|
johnm214



Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
|
Crack Sentencing Reform Hysteria... Oh Noes, those bad men will be released says Att. General
#7997372 - 02/08/08 06:05 PM (15 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
So apparently doing years for possesion of some crystals isn't enough, now people are bitching about correcting the wrong of the crack/cocaine disparity.
From teh drug war rant: http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/
Quote:
Bolt the doors, Ethel, the Prison Crack Gangs are loose!
Our Attorney General pulls out the FEAR card again.
In a statement prepared for his scheduled appearance before the House Judiciary Committee today, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey said that unless Congress acts, "1,600 convicted crack dealers, many of them violent gang members, will be eligible for immediate release into communities nationwide" under a decision by the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
"Retroactive application of these new lower guidelines will pose significant public safety risks . . ." Mukasey said in the statement. "Many of these offenders are among the most serious and violent offenders in the federal system and their early release . . . would produce tragic, but predictable results."
Malakkar Vohryzek does a good job of putting Mukasey in his place. Vohryzek does it by using things like facts.
First off, no one is addressing the truth that I've experienced first hand, being a former federal prisoner: most of the "gang member" crack dealers are profiled as gang members. Just as I was listed as a "Drug Kingpin" due to the weight of the paper involved in my case (not the actual LSD amount), most young black men convicted of crack offenses are called "gang members" based on little more than speculation.
They certainly aren't convicted of being gang members. A tattoo of a girlfriend's name becomes a gang affiliation mark. A scar from a bullet wound. Clothing worn when arrested. There are endless facts that can be taken out of context, and used to assert a gang membership, even when this is patently false. I did five years with a man out of Compton. He had no gang affiliation whatsoever. Yet he was listed as a blood, because the snitch in his case was affiliated with the Bloods, and if he was supplying a gang member affiliate, clearly it was because he was in the gang himself.
And yes, this epidemic of violent crack dealers? Let me look at my area -- Bloomington-Normal, Illinois -- a booming twin cities with two universities, major industry, several police departments, and over 200 police officers. Based on population averages, we should be prepared to expect an onslaught of... almost one crack dealer. That is, assuming that a Judge approves the release even after Justice Department efforts to prevent it. And this crack dealer will already have served significantly more time than an equivalent powder cocaine dealer.
It would be nice to have an Attorney General who would come out and say:
"This is an overdue correction to a bad law, and I'm instructing the Justice Department to work with the Judiciary to expedite the identification and release of eligible non-violent offenders to be reunited with their families. As an additional benefit, this initial release could save us up to $40 million per year in prison costs."
Well, I can dream, can't I?
what say you?
I think incarcerating people for drugs is stupid anyways, but bitching about people being let out when the law is obviously wrong- dumb.
If these people were such violent thugs, they would have concurrent sentences for those crimes. This reduction won't do shit to those concurrent sentences. So someone sentenced for drug possesion and assault won't have the assault sentence affected, they'll still do their time.
Same old shit: but drug users/dealers are violent! No thugs are violent, and more thugs use drugs. I've no problem with locking up violent assholes, so lets get to it, but how will legalising or lessining drug penalties affect these violent folks? If its their charecter it won't, and so we'll still have cause to imprison them irrespective of drug law reform. So why the fuss? No one is saying someone amped on crack shouldn't be in jail when they flip out and stab someone, but stabbing someone isn't caused by crack, its caused by a shitty person or a volatile situation. When these thugs assault someone, we'll throw em away.
Leave the peacful possesers, dealers, and manufacturers alone though.
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist


Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,276
Last seen: 3 hours, 13 minutes
|
Re: Crack Sentencing Reform Hysteria... Oh Noes, those bad men will be released says Att. General [Re: johnm214]
#7997497 - 02/08/08 06:35 PM (15 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
From last week's Drug War Chronicle:
Summary: The evil US attorney general Mukasey seems unlikely to get his wish.
Sentencing: US Attorney General Raises Specter of Violent Crime Jump If Crack Prisoners Released, Warns He Could Try to Block It http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/521/attorney_general_mukasey_crack_early_release
Twice in two days last week, US Attorney General Robert Mukasey lashed out at the US Sentencing Commission's December decision to apply cuts in federal crack sentences to prisoners currently behind bars, warning last Thursday that they could spark an increase in violent crime and suggesting the following day he may try to block the releases.
The Sentencing Commission decision brought a small measure of justice to some 19,500 federal prisoners, about 85% of whom are black, who were sentenced under harsh federal crack laws. Some 2,500 of them will be able to start applying for sentence reductions in March, a process that will undoubtedly drag out for months and not automatically result in reductions for everybody.
Still, speaking before the US Conference of Mayors last Thursday, Mukasey warned that some 1,600 convicted crack offenders, "many of them violent gang members," could be released as early as March. "Before we take that step, we need to think long and hard about whether that's the best way to go about this -- whether it best serves the interests of justice and public safety," Mukasey said. "A sudden influx of criminals from federal prison into your communities could lead to a surge in new victims with a tragic but predictable result."
Jurists and sentencing reform analysts contacted by the Los Angeles Times (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-crime25jan25,1,2272175.story?ctrack=6&cset=true) were quick to criticize Mukasey's remarks. "In the grand sweep of the nation's criminal justice system, the release of this minuscule number of prisoners will not affect crime rates. It will, however, significantly improve the perceived fairness of our federal criminal justice system," said Paul Cassell, a professor at the University of Utah law school and prominent conservative, noting that no prisoner would be released early unless a judge found he was not a threat to the community. "All of these prisoners were going to be released in the future," Cassell said, "so the retroactivity provision simply provides a slight acceleration of their release date."
Mukasey's numbers are misleading, said Marc Mauer, executive director of the Sentencing Project. "About 700,000 people are coming out of prison this year, many of whom were convicted of a violent offense. So now the change means we'll have 701,600 instead. Seems like he's kind of missing the point," said Mauer.
Criticism notwithstanding, Mukasey was back at it again last Friday. In a press briefing (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-mukasey26jan26,1,1666319.story), he said that the Justice Department may try to block the sentencing guideline reforms that will lead to the early releases. "We're going to try to do whatever we can to mitigate it," Mukasey said. "We would obviously like to see something done about something that we think was unwise in the first place." The department could suggest legislation to block it, he said, although he acknowledged it could be hard to pass in the Democratic Congress.
"Many of those [defendants eligible for release] were involved in violence, and can be expected to continue after they get out," Mukasey told reporters. He reiterated his comments from the previous day that he was concerned the early release prisoners might not have received job training and drug treatment. "None of that will have happened, or a lot of it will not have happened, by the time some of these folks get out," he said. "And that's a cause of anxiety."
Douglas Berman, professor of law at Ohio State University and published of the Sentencing Law and Policy (http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2008/01/ag-mukasey-talk.html) blog, speculated, "I suspect AG Mukasey is now being 'unusually outspoken' primarily to influence federal district judges as they consider motions for crack sentencing modifications. As the AG knows, no defendant will get a reduced sentence without judicial approval. During the post-Booker period, tough talk by DOJ has led judges to be particularly cautious about lenient sentences that might become 'tough-on-crime' political talking points. I suspect that the AG and main Justice hope that tough talk about going to Congress might make it easier for local federal prosecutors to oppose sentence reductions in individual cases."
---------------------------------------------------------------- An update from this week's Drug War Chronicle
7. Sentencing: Mukasey Tells Congress to Pass Bill Blocking Early Release for Crack Prisoners http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/522/mukasey_congress_block_crack_retroactivity
US Attorney General Michael Mukasey took his campaign against retroactive early releases for people sentenced under the federal crack cocaine laws to a new level Wednesday as he called on Congress to pass legislation by March 3 to block the releases. This week's call to arms comes just a few days after Mukasey first sounded the alarm about the release of crack prisoners (http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/521/attorney_general_mukasey_crack_early_release), raising the specter of thousands of criminals pouring out of the nation's prisons and wreaking havoc on the streets.
Mukasey is responding to a decision by the US Sentencing Commission in December to make changes in the crack sentencing guidelines retroactive so they will apply to about 20,000 prisoners doing time under the crack laws. Earlier in the year, the commission had changed the sentencing guidelines for current offenders. The decision making the changes retroactive will go into effect March 3.
While as many as 20,000 crack prisoners could apply for sentence cuts, each one will have to go through a judicial process, and the cuts are not guaranteed. And only about 1,600 of them are eligible for sentence cuts that could result in their being released this year.
But that hasn't stopped Mukasey from playing up the fear angle. He was at it again Wednesday during a House Judiciary Committee hearing. In testimony prepared for that hearing, Mukasey said, "Overall, the Sentencing Commission estimates that retroactive applications of these lower guidelines could lead to the re-sentencing of more than 20,000 crack cocaine offenders, any number of whom will be released early."
Congress needs to act to avert that threat, Mukasey said. But given that March 3 is less than a month away, given that Congress very rarely moves so swiftly, and given that Congress passed on the chance to kill the retroactivity provision last year, Mukasey seems unlikely to get his wish.
|
Seuss
Error: divide byzero



Registered: 04/27/01
Posts: 23,480
Loc: Caribbean
Last seen: 2 months, 20 days
|
Re: Crack Sentencing Reform Hysteria... Oh Noes, those bad men will be released says Att. General [Re: Alan Rockefeller]
#7997738 - 02/08/08 07:26 PM (15 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
> 20,000 crack prisoners
At an average cost of $22,000 per prisoner per year... thats around half a billion dollars per year that the law enforcement community loses. This says nothing about the prison construction sector that would lose $54,000 per new bed.
Do you really want to see prison guards and prison construction workers out of a job? (sarcasm for the impaired)
-------------------- Just another spore in the wind.
|
Molasses
sobriety with aside of what thefuck am i doing?



Registered: 11/03/07
Posts: 564
Loc: Marijuanaville, Vermont
Last seen: 11 years, 5 months
|
Re: Crack Sentencing Reform Hysteria... Oh Noes, those bad men will be released says Att. General [Re: Seuss]
#7998789 - 02/09/08 12:47 AM (15 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
wow, so how do we impeach this fucktard from attorney general?
|
|