On the topic of shady dealings, let's talk about McCain's new line of attack, that Obama's only been to Iraq once. Now let's leave aside the fact that a presidential candidate would never be allowed to just stroll around and talk to whoever he wants- he'd be cordoned off by hundreds of troops and given the same tour that journalists, scholars or Senators would get. In other words, it would be a fine photo-op but it wouldn't really advance anyone's understanding of the situation.
And let's not focus on the false claim that Obama would meet with Ahmadinejad; Obama has never claimed that. Instead, he promised to meet with Iran's leadership in order to negotiate. McCain has tried to conflate "Iran's leadership" with Ahmadinejad, which only shows his own ignorance for as even Wikipedia knows, "he has much less power than the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of Iran and has the final word in all aspects of foreign and domestic policies." Let's also forget that McCain has previously advocated talks with Hamas and Syria(a state sponsor of terrorism).
No, let's not focus on all that. Let's focus instead on the striking similarity between Vets for Freedom, a 527 organization, and the McCain campaign. According to the campaign finance legislation that McCain has championed, it is strictly forbidden for political campaigns to work in coordination with such organizations since these organizations are not bound by the same transparency or donation-limiting guidelines as political campaigns. And yet, his new talking point is almost verbatim from one of Vets for Freedom's ads and two of his advisers also work with the 527. Even if it doesn't violate the letter of the law, it certainly is skeezy and unbecoming of a man promising a clean and honorable election. From The Huffington Post:
Quote: John McCain has gleefully pounded Barack Obama in recent days for having traveled to Iraq only once since he entered Congress. But his arguments virtually mirror those used in a new attack ad by an independent conservative group, adding to the perception that there is a coordinated effort between McCain and the outside groups that his campaign has sought distance from.
On Wednesday, McCain ripped into Obama during an appearance in Reno, Nevada, claiming the Illinois Democrat lacked the leadership to navigate international waters in times of war. The language he used was telling (emphasis added below).
"Senator Obama has been to Iraq once. A little over two years ago he went, and he has never seized the opportunity, except in a hearing, to meet with General Petraeus, with General Petraeus! My friends, this is about leadership and learning," McCain said. "Now, why is it that Senator Obama wants to sit down with the President of Iran, but hasn't yet sat down with General Petraeus - the leader of our troops in Iraq?"
Last Friday, the organization Vets for Freedom, a non-partisan pro-Iraq war organization, released an advertisement attacking Obama with the same language.
"Obama wasn't available to meet with us [combat veterans]," Sgt. Garrett Anderson (Ret.) of Illinois' Army National Guard says to the camera. "But we weren't surprised. Because he hasn't once, sat down one-on-one with our in Iraq, Gen. Petraeus. Worse, he hasn't been to Iraq in two-and-a-half years. He's unwilling to get the facts on Iraq, yet he is willing to travel to Iran to meet with their leader or anyone else who hates our country. The question for America is, if Barack Obama won't listen to us, who will he listen to?"
Message coordination between like-minded candidates and interest groups is hardly a novel concept in politics. In fact, around the same time as McCain's speech, the Republican National Committee started a clock tracking the number of days it has been since Obama visited Iraq.
But the Arizona Republican has positioned his campaign as a decidedly distinct entity from groups that dabble in attack politics. He has even implemented an internal campaign ethics policy that restricts campaign officials from collaborating or serving with these very organizations.
"No person with a McCain Campaign title or position may participate in a 527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate," the new policy reads.
Already there are questions about the firmness of that pledge. As the Huffington Post reported last week, Sens. Joseph Lieberman and Lindsey Graham, both of whom hold chairs for the McCain campaign, are also on the board of advisers of Vets for Freedom.
In response to the onslaught of attacks, the Obama campaign - taking the hook of former White House press secretary Scott McClellan's new book - shot back.
"On the day after the former White House press secretary conceded that the Bush administration used deception and propaganda to take us to war, it seems odd that Senator McCain, who bought the flawed rationale for war so readily, would be lecturing others on their depth of understanding about Iraq," said Obama press secretary Bill Burton in a statement. "Senator Obama challenged the President's rationale for the war from the start, warning that it would divert resources from Afghanistan and the pursuit of Al Qaeda and mire us in an endless civil war. Senator McCain stubbornly insists on pursuing the failed Bush policy..."
Let's hope the media doesn't stay asleep on the job and echo this idiotic attack without rehashing McCain's previous trips. When he went to Iraq and claimed there are neighborhoods an American could walk freely unescorted. Of course, that's nonsense: he was wearing body armor and had 100 soldiers and 5 helicopters protecting him so he could have a photo-op. As mentioned before, McCain's lack of knowledge about Iraq is startling- he has made the stunningly inaccurate and wildly provocative claim that Iran is helping Al Quaida for instance even though the two are longtime and bitter enemies who have diametrically opposed political and strategic goals. He was also one of those visionaries who believed the US troops would be welcomed as liberators by the Iraqis. But he's made more visits to Iraq, got the "my soldiers were killed and maimed and all I got was this stupid T-shirt" shirt and bought a few postcards.
The question we should be asking isn't, who knows how to beat the wardrum harder, or who has taken more Iraq photo-ops, but rather who's shown better judgement and understands the situation better? The answer of course is Obama- he understood from the beginning that the war was a mistake and that the bellicose and idiotic foreign "policy" advocated by Bush and McCain has only hurt us and strengthened terrorists and dangerous extremists.
In the words of Clay Davis, this is some shameful shit right here.
|