| Home | Community | Message Board |
|
You are not signed in. |

This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.
|
|
|
fastfred | 05/24/06 09:06 AM |
|
|
beforetimetook | 05/24/06 11:28 AM |
|
|
mycogirl | 05/25/06 12:14 AM |
|
|
fastfred | 06/02/06 09:48 PM |
|
|
mycogirl | 06/02/06 10:48 PM |
|
|
fastfred | 06/03/06 01:23 AM |
|
|
EonTan | 06/03/06 11:08 AM |
|
|
fastfred | 06/03/06 01:47 PM |
|
|
Zen Peddler | 06/12/06 04:33 AM |
|
Mycologist Reged: 03/10/07 Posts: 48271 |
|
||
Quote: Probably because some of them were not P. cubensis. Quote: Psilocybe cubensis is not closely related to any of those species. P. cubensis is closely related to P. ovoideocystidiata, P. subcubensis and P. chuxiongensis. Quote: I agree with that. If it coded for anything, it wouldn't be useful for species level differentiation. Quote: That is too small. When I see sequences of that length, I just delete them. If the people who made the sequences knew what they were doing, they would be around 700 base pairs. Quote: Its1f/its4b primers give around 750 base pairs. Quote: My analysis shows they are a little bit different, but more sequences with spore size measurements are needed. Here is my most recent Psilocybe ITS tree:
|
|
|
Chemiker | 12/13/06 11:33 AM |
|
|
Alan Rockefeller | 10/19/14 11:29 PM |
| Extra information | ||||
|
2 members, 14 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
Moderator: RogerRabbit, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta |
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled BBCode is enabled |
Rating:
Thread views: 5153 |
||
|
|
||||
