|
Anonymous #11
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #10]
#7554118 - 10/24/07 08:41 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
No. It is him talking, he is just quoting me.
|
Anonymous #10
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #11]
#7554133 - 10/24/07 08:46 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
What??
There is the post,
"See now I know you're from P&S"
followed immediately by the post
"Too bad nobody knows who you're talking to"
followed immediately by
"the guy above you."
If you are the poster who wrote "See now I know you're from P&S" and "the guy above you", then the guy above the poster who wrote "Too bad nobody knows who you're talking to" is you.
|
Anonymous #12
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #1]
#7554163 - 10/24/07 08:59 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Well, at least it ain't the stuff the loonies in Mysticism and the Paranormal talk about. Although that can be pretty entertaining sometimes.
|
Anonymous #13
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #10]
#7554215 - 10/24/07 09:22 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
That entire forum is just mental masturbation.
What a bunch of fucktards.
I wouldn't mind, but now some of them are finding their way to other forums and talking nonsense philosophy there...
|
Anonymous #10
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #13]
#7554238 - 10/24/07 09:30 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: That entire forum is just mental masturbation.
What a bunch of fucktards.
I wouldn't mind, but now some of them are finding their way to other forums and talking nonsense philosophy there...
Aside from the mycology stuff, what parts of the Shroomery forum is not mental masturbation?
Why the anger? As a P&S poster once said, "Chill out, it's the Internet."
|
Anonymous #12
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #1]
#7554294 - 10/24/07 09:51 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I like the one who have everything figured out, and they're not even 20! Just think what geniuses they'll be at 40.
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #12]
#7554839 - 10/24/07 12:46 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
i would say the p&s would be a more useful forum if veterans weren't in there dominating
|
Anonymous #4
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #1]
#7554874 - 10/24/07 12:54 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I would say that you prefer that because you don't like to have your ideas being subject to a critical analysis.  That could also be the reason why you post here, because it's a forum where you can say any stupidity without having to assume any form of responsibly for it. Also, you suck.
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: S&P is completely retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #4]
#7555355 - 10/24/07 03:02 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
typical P&S bullshit last poster. i like critical analysis, the P&S people never have anything new to say so once you've read their opinions once you're pretty much done with that forum because they dominate it with their repetition. also, i do not find the critical analysis of the P&S veterans particularly constructive, it tends to rely on picking apart semantics, which pretty much turns intelligent debate into hen-pecking. not to mention the terrible puns that i have to endure when reading responses.
also, as far as i know there are only two forums where i am allowed to flame the P&S without being attacked by mods. i hate OTD so I've decided to post here. this is truekimbo2. so there, another fail by P&S.
|
Anonymous #14
|
Re: S&P is completely retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #1]
#7555378 - 10/24/07 03:07 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I used to like P&S a long time ago when it was more chaotic. it seems to me there is an establishment there now, kind of a hippie clique that took over and now the forum has this weird, incestuous cult vibe going on...
|
Anonymous #9
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #1]
#7555488 - 10/24/07 03:30 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: i would say the p&s would be a more useful forum if veterans weren't in there dominating
Swami does make a stupid pun in every single thread
|
Anonymous #15
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #9]
#7556322 - 10/24/07 06:21 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
yes let it out!! let it all out!
|
Anonymous #15
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #15]
#7556384 - 10/24/07 06:33 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
just wait 'til 2012 when swami stays in the third dimension with all the rest of the pinks and nay-sayers. enlightenment, FTW!
|
Anonymous #6
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #6]
#7557487 - 10/24/07 11:12 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: Sample Post:
I saw an aura
Ok this is one of the coolest things that has happened to me for a while. It started with me diligently reading a book on aura reading, what I had read was an introduction to a world where one is aware of life energy, I hadnt read a detailed guide on how to actually read the aura of anything - but was thinking constantly in terms of auric fields and that everything that happens to us is recorded in our aura ...
It started a couple of inches from his physical body and was maybe three inches thick, the inner edge was rather straight and well defined - the outer edge was like the mix of many different waves, similar to choppy seawater, and also shimmering. Colour wise it was almost impossible to define - like it was a colour I had never seen before, although the closest thing I can think of to describe it is electrical blue with silver- it seemed to have a rather alien time dimension to it - what I mean is it moved both very fast and strangely slowly (one must remember here that it was multi faceted )the slow element of its changing was very elegant and smooth and affected relatively large areas in a wave like fashion, whereas the faster parts were only as big maybe as a millimeter and were almost buzzing - it was very concretely real and very detailed - If someone wants I'll post a drawing of what I saw ."
btw.. that whole thing was like 5 pages and had about two sentences.
wtf?
I really did see an aura
|
Anonymous #12
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #6]
#7557502 - 10/24/07 11:18 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: I really did see an aura
Oh, you did not!
|
Anonymous #16
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #12]
#7557662 - 10/25/07 12:40 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Why do people even care? If you don't like the P+S forum why go there? Same thing for any forum on here.
Topics like this aren't very shroomy.
|
Anonymous #17
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #16]
#7558955 - 10/25/07 11:58 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said: Why do people even care? If you don't like the P+S forum why go there? Same thing for any forum on here.
Topics like this aren't very shroomy.
If you dont like this topic why did you come here?
|
Anonymous #4
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #17]
#7558985 - 10/25/07 12:10 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
Anonymous said: Why do people even care? If you don't like the P+S forum why go there? Same thing for any forum on here.
Topics like this aren't very shroomy.
If you dont like this topic why did you come here?
Ahh, you're a thinker...
|
Anonymous #16
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #4]
#7559272 - 10/25/07 01:36 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
Anonymous said:
Quote:
Anonymous said: Why do people even care? If you don't like the P+S forum why go there? Same thing for any forum on here.
Topics like this aren't very shroomy.
If you dont like this topic why did you come here?
Ahh, you're a thinker...
How would I know if I like a topic or not before I start reading it?
|
Anonymous #18
|
Re: S&P is completly retarded now. [Re: Anonymous #16]
#7563228 - 10/26/07 12:46 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I kind of agree with the ganging up on people in that forum. But let's be honest, that's not the only forum where the regulars stick together.
It does seem like having an original idea and posting it in P & S is akin to standing in front of a firing squad. But they are nice enough to have the disclaimer that you need to be prepared to defend your statements.
Maybe that's why you don't see alot of fresh ideas in there.
|
|