|
veggie

Registered: 07/25/04
Posts: 17,504
|
Drugs strategy debate 'is a sham' [UK]
#7540246 - 10/20/07 06:00 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
October 21, 2007 - Guardian
Drugs strategy debate 'is a sham' Think-tank says prohibition has failed and wants talks on legalisation as Home Office defends ban
The government's consultation on a new 10-year drugs strategy is a 'sham', according to one of Britain's leading think-tanks on narcotics, which warns that the current policy is fuelling a crime epidemic.
The Transform Drug Policy Foundation, the only UK organisation of its kind to advise the United Nations on such issues, will this week publish a new report claiming the current strategy has failed. The report, 'After the War on Drugs: Tools for the Debate', claims there is an urgent need for full consultation on allowing the controlled supply of illegal drugs. 'It is clear our drug policy cannot continue down the same failed path forever,' the report states. 'Prohibition's failure is now widely understood and acknowledged among key stakeholders in the debate... the political benefits of pursuing prohibition are now waning and the political costs of its continuation are becoming unsustainable.'
The report claims that drug prohibition has allowed organised crime to control the market and criminalised millions of users, putting a huge strain on the justice system. The Home Office estimates that half of all property crime is linked to fundraising to buy illegal drugs. The police claim that drug markets are the main driver of the UK's burgeoning gun culture. Official figures released last week showed that drug offences recorded by police had risen 14 per cent in April to June of this year, compared with the same period in 2006.
Politicians claim tough anti-drugs laws send clear signals to society. But Transform points to a Home Office survey, commissioned in 2000, which showed the social and economic costs of heroin and cocaine use were between £10.1 and £17.4 billion - the bulk of which were costs to the victims of drug-related crime.
'Over the course of 10 years, a series of different inquiry reports into UK drugs policy all say the same thing: the policy is malfunctioning,' said Steve Rolles, the report's author. 'They've all been blithely ignored by the government, which insists it is making progess.'
Last week, North Wales Police chief constable Richard Brunstrom said he would 'campaign hard' for drugs such as heroin to be legalised. Previously he has said that drugs laws are out of date and that the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 should be replaced by a new 'Substance Misuse Act'.
Transform claims the consultation process, which finished on Friday, was designed to stifle debate on drugs policy. 'The consultation process has been a sham,' Rolles said. 'It hasn't highlighted any policies to consult on. It's becoming very clear the next 10-year strategy is going to be identical to the last one. The whole idea that there is going to be a radical change is just not the case.'
The think-tank has taken the unusual step of writing to the Better Regulation Executive, set up to ensure government runs smoothly, to complain that the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is already making policy before the consultation process had finished.
The Prime Minister signalled earlier this year that the government would reclassify cannabis. He also recently insisted the government would never decriminalise drugs, something Transform argues makes a mockery of the consultation process.
A spokeswoman for the Home Office said: 'We have undertaken an open consultation and we welcome constructive ideas and views on how we can continue to reduce drug harm. However, the government is emphatically opposed to the legalisation of drugs which would increase drug-related harm and break both international and domestic law.'
|
koppie
astral projectile


Registered: 07/23/04
Posts: 2,653
Loc: cloud hidden
|
Re: Drugs strategy debate 'is a sham' [UK] [Re: veggie]
#7541416 - 10/21/07 02:12 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
However, the government is emphatically opposed to the legalisation of drugs which would increase drug-related harm and break both international and domestic law.'
WTF?
That statement doesn't make any sense at all. How can abolishing a law break the law that's being abolished?
More proof that politicians are utter morons and the people who vote for them are even worse.
|
Visionary Tools



Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 7,953
Last seen: 1 year, 7 months
|
Re: Drugs strategy debate 'is a sham' [UK] [Re: koppie]
#7541614 - 10/21/07 04:55 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Politicians claim tough anti-drugs laws send clear signals to society. But Transform points to a Home Office survey, commissioned in 2000, which showed the social and economic costs of heroin and cocaine use were between £10.1 and £17.4 billion - the bulk of which were costs to the victims of drug-related crime.
Yes it does. It sends a clear message that if you want to have a good time, you need to buy it from a criminal. And criminals are only in it for the money. The sooner we make it legal, the sooner people stop dying from cut shit. Is this about damage prevention, or state control?
--------------------
|
DNKYD
Turtle!

Registered: 09/23/04
Posts: 12,326
|
Re: Drugs strategy debate 'is a sham' [UK] [Re: koppie]
#7550569 - 10/23/07 11:50 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koppie said:
Quote:
However, the government is emphatically opposed to the legalisation of drugs which would increase drug-related harm and break both international and domestic law.'
WTF?
That statement doesn't make any sense at all. How can abolishing a law break the law that's being abolished?
More proof that politicians are utter morons and the people who vote for them are even worse.
Member nations of the United Nations entered into a treaty with the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs to not legalize certain drugs in their respective countries. That is the main roadblock to full legalization. The United States cannot legally, under international treaty, repeal marijuana prohibition laws.
|
DadeMurphy
H4x0r

Registered: 01/29/03
Posts: 908
Last seen: 13 years, 10 months
|
Re: Drugs strategy debate 'is a sham' [UK] [Re: DNKYD]
#7550839 - 10/23/07 01:13 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
That explains the international law part but not the domestic law part.
-------------------- --------------------------------------------------
|
|