Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Viewing johnm214's Ratings (238 General: 4.4 4.0 | 3 Trade: 5.0 ) Display: [ All | General | Trade ]  Sort: [ Rating | User | Date ]
[ See Ratings by johnm214 ] [ Rating Stats ] Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next >  [show all]
InvisibleHeavyToilet
The Heaviest OfThem All
Male

Registered: 08/06/03
Posts: 9,458
Loc: British Columbia
Excellent member of the community
07/28/11 11:24 PM

Super smart, sharp as a tack, and an exceptional moderator. :thumbup:
Invisiblemisterogerz

Registered: 06/07/02
Posts: 1,433
Loc: Gulf Coast
helpful
08/19/11 07:31 PM

very helpful :thumbup: thanks abunch
Invisiblememes
Blessed

Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 27,785
Loc: In a Tree
For a
09/02/11 04:35 PM

smart man.
OfflineOoBYCoO
One grow down, a million to go!!
Male

Registered: 08/18/10
Posts: 8,120
Loc: USA Flag
Last seen: 10 years, 3 months
Good dude!
09/26/11 09:59 PM

:handth:  Stand-up Mod who isn't all up on his high horse!  :borat:
InvisibleP-O
#AnyoneButHarper
 User Gallery

Registered: 05/13/09
Posts: 13,636
Loc: Flag
5
09/28/11 12:01 AM

:deepman:

keep on keeping on
:hamletmonkey:
InvisibleJufin
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/31/08
Posts: 5,116
Loc: Australia
So true
09/29/11 08:22 PM

I hate hippies

http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/15154983#15154983
Offlinemarkst
Stranger
Male

Registered: 07/25/09
Posts: 85
Last seen: 4 years, 10 months
Idiotic reasoner.
10/10/11 07:44 PM

Be extremely weary of this man's arguments, he hi jacks philosophical terms such as "ad hominem" and uses them in the wrong context. He clearly does not have an understanding of these term that are used to analyze the structure of arguments, yet he pulls them out of his arse in order to persuade gullible or naive readers that he makes a point. Yet it is a completely redundant and nonsensical point.
Not to mention I have received many unnecessary ban warnings such as:
Quote:

Warning details: markst, please do not continue calling people names, such as calling them trolls, or suggesting what they are doing is 'trolling'.  Additionally, please do not insult moderators in response to their instructions to stop insulting users, as you did in the following post: http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/15202560#15202560




He feels that he was insulted because I called him out for his bullshit.

Please observe this thread to witness this mans rather irrational behavior and woe to those who do not agree with him.
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/15170340/fpart/4

Last Edited 10/10/11 07:47 PM
OfflineGomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,888
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
Seems fair..
11/01/11 10:41 AM

:happyheart::thumbup:
InvisibleIeponumos
Mycophile/Phytophile
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/02/09
Posts: 4,850
llamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallamallama
01/13/12 11:21 AM

Once upon a time there was a llama. This llama was no ordinary llama because he had red fur and when you have red fur and you're a llama, you're not ordinary because ordinarily llamas don't have red fur. Rather than having red fur, it is ordinary for the llamas to have a fur color other than red.
Offlinesonamdrukpa
Wayfarer

Registered: 10/18/11
Posts: 2,777
Last seen: 25 days, 19 minutes
This made me laugh
02/03/12 06:26 PM

Quote:


I don't have much faith that someone who can't even identify what is persuasive in some video is to be trusted when he claims, conclusively, that something is.  Another point you'll note is that they hardly ever cite a portion of the video which contains the argument which is convincing- even when the videos are hours long, as they often are.  To me this suggests that the advocate's satisfaction with the video is less than the logical analysis one might hope.

This is no more a valid argument than a simple denial followed by a citation to the corpus of English literature as proof.  There's a reason no academic or professional society, journal, allows such bullshit into its publications, and requires citations to be specific- apparently that reason escapes the argument-by-youtube crowd.




Though I have to say, at least the first time round thinking about this, that as long as there exists a valid argument for the denial within the corpus, then technically that is a valid argument...
OfflinexFrockx
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/17/06
Posts: 10,458
Loc: Northeast
Last seen: 7 days, 8 hours
Awesome poster
02/23/12 09:00 PM

John never passes judgement on others, and always tries his hardest to understand others. If other people do things that John feels is mistaken or wrong, John doesn't feel the need to verbally harass them and make charachter judgements, he does his best to make them better people. John is a loving, caring individual who contributes positively to this forum and to humanity as a whole.
OfflineBothHands
Dog Coffee
Female User Gallery

Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 13,177
Loc: Flag
Last seen: 5 years, 2 months
Ahahahaha
03/13/12 03:21 PM

Re: Re: The woodpecker conspiracy

+5
Invisiblenaum
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/09/07
Posts: 4,069
5
04/30/12 09:53 PM

.
OfflineEllis Dee
Archangel
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/29/01
Posts: 13,104
Loc: Fire in the sky
Last seen: 5 years, 2 months
Still 5 shrooms
06/09/12 12:53 AM

We may not see eye to eye about debating. I'll present my opinion and let people judge it. I have little interest in defending positions I believe are correct from obviously foolish rebuttals. I do appreciate your opinions and what you bring to the table.

:murray:

Last Edited 01/21/13 09:36 AM
OfflineSaint Marcus
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 05/11/12
Posts: 765
Last seen: 8 years, 3 months
Disinfo like a mofo
07/02/12 09:55 AM

Constantly spreading disinformation and trying to derail topics. This guy is straight outta the cointel manual for government agents to sieze and control forums.
Where do they find these mods? DoD? DHS? CIA? Some other government organization. Thank goodness there is an ignore function for the mods tho :tongue2:
InvisibleElementium
Friendly Neighborhood Lurker
 User Gallery

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 658
+++++
07/12/12 03:14 AM

Can't believe I never rated you -- been reading your posts for a long time.

Always well-spoken and usually right on point. :thumbup:
InvisiblezZZz
jesus
I'm a teapot User Gallery

Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 33,479
good teacher
08/02/12 02:13 AM

you can learn a lot from this guy.
InvisibleAbuse
end of the line

Registered: 08/08/08
Posts: 6,039
Bygones
08/02/12 06:38 AM



Edit: I'm not such a dick as I used to be. John is a good mod.

Last Edited 06/09/14 06:52 AM
InvisibleBurke Dennings
baby merchant

Registered: 11/29/04
Posts: 81,641
+
08/05/12 12:56 PM

Gets the job done.

Last Edited 12/07/12 12:01 AM
OfflineMaitreya
Vishnu.
Male

Registered: 07/16/12
Posts: 219
Last seen: 10 years, 9 months
Does not understand the meaning of the word "illogical"
08/13/12 04:41 PM

Should be taken out behind the barn and shot in the head.
Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Next >  [show all]

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.021 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 5 queries.