| Home | Community | Message Board |
|
You are not signed in. |
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.
|
|
Stranger Reged: 05/20/13 Posts: 158 |
|
||
Quote: This is discussed pretty interestingly in my other thread: https://www.shroomery.org/forum In my opinion, the "who" which determines what is real/not, and what is in touch/out of touch with reality, is the sober population that experiences things that are objectively the same (or as close to the same as we can get, given natural, slight perceptual differences), and/or the person/population who can support his/its claim(s) via repeatable testing. For instance, if there are 10 sober people in a room, and they all can observe that a a statue is motionless (which is also a testable claim), and one person who took a drug claims that it is dancing or swaying, I would side with the claims made by the 10 sober people over the one person who's on drugs. If the drug consumer's claim can be proven via testing, that's a different story, but his experiencing it, alone, while under the influence of a chemical(s) that affects perception, is less convincing.
|
| Extra information | ||||
|
3 members, 89 guests and 13 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
Moderator: psilocybinjunkie, Rose, mushboy, LogicaL Chaos, Northerner, bodhisatta |
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled BBCode is enabled |
Rating:
Thread views: 3232 |
||
|
|
||||

