complexity

Auto-Summary

The author argues that entropy, a fundamental concept in modern physics, is a mathematical fiction created to compensate for the limitations of Newtonian mechanics. They claim that entropy was invented to explain the unpredictable behavior of particles in hot gases, but it's merely a euphemism for heat dissipation. The author suggests that a deeper understanding of plasma physics and sympathetic vibratory physics reveals that the universe is an open and stable system governed by electromagnetic forces, not entropy. They propose that plasma cosmology and electric universe theories provide a more accurate and verifiable explanation for the universe's behavior, without the need for concepts like black holes, the Big Bang, or dark matter. The author criticizes the reliance on mathematical speculation and thought experiments in modern physics, which they believe has led to a mythology of complexity and nonsense. They point to alternative theories and research, such as the work of Eric Dollard and the EM Drive, as evidence that a more straightforward and empirically grounded approach is possible.

Entropy is a mathematical fiction created due to a failing of Newtonian mechanics to accurately describe how the universe works. Two major points that Newton did not investigate or describe were Sympathetic Vibratory Physics and electromagnetic plasma physics.

Entropy as a scientific concept was born because observers were unable to predict the flow of particles in super heated gasses once they were allowed to cool and there was a temperature equilibrium reached. Entropy is just a $10 word for heat dissipation and nothing else. Very smart people got lost in their imaginations and created all manner of nonsense about order and chaos, in part because they believe in the silliness of a Big Bang.

Deep examination of plasma physics as compared to observational astronomy shows that the universe is an open and stable system governed by electromagnetic forces and sympathetic vibratory physics. Entropy does not exist in an open system, and gravity is a byproduct of electromagnetics, it is not an Independent force and it does not control the universe. Plasma Cosmology, and through extension electric universe cosmology, provide ample evidence for other mechanisms that are simpler and readily verifiable than those used by standard model cosmology. No black holes, no Big Bang, no relativity, no dark matter, no heat death of an expanding universe, no nuclear sun, no neutron stars, and no entropy. That is all mathematical invention born of thought experiments similar to the epicycles of Ptolemaic geocentrism. This includes the semi-usable but mostly nonsensical works of quantum theory, which again is pure mathematical speculation taken as truth. Practically all of Quantum Mechanics can be explained with Sympathetic Vibratory Physics, Plasma Physics, and Electrical Engineering. The rest, like particle physics is just garbage that takes up space in people's heads and produces noting concrete in the physical world. It is a distraction and a complicated type of noise.

http://milesmathis.com/ent.html

These thought constructs of a universe of increasing complexity based on nonsensical entropic acceleration of the cosmos are laughable at best when an actual investigation of the universe is undertaken. I am aware that it is the prevalent mythology and most powerful religion of the 20th century, but Jesus didn't exist either, at least not in any form the surviving biblical texts or even non canonical gospels try to paint him as, and it is time to put these concepts to bed.

The issue with modern science really seems to begin with the wide acceptance of Entropy as a meaningful concept. Entropy and the failure of Newtonian thermodynamics allowed the Mathematicians to get involved, and instead of using Empirical science to test ideas and build a solid case of concepts, they created ever more complicated mathematics that found circumstantial and often unusable patterns in the noise of data recovered by the instruments and readings of empirical scientists.

Yet Newton was incomplete and his theory of gravity was wrong, even if his equations worked. In the last 20 years extensive experimental evidence has provided for an electrodynamic source of gravity, however, there is even more evidence that it all traces down to sympathetic vibrations and harmonic resonances. Funny that empirical data collected from cymatics and electrical engineers and sympathetic vibratory physicists is called pseudoscience, yet the inventive ideas of thought experiments that create speculative mathematics are called real science (this is deductive logical invention via mathematics and thought experiments..... not empirical science...).

http://philpapers.org/archive/HOLTDO-13.pdf ; Here is an interesting book called the death of science that investigates these issues.

Here is an article from 1950 on how rigid beliefs and thought training corrupt the science and create paradigms of investigation that lead nowhere, but are continually supported because of the nearly limitless power of belief to control the mind of the observer regardless of what is actually being observed. http://www.compilerpress.ca/Competitiveness/Anno/Anno%20Polanyi%20Scientific%20Beliefs%20Ethics%201950.htm

Meet Eric Dollard, maybe the only person to ever reproduce almost all of Tesla's experiments and understand the math of Steimentz and Heaviside and the implications that the destruction of Tesla's work had on science and how it lead directly to a standard model of inventive mathematics.

A brief primer to Plasma Physics and Plasma Cosmology

There is so much more that just doesn't get press and if it is published in peer reviewed Journals it is ignored until it eventually wins a Nobel Prize and then it is still ignored or twisted until it is made to fit into the mathematical mythology of current thinking. It is bad.

The EM Drive that actually works and provides more thrust than any other system ever created, tested by multiple labs with the same result.
http://www.physics-astronomy.com/2015/07/nasas-impossible-em-drive-works-german.html#.V8GTf1c7tn_

Other sources of continuing education away from the popular mythology

http://plasmauniverse.info/
http://milesmathis.com/
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/
http://svpwiki.com/SVPwiki+Home+Page ; (however, he takes the science to a more theosophical place that just doesn't sit well.)

and there are many more places to dig, many many more.

Similar Threads	Poster	Views	Replies	Last post
The ability to conceptualize ( 1 2 all )	TrueBrode	4,256	27	01/18/04 03:05 PM by jpod
Conceptual thinking. DELETED	dorkus	1,346	1	05/01/06 02:43 PM by TheQueen
Conceptual Evolution And Physical Evolution	fireworks_god	3,383	15	04/19/05 08:33 PM by entiformatie
Implications of the Big Bang Origin and Fate of the Universe ( 1 2 3 all )	Source	7,017	41	09/08/04 01:01 AM by gettinjiggywithit
The concept of randomness	Rhizoid	2,200	14	07/11/03 09:01 PM by Strumpling
Begining To See What Certain Concepts Mean	Twirling	918	12	09/08/04 05:12 AM by thelion
A proposed end to our concept of "family"	Amnesiac	957	7	05/28/03 08:53 PM by Amnesiac
Concepts unimaginable to humans	Rizn	653	1	08/28/07 06:45 PM by Huehuecoyotl