|
 ManianFH
living in perverty
Registered: 07/06/04
Posts: 14,996
Last seen: 15 hours, 16 minutes
|
 Re: why peyton manning > tom brady  [Re: lonestar2004]
#7752659 - 12/13/07 06:24 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
lonestar2004 said:
Manning, eventually he will own ALL the records.
Brady is on pace to get 55-60 passing touchdowns this season... If that happens you can be assured nobody, not even manning will touch it. That record if it happens may in fact be never broken by another football player ever again.
I love Peyton, he is a joy to watch play football, but Brady is a more efficient quarterback. He may have more self-restraint, and may be better under pressure than manning. And he has 3 superbowl rings... with a fourth possibly on its way.
And to people who say a quarterback isnt heavily responsible for his teams part in attaining a superbowl ring, let me tell you, very few teams with a shitty quarterback would ever make it to the superbowl, let alone win the damn thing. But his team deserves much credit as well...
--------------------
notapillow said: "you are going about this endeavor all wrong. clear your mind of useless fear and concern. buy the ticket, take the ride, and all that.... "
ChrisWho said: "It's all about the journey, not the destination."
|
AaronEvil
The GuitarVillain
Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 12 years, 11 months
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: Redstorm]
#7753602 - 12/13/07 12:59 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
It wasnt Brady against 11 Defensive players. Like I said, the superbowl is a team stat. The team won, brady was part of the team and he contributed but he didnt win them all those games. I still think their running game got them there. And it isnt my homework, I make claims after looking at stats not before. Frankly, I dont have the time during the week to go copy and paste every stat that supports my opinion.
--------------------
There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.
|
LiquidSmoke
My title's cooler than yours DBK
Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 25,335
Loc: S.A.G.G.Y.B.A.L.L.S.
Last seen: 9 months, 11 days
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: AaronEvil]
#7754135 - 12/13/07 03:01 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
AaronEvil said:
I still think their running game got them there. And it isnt my homework, I make claims after looking at stats not before.
Yes, since you know, the game clinching drives against the Eagles, Rams, and Panthers, were all using the rush, right?
Do you even realize how often Brady passed during the 4th quarter game-winning drives in ALL THREE super bowls?
--------------------
"Shmokin' weed, Shmokin' wizz, doin' coke, drinkin' beers. Drinkin' beers beers beers, rollin' fatties, smokin' blunts. Who smokes tha blunts? We smoke the blunts" - Jay and Silent Bob strike Back
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 27 days
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: LiquidSmoke]
#7754699 - 12/13/07 05:07 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Of course he doesn't because then he would have to accept facts that go against his preconceived notions of why they won.
Notice how he makes an assertion and then doesn't back it up with any facts? It's typical.
|
LiquidSmoke
My title's cooler than yours DBK
Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 25,335
Loc: S.A.G.G.Y.B.A.L.L.S.
Last seen: 9 months, 11 days
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: Redstorm]
#7754981 - 12/13/07 06:16 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Here, this thread is for you
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=86&Number=7542581&page=0&fpart=1
notice how he can't even back his initial claims so he diverts his original points into various far-fetched explanations
here's some good excerpts:
Quote:
Because a record obviously shows how good a team is as a whole. I hope you dont honestly believe that. If you do, I will stop arguing. But look at the players on the teams not the record.
Here's the real cherry on the top
Quote:
They had a couple good wins but most of the teams they have played are mediocre.
Indy beats New England
Quote:
I think the 14-2 season the Chargers has last year was more impressive than the Pats, Dallas, and Greenbay records this year. The Chargers actually had to play tough teams last season.
But once i call him out on the facts, he diverts to this:
Quote:
The Pats ARE better than the Chargers and Baltimore of last season, but the records of both those teams WERE more impressive to me considering the mediocre players both teams has in many possitions.
Quote:
I stand by my statement that the Pats will not make it to the AFC Championship game and they will hopefully lose this weekend.
--------------------
"Shmokin' weed, Shmokin' wizz, doin' coke, drinkin' beers. Drinkin' beers beers beers, rollin' fatties, smokin' blunts. Who smokes tha blunts? We smoke the blunts" - Jay and Silent Bob strike Back
|
AaronEvil
The GuitarVillain
Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 12 years, 11 months
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: LiquidSmoke]
#7757193 - 12/14/07 03:16 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
.
--------------------
There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.
Edited by AaronEvil (12/14/07 01:41 PM)
|
 WhiskeyClone
Not here
Registered: 06/25/01
Posts: 16,509
Loc: Longitudinal Center of Canada ...
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: AaronEvil]
#7757608 - 12/14/07 09:22 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Whoa.. deja vu
--------------------
Welcome evermore to gods and men is the self-helping man. For him all doors are flung wide: him all tongues greet, all honors crown, all eyes follow with desire. Our love goes out to him and embraces him, because he did not need it.
~ R.W. Emerson, "Self-Reliance"
|
castle212
Cannibal
Registered: 11/05/07
Posts: 36
Loc: The Twilight Zone
Last seen: 5 months, 44 minutes
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: AaronEvil]
#7784916 - 12/21/07 09:25 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I have been watching Manning since he played for the Tennessee Vols. To be honest, I think he is a better QB than Brady because of the way he can read defenses. That being said, I think that the Patriots have an all around better team. Brady is a good QB but his team completes the package. I am a big Manning fan but I would take a great TEAM(patriots) over a phenomenal player(manning) any day. Just to make it clear, I am not saying the colts don't have good players because they do. I just think the Pats are a better balanced team. Thats just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions? Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, lol.
--------------------
IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY FIRE THEN DON'T COME AROUND CAUSE I'M GONNA BURN ONE DOWN. - Ben Harper
|
AaronEvil
The GuitarVillain
Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 12 years, 11 months
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: castle212]
#7786551 - 12/21/07 06:08 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I agree, you do have an asshole.
Thats what I have been saying as well, only I put it in terms of Brady's season being incredible due to the fact his team as a whole is great. He isnt the greatest to ever play the game though. Manning might not be either, but I think Manning is better than Tom Brady.
--------------------
There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.
|
relativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
|
Re: why peyton manning > tom brady [Re: AaronEvil]
#7788646 - 12/22/07 11:35 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
im gonna have to agree with you on that one
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale 
Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder
Edit 
Reply 
1 2 all )
Banez
Paw_Paw
Madtowntripper
OldSpice