Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
Great to see!
From the research that ive been conducting with the help of workman, reville in WA, Teonan as well as a mycologist here in Melb and one in Canada it appears that Australiana itself varies from being synonmous with the mushroom described microscopically as Australiana by Guzman to a mushroom that is macroscopically and microscopically similar to Subaeruginosa - i does not seem to be a stable mushroom in its own right - unlike the wavy cap mushroom which is consistently wavy-capped and smaller in stature. The wavy cap always displays microscopic characteristic identical to Subaeruginosa - whereas Australiana varies.
Ive got more specmins to examines from NSW and then i suppose a conclusion can be drawn.
Those second pictures are interesting - the gills seem more like Subaeruginosa than Australiana - how did Snu identify them??
BTW this mushroom is potent!! More so than the wavy cap Subaeruginosa type
According to Guzman the main characteristic of Australiana is purely lageniform pluerocystidia - and im finding that this mushroom varies from this to a mixture of both - Buchanan's Subaeruginosa displays a mixture varying from lageniform to other types of pluerocystidia.