorum said:

Shroom Kitty said:

I see what your talking about. People could make the argument that how would you feel If you were the first one one the chopping block. Instead of genocide how how making laws that restrict births. I believe thus would help on so many levels . People don't like to think this way but it truly would cut down on a shit ton of thing. Resources ,welfare,world hunger you name it

---

We must never make laws restricting reproductive rights. What we must do is convince women that by only having one child they are being heroic, they are doing their selfless part to save the species, look, this is a one shot deal, if society collapses anybody trying to rebuild will find they have very little to work with, the earth will have been heavily mined, polluted, deforested, etc...they wont have a chance of getting our species off the planet before our sun runs out....but I'm getting off topic.

I believe there are reproductive restrictions in some country's in Asia, and it seems wrong to me, I.understand the intention, but how do you think those women feel? I have heard some very negative things about these laws and what happens to the children, but not enough to know if any of it is true, regardless the Nazis were the first to employ reproductive restrictions, though to a much more brutal and extreme extent.

We must convince the women that this is the right thing to do and hope they are selfless enough to go along with it, but we must never make any law restricting reproduction or start stealing peoples reproductive functions.

-e. Borodin

---

Salomon said:

here's a question to the OP, sorry if it's already asked in the thread, major tl;dr.


would you still be pro mass genocide if YOU were grouped in to the 99%?




because i would


i wanna be at ground zero when the nuke goes off

---

Shroom Kitty said:

You sound like some feminist pussy. It all comes down to politics. You obviously need to open your eyes and see the big picture. 30 years from now we will be so pussifide its not won't even be funny. We will have to watch what we so and what we wear because it might offend some motherfuckers in the middle east. We are a Christian nation and are supposed to be free m not bow down to some fucking rag heads. I say fuck em. And fuck all you faggets who have a problem with what I say. We don't need your cock sucking comments . We don't need you corrupting our youth. And feminist are the worst. They want equality but when it comes down to it they don't want to do the work . You want equality and the patriarchy to go away then stop acting like whores and flaunting your bodies. That goes for all you attention whore on this site to. Fuck all you mother fuckers. Just because you have a pussy doesn't make you better. You. See all these thirsty motherfuckers completing you and the funny thing is you actually think they like your personality . Fuck you...im out ...dont forget to give me a no shrooms rating. I really don't give a fuck

---

You sound like an extremely intellegent person who has put some very deep thought into your beliefs, someone who truley has humanities best intrest in mind, a selfless saint only concerned with the welfare of others.....:

Why would I give you a negative shroomery thing or what ever the fuck you were talking about? Ive got a lot thicker skin than that, and feel no need resort to petty or childish vindictive behavior just because somebody believes something contrary to my own beliefs and states in an obnoxious way.

You not offending anybody, id be glad to discuss your veiws on these things, freedom of speach means you have the right to say and think what ever you want. Even if your only spouting inflammatory nonsense in a vein attempt to be offensive.

You make several assumptions about me, but ive never once stated my personal beliefs, ive just speculated on the topic at hand.

Learn how to smile, don't take life so seriously, vote for rand Paul in 2016, you know that at least Jesus loves you

-E. Borodin

Beanhead said:

Coincidentiaoppositorum said:

Shroom Kitty said:

I see what your talking about. People could make the argument that how would you feel If you were the first one one the chopping block. Instead of genocide how how making laws that restrict births. I believe thus would help on so many levels . People don't like to think this way but it truly would cut down on a shit ton of thing. Resources ,welfare,world hunger you name it

---

We must never make laws restricting reproductive rights. What we must do is convince women that by only having one child they are being heroic, they are doing their selfless part to save the species, look, this is a one shot deal, if society collapses anybody trying to rebuild will find they have very little to work with, the earth will have been heavily mined, polluted, deforested, etc...they wont have a chance of getting our species off the planet before our sun runs out....but I'm getting off topic.

I believe there are reproductive restrictions in some country's in Asia, and it seems wrong to me, I.understand the intention, but how do you think those women feel? I have heard some very negative things about these laws and what happens to the children, but not enough to know if any of it is true, regardless the Nazis were the first to employ reproductive restrictions, though to a much more brutal and extreme extent.

We must convince the women that this is the right thing to do and hope they are selfless enough to go along with it, but we must never make any law restricting reproduction or start stealing peoples reproductive functions.

-e. Borodin

---

That would still be laws but only for women. Why place the burden on them?

That's pretty negative eugenics, I don't think forced anticonception; said women being put on a pedestal for having no children is entirely right.

Give a married statute to (fe)males who sterilize themself. That's a pretty interesting bonus when it comes to taxes, buying a house and general cost on society.

Why not? Given that everyone preaches equality how can it get more equal than imposing a limit on everyone and giving everyone the chance to have one?
Although they are pretty cruel in China where the child must be kept secret and usually has no papers proving their existence.

For every extra child you turn to a higher tax bracket.
Sounds good on paper but in reality it'd give the rich only the possibility to have many children.

Delicate subject :P

---