Home | Community | Message Board

MushroomCube.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
InvisibleJ3illy
Trainee

Registered: 10/18/08
Posts: 3,344
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: tak]
    #9370416 - 12/05/08 02:55 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

tak said:
Quote:

authorities can eavesdrop on without a warrant, without the phone having to even be powered on in some cases.




What??  Do you have any proof of this?  Doesn't make sense IMO

Quote:

When I made a call to highway patrol using my girlfriends phone, they referred to me by my real name without knowing anything but the phone # and that it was a male's voice.




Huh?  Maybe if they KNEW your g/f and that you were her b/f, otherwise how could this be remotely possible?





Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletak
geo's henchman
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 11/20/00
Posts: 3,776
Loc: nowhereland
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: J3illy]
    #9370613 - 12/05/08 05:33 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

J3illy said:
What??  Do you have any proof of this?  Doesn't make sense IMO






This quote was taken from:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061203-8343.html

Not sure how reliable it is, but it was the first of 131,000 search results on google.

Quote:


Cell phones are capable of providing more information about us and our whereabouts than we usually realize. We familiar with the ability of cell phones to be used to track users' locations, but now the FBI has begun using them for eavesdropping—even when they are turned off.

The FBI's activities came to light in the course of the prosecution of two alleged members of the Genovese crime family. John Ardito and Peter Peluso had their Sprint Nextel phones tapped by the FBI in the course of their investigations, which itself is not unusual. The government went a step further in their case: not only were their phone calls recordded, but so were all conversations carried out in the presence of the defendants' cell phones.






Quote:

J3illy said:
Huh?  Maybe if they KNEW your g/f and that you were her b/f, otherwise how could this be remotely possible?





She doesn't know anyone who works there. But fuck man, your guess is as good as mine.


--------------------
The DJ's took pills to stay awake and play for seven days.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletak
geo's henchman
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 11/20/00
Posts: 3,776
Loc: nowhereland
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: tak]
    #9370623 - 12/05/08 05:41 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

The FBI reported more than 100 possible violations to an intelligence oversight board over the past two years, including cases in which agents tapped the wrong telephone, intercepted the wrong e-mails or continued to listen to conversations after a warrant had expired, according to a report issued yesterday.

In one case, the FBI obtained the contents of 181 telephone calls rather than just the billing records to which it was entitled. In another, a communication was monitored for more than a year after eavesdropping should have ended -- although investigators blamed a third-party provider for the mix-up.




http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/08/AR2006030802132.html


--------------------
The DJ's took pills to stay awake and play for seven days.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMHbound
Ballin Out At All Cost
Male

Registered: 09/24/07
Posts: 6,512
Loc: Under The Rainbow
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: tak]
    #9370751 - 12/05/08 07:01 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Caller ID?? :shrug:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleJ3illy
Trainee

Registered: 10/18/08
Posts: 3,344
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: MHbound]
    #9374706 - 12/05/08 06:39 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

MHbound said:
Caller ID?? :shrug:



without knowing anything but the phone # and that it was a male's voice.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleJ3illy
Trainee

Registered: 10/18/08
Posts: 3,344
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: tak]
    #9374751 - 12/05/08 06:45 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

tak said:
This quote was taken from:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061203-8343.html

Not sure how reliable it is, but it was the first of 131,000 search results on google.




Just read the story - they had "roving bugs" installed, which totally explains it - and although it claims that many phones can have these remotely activated, I just don't buy it.  A federal judge also had to authorize the whole thing.  The technology for this "roving bug", being able to transmit conversations when the phone is off, sounds advanced and expensive.  I doubt many phones have them - why would manufacturers spend extra money on them, ya kno?  I would like to see more info on it tho if it's out there.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMHbound
Ballin Out At All Cost
Male

Registered: 09/24/07
Posts: 6,512
Loc: Under The Rainbow
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: J3illy]
    #9375027 - 12/05/08 07:21 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

J3illy said:
Quote:

MHbound said:
Caller ID?? :shrug:



without knowing anything but the phone # and that it was a male's voice.




I can get your name, and often times address...Just with your phone number. It costs me a few dollars, but I would imagine the police etc have it for free. And probably have some type of caller id, but a little more advanced.

I could be wrong.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHumility
Working on it
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/07/08
Posts: 6,745
Last seen: 6 years, 11 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: MHbound]
    #9377438 - 12/06/08 05:56 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

You're missing the point, it wasn't his phone he was calling from but rather his girlfriend's phone.

Depending on how regularly you use your girlfriend's phone (to order shit like food, or place reservations etc.) it *may* make sense for them to have your name in some sort of uber reverse-lookup directory but even then that's really odd and discomforting.

If you have never used her phone before or rarely use it then there must be something else going on.  G'luck with that m8.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMHbound
Ballin Out At All Cost
Male

Registered: 09/24/07
Posts: 6,512
Loc: Under The Rainbow
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: Humility]
    #9377535 - 12/06/08 06:58 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Ohhhhhhh. He used his GF's phone, and they knew who he was. That is strange. I have no explanation there.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibletak
geo's henchman
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 11/20/00
Posts: 3,776
Loc: nowhereland
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: J3illy]
    #9383344 - 12/07/08 02:35 AM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Yeah, I used her phone pretty frequently for stuff like that. Nothing official, but just random BS on occasion. This is how i figure they had it, but like you said still kinda freaky since its not really listed under my name, etc.


Quote:

J3illy said:
Just read the story - they had "roving bugs" installed, which totally explains it




From what I understand, a roving bug is nothing more than a name given to the process. It is not a piece of hardware installed on their phones or anything.

Quote:

J3illy said:
although it claims that many phones can have these remotely activated, I just don't buy it.



Not trying to be a dick, but what exactly do you not buy. This is fact, not opinion. If you are trying to close your eyes and pretend it can't happen because you don't want it to happen that is fine, but do so in the comfort of your own mind.

Quote:

J3illy said:
The technology for this "roving bug", being able to transmit conversations when the phone is off, sounds advanced and expensive.  I doubt many phones have them - why would manufacturers spend extra money on them, ya kno?  I would like to see more info on it tho if it's out there.




It doesn't sound advanced or expensive to me. I mean, yeah the phone's might be expensive, but its you and I who are buying them, not the government :grin:

Your phone is made to transmit voice via wireless signal, that is what a cell phone is. How can the phone being used for the same exact purpose be considered "Advanced?" The only thing that could be considered advanced is the feature known as speaker phone, which I guess allows the mic to pick up sounds from greater distance.

Quote:

J3illy said:
A federal judge also had to authorize the whole thing.




You do need a judge to sign off for this to happen, but as proven in the other post...it's not always the case. To think that big brother is not in with the telecommunication companies is silly. I mean come on, read the newspaper. There are countless whitsleblowers from these companies saying that the government is data mining vast amounts of all information passing through.


--------------------
The DJ's took pills to stay awake and play for seven days.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemerzdiesler
Peasant Laborer
Male User Gallery


Registered: 10/25/08
Posts: 64
Loc: Arizona
Last seen: 14 years, 11 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: J3illy]
    #9385346 - 12/07/08 02:25 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Well, I used to be a military intelligence analyst. I can tell you beyond a reasonable doubt that big brother has both the capability and intent to listen in on you. Not only that, they can intercept your texts. There exists a software program that screens phone calls and texts for keywords. The keyword trigger will cause more of your communications to be intercepted. In addition, if you are caught doing something illegal, they could retrieve all of your communications to find your associates (think about Kwame Kilpatrick and countless others) We are talking about a government that spends in excess of $118 Billion a year to arrest and prosecute petty marijuana users. We are talking about a government that in 2006 told the United Nations that a "Drug Free" planet is in sight! They are out of control and my best advice would be to code word everything. Limit conversations on the phone to small sentences. You never know who is watching and listening. It may sound like paranoia, but a little paranoia will keep your ass out of the slammer! Good luck to everyone! Keep your eye on the prize. No government can rid the world of shrooms!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMustNotBe
HPPDer
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/27/06 Happy 18th Shroomiversary!
Posts: 930
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: fastfred]
    #9386910 - 12/07/08 06:17 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

Are you suggesting that they store terabytes of data just to piss people off and kiss BB's ass?




And your suggesting that they wouldn't spend $1000.00 on a 10 TB harddrive to do so.


--------------------
Junkies United we stand , Devided we're sick as fuck.
-                  -                -
"Hallucinations are something heroin users are not at all accustomed to," said Const. Conor King, Victoria police drug expert. "They react like you or I would react if we took Aspirin and all of a sudden the TV got up and started walking across the room."
-                  -                -
Make drugs legal, or alcohol and tobacco illegal. Either way it's more fair.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMHbound
Ballin Out At All Cost
Male

Registered: 09/24/07
Posts: 6,512
Loc: Under The Rainbow
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: MustNotBe]
    #9387063 - 12/07/08 06:36 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Yea...It really isn't that much money when you think about it. I have a couple of TB that I got for like a few hundred I don't remember anymore.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAlan RockefellerM
Mycologist
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,266
Last seen: 11 hours, 33 minutes
Re: Cell Phone Safety [Re: tak]
    #9393185 - 12/08/08 03:56 PM (15 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

Quote:

J3illy said:
The technology for this "roving bug", being able to transmit conversations when the phone is off, sounds advanced and expensive.  I doubt many phones have them - why would manufacturers spend extra money on them, ya kno?  I would like to see more info on it tho if it's out there.




Your phone is made to transmit voice via wireless signal, that is what a cell phone is. How can the phone being used for the same exact purpose be considered "Advanced?"





It is neither expensive or advanced, its just a software upgrade.  The telco can push new software on to your phone whenever they feel like it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* how good are cell phone taps? thegnomeking 1,424 4 08/03/04 11:42 PM
by Prisoner#1
* Can cops scanners hear cell phone calls? PDU 1,263 15 01/14/08 03:44 PM
by johnm214
* Tracing or Tracking Cell Phone Numbers gregorio 893 4 11/23/05 02:30 AM
by gregorio
* Guess who's tracking you by cell phone? Lana 2,126 2 03/29/02 04:42 PM
by Papa_Smurf
* CELL PHONES and mushroom talk?
( 1 2 all )
3eyeswise 4,997 26 06/02/05 02:17 PM
by cubicidal
* cell phones
( 1 2 all )
jtseaweed 3,433 25 09/08/03 11:20 PM
by sinewavesurf
* Can cell phones be used as eaves-dropping devices? RandalFlagg 780 8 12/27/07 09:38 AM
by RoosterCogburn
* Please help, reverse cell phone directory help needed distortion 5,250 3 02/18/05 06:00 PM
by ToolTroll

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, Alan Rockefeller
2,444 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 15 queries.