Anonymous #4 said:
Anonymous #1 said: Do you imagine a jury believing the defense attorney when they say all his cactus, mimosa hostilis, psychotria viridis, and chaliponga was for dye purposes and should be considered perfectly legal? Or would they be compelled to accept these dried plant materials were sold as drugs? It seems cut and dry to me.
If they can't prove you were extracting then it is not cut and dry. Every person with a gun is a murderer? Using your logic, that would also be cut and dry.
From the horses mouth:
United States Controlled Substance Act
(c) Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation, which contains any quantity of the following hallucinogenic substances, or which contains any of their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation: (1) 3,4-methylenedioxy amphetamine. (2) 5-methoxy-3,4-methylenedioxy amphetamine. (3) 3,4,5-trimethoxy amphetamine. (4) Bufotenine. (5) Diethyltryptamine. (6) Dimethyltryptamine.
|