|
Chronic7
Registered: 05/08/04
Posts: 13,679
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: PhanTomCat]
#8042410 - 02/19/08 11:11 AM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
PhanTomCat said:
Quote:
Chronic777 said:
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: Thank you.
. sorry for getting two physicists mixed up OC, i failed physics, big deal... . you will nitpick over any tiny little detail i slip up on, just so your ego feels you have won some sort of battle lol . tell you what, you win, you are the heavy weight champ of the world, you win buddy, im wrong about everyhtign i believe in, you win, hooray for you! . three cheers for OC!!!!
Seems like you may be blowing things out of proportion.... If I said that Nancy Reagan was the current President, and you corrected me, should I go off on you for correcting me....? Name dropping, or "fact" dropping when it is incorrect, should be corrected - or shouldn't be dropped at all....
>^;;^<
If you check the history of that situation (mine and OC's posts) you'll see this had almost nothing to do with him correcting me, only proving im wrong, which isnt exactly "nice", if he corrected me fair enough! But he didnt correct me he stated im wrong and sumone else corected me, all he can do is state that what i say is wrong, he has never ever corrected me on anything
If that was just a normal reply to my posts and he was correcting me i wouldnt have felt to say anything at all, i would've thanked him for correcting me!
Edited by Chronic7 (02/19/08 11:41 AM)
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group
Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,441
Loc: Under the C
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: PhanTomCat]
#8043437 - 02/19/08 04:03 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Would someone who drones on endlessly about other's egos be so easily offended by an innocuous correction unless he was stuck in ego?
An egoless person would thank the poster for freely providing relevant information and move on.
--------------------
|
Ginseng1
Elegant Universe
Registered: 09/02/04
Posts: 3,310
Last seen: 9 years, 6 months
|
|
Who cares.
The point is faster-than-light speed is possible. Propulsion systems with the ability to exceed light speeds and remove itself from the confines of mass inertia already exist. Lockheed Martin already has already created (or... copied) craft with the ability to take "ET home".
-------------------- Flowing through beginningless time since time without beginning...
Edited by Ginseng1 (02/19/08 05:25 PM)
|
TheCow
Stranger
Registered: 10/28/02
Posts: 4,790
Last seen: 15 years, 8 months
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: Ginseng1]
#8043824 - 02/19/08 05:52 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
he aint lyin
|
backfromthedead
Activated
Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 3,592
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: TheCow]
#8046404 - 02/20/08 08:52 AM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Where's home??
--------------------
|
DimensionX
King of Birds
Registered: 09/26/07
Posts: 5,486
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
|
Things with weight theoretically cant travel as fast as light which has no mass. I think there are other things in the universe which don't have weight, so they would be able to travel at light speed or faster as well. I think human thought and consciousness could be some of these things.
|
Chronic7
Registered: 05/08/04
Posts: 13,679
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: Would someone who drones on endlessly about other's egos be so easily offended by an innocuous correction unless he was stuck in ego?
An egoless person would thank the poster for freely providing relevant information and move on.
lol u didnt provide me any information, you just told me i was wrong, which gave you ego a boost yet did not help me one bit, if you wanted to help you would have corrected me instead of just stating i was wrong
i never claimed to be egoless either. we are all ego machines and youve offended mine many a time by trying to make me quesiton my beliefs, which is good in a way, but you have to accept that in this case if you wanted to help me you would've told me i was wrong & corrected me!
its just a fact, people who help people dont just tell them theyre wrong, they give them advice on how to be right.
this is geting oooold now.
|
Slave of Cthuluh
I know it's spelt wrong...
Registered: 02/22/08
Posts: 722
Loc: R'lyeh
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: Chronic7]
#8069425 - 02/25/08 05:43 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Faster then the speed of light. What an interesting topic, I like it.
--------------------
|
wishcouldeletethis
Registered: 02/22/05
Posts: 1,182
Loc: georgia
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? *DELETED* [Re: Chronic7]
#8073227 - 02/26/08 04:13 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by wishcouldeletethisReason for deletion: k
|
DimensionX
King of Birds
Registered: 09/26/07
Posts: 5,486
Loc: Australia
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
|
I dont think it takes any energy to change from a particle to a wave. It innately is a particle and a wave at the same time. Its the experiment itself causing it to behave in one form or the other. Its basically two different things at the same time, and different experiments show you different aspects of the same thing. Thats my understanding anyway.
|
Ginseng1
Elegant Universe
Registered: 09/02/04
Posts: 3,310
Last seen: 9 years, 6 months
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: DimensionX]
#8076780 - 02/27/08 11:07 AM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
If God can see everything, then how can he possibly see the entire universe all at once if absolutely no information can travel at faster than light speed?
-------------------- Flowing through beginningless time since time without beginning...
|
AlteredAgain
Visual Alchemist
Registered: 04/27/06
Posts: 11,181
Loc: Solar Circuit
|
Re: Faster than the speed of light? [Re: Ginseng1]
#8076982 - 02/27/08 12:07 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
|