Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
InvisibleMinstrel
Man of Science
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 1,974
Loc: Hogtown
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: dtugg]
    #8811220 - 08/22/08 01:22 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

dtugg said:
Quote:

Minstrel said:
EOP is arguing that I should shut up, because my idea's don't conform to some external authority.





More like you should shut up because your "ideas" lack any evidence whatsoever.

"Evidence" for a controlled demo of WTC7 summed up:

Well, it sort of looked like one and no building that tall had collapsed because of fires before. Plus, the government is evil and lies.




Don't confuse a lack of evidence with your unwillingness to learn.

The information is out there, you judge for yourself. 

http://www.journalof911studies.com/:  I still invite you to tell me what lies they tell.


--------------------

Edited by Minstrel (08/22/08 01:24 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedtugg
Druggie
Male


Registered: 12/24/07
Posts: 355
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: Minstrel]
    #8811274 - 08/22/08 01:30 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Minstrel said:
Don't confuse a lack of evidence with your unwillingness to learn and judge for yourself.




I have learned and judged for myself...that there is no evidence for any 9/11 conspiracy theory and that the believers of them have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. It is you who is unwilling to learn and judge for yourself because your hatered of the US government severely clouds your judgement and rational thought process.

I actually used to buy into some of this stuff. Especially after I first saw Loose Change. And then I did some real research and found that every point the 9/11 deniars make is without fail, bullshit.

I love WTC7 is supposedly the smoking gun of 9/11 truth, but when scrutinzed closely, that too all falls apart.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineScavengerType
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: Minstrel]
    #8811318 - 08/22/08 01:38 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

I've never understood 9/11 truthers obsession with a theory that has so little proof, while simultaneously the same people dropped their interest in the Florida election fraud of 2000 that actually has lots of evidence and no popular backing. Oh wait it may have something to do with the fact that the US media stopped talking about the Florida election fraud quickly while it drones on and on about 9/11. I'll tell you what Chomsky said when asked about the subject. "No articles in any peer reviewed magazines on architecture have validated any claims that contradict the 9/11 commission's findings on how the WTC towers have came down." Paraphrasing ofcorse but it's still a valid argument. Can you name one article that isn't in zeitgeist or some conspiracy website or blog that gives a credible explanation of how the buildings were not blown up by the 747s that slammed into them?


--------------------
"Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?"
"The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything."
- Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now.
Conquer's Club

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMinstrel
Man of Science
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 1,974
Loc: Hogtown
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: ScavengerType]
    #8811355 - 08/22/08 01:44 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

ScavengerType said:
Can you name one article that isn't in zeitgeist or some conspiracy website or blog that gives a credible explanation of how the buildings were not blown up by the 747s that slammed into them?




Why indeed did the WTC buildings completely collapse PDF

And they weren't 747s.  And they were not 'blown up' by them.  'The damage resulting from the kinetic energy and fires from the jet fuel weakened the sturcture which led to 'global collapse''.


--------------------

Edited by Minstrel (08/22/08 01:46 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedtugg
Druggie
Male


Registered: 12/24/07
Posts: 355
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: Minstrel]
    #8811402 - 08/22/08 01:53 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

He said something that is not published on a conspiracy site. And Steven Jones might be the biggest idiot fraud of them all. He just made the whole thermite crap up. He offers no proof that it would work and makes no calculations about how much would be needed if it would work(a fucking shitload).

It's not like he has any expertise in any relevent fields anyway. His field of study (before BYU fired him) was cold fusion.

Edited by dtugg (08/22/08 01:57 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMinstrel
Man of Science
Male User Gallery


Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 1,974
Loc: Hogtown
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: dtugg]
    #8811795 - 08/22/08 03:31 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

dtugg said:
He said something that is not published on a conspiracy site. And Steven Jones might be the biggest idiot fraud of them all. He just made the whole thermite crap up. He offers no proof that it would work and makes no calculations about how much would be needed if it would work(a fucking shitload).

It's not like he has any expertise in any relevent fields anyway. His field of study (before BYU fired him) was cold fusion.




By your definition, they are all conspiracy sites.  You've poisoned the well.

I'm still not finding any explanation from NIST to suggest where the extremely high temperatures in the rubble came from.


--------------------

Edited by Minstrel (08/22/08 03:32 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedtugg
Druggie
Male


Registered: 12/24/07
Posts: 355
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: Minstrel]
    #8811838 - 08/22/08 03:43 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Explain how high temperatures in the rubble have anything to do with a controlled demolition? I would love to see a truther try to prove that high temps mean the building destroyed by controlled demo.

Were the demolished using some sort of super secret magic explosives that leave things burning very hot for a long time?

Like I said before, it is completely possible that they don't look into the exact causes of the high temps in the rubble. Their mandate was to find the mechanics of the collapses and make recomendations so that it doesn't happen again. Temps in the rubble weeks and months after the fact have nothing at all to do with this.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePhred
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires (moved) [Re: dtugg]
    #8814516 - 08/23/08 06:57 AM (15 years, 7 months ago)

<img src='http://www.shroomery.org/forums/images/moved.gif'> This thread was moved from Political Discussion.

Reason:
Since the report of the NIST was produced by engineers, and there is a sub-conversation going on in this thread about the value of peer review, it seems more appropriate for this thread to live in the Science and Technology forum.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineScavengerType
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires (moved) [Re: Phred]
    #8815539 - 08/23/08 12:36 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

minstrel that source has never been peer reviewed cause it's bullshit.

Additionally all I get is a 404 error when I follow the link.


Edit: I don't think this belongs in science and tech either.


--------------------
"Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?"
"The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything."
- Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now.
Conquer's Club

Edited by ScavengerType (08/23/08 12:37 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLuddite
I watch Fox News
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/23/06
Posts: 2,946
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires [Re: Mr.Al]
    #8815707 - 08/23/08 01:20 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Mr.Al said:
Quite frankly it tickles the shit out of me to see supposed "drug users" defend the government...  The same government that tells people they don't have the right to do what they will with their own consciousness.  They probably will even tell you the J.F.K., M.L.K., and R.F.K. assasinations were not inside jobs...  Just bizarre, this defense of the government.  Don't worry folks, Uncle Sam always has your best interests in mind!




I can see why the drug laws are so draconian.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDieCommie


Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires (moved) [Re: ScavengerType]
    #8815724 - 08/23/08 01:29 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

ScavengerType said:
Edit: I don't think this belongs in science and tech either.




To the magical mystery forum maybe?


There are two virtually identical ones here, :lol: pseudo science is always gonna creep its way in here.  Maybe in a week we will have two of the 'run your car on water threads' again.  I dont really mind it, :wexican:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblejohnm214
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
Re: NIST concludes that WTC7 collapsed due to fires (moved) [Re: ScavengerType]
    #8816728 - 08/23/08 04:39 PM (15 years, 7 months ago)

Well I asked phred if he could move the thread in here, since we were discussing peer review and I wanted to let folks respond to my positiion if they like.

Its not that I think its worthless, far from it, its just that I think the name itself is hoisted about with lack of recognition that the merits of peer review are largely as dependant upon the individual publication and reviewers as the paper is related to the authors.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* National Institue of Science & Technology's (NIST) Official 9/11 WTC7 Investigation PookztA 871 10 12/20/09 06:25 AM
by PookztA
* So, after 7 years, we finally know what happened in WTC7
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Minstrel 4,249 72 09/04/08 01:09 AM
by pINNhEAD
* Scientific Study Concludes that Ecstasy Harms the Brain of First Time Users
( 1 2 all )
JackTackle 6,421 26 12/06/06 09:09 AM
by badchad
* Possible to ionize fire? Baby_Hitler 1,527 17 07/13/04 01:16 PM
by gnrm23
* fire walls DrewBaccA 1,125 7 10/29/04 09:18 AM
by KoOs
* Players on Fire?!? relativexistance 700 5 10/11/04 10:18 PM
by Redstorm
* Fire -) Batteries? Locus 557 3 03/20/05 01:07 AM
by RuNE
* Comp freezes up due to Wi-fi USB connector Liquid_Dimension 657 3 02/24/07 01:00 AM
by Liquid_Dimension

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: trendal, automan, Northerner
4,744 topic views. 0 members, 2 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 15 queries.