|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
MarioTrip
since84


Registered: 10/21/07
Posts: 2,207
Loc: 69 w/ you
Last seen: 15 years, 4 months
|
DELETED
#7614827 - 11/09/07 11:37 AM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by MarioTrip<p>Reason for deletion: fuck you?
-------------------- I'm Livin' It, distribute it The streets are inhibited By cut throat niggas just like me that out there getting dividends
Edited by MarioTrip (09/07/08 02:07 PM)
|
blood4blood
Calmer Than You Are


Registered: 04/25/07
Posts: 6,029
Loc: The Valley
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: MarioTrip]
#7614853 - 11/09/07 11:45 AM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
id do mono's. they're less work. but your talking a 1:1 ratio you'd want something more like 1:3 or 1:4
|
MarioTrip
since84


Registered: 10/21/07
Posts: 2,207
Loc: 69 w/ you
Last seen: 15 years, 4 months
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: blood4blood]
#7614874 - 11/09/07 11:49 AM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
That would mean Tim would need more horse manure. Is there anything bad about 1:1? The speed of colonization would be faster, wouldn't it?
-------------------- I'm Livin' It, distribute it The streets are inhibited By cut throat niggas just like me that out there getting dividends
|
blood4blood
Calmer Than You Are


Registered: 04/25/07
Posts: 6,029
Loc: The Valley
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: MarioTrip]
#7614902 - 11/09/07 11:55 AM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
yea it would be faster. but the whole point of spawning is to give your mushrooms more food to consume so they will turn out better.
|
MarioTrip
since84


Registered: 10/21/07
Posts: 2,207
Loc: 69 w/ you
Last seen: 15 years, 4 months
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: blood4blood]
#7614935 - 11/09/07 12:03 PM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
This makes sense Blood2Blood, thank you for clarifying that.
5 pounds of horse manure/straw is roughly 6-8 quarts. If Tim goes a 1:3 ratio (1 quart rye to 3 quarts of hpoo) he will need roughly another 10 pounds of horse manure. Does this sound about right?
Horse manure is so expensive online (20lbs = $40 + shipping), and finding it in the big city is a difficult task
-------------------- I'm Livin' It, distribute it The streets are inhibited By cut throat niggas just like me that out there getting dividends
Edited by MarioTrip (11/09/07 12:05 PM)
|
Sillicybin
Registered: 02/14/05
Posts: 2,134
Loc:
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: MarioTrip]
#7614973 - 11/09/07 12:11 PM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
1:1 spawn to bulk will give you a much higher chance of success without contamination than 1:3 or 1:4, with the only negative being that you will use more spawn. Either way would be fine, nutritionally speaking.
If you do a couple good successful monotub grows with that much spawn, you should be able to produce more shrooms than can personally consume in 6 months unless you trip every day.
EDIT: I usually recommend 1:1 or 1:2 for those new to bulk spawning.
|
jeetered
Stranger



Registered: 07/07/06
Posts: 3,055
Loc: no clue
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: Sillicybin]
#7615066 - 11/09/07 12:33 PM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
i do 2 parts spawn per 1 part sub
|
MarioTrip
since84


Registered: 10/21/07
Posts: 2,207
Loc: 69 w/ you
Last seen: 15 years, 4 months
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: Sillicybin]
#7615098 - 11/09/07 12:39 PM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Does this sound right mathematically:
(for 12 quart rye jars) (Mycopath tells me 5 pounds = 6-8 quarts)
1:1 ----> 10 pounds of horse manure 1:2 ----> 20 pounds 1:3 ----> 30 pounds
etc etc.
-------------------- I'm Livin' It, distribute it The streets are inhibited By cut throat niggas just like me that out there getting dividends
|
Vegan
using the searchbutton



Registered: 08/16/07
Posts: 352
Last seen: 14 years, 6 months
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: Sillicybin]
#7616213 - 11/09/07 05:41 PM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sillicybin said: 1:1 spawn to bulk will give you a much higher chance of success without contamination than 1:3 or 1:4, with the only negative being that you will use more spawn. Either way would be fine, nutritionally speaking.
If you do a couple good successful monotub grows with that much spawn, you should be able to produce more shrooms than can personally consume in 6 months unless you trip every day.
EDIT: I usually recommend 1:1 or 1:2 for those new to bulk spawning.
GOOD ADVICE..
jeets answer also
Peace VEGAN
-------------------- I came, I saw , I came back
|
Vegan
using the searchbutton



Registered: 08/16/07
Posts: 352
Last seen: 14 years, 6 months
|
Re: Higher yield: monotub or tray? [Re: Sillicybin]
#7616252 - 11/09/07 05:57 PM (16 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sillicybin said: 1:1 spawn to bulk will give you a much higher chance of success without contamination than 1:3 or 1:4, with the only negative being that you will use more spawn. Either way would be fine, nutritionally speaking.
If you do a couple good successful monotub grows with that much spawn, you should be able to produce more shrooms than can personally consume in 6 months unless you trip every day.
EDIT: I usually recommend 1:1 or 1:2 for those new to bulk spawning.
GOOD ADVICE..
jeets answer also
Peace VEGAN
-------------------- I came, I saw , I came back
|
|