Trans phobic, racist and hateful.

stareatclouds responded on 04/23/26 07:40 PM:
Men have no right to women's spaces. It's immoral to allow men to cosplay as women and invade spaces meant for their safety and privacy. Anyone who disagrees with this is a pathetic person with zero respect for women. You supporting this, this, and this doesn't make you compassionate or kind, but naïve at best, and evil at worst. Grow up a little and ditch the embarrassing leftoid takes.

---

stareatclouds responded on 08/17/25 09:58 PM:
What am I moving on from? I responded once to his comment in a topic about "gender." Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but when I share facts along with opinions, you rate me negatively, tell me I'm devoid of meaning, and hope I have a poor future?

The idea that I'm not a decent person because I don't support men invading women's spaces is what's disappointing. There is nothing kind about denying reality and forcing women out of their own spaces because a man wants to play pretend.

If you support the idea that men can be women, you're denying the right of humans to be same-sex attracted. In particular, this harms lesbians significantly. Congrats, you've crossed into homophobia, something I'll never support.
Last Edited 08/17/25 11:59 PM

---

stareatclouds responded on 08/17/25 10:01 PM:
Harassment would be piling on with negative ratings to people you've never interacted with. Men do not have the right to invade women's spaces, including areas requiring privacy. If standing up for women's rights to spaces they fought hard to get is "backwoods, bigoted bullshit" to you, perhaps consider that you just hate women.

---

stareatclouds responded on 08/11/25 08:30 PM:
I don't support men invading sex-exclusive spaces for women. This is only hate to predatory men who don't respect women who tell them, "No." Hit dogs will holler.

---

And appears to think that his opinions are fact. When challenged with legitimate sources, proceeds to dismiss all data that contradicts his opinion as "obviously stupid", name-call, and generally melt being challenged.
This guy stewed on an argument we had for 5 months, dropped a bunch of transphobic media as sources, and called me a bunch of names, rather than engaging in anything resembling a civil discussion, in a thread that is all about opinions.
Generally a toxic person when he thinks he's objectively right, and doesn't appear to understand how immature it makes him look.
I'll give him some credit for being a quality poster in the fungi-related forums. The guy knows his stuff when it comes to mushrooms. I wasn't going to rate him at all, but this cringey 5-month grudge reply really highlights the immaturity and toxicity that he can bring to a thread.
Now we'll get to watch him confirm all of this with his response to this rating.

stareatclouds responded on 04/12/24 11:50 PM:
If you want to call forgetting about that thread until now "stewing", do your thing. But still, what a pathetic response to being proven wrong. I updated the thread with demonstrable proof that you were incorrect. Instead of acknowledging the evidence, you slunk your shoulders and disappeared like a coward. I mean, damn, you posted paragraph after paragraph about just how safe child mutilation was. I figured you'd want to see the nearly 400-page report that has made it clear just how wrong you were. You know, since that's a dangerously stupid opinion and all.

Quote:

When challenged with legitimate sources, proceeds to dismiss all data that contradicts his opinion as "obviously stupid", name-call, and generally melt being challenged.

---

Man, you have a really active imagination. You challenged nothing by rambling on for 3 pages with strawman arguments that had nothing to do with what I posted. And where are all these links of yours with contradictory data to anything? You posted a single link, again on a topic that I didn't introduce, about these mythical "Standards of Care" that I've debunked. This is what it looks like when someone is actually presented with legitimate sources that dismantle their stance and they ignore it out of ego.

This is all just a very weird reaction to finding out you were patently wrong. Maybe you'll do better in the future. Also, the whole "dropped a bunch of transphobic media as sources" is more pathetic than the rest of your fabrications. I posted about 4 links in that thread, all were related to studies and papers. I updated the thread with a relevant source that refutes everthing you were saying. You spazzed out, ignored it, and rated me negatively with unhinged lies about me spreading "transphobic media." It kind of seems like you're the one bent out of shape, holding a grudge.
Last Edited 04/15/24 08:32 AM

---

unless I could piss petrol.

stareatclouds responded on 04/08/24 05:36 AM:
Braindead anti-Semite loser who parrots insane conspiracy theories while supporting 10/7. Pathetic loser defending Islamic terrorists who brutally raped innocent Israelis. It's wild that rape supporters are allowed on here.

---

stareatclouds responded on 08/15/25 04:19 PM:
Same back to you, Big Perm. I mean Big Worm.

---

what goes up must come down, so bench press only what wont suqish your bits

stareatclouds responded on 03/23/24 05:02 PM:
Hell yeah, RGV. Always nice to see your posts. Cheers, mate.

---

stareatclouds responded on 12/29/23 10:14 PM:
To be fair, you are really, really, really fucking stupid. Extremely shitty attitude, like you introducing a topic just to talk shit about me on? Like inventing stances and quotes to argue against that I've never held or said? I responded to you directly plenty of times, addressing everything you said repeatedly. You'd ignore the message and go back to shit posting. That's legitimately loser behavior, bub. Imagine spending 8 years on a psychedelic message board, salivating at the chance to tell someone, "OMG I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU THINK ENTITIES ARE REAL" when you've never even really done DMT lol sad stuff.

Quote:

As a reply to anyone actually wanting to engage in conversation you just reply that they add no value or they do not interest you.

---

You repeatedly add zero value, this is true. And one of the better examples of how little value your contributions bring are your statements like the quote above. You can't even accurately and truthfully summarize our interactions. I've answered essentially everything you asked, despite you arguing in bad-faith regarding information readily available through links in my signature. Beyond that, I have repeatedly pointed out how flawed, nonsensical, misapplied, and contradictory your arguments were -- you ignored them entirely.

Edit: I ruined no thread. Please post a link. You mean when I called out the dude suggesting 50mg as a minimum dose required for breakthrough? I guess what I consider correcting information is what you think ruins threads. You calling me a "dick" while adding 0 value is probably better, though.

Edit (8/17/25): Hey, at least you edited out your rule-breaking violation where you erroneously shared details of PM's in public. Although more of your guys' coordinated effort to get me perma'd is shining through. As always, feel free to share where I've lied or misrepresented anything, buddy.
Last Edited 08/17/25 11:55 PM

---

This man knows how to grow shrooms! Thank you for sharing the experience.
Good man and has a nice avatar picture
Cheers!

stareatclouds responded on 01/04/24 10:41 PM:
Thanks, brother. That's actually a pretty old pic of me, but I'm glad you like it.

---