|
fake estate
didgin it out



Registered: 10/13/07
Posts: 264
Loc: NC
Last seen: 8 months, 4 days
|
ww3
#7534730 - 10/19/07 10:08 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
so whos ready to get fucked up by russia, china, and iran?
bush is preparing to get into yet another war before finishing his first 2 wars of lies...
-------------------- eat more algae.
|
Madtowntripper
Sun-Beams out of Cucumbers



Registered: 03/06/03
Posts: 21,287
Loc: The Ocean of Notions
Last seen: 5 months, 23 days
|
|
Are you kidding?
-------------------- After one comes, through contact with it's administrators, no longer to cherish greatly the law as a remedy in abuses, then the bottle becomes a sovereign means of direct action. If you cannot throw it at least you can always drink out of it. - Ernest Hemingway If it is life that you feel you are missing I can tell you where to find it. In the law courts, in business, in government. There is nothing occurring in the streets. Nothing but a dumbshow composed of the helpless and the impotent. -Cormac MacCarthy He who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God. - Aeschylus
|
BrAiN
Art Fag

Registered: 03/01/01
Posts: 6,875
Loc: Chocolate City
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
|
|
China's economy would crumble without ours
|
fake estate
didgin it out



Registered: 10/13/07
Posts: 264
Loc: NC
Last seen: 8 months, 4 days
|
Re: ww3 [Re: BrAiN]
#7535998 - 10/19/07 03:34 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7116
the people didnt want to be involved in ww1 until we sent a cruiseliner full of americans into german occupied waters and had it blown up..
we didnt want in ww2 until we provoked the japense to attack pearl harbor and ignored warnings of a fleet headed toward hawaii from australi
and we dont want in a ww3..until they fake another terrorist attack and blame in on iran this time
its all about the money people...wars give the elite more money while our dumb asses are killed off left and right, yet none of us give a fuck and refuse to believe it till its too late
-------------------- eat more algae.
|
afoaf
CEO DBK?



Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
|
Re: ww3 [Re: BrAiN]
#7536008 - 10/19/07 03:36 PM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
not to say they wouldn't feel the pinch, but with europe and asia, China has plenty of people to peddle their wares to.
-------------------- All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
|
So why don't you invest in warmonger companies? You too can be a war profiteer. Oh yeah, and vote Rethugnican too. I'll see you at the club.
--------------------
|
johnm214



Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
|
|
Quote:
fake estate said: so whos ready to get fucked up by russia, china, and iran?
bush is preparing to get into yet another war before finishing his first 2 wars of lies...

I'm not sure what your angle here is, but I've heard bush preaching diplomacy towards all these countries (despite the occasional barb- but I don't think the man can help himself).
Besides, in the case of Iran, I do think there is a legitimate security risk justifying military action if the disarmament plans fail. What would you have us do w/ a regime such as theirs who is developing missles and nuclear warheads capable of attacking us, our allies, and being funnled to groups willing to undertake hail mary suicide attacks which could signifigantly destabalize our country.
|
peter19
peter19
Registered: 10/14/07
Posts: 88
Last seen: 16 years, 2 months
|
|
Quote:
fake estate said: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7116
the people didnt want to be involved in ww1 until we sent a cruiseliner full of americans into german occupied waters and had it blown up..
we didnt want in ww2 until we provoked the japense to attack pearl harbor and ignored warnings of a fleet headed toward hawaii from australi
and we dont want in a ww3..until they fake another terrorist attack and blame in on iran this time
its all about the money people...wars give the elite more money while our dumb asses are killed off left and right, yet none of us give a fuck and refuse to believe it till its too late
on the ball.
-------------------- “All Truth Goes Through Three Stages. First, it is ridiculed. Then, it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.” - Arthur Schopenhauer
|
peter19
peter19
Registered: 10/14/07
Posts: 88
Last seen: 16 years, 2 months
|
|
Quote:
johnm214 said:
Quote:
fake estate said: so whos ready to get fucked up by russia, china, and iran?
bush is preparing to get into yet another war before finishing his first 2 wars of lies...

I'm not sure what your angle here is, but I've heard bush preaching diplomacy towards all these countries (despite the occasional barb- but I don't think the man can help himself).
Besides, in the case of Iran, I do think there is a legitimate security risk justifying military action if the disarmament plans fail. What would you have us do w/ a regime such as theirs who is developing missles and nuclear warheads capable of attacking us, our allies, and being funnled to groups willing to undertake hail mary suicide attacks which could signifigantly destabalize our country.
my personal view is if one country has nukes then ever body should be able to have them, or prefarably no-body. iran would never have the capability to defeat america, israel, uk. its partially bully tactics you dont want somebody whos not in your control to have nukes because once they have them other country might have to take them seriously.
but i agree with another poster, alot of it will be "major theator wars" dont believe the propoganda, we have attacked alot more countrys than iran. Quote:
"The PNAC program, in a nutshell: America’s military must rule out even the possibility of a serious global or regional challenger anywhere in the world. The regime of Saddam Hussein must be toppled immediately, by U.S. force if necessary. And the entire Middle East must be reordered according to an American plan. PNAC’s most important study notes that selling this plan to the American people will likely take a long time, "absent some catastrophic catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." (PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses (1997), p.51)" http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040527220940331
-------------------- “All Truth Goes Through Three Stages. First, it is ridiculed. Then, it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.” - Arthur Schopenhauer
|
fake estate
didgin it out



Registered: 10/13/07
Posts: 264
Loc: NC
Last seen: 8 months, 4 days
|
|
Quote:
johnm214 said:
Quote:
fake estate said: so whos ready to get fucked up by russia, china, and iran?
bush is preparing to get into yet another war before finishing his first 2 wars of lies...

I'm not sure what your angle here is, but I've heard bush preaching diplomacy towards all these countries (despite the occasional barb- but I don't think the man can help himself).
Besides, in the case of Iran, I do think there is a legitimate security risk justifying military action if the disarmament plans fail. What would you have us do w/ a regime such as theirs who is developing missles and nuclear warheads capable of attacking us, our allies, and being funnled to groups willing to undertake hail mary suicide attacks which could signifigantly destabalize our country.
iran isnt even looking to make fucking weapons they are trying to create energy, which russia is nice enough to be helping them with...if they wanted a god damned nuke putin could just fucking hand one over...
the matter of the fact is crazy bush is willing to set a pre emptive nuclear strike against someone "threatening the use of a nuclear weapon"...were the ones who shouldnt have the fucking technology, were the ones in the wrong..we need to get the cheney regime out and fucking 'get rid of' bush...
-------------------- eat more algae.
|
ElectricJW
Stoner


Registered: 10/31/05
Posts: 136
Last seen: 6 years, 11 months
|
|
I also find it funny that we are worried about a nation that **might** get a nuclear bomb. In the cold war, the Soviets had thousands of nuclear bombs, yet they didnt do shit. Also, china, pakistan, india, israel all have nuclear weapons. They aren't using them on anyone. And last time I checked, the USA was the only country to use them on another.
Also I dont think Iran (or any other nation) is stupid enough to fuck w/ the US. Even if Iran got 1 nuclear bomb, they wouldn't fuck w/ us, b/c we would retaliate and completely wipe them off the face of the earth. I think Iran just wants one, b/c their neighbors has some.
And here is a link that shows some nations w/ nuclear bombs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
-------------------- "Visualize the action, then actualize the vision." - King of the Hill “Long you live and high you'll fly and smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry and all you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be.”- Pink Floyd
|
Annapurna1
liberal pussy


Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
|
|
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060301faessay85204/keir-a-lieber-daryl-g-press/the-rise-of-u-s-nuclear-primacy.html
the authours of this link are nuts if you ask me...OTOH..someone on the far right that doesnt think their nuts..such as king george the decider..might read that shit and conclude that now would be a good time to start WW III...
--------------------
"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...
|
BrAiN
Art Fag

Registered: 03/01/01
Posts: 6,875
Loc: Chocolate City
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
|
Re: ww3 [Re: afoaf]
#7538448 - 10/20/07 07:48 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
afoaf said: not to say they wouldn't feel the pinch, but with europe and asia, China has plenty of people to peddle their wares to.
You think Europe would just sit there if we got in a war? the UK would come to help us.. and probably France now given the new president... lord knows how many other tiny countries
|
afoaf
CEO DBK?



Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
|
Re: ww3 [Re: BrAiN]
#7538759 - 10/20/07 10:11 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I was replying to your statement:
"China's economy would crumble without ours."
I disagree.
-------------------- All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.
|
johnm214



Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
|
|
Quote:
ElectricJW said: I also find it funny that we are worried about a nation that **might** get a nuclear bomb. In the cold war, the Soviets had thousands of nuclear bombs, yet they didnt do shit. Also, china, pakistan, india, israel all have nuclear weapons. They aren't using them on anyone. And last time I checked, the USA was the only country to use them on another.
Also I dont think Iran (or any other nation) is stupid enough to fuck w/ the US. Even if Iran got 1 nuclear bomb, they wouldn't fuck w/ us, b/c we would retaliate and completely wipe them off the face of the earth. I think Iran just wants one, b/c their neighbors has some.
And here is a link that shows some nations w/ nuclear bombs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
the soviets had an excellent incentive not to mess w/ us, and vice versa. But what happens when a holocaust-denying fruitcake gets them? Any reason for them to not spread the tech. on to other cracckpots, which he allready financially supports?
Just cuz others have nucs doesn't mean it is in our best interest to let others have em.
|
peter19
peter19
Registered: 10/14/07
Posts: 88
Last seen: 16 years, 2 months
|
|
Quote:
the soviets had an excellent incentive not to mess w/ us, and vice versa. But what happens when a holocaust-denying fruitcake gets them? Any reason for them to not spread the tech. on to other cracckpots, which he allready financially supports?
Just cuz others have nucs doesn't mean it is in our best interest to let others have em.
so because we are the "goodies" and other people who we want to control, the "badies" anyone who thinks about makeing nuke reactors for energy we should attack/bomb?.
lets see what the people in power now said in 2000. in the Project for the New American Century they wrote - "The report builds upon the 1992 draft document "Defense Planning Guidance," which claimed that the U.S. must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role" they also say - "Increasing military pressure on China: "it is time to increase the presence of American forces in southeast Asia" which will lead to "American and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratisation in China" and not to mention - " The U.S. must "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars" as a "core mission". so lets see who this project for a new american century was produced for - "The group's core ideas are expressed in a September 2000 report produced for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, and Lewis Libby entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century. The Sunday Herald referred to the report as a "blueprint for U.S. world domination." http://home.earthlink.net/~platter/neo-conservatism/pnac.html
so what im saying is its massively contradictory to call some other nations "terrorists" when if you look at our track record (u.s) you will see that in the past 100 years we have either tryed to over throw or attack over 50 nations. maybe we point the others out as behing terrorists when the reason the u.s is only doing that is too spread propoganda so we can go in all guns blazeing, and take over yet another country.
i mean its "genius" the way they want to keep us safe, because that way is wipe out anyone who might slightly become more powerful/self reliant.
-------------------- “All Truth Goes Through Three Stages. First, it is ridiculed. Then, it is violently opposed. Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.” - Arthur Schopenhauer
Edited by peter19 (10/21/07 08:14 AM)
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: ww3 [Re: peter19]
#7542137 - 10/21/07 10:25 AM (16 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Linkee no workee. So, I'll do you a favor and link the actual New American Century website, which is now inactive but a useful archive of what they actually did espouse in it's complete form. Earthlink? Who knows. http://www.newamericancentury.org/
Let's see, hmmmmm, one of the world's largest producers of crude oil NEEDS nuclear power for electricity. Meanwhile, they have to ration gasoline because they can't build refineries. But there's billions to build reactors. And mine uranium, which they are not exactly awash in. Electricity my ass. I'm not that stupid.
--------------------
|
EternalCowabunga
Being of Great Significance



Registered: 04/04/05
Posts: 7,152
Loc: Time and Space
|
|
world war 3 isn't going to happen. period. end of story.
--------------------
|
aDoS
freedom lover



Registered: 06/18/05
Posts: 7,590
Loc: land of the free
|
|
I predict a massive world conflict in 15-20 years. It is NOT going to happen tommorro, next week, next month, or even next year.
-------------------- "If we could sniff or swallow something that would, for five or six hours each day, abolish our solitude as individuals, atone us with our fellows in a glowing exaltation of affection and make life in all its aspects seem not only worth living, but divinely beautiful and significant, and if this heavenly, world-transfiguring drug were of such a kind that we could wake up next morning with a clear head and an undamaged constitution - then, it seems to me, all our problems (and not merely the one small problem of discovering a novel pleasure) would be wholly solved and earth would become paradise." - Aldous Huxley GIVE ME OPIATES OR GIVE ME DEATH
|
Nephlyte
Misfortunate One


Registered: 10/11/05
Posts: 1,025
Loc: South Texas
Last seen: 13 years, 5 months
|
|
Quote:
fake estate said:
iran isnt even looking to make fucking weapons they are trying to create energy, which russia is nice enough to be helping them with...if they wanted a god damned nuke putin could just fucking hand one over...
My major concern in this whole "debate" is that the issue is a false one. Like fake estate said, its about energy.
Iran can't burn their own oil. They need to sell it, its their only cash cow. If they are going to power infrastructure, they need a reliable and long lasting power source. And unlike us, they have made the right power choice in wanting to go nuclear.
Somehow this issue is never brought up. Conservatives (and the weak willed libs) have pushed this issue off the table. So we're left to either say that we should use diplomacy to disarm the unarmed or we should be using bombs to disarm the unarmed.
So choose fake option A or fake option B.
-------------------- "To do right is to know what you want. Now when you are dissatisfied with yourself it's because you are after something you don't really want. What objects are you proposing to yourself? Are they the objects you really value? If they are not, you are cheating yourself. I don't meant that if you chose to pursue the objects you most value, you will attain them; of course not. Your experience will tell you that. But success in getting after much labor what you really don't care for is the bitterest and most ridiculous failure." -George Santayana
|
Disco Cat
iS A PoiNdexteR

Registered: 09/15/00
Posts: 2,601
|
|
Quote:
johnm214 said: the soviets had an excellent incentive not to mess w/ us, and vice versa. But what happens when a holocaust-denying fruitcake gets them?
Ahmadinejad is not a holocaust denier, please get your facts straight.
I'm not to interested in the topic of ww3, as it's already history. Don't you all remember?: Bush referred to the wars in Iraq and Afgahnistan as ww3 a long time ago, in attempts to recruit allies with hype.
Now again, Bush warns of ww3. He seems pretty eager to get this thing started, so why does he try to point the finger at Iran?
Are there any empty-headed dupes out there who've actually bought the line that Iran is pursuing a nuke? If there are, I say to them: you're the blight of the world.
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
Disco Cat said:
Quote:
johnm214 said: the soviets had an excellent incentive not to mess w/ us, and vice versa. But what happens when a holocaust-denying fruitcake gets them?
Ahmadinejad is not a holocaust denier, please get your facts straight.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/12/14/iran.israel/
Quote:
"They have invented a myth that Jews were massacred and place this above God, religions and the prophets," Ahmadinejad said in a speech to thousands of people in the Iranian city of Zahedan, according to a report on Wednesday from Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.
I doubt he was misquoted.Quote:
I'm not to interested in the topic of ww3, as it's already history. Don't you all remember?: Bush referred to the wars in Iraq and Afgahnistan as ww3 a long time ago, in attempts to recruit allies with hype.
Now again, Bush warns of ww3. He seems pretty eager to get this thing started, so why does he try to point the finger at Iran?
Are there any empty-headed dupes out there who've actually bought the line that Iran is pursuing a nuke? If there are, I say to them: you're the blight of the world.
Right, the nation with one of the largest oil reserves and relatively little uranium reserves needs nuclear power for electricity. Billions and billions for reactors and not one cent for refineries. Because they need electricity. Can you put together a puzzle that has more than twelve big wooden pieces?
--------------------
|
mikebart101
Bromden



Registered: 08/01/06
Posts: 619
Loc: New England
Last seen: 11 years, 5 months
|
|
China's economy would not crumble; they just wouldn't make as much money because dumbass consumers like us wouldn't be shelling out thousands of dollars for products that cost less than a hundred to produce.
How do foreign based companies (China) still manage to make a killer profit by dropping prices 50% on some products?
-------------------- So we finish the eighteenth and he's gonna stiff me. And I say, "Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
|
mindspin
Heirophant

Registered: 10/23/07
Posts: 96
Last seen: 12 years, 2 months
|
|
I think it's fairly obvious that we (the United States) are trying to fund a war in the Middle East. We have sold weapons to both Saudi Arabia (who hates Israel just as much as anyone else) as well as Israel, we are about to engage in a new conflict with Iran, and we still want all of their oil.
I honestly don't think we're going to stop for anything until we control the Middle East. It may sound like a conspiracy theory, but put two and two together and do a little research, it's pretty scary what you'll come up with.
|
Disco Cat
iS A PoiNdexteR

Registered: 09/15/00
Posts: 2,601
|
|
Quote:
zappaisgod said:
Quote:
Disco Cat said: Ahmadinejad is not a holocaust denier, please get your facts straight.
Quote:
"They have invented a myth that Jews were massacred and place this above God, religions and the prophets," Ahmadinejad said in a speech to thousands of people in the Iranian city of Zahedan, according to a report on Wednesday from Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.
I doubt he was misquoted.
No, maybe not in Farsi, but was he mistranslated or misunderstood, just as he was in the "wipe israel from the map" comment?
Did you never read the Columbia University transcripts, or watch the lengthy 60 minutes interview that happened right before his trip to the US? He called the claims that he was a holocaust denier, and others, incorrect, and affirmed that it happened. I believe I posted on the subject before either of these two press events even occured, correcting the false-hype over both the "wipe israel from the map" and holocaust denying rumours - and then, once again, my claims were subsequently further reinforced, and by his own words. How coincidental that should happen.
Quote:
Right, the nation with one of the largest oil reserves and relatively little uranium reserves needs nuclear power for electricity. Billions and billions for reactors and not one cent for refineries. Because they need electricity. Can you put together a puzzle that has more than twelve big wooden pieces?
You probably shouldn't even try to mock, you simply don't possess the needed skills, and it just comes back at you. It has nothing to do with need. More electricity to export, more money to be made, more regional power, stabilization for the future as their gas resources start to wane... there's not a single bad aspect to it for them, unless you count Western discord, which is irrational and not to be heeded if it is truly empty.
Edited by Disco Cat (10/24/07 05:53 PM)
|
|