Home | Community | Message Board

Mushrooms.com
Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract, Kratom Powder For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
OfflineBleedingSickness
Friend OfAttention Whore
Registered: 08/02/02
Posts: 412
Loc: Northern USA
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD...
    #930577 - 10/04/02 02:33 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Many people believe that scientists are against religion and that they rule out all traces of god through their work but this is not the case and is clearly as it always has been ...simply a matter of your own personal faith and beliefs even the great Scientist Einstein believed in some form of higher power though it's form wasn't how many religions percieve "god" to be. Now out of all the people of this world speaking towards scientists one of the last people you would expect to believe in God would be Einstein really he was the last one for me at least..... if you don't believe me here are a few tidbits of quotes....... I can post sitings if you wish as well.

"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." This is a direct quote of Einstein himself followed by yet another quote

"Our situation on this earth seems strange. Every one of us appears here involuntary and uninvited for a short stay, without knowing the whys and the wherefore. In our daily lives we only feel that man is here for the sake of others, for those whom we love and for many other beings whose fate is connected with our own." ... "The most beautiful and deepest experience a man can have is the sense of the mysterious. It is the underlying principle of religion as well as all serious endeavour in art and science. He who never had this experience seems to me, if not dead, then at least blind. To sense that behind anything that can be experienced there is a something that our mind cannot grasp and whose beauty and sublimity reaches us only indirectly and as a feeble reflection, this is religiousness. In this sense I am religious. To me it suffices to wonder at these secrets and to attempt humbly to grasp with my mind a mere image of the lofty structure of all that there is." Einstein's speech 'My Credo' to the German League of Human Rights, Berlin, autumn 1932

Just some knowledge to ponder I guess....... sorry if it's useless but now you know sumthin right...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleShroomismM
Space Travellin
Male User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 66,006
Loc: 9th Dimension
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #930645 - 10/04/02 03:00 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

"The most beautiful and deepest experience a man can have is the sense of the mysterious. It is the underlying principle of religion as well as all serious endeavour in art and science. He who never had this experience seems to me, if not dead, then at least blind. To sense that behind anything that can be experienced there is a something that our mind cannot grasp and whose beauty and sublimity reaches us only indirectly and as a feeble reflection, this is religiousness. In this sense I am religious. To me it suffices to wonder at these secrets and to attempt humbly to grasp with my mind a mere image of the lofty structure of all that there is."

Bloody brilliant! Good ol' Albert..


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Invisiblesir tripsalot
Administrator

Registered: 07/10/99
Posts: 6,486
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #930716 - 10/04/02 03:18 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Many relgious people see threads about evolution as a personalthreat to their religion.


--------------------

"Little racoons and old possums 'n' stuff all live up in here. They've got to have a little place to sit." Bob Ross.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleShroomismM
Space Travellin
Male User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 66,006
Loc: 9th Dimension
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: sir tripsalot]
    #930849 - 10/04/02 04:10 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Not I


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineMitchnast
Toadmonger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/28/99
Posts: 8,646
Loc: Okanagan
Last seen: 1 day, 7 hours
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Shroomism]
    #930901 - 10/04/02 04:29 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

did einstein not say something like "i want to know gods immagination, the rest is just details" ?


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleJoshua
Holoman
Male

Registered: 10/27/98
Posts: 5,395
Loc: The Matrix
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #930945 - 10/04/02 04:42 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Indeed he did, however his idea of God is far different than that of mainstream religion. I am glad you posted those quotes, I think they do justice toward his true feelings of God.

Joshua


--------------------
The Shroomery Bookstore

Great books for inquiring minds!

"Life After Death is Saprophytic!"


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Anonymous

Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #931402 - 10/04/02 10:28 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

That quote is my all-time favorite of Albert Einstein's. It is found in part on the PBS documentary of him.

Cheers,


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Anonymous

Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: sir tripsalot]
    #931403 - 10/04/02 10:30 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Yes, and many people see religion as a threat to their evolution. :wink:

Cheers, 


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineAlbino_Jesus
Clearly Retarded
 User Gallery

Registered: 09/14/02
Posts: 1,698
Loc: Construction ahead...
Last seen: 11 years, 8 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Shroomism]
    #931434 - 10/04/02 10:55 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

In reply to:

The most beautiful and deepest experience a man can have is the sense of the mysterious

Bloody brilliant!





disagreed.


--------------------
The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door.
-Ralph Nader



Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineLearyfanS
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 32,709
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 17 hours, 2 minutes
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD.. [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #931469 - 10/04/02 11:18 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Good thread.

His beliefs about God closely mirror mine. Here's my favorite quote of the two:

In reply to:

"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."






--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month:  Wendell Austin and The Country Swings- LSD



Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleRevelation

 User Gallery

Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #931530 - 10/04/02 11:58 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Greatness

edit:..okay, was meant to be a thumbs up icon.


--------------------


Edited by Revelation (10/04/02 05:51 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleIn(di)go
People of the sun.
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/30/00
Posts: 8,157
Loc: Cologne, Germany
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #931910 - 10/04/02 02:51 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)


einstein was a great mind... and a grand spirit... he changed the world for the better...
thanks for the post, bleedng... i enjoyed that quotes a lot...


--------------------


Edited by Lozt Soul (10/04/02 02:52 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinevaporbrains
Cub Scout

Registered: 09/09/02
Posts: 539
Loc: ghetto# 03479
Last seen: 16 years, 2 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: In(di)go]
    #932113 - 10/04/02 03:58 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

God does not play dice with the universe.... he said that too. it looks like he was disproven according to quantum mechanics...we ..or our grandchildren's grandchildren shall see....


--------------------
All refrences to and statements concerning mushrooms, mushroom cultivation, and mushroom related paraphrenalia refer specifically to the cultivation of legal species.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 15 years, 10 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: vaporbrains]
    #932194 - 10/04/02 04:25 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

quantum mechanics are only theory also, einstein even said he didnt fully undersatnd it....but, it is a theory that makes the MOST sense, even though it fails when it comes to some things, thats why there trying to find the universal theory that makes sense of it all...


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #932211 - 10/04/02 04:28 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

I often wonder why the sense of the mysterious is often degraded with metaphysical theory. Einstein was brilliant, but he wasn't perfect... he still desperately clung to his encultured concept of God (that's where the "dice" quote originates).


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: CleverName]
    #932234 - 10/04/02 04:35 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

thats why there trying to find the universal theory that makes sense of it all...

Ah yes... the fabled GUT or Grand Universal Theory... now called Superstring Theory (more or less). It's weird that Hawking can't accept Heisenberg... why oh why would he have a problem with "sometimes things just happen" (rather than "everything happens for a reason")? Oh well... when the string theorists all die off, science will hopefully delve into more realistic matters.


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleIn(di)go
People of the sun.
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/30/00
Posts: 8,157
Loc: Cologne, Germany
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #932244 - 10/04/02 04:40 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

In reply to:

he still desperately clung to his encultured concept of God


encultured? man... you should take a look at germany's culture back in those days... whomever came up with such a concept of god was inmideately(sp?) cursed out of church... einstein's ideas and concepts about god or the higher power were in NO WAY originated in culture...

oh! and einstein WAS perfect... we all are... you just have to see the perfection


--------------------


Edited by Lozt Soul (10/04/02 04:41 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: In(di)go]
    #932276 - 10/04/02 04:50 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Okay... we're going to have a semantics battle... whatever...

encultured? man... you should take a look at germany's culture back in those days... whomever came up with such a concept of god was inmideately(sp?) cursed out of church... einstein's ideas and concepts about god or the higher power were in NO WAY originated in culture...

Was he Jewish? I'm pretty sure he was. And I'm pretty sure they believed in a God... though I could be wrong on that one. So his definition of God was different... he still needed to believe in one.

oh! and einstein WAS perfect... we all are... you just have to see the perfection
Right right.... maybe Mr_Mushrooms can help me on this one. What's the name of that (epistemology?) theory that everything's perfect just the way it is? Whatever... I'm not knocking him. His picture's on my friggin' wall. Why don't you just argue with Aristotle that he disagreed with his teacher?


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineAdamist
ℚṲℰϟ✞ЇѺℵ ℛ∃Åʟḯ†У
Male User Gallery

Registered: 11/24/01
Posts: 10,211
Loc: Bloomington, IN
Last seen: 6 years, 6 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #932305 - 10/04/02 05:00 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Einstein was a Pisces...  :grin: 


--------------------
:heartpump: { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } } :heartpump:


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Invisiblebuttonion
Calmly Watching

Registered: 04/04/02
Posts: 303
Loc: Kansas
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #932724 - 10/04/02 07:59 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

I often wonder why the sense of the mysterious is often degraded with metaphysical theory.

There is a little metaphysical in every perspective.


--------------------
Concepts which have been proved to be useful in ordering things easily acquire such an authority over us that we forget their human origins and accept them as invariable.- Albert Einstein


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: buttonion]
    #932773 - 10/04/02 08:14 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

I often wonder why the sense of the mysterious is often degraded with metaphysical theory.
There is a little metaphysical in every perspective.

Not in mine.
Is it impossible to be spiritual whilst denying the metaphysical?
I don't think so, and neither would the Fightin' Jesus or Buddha.

Okay... Just hear me out on this little thought experiment...

If it could be proven (it can't) that there is no metaphysical aspect to this reality- only what can be observed exists (more or less), would it change you/your behavior?
Serious answers only, please.


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinechemkid
Be excellent toeach other

Registered: 06/21/02
Posts: 506
Loc: Between a rock and a hard...
Last seen: 17 years, 2 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #932815 - 10/04/02 08:33 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

If it could be proven that no metaphysical experience exists: Of course it would change your behavior. If however you never had a belief in the metaphysical, then I suspect behavior would remain the same.

Question: If it could be proven without a doubt that God existed and that hell was a very real place that some sinners went to, would it change your behavior?


--------------------
An open mind is the greatest journey of all.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleIn(di)go
People of the sun.
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/30/00
Posts: 8,157
Loc: Cologne, Germany
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: chemkid]
    #932865 - 10/04/02 09:00 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

In reply to:

a very real place that some sinners went to


sinners go where they want to go, just like everyone else...

and to answer your question, sclorch... it all depends on what kind of proof you deliver... what would be proof in your eyes could not mean anything in mine...


--------------------


Edited by Lozt Soul (10/04/02 09:01 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: In(di)go]
    #932921 - 10/04/02 09:25 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Question: If it could be proven without a doubt that God existed and that hell was a very real place that some sinners went to, would it change your behavior?


NO. And I can say that without hesitation.

and to answer your question, sclorch... it all depends on what kind of proof you deliver... what would be proof in your eyes could not mean anything in mine...

Usually, answers contain ANSWERS.
Proof is proof is proof.
Fine... proof in YOUR eyes... I don't care what that entails. Just answer me. No more sidestepping.


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinechemkid
Be excellent toeach other

Registered: 06/21/02
Posts: 506
Loc: Between a rock and a hard...
Last seen: 17 years, 2 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: In(di)go]
    #932939 - 10/04/02 09:37 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

You're dodging the question Loztsoul :grin:


When I say proof I mean irrefutable proof (in your eyes and mine) 


--------------------
An open mind is the greatest journey of all.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinechemkid
Be excellent toeach other

Registered: 06/21/02
Posts: 506
Loc: Between a rock and a hard...
Last seen: 17 years, 2 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #932946 - 10/04/02 09:39 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

just curious as to why you say "without hesitation"?

If you knew you could avoid an eternity of fire and brimstone by following the plan that was now proven....why wouldn't you change?

Just playing Devils advocate here.


--------------------
An open mind is the greatest journey of all.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: chemkid]
    #932976 - 10/04/02 09:52 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

If you knew you could avoid an eternity of fire and brimstone by following the plan that was now proven....why wouldn't you change?

You're assuming I would go to hell. I'm a very moral person... most pinks don't have a clue who I really am.

However, there is one thing I won't be compelled to do: believe anything dogmatically. Furthermore, I would argue that (if he/she existed) God isn't a cocksucker. That being the case, God would check out my life and say, "hey, you're not such a bad guy afterall... so what if you don't believe in me... you were still a good person... ah, fuck what the church says... come on in!! *big smile*".

If God were a dick, I'd tell him to fuck off as I'm being thrown into the fiery pits of hell. Tyrants suck.

And that's the truth. I don't have time to make up bullshit.


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinechemkid
Be excellent toeach other

Registered: 06/21/02
Posts: 506
Loc: Between a rock and a hard...
Last seen: 17 years, 2 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #933026 - 10/04/02 10:10 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

GOOD RESPONSE Sclorch....You're right....I guess I didn't consider the possibility that you're a swell guy afterall :cool:

Anyway....Let's assume that the Judaeo/Christian version of God and the Bible was proven beyond a doubt.

You say you wouldn't believe anything dogmatically....but that is the present Sclorch. You don't think you would change if you found out that by not believeing you would be delivered into the worst imaginable hell.  You say that God would notice that you are basically decent guy so you would make into heaven but if not then fuck him. That seems pretty ego driven. If you can't have it your way then forget everyone.

This is just me but if I knew without a doubt that all of it was true I would eat a major chunk of crow pie, beg for forgiveness and live the way you are supposed to.

It is really difficult to debate this without knowing the specific differences between heaven and hell. But given a choice (indulge my descriptions for a sec) between a hot, nasty place that smells like rotting corpses and old cheese with the worst noncessable pain, thirst, hunger, blah, blah, blah

--OR--

Clean, fun, loving, beautiful people with no hunger, thirst, emptiness. All the knowledge you could imagine, blah,blah,blah

You wouldn't bow your head in deferrence to make it into the latter category..........boy, you so crazy!!!! 


--------------------
An open mind is the greatest journey of all.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineNiamhNyx
I'm NOT a 'he'
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/01/02
Posts: 3,198
Last seen: 12 years, 4 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: chemkid]
    #933261 - 10/05/02 12:05 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Ah, einstein, i love this guy. He understood so very much, I wish he was alive so I could converse with him about the nature of the universe and our interpretations of the divine.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Anonymous

Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: NiamhNyx]
    #933275 - 10/05/02 12:14 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Not replying directly to you, just this thread in general:

:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: 


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
InvisibleSclorch
Clyster

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 07/13/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: chemkid]
    #933838 - 10/05/02 04:54 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

You say you wouldn't believe anything dogmatically....but that is the present Sclorch.
True... but's it's been the past Sclorch for as long as I've known, too.

You don't think you would change if you found out that by not believeing you would be delivered into the worst imaginable hell. You say that God would notice that you are basically decent guy so you would make into heaven but if not then fuck him.

All I have is RIGHT NOW. That's all anyone ever has. And RIGHT NOW, a hateful God is at the top of my shit list. Take it or leave it.

That seems pretty ego driven. If you can't have it your way then forget everyone.

Isn't "save your ass" pretty ego driven as well?

This is just me but if I knew without a doubt that all of it was true I would eat a major chunk of crow pie, beg for forgiveness and live the way you are supposed to.

You're basically talking about Pascal's wager.
Pascal's wager isn't true belief. It's gambling. And it's a lie.

You wouldn't bow your head in deferrence to make it into the latter category...
If God were an asshole... do you really think he/she would just LET me get away with sucking it up at the last minute? I'd still get the big burn treatment... fuck 'em (at least I'll be one of the few to say it).


--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinejohnnyfive
Burning withCircles!
Registered: 07/02/02
Posts: 886
Loc: Hell
Last seen: 17 years, 4 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #934257 - 10/05/02 12:15 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

"I want to know the thoughts of god, anything else is details" - Einstein

This was copyed and posted from an unknown source but its been on my computer for awhile. Its some interesting stuff!

PROLOGUE
WHO OR WHAT KILLED EINSTEIN?
It might be a strange question to ask, but ask it nonetheless. Who or what killed Einstein? What entity or force ended the life of perhaps the greatest mind of our era, that scientist whose name is synonymous with intelligence? Well, it was clearly not a butler who did it, nor, as far as we know, was it an assassin belonging to some sinister governmental agency. To put it bluntly, it was the reality process which killed the great Einstein. Now, although this deceptively simple answer may seem reminiscent of a Woody Allen joke, what I mean to convey is that all of us, regardless of age, sex, race or creed, are born out of, and are destined to die, within a massive on-going process consisting not only of the evolution of life on Earth but the evolution of the Universe also. It is this relentless, all-encompassing, and outrageously complex process within which we are all so intimately embedded which we term 'reality'. We might also call such a process Nature. Thus, another obvious way of answering my unusual question is to say that 'natural causes' killed Einstein. Which means that Nature killed him. Well, to be sure about it, Nature gave birth to him, gave him 76 years of existence and then summarily dispatched him.
Call it Nature or call it reality, either way they are but small words for one vast process which flows inexorably onward. Whatever one's preferred term, it most certainly is a process, a word whose Latin roots mean 'to advance' or 'move forwards', and there can be little doubt that reality is, at heart, a single universal process which has been running non-stop for some 15 or so billion years. Not bad. Pretty impressive in fact.
So what? you might ask. Well, what this book is concerned with is the ultimate point of this creative but fatal reality we find ourselves in. To put it bluntly once more, are we biologically woven into an accident or is reality somehow directed? This is quite some question, perhaps the most profound we can ask in our short earthly sojourn, and one we know to have crossed Einstein's mind while he lived. Consider, for example, a famous remark of his which went something like:
"The most incomprehensible thing about the Universe is its comprehensibility".
What Einstein meant by this sublime statement (of which there are many paraphrased versions) is that it is astonishing not only that Nature is intelligible, and not only that Nature works so well, but that Nature has somehow conspired, through a process of organic evolution, to build biological brains endowed with minds capable of understanding these things. Why? Why exactly should Nature be that way? Why should the Universe have been endowed with such a staggeringly creative capacity to construct and organise itself, even to the point of eliciting conscious human beings? Could it have been otherwise?
Whatever the case, should we believe the reality process to be essentially a mindless accident or even a series of mindless incidents, then we might conceive ourselves to be hapless mortal prisoners entrapped in the process. Or, if we instead believe reality to be purposeful and meaningful in some way then we might consider ourselves fortunate functional components of the process. Whatever you may have read let me assure you that this issue has most definitely not been settled. It is neither completely obvious that reality is a purely accidental affair, nor is it at all clear that reality is purposeful. Neither science nor religion - arguably the two dominant strands of thinking which tend to confront the fundamental nature of reality - have absolutely conclusive evidence at hand.
But if we look to science for clues - since science has enjoyed more evident practical success than religion - then clearly over the last 300 or so years since the time of Newton and the development of classical physics, science has made great headway in elucidating how reality works; not why it works but how. Because the process of reality is so obligingly intelligible and comprehensible, then we see that science has enjoyed a kind of dialogue with Nature in which information is accessed through scientific experiment. In this way, scientists like physicists, chemists, biologists, and cosmologists have acquired a wealth of information concerning the sub-atomic, chemical, biological, and astronomical aspects of reality and have subsequently built elaborate models detailing them. However, how one interprets the informational language of Nature, how one translates the objective data collated by science into a theory about the ultimate nature of reality is a subjective affair very much up for debate. Thus, our 'big question' awaits a satisfactory answer and Einstein's killer remains very much on the loose.
At heart, if we wish to know what, if anything, the reality process is really up to, we can do no more than assess all the relevant information revealed by collective science and the information or intuitive wisdom accrued via personal experience, and then attempt to form some viable theoretical overview. Absolute truths, it would seem, are all but inaccessible, and thus the true nature of Einstein's creator and killer might forever remain a mystery. But, whatever we believe about the reality process, we are, willy-nilly, most definitely all 'in it together' whether we like it or not, and it is for this terrifying or wonderful reason that I have taken it upon myself to explore by any means necessary just what it is that is driving reality, whether the driver is blind or has vision.
Before I reveal to you my particular mode of investigation, lets briefly review the status of science in relation to such a decidedly daunting issue. As it is, current scientific thought definitely veers towards a purposeless and mechanistic account of how the reality process works, an account which is, with all due respect, depressing and devoid of spirit. Although our scientific knowledge of the world reveals its microscopic and macroscopic complexity and highlights the universal mathematical precision of things like physical law, such knowledge has in effect reduced the Universe to a kind of reasonless mechanism devoid of high intelligence apart from our own. Everything from a cell to an orchid to the emergence of our species is generally reduced to a set of 'merelys'. Indeed, the more successful a scientist is in reducing whatever facet of Nature he or she is working on to 'merely this' or 'merely that', then the more warmly is their work received. To argue otherwise by, say, suggesting that Nature is purposeful in some way, is to ostracise oneself from mainstream science. Certainly it is the case that nobody will win a Nobel prize for planting purpose in Nature despite the uplifting appeal that such an intentional theory of reality would undoubtedly carry.
But is it valid to build a new and overtly optimistic theory concerning the ultimate nature of the reality process solely because our current theories are not uplifting enough? Obviously not. Such a new theory would represent whim, an artifice whose lax roots lie in an imagination galvanised into action because the consensus 'truth' about reality is perceived to be too gloomy and unpalatable. Indeed, to enthusiastically infer that the human species has some kind of special purpose in the reality process, that we are somehow at the centre of an intentional Universe, smacks of the pre-scientific beliefs confined to the pages of history books, to a time when supernatural thinking governed the minds of men. Such anthropocentric religious ideology has now been all but crushed by rational scientific thought which firmly places our kind on a mere satellite circling a mere star amongst billions. We are no more than the product of evolution, one particular species out of countless millions whose only real claim to fame is our big brains with their ability to think and direct complex behaviour.
Over a few centuries, in particular from the seminal publication of Darwin's The Origin of Species in 1859 (which can be cited as the definitive turning point in our concepts of man's place in Nature), the ideological pendulum has thus swung through 180 degrees, from a position in which humanity was the crowning glory of creation to a position in which we are but speckish organic bystanders in an essentially pointless Universal exercise of physics and DNA-orchestrated biochemistry. Life is accidental, mostly hard and then you die - a tough fact, best swallowed with a large brandy.
To revert to the ancient view in which human life, and in particular human consciousness, is considered to be somehow significant therefore seems completely out of the question, a futile move serving only to stir up false hope in a Universe that basically 'just don't give a damn'. This is especially so if our only motivation is a dislike of current scientific reasoning. Only if such a new theory were driven primarily by direct conscious experience could it possibly hope to possess validity. And not just wishy-washy conscious experience either. The experience, if it were to bear upon notions of the ultimate nature of reality, would have to be remarkably compelling and potentially accessible to all. It would have to provide incontrovertible evidence that we have some significant role to play in the reality process. But could a direct conscious experience really afford us such an insight into the 'big question'?
Well, if we keep in mind that science proceeds through verifiable experimentation in which information is gained via perceptual experience and that we depend upon our conscious experience however it should arise to build models of reality, then it would indeed appear to be a possibility. Which is to say that new forms of conscious experience might well offer us a glimpse into the biggest questions that face our mortal existence. Which brings me to the central fact permeating this book, namely that conscious experience is entirely mutable. And herein lies the hope of any new optimistic theory concerning the significance of human consciousness within the reality process.
The mutability of consciousness. What does such a concept imply? Well, first of all we should consider the fact that consciousness, whatever it is exactly, is the 'stuff' which mediates all science and, for that matter, all types of reasoning and all of our theories about the world. Consciousness can therefore be understood as the very ground of our being, the 'factor x' which makes us what we are. In order to fully engage the reader in the important point I am here trying to convey, consider the following simple thought experiment.
Imagine, if you will, that all scientists wore identical spectacles and that these spectacles determined the perceptual view of the things being scrutinised by the scientists. All the data amassed by these scientists would be related in some intimate way to the effects of their spectacles since all their perceptions will have passed through the self-same lenses. Now, it isn't pushing credulity too far to suggest that the scientists would do well at some point - possibly over their morning coffee break, or perhaps at a stage when their theories are proving to be inadequate - to reflect upon the characteristics of their shared state of 'bespectacledness'. In other words, it would be quite a breakthrough for these scientists to suddenly cease their traditional research in order to focus upon the nature of the factor mediating their research, namely, their glasses. What they would soon come to realise is that their glasses represent a subject worthy of analysis since they are, in a sense, the closest thing to them.
This imaginary situation is not unlike the real world, only this time it is our consciousness, or rather our state of consciousness, as opposed to glasses, through which we view and experience Nature. For simplicity's sake, we can call this 'normal consciousness', a kind of shared lens through which science and scientific interpretation proceeds. Thus, it is quite legitimate to reflect upon this 'lens of normal consciousness' and ask whether, perhaps, it could be altered or enhanced. In other words, one might well wonder if it is possible to improve upon the lens of normal consciousness and attain a state of mind in which the essence of Nature is more clearly discernible.
Although such a science is clearly specialised and seemingly remote from the affairs of modern culture, it was only due to their dedicated ethnomycological investigations that the Wassons learned of sacred Mexican mushrooms, sought to find them, experienced them first-hand, and thence gave psilocybin (the as yet unnamed active constituent of the mushroom, pronounced either 'silla-sigh-bin' or 'sigh-le-sigh-bin') to the West. Once discovered, ethnomycological science suddenly acquired a distinctly mystical edge allowing it to breach the domains of religion and psychology. It also provided a new impetus to mankind's enduring quest to access transcendental knowledge and there can be no doubt that Wasson's discovery and vivid description of the effects of the psilocybin were crucial in generating the subsequent cultural wave of psychedelic experimentation that soon followed in the 60's. Moreover, as we shall eventually see, the mushroom also reveals itself as the key to unveiling the secrets of consciousness and the hidden riches of Nature. Theophany, mind, and reality; these three most profound of topics are all met in some way through use of the psilocybin mushroom. But, before we jump into the deep end who, pray, was this Wasson fellow, this financier-cum-adventurer, and how had he come to penetrate the Earth's secret psychedelic dimension? Who was he to bring news of sacred fungi into the Western world?
In effect, Wasson's Life article was timed to coincide with the release of his magnum opus 2-volume book Mushrooms, Russia, and History, co-written with his wife Valentina. It is this work which fully reveals the extent of Wasson's long-standing interest in the cultural use of fungi and how he finally came to be at the door of perception marked 'psilocybin'.
With only 512 handcrafted copies luxuriously bound and printed, Mushrooms, Russia, and History stands as a rare piece of art. Indeed, by the late 70's its value had reached some $2500 making it the most valuable book in existence at that time whose author was still alive. It is a highly polished book, written in a lively style that reflects the love of ethnomycology borne by the Wasson's. It represents the distilled wisdom drawn from their extensive studies into the role that various species of mushroom played in different cultures and culminates in their discovery of the sacred mushroom ceremonies still being conducted in Mexico, a discovery important enough to warrant the further account in the more accessible pages of Life magazine.


Whatcha think?



--------------------
And the gameshow host rings the buzzer (brrnnntt) oh and now you get a face full of face!


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineBleedingSickness
Friend OfAttention Whore
Registered: 08/02/02
Posts: 412
Loc: Northern USA
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: johnnyfive]
    #934786 - 10/05/02 05:03 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)


Well I personally thought that the paper "or excerpt from the book" wasn't put together very well and used repetative words there was some good theories and idea's/information in the article but they weren't put together in an orderly fashion which sometimes made the article dry and a bit hard to read through ya really had to pump out the interesting info but it did make sense in some areas he should have avoided saying Clearly"when his own point wasn't clear enough" First of all"he said this a TON there were more then five of em I'm sure I didn't go through and count but it did stick out in my mind alot after I finished reading the paper." Also he jumped around alot he'd be describing one thing then suddenly jump to something else never totally following through to his point but with those English things in the past.

There were quite a few interesting ideas within the paper that did tye themselves together. That was just my view others may think differently and that's why you posted it wasn't it to get others thoughts;)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineBleedingSickness
Friend OfAttention Whore
Registered: 08/02/02
Posts: 412
Loc: Northern USA
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: sir tripsalot]
    #934835 - 10/05/02 05:40 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

It is true that many people are threatened by evolution others embrace it like a new religion but they don't totally disregard god I see no reason why we can't believe in both perhaps god created us so that we could evolve maybe that was part of his plan for us to see how far we could go but maybe that's a threatening comment as well hehe......

In reply to:

Lozt Soul
einstein was a great mind... and a grand spirit... he changed the world for the better...
thanks for the post, bleedng... i enjoyed that quotes a lot...




In reply to:

Joshua Indeed he did, however his idea of God is far different than that of mainstream religion. I am glad you posted those quotes, I think they do justice toward his true feelings of God.




NO problem I enjoyed reading through them and I'm also glad that all of you did as well I agree that his idea's of GOd are different from mainstream but I myself have a great respect for that and for him haha then again he is Einstein. I also agree that he did change the world for the better and hopefully he will continue to do so through his ideas and theories of which we haven't quite totally deciphered (sp) yet.

In reply to:

Mr_Mushrooms
That quote is my all-time favorite of Albert Einstein's. It is found in part on the PBS documentary of him




In reply to:

Learyfan
His beliefs about God closely mirror mine. Here's my favorite quote of the two



I don't really think I had a favorite of all of them I enjoyed his thoughts on all of them but the one that you chose for the first one was the one I found very intrigueing(sp)
In reply to:

Mitchnast
did einstein not say something like "i want to know gods immagination, the rest is just details" ?



I wish I had caught that one to post up above it is also a great quote.

TO EVERYOne I enjoyed reading your thoughts:) just thougth that I'd let you all know that.


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineAlbino_Jesus
Clearly Retarded
 User Gallery

Registered: 09/14/02
Posts: 1,698
Loc: Construction ahead...
Last seen: 11 years, 8 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: BleedingSickness]
    #934859 - 10/05/02 05:48 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

holy shit man
I like your posts, but do you mind using a little punctuation now and then? 100 word run-on sentences are a bit hard to "decipher"


--------------------
The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door.
-Ralph Nader



Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineBleedingSickness
Friend OfAttention Whore
Registered: 08/02/02
Posts: 412
Loc: Northern USA
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Albino_Jesus]
    #934939 - 10/05/02 06:38 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Hahaha agreed I do have a lacking in punctuation. Even as a writer I lack that I use huge run on setences but do occasionally add other marks I never use!!!! unless I'm messing around I could add more paragraphs...........and I do apologize about the run on sentences


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineMarkostheGnostic
Elder
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/10/99
Posts: 14,279
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 7 months, 26 days
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: ]
    #935470 - 10/06/02 12:05 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Not to mention the threat to their devolution.


--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineMarkostheGnostic
Elder
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/10/99
Posts: 14,279
Loc: South Florida
Last seen: 7 months, 26 days
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #935499 - 10/06/02 12:18 AM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Just to note (semantics again), that metaphysical simply translates as 'before' or 'prior to' physics, and therefore the state of the universe 'shortly' after the Big Bang (perhaps up to 400,000 years) can be described as metaphysical insofar as 'physis' and the laws governing matter had not been created yet. What if, one talks of Mind becoming matter? I find nothing degrading in this, why do you?


--------------------
γνῶθι σαὐτόν - Gnothi Seauton - Know Thyself


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineBleedingSickness
Friend OfAttention Whore
Registered: 08/02/02
Posts: 412
Loc: Northern USA
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #936797 - 10/06/02 05:13 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

A very interesting thought indeed. I personally am not offended by any person, or persons thoughts on creation or anything for that matter. I'm always very open to anything;) sure some things may seem a lil more likely to me but that doesn't mean something else couldn't convince me to think otherwise or interest me.

I think everything the talk of evolution and different creation scenario's (sp) should be respected not instantly rejected because of the basis of religion. Everyone has the right to believe and not believe in things it's only fair that someone who believes differently be allowed to voice their opinions. Just as the main branches have been allowed to voices theirs;)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Anonymous

Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: MarkostheGnostic]
    #937038 - 10/06/02 06:48 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

I love it when you understand my icons.  I wish everyone didn't. :wink:


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Anonymous

Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #937055 - 10/06/02 06:54 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

You're assuming I would go to hell. I'm a very moral person... most pinks don't have a clue who I really am.

However, there is one thing I won't be compelled to do: believe anything dogmatically. Furthermore, I would argue that (if he/she existed) God isn't a cocksucker. That being the case, God would check out my life and say, "hey, you're not such a bad guy afterall... so what if you don't believe in me... you were still a good person... ah, fuck what the church says... come on in!! *big smile*".

If God were a dick, I'd tell him to fuck off as I'm being thrown into the fiery pits of hell. Tyrants suck.

And that's the truth. I don't have time to make up bullshit.


I dunno bud, sounds pretty dogmatic to me.

What's a "pink"? <----

Cheers,


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Offlinejohnnyfive
Burning withCircles!
Registered: 07/02/02
Posts: 886
Loc: Hell
Last seen: 17 years, 4 months
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: ]
    #937766 - 10/06/02 10:55 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

Shit i didn't read it agian. i just posted this from somthing i saw the other day. i didn't write this!


--------------------
And the gameshow host rings the buzzer (brrnnntt) oh and now you get a face full of face!


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
OfflineZahid
Stranger
Registered: 01/21/02
Posts: 4,779
Last seen: 17 years, 17 hours
Re: Einstein A Father of Science Believed in GOD... [Re: Sclorch]
    #940183 - 10/07/02 04:00 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

However, there is one thing I won't be compelled to do: believe anything dogmatically. Furthermore, I would argue that (if he/she existed) God isn't a cocksucker. That being the case, God would check out my life and say, "hey, you're not such a bad guy afterall... so what if you don't believe in me... you were still a good person... ah, fuck what the church says... come on in!! *big smile*".

If God thought you were a decent guy He would have guided you to belief/faith in this life, silly goose.


--------------------


Edited by Zahid (10/07/02 04:03 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract, Kratom Powder For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* When will you all understand? There is no god!
( 1 2 3 4 ... 13 14 )
Fliquid 20,260 263 09/22/11 12:30 PM
by Cactilove
* Are you a slave to a God that doesn't exist?
( 1 2 3 all )
Larrythescaryrex 7,140 42 07/30/02 06:00 PM
by Larrythescaryrex
* Thinking about the nature of God Ellis Dee 2,235 19 03/09/16 08:31 PM
by falcon
* Do you really believe in a god?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Makaveli 11,880 64 03/09/01 03:18 PM
by holographic mind
* Einstein's Internal Conflict
( 1 2 all )
Sclorch 4,246 32 06/06/03 03:51 PM
by Zero7a1
* Does God Exist? part one
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
MentalHygene 15,149 126 02/22/02 10:26 PM
by ArCh_TemPlaR
* Why God doesn't reveal himself anymore...
( 1 2 3 all )
plague member 4,389 46 04/13/08 10:13 PM
by Kinetic
* Dose God exist? Take a look around.
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Bavet 5,971 68 02/06/03 12:46 PM
by Strumpling

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, Jokeshopbeard, DividedQuantum
5,853 topic views. 1 members, 0 guests and 5 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Print Topic | ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2021 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.047 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.