|
Ophanim
The Molecule'sSpirit



Registered: 10/01/07
Posts: 1,002
Last seen: 5 years, 9 months
|
Why does iamshaman.com indicate the legality of Salvia is coming to an end in 2008?
#7749512 - 12/12/07 01:57 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
http://www.iamshaman.com/
"LAST DAYS OF SALVIA BLOWOUT! LEGAL ONLY UNTIL JANUARY 2008!
ENTER THIS CODE INTO THE "COUPONS" SECTION OF THE SHOPPING CART:
LASTDAYS07
AND GET 25% OFF ANY SALVIA PRODUCTS"
So what's the deal with this? I haven't read any news articles about it, or seen any other distributors mention it. It's too cold this time of year to buy a live cutting, so I guess I'm kind of screwed if it's true But I'm really suspicious as I haven't heard of it anywhere else.
|
danlennon3
LivingIsEasyWithEyesClosed.....



Registered: 10/29/02
Posts: 19,246
Loc: usa
Last seen: 1 year, 12 days
|
Re: Why does iamshaman.com indicate the legality of Salvia is coming to an end in 2008? [Re: Ophanim]
#7749528 - 12/12/07 02:02 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
money?
-------------------- "Psychedelics should be used not to escape reality, but to embrace it"
|
im_on_a_boat
Stranger

Registered: 04/06/06
Posts: 3,950
|
Re: Why does iamshaman.com indicate the legality of Salvia is coming to an end in 2008? [Re: danlennon3]
#7749533 - 12/12/07 02:03 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
are they scheduling salvia?
|
JackthaTripper
MSME!



Registered: 01/29/07 
Posts: 2,494
Loc: Mind Exploration
|
Re: Why does iamshaman.com indicate the legality of Salvia is coming to an end in 2008? [Re: Ophanim]
#7749552 - 12/12/07 02:09 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Because they are based from Chicago, IL.
--------------------
Come on breakthrough with me...such wonders terrify the soul...it's real no need to question...knowledge infiltrates the host
|
JackthaTripper
MSME!



Registered: 01/29/07 
Posts: 2,494
Loc: Mind Exploration
|
Re: Why does iamshaman.com indicate the legality of Salvia is coming to an end in 2008? [Re: JackthaTripper]
#7749558 - 12/12/07 02:10 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Illinois On January 19, 2006, Senator John Millner (R) introduced Senate Bill 2589 to the Illinois State Legislature. This bill sought to add Salvia divinorum to that state’s list of Schedule I controlled substances. The bill only mentions Salvia divinorum; it does not mention salvinorin A. This bill died with the dissolution of the 94th General Assembly. Efforts to ban Salvia divinorum were renewed the following year. On January 29, 2007, Representatives Dennis Reboletti (R), Chapin Rose (R), Robert Pritchard (R), and Renee Kosel (R) introduced House Bill 0457. On February 7, 2007, Senator Millner introduced this same bill to the State Senate as Senate Bill 0226. The wording of these bills define Salvia divinorum as “meaning all parts of the plant presently classified botanically as Salvia divinorum, whether growing or not, the seeds thereof, any extract from any part of that plant, and every compound, manufacture, salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation, derivative, mixture, or preparation of that plant, its seeds or extracts.” This wording is absurdly broad in scope, for it implies that any substance extracted from Salvia divinorum (water, chlorophyll, whatever) would be treated as a Schedule I controlled substance under the proposed law. House Bill 0457 passed unanimously in the House on March 20, 2007, and in the Senate on May 22, 2007. Senate Bill 0226 passed unanimously in the Senate on March 8, 2007, and in the House on May 24, 2007. This legislation was signed into law by Governor Rod Bagojevich (D) on August 17, 2007. The new law goes into effect on January 1, 2008.
--------------------
Come on breakthrough with me...such wonders terrify the soul...it's real no need to question...knowledge infiltrates the host
|
Ophanim
The Molecule'sSpirit



Registered: 10/01/07
Posts: 1,002
Last seen: 5 years, 9 months
|
Re: Why does iamshaman.com indicate the legality of Salvia is coming to an end in 2008? [Re: JackthaTripper]
#7749620 - 12/12/07 02:23 PM (16 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Ah, that clears it up. Thanks.
|
|