|
Boom
just a tester

Registered: 06/16/04
Posts: 11,252
Loc: Cypress Creek
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: makaveli8x8]
#7395767 - 09/11/07 10:39 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Buildings are demolished from the ground up
|
FecalDildo
Fat LadiesBingo.


Registered: 04/25/04
Posts: 9,645
Loc: Ass Flavour Pie Factory.
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: makaveli8x8]
#7395772 - 09/11/07 10:44 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
makaveli8x8 said: still its gotta play a role in the movement of titanic plates...its gotta help with something is what im saying.
and im sure it slowly trickles down, the hotter it gets the thinner it gets.
Amazing.
|
shitfacedme
fustfuffs

Registered: 08/22/07
Posts: 285
Last seen: 16 years, 4 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: FecalDildo]
#7395801 - 09/11/07 10:53 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FecalDildo said: I find your attitude to be disgusting.
 like i find you
|
sublimistri
Higher Than AKite



Registered: 11/21/04
Posts: 2,952
Loc: Forgotten
Last seen: 15 years, 10 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: ravin0ff]
#7395832 - 09/11/07 11:06 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ravin0ff said: i thought i would avoid this thread as i do most of the time.
negative entities feed on energy(or so i hear)
but i figured i'de just drop the greatest and most simple zinger i know.
so randall, how did WTC7 collapse? first steel building ever to collapse from fire without an impact?(and in it's own footprint nonetheless! all those man hours put into figuring out the precise way to blow up a building so it wouldn't harm surrounding structures and it turns out you can just set a couple floors on fire for a few hours, and presto, like magic all floors below it will give out at precisely the same time to allow for a free-fall vertical drop!)
and, how did the news writers anticipate this event that has never occurred once in recorded history? except, instead of actually saying the building is GOING to collapse, they said the building already HAD collapsed... before it actually did. hmmmmm. 
oh well, put a little bit more into this than i intended.
Watch the video I posted above. They had some guy say they "pulled" it, Its a demolition term for basically collapsing a building. Some guy who studied demolition or worked for it whatever, he said there was a noticible crack in the middle of it when it started going down (the video shows all this) and they believe there was bombs in WTC7 that caused the middle to collapse first (which is a good way to take buildings down so the debree dont fly outwards, instead it flys inwards). They ordered to "pull" it. So i think its possible we might have played a role in bombing the wtc7.
I just woke up so that might be all mixed up or whatever.
Il get you the vid in a second.
Edit alreight here you go, this is from the owner of the building, talkin about WTC7. Well not the whole thing, the owner does talk in this though.
-------------------- Tradelist My Ethnobotanical Garden Cup Greenhouse Tek. Make small sturdy pots (With detachable grenhouse tops) with cups. Your human friend will have to dose atropine uninformed, I will not spread information that may harm a cat. - Wiccan_Seeker
Edited by sublimistri (09/11/07 11:13 AM)
|
trippindad82
Trusted Cultivator of Trich



Registered: 01/07/07
Posts: 1,087
Loc: down, down the hole
Last seen: 10 years, 11 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: sublimistri]
#7395883 - 09/11/07 11:20 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
What about the flurry of trading and the put options placed on the two airlines and the companies who had offices in the buildings? Gee, that doesn't show some foreknowledge at all. Or the eyewitness statements of multiple explosions going off in both towers starting just before the planes hit the buildings and continuing to their demise? Oh wait, eyewitness statements are NEVER used in investigations, right? Or how about the numerous countries that have come out saying that they forewarned the US about the pending attacks and then Rice saying that it was something they never anticipated. So much cover up for a "surprise" attack.
-------------------- Trying to explain a journey to someone who has never experienced it is like trying to explain what a zebra looks like to blind person who has never seen a horse. ^^^The above matter may be a complete fantasy that I concocted out of possible boredom.^^^ --------------------------------------
|
sublimistri
Higher Than AKite



Registered: 11/21/04
Posts: 2,952
Loc: Forgotten
Last seen: 15 years, 10 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: trippindad82]
#7395896 - 09/11/07 11:24 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
trippindad82 said: What about the flurry of trading and the put options placed on the two airlines and the companies who had offices in the buildings? Gee, that doesn't show some foreknowledge at all. Or the eyewitness statements of multiple explosions going off in both towers starting just before the planes hit the buildings and continuing to their demise? Oh wait, eyewitness statements are NEVER used in investigations, right? Or how about the numerous countries that have come out saying that they forewarned the US about the pending attacks and then Rice saying that it was something they never anticipated. So much cover up for a "surprise" attack.
Just about all those questions can be answered going from chapter one to twelve of that whole series of 9/11 coincidences. As for the bombs, i found that proof too I watched all this stuff last night...
""9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!""
-------------------- Tradelist My Ethnobotanical Garden Cup Greenhouse Tek. Make small sturdy pots (With detachable grenhouse tops) with cups. Your human friend will have to dose atropine uninformed, I will not spread information that may harm a cat. - Wiccan_Seeker
|
trippindad82
Trusted Cultivator of Trich



Registered: 01/07/07
Posts: 1,087
Loc: down, down the hole
Last seen: 10 years, 11 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: sublimistri]
#7395921 - 09/11/07 11:34 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I like how on that day the mainstream media reported on all of this stuff going on and then once the official story came out they forgot about it. I though journalism was supposed to be investigative, not regurgitation of the politician's expert opinion.
-------------------- Trying to explain a journey to someone who has never experienced it is like trying to explain what a zebra looks like to blind person who has never seen a horse. ^^^The above matter may be a complete fantasy that I concocted out of possible boredom.^^^ --------------------------------------
|
RandalFlagg
Stranger

Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 15,608
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: ravin0ff]
#7395926 - 09/11/07 11:36 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah....the nefarious government planners of this scheme to fake 9/11 decided to let a reporter in on the whole secret and the reporter happened to announce the news too soon. 
Did WTC7 collapse because of the chaos and rumblings caused by the collapse of the towers? Maybe. Did demolitions experts run in and bring down the building in order to make it safer for rescuers to get to Ground Zero? It's possible.
None of this changes the indisputable fact that Islamic terrorists hijacked planes and crashed them into buildings and that's what caused the whole occurrence.
|
OneMoreRobot3021



Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 61,024
Loc: the sky
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7395929 - 09/11/07 11:37 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Randal, did I ever tell you my conspiracy theory about 9/11? I think these Islamic religious zealots got trained as pilots and flew a bunch of planes into buildings. I know, I know - it's going out on a limb. But just step back and think about it for a second.
-------------------- Acid doesn't give you truths; it builds machines that push the envelope of perception. Whatever revelations came to me then have dissolved like skywriting. All I really know is that those few years saddled me with a faith in the redemptive potential of the imagination which, however flat, stale and unprofitable the world seems to me now, I cannot for the life of me shake. -Erik Davis
|
RandalFlagg
Stranger

Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 15,608
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: trippindad82]
#7395942 - 09/11/07 11:44 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
trippindad82 said: What about the flurry of trading and the put options placed on the two airlines and the companies who had offices in the buildings?
Get your facts straight. There was no "flurry" of activity on the airlines or on the companies in question before 9/11. People rountinely have "put options" up on stuff like airlines just in case there is a crash....because if there is a crash then stocks go down and you can make money off of those put options. Morbid...yes. Illegal...no.
And if there was some flurry of strange trading activity before 9/11 people would have found out about it and traced it.
Quote:
trippindad82 said: Or the eyewitness statements of multiple explosions going off in both towers starting just before the planes hit the buildings and continuing to their demise?
Would I trust eyewitnesses talking about something so trivial and easy to misinterpret on such a stressful and awesome occurrence? No. Would I trust eywitness testimony on the major stuff (they saw the planes hit the buildings, etc..)? Yes.
And why would some super-secret and evil government agency take the risk of getting caught by planting explosives when the planes smacking into the towers was good enough to "get a reaction"?
Quote:
trippindad82 said: Or how about the numerous countries that have come out saying that they forewarned the US about the pending attacks
I'm not surprised that the Bush administration didn't take shit too seriously. The Islamists have hated us for years and they had been unable to do too much to us. Who would have envisioned such a magnificent and bold operation being acted out? If somebody had told me of it beforehand I would have thought, "Pfft...that could never happen.".
|
Stizzle
Stranger



Registered: 04/26/07
Posts: 754
Loc: Tuvalu
Last seen: 15 years, 6 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7395948 - 09/11/07 11:46 AM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
RandalFlagg
Stranger

Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 15,608
|
|
Quote:
OneLessForeskin said: Randal, did I ever tell you my conspiracy theory about 9/11? I think these Islamic religious zealots got trained as pilots and flew a bunch of planes into buildings. I know, I know - it's going out on a limb. But just step back and think about it for a second.
Not possible. Bush, Cheney, and the Halliburton corporation had to be involved. Also, those weren't really planes. They were mirages of some type set up by the CIA. It's the only believable explanation.
|
Rustifer
prestige worldwide



Registered: 04/10/05
Posts: 7,071
Loc: Central Texas
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7396026 - 09/11/07 12:05 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
My step mother belives they gassed all the passengers on the plane, and flew it into the shit by radio.
|
trippindad82
Trusted Cultivator of Trich



Registered: 01/07/07
Posts: 1,087
Loc: down, down the hole
Last seen: 10 years, 11 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7396034 - 09/11/07 12:07 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Hmm...A bomb going off in 93 wasn't enough to get reaction. They needed deaths and a lot of them. I believe that terrorists flew planes into the buildings. I also believe that certain persons had foreknowledge or were part of the planning and took advantage of a situation to gander support from otherwise passive americans.
-------------------- Trying to explain a journey to someone who has never experienced it is like trying to explain what a zebra looks like to blind person who has never seen a horse. ^^^The above matter may be a complete fantasy that I concocted out of possible boredom.^^^ --------------------------------------
|
RandalFlagg
Stranger

Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 15,608
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: trippindad82]
#7396053 - 09/11/07 12:13 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
trippindad82 said: Hmm...A bomb going off in 93 wasn't enough to get reaction. They needed deaths and a lot of them. I believe that terrorists flew planes into the buildings.
Wait...several large commercial airliners loaded with passengers and being flown into heavily populated office buildings was not enough to ensure a high death count?
???
That is more than enough to kill a lot of people and make a shocking statement. Why add the unnecessary risk of unraveling the whole government conspiracy by setting up bombs? It just seems stupid.
|
Gumby
Fishnologist



Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 26,656
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: makaveli8x8]
#7396067 - 09/11/07 12:19 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I have a theory: don't be dumb.
|
Cepheus
Balance




Registered: 04/19/06
Posts: 8,266
Loc: the space between reality...
Last seen: 1 year, 1 month
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7396073 - 09/11/07 12:23 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
3 words.
New world order.
This is what 9/11 and all other recent 'terrorist' attacks have been about. Fear is a very powerful instrument.
-------------------- "I only ever hope to reach equilibrium, in Nature's matrix, in line with the meridian" ~ Jehst
"...and I know that I have to keep breathing, as tomorrow the sun will rise, who knows what the tide will bring?" Free Spore Ring Europe Send any spare spore prints you might have and help the distribution
Open Source. Freedom. GNU/Linux Addicting is not a word.
|
WakeboardrB
Pepe Silvia



Registered: 05/18/03
Posts: 13,678
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: Gumby]
#7396075 - 09/11/07 12:24 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Gumby said: I have a theory: don't be dumb.
That's more of a statement or direction, not a theory. Still wise advice regardless.
-------------------- Same thing happened to me when I played Neil Armstrong in Moonshot. They found me in an alley in Burbank trying to re-enter the earth's atmosphere in an old refrigerator box.
|
Gastronomicus
3-0-G



Registered: 03/31/05
Posts: 9,727
Last seen: 7 hours, 20 minutes
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7396080 - 09/11/07 12:24 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Now, I don't believe about 95% of these conspiracy theories, I believe that for the most part, what was told to us happened. That is that hijackers took over planes and flew them in to buildings etc... However, I do fully believe that the Bush administration orchestrated the entire thing.
If they're innocent, why classify 75% of the investigation? Why not testify under oath? Why wait so long to start an investigation? Why give it such a small budget?
The Bush administration and their corporate lackeys benefited so much after 9/11. They got a war in Iraq for oil, an automatic profit contract for Halliburton that is payed for by tax payers that guerentees Halliburton makes a profit, regardless of how they conduct business. I think too many people overlook the fact that Halliburton can buy a 100 thousand dollar truck, light it on fire, and get payed by the US government 103 thousand dollars of restitution. It has lead to a practice of wastefuly negligence so Halliburton can collect the most money possible from American tax payers.
These men are criminals in the truest sense of the word. They not only break the law, they change it to benefit them. With all my heart, I believe they should be shot.
-------------------- Make my Funk the P Funk, I wants to get Funked up
LAGM2024
|
trippindad82
Trusted Cultivator of Trich



Registered: 01/07/07
Posts: 1,087
Loc: down, down the hole
Last seen: 10 years, 11 months
|
Re: September 11 Wiki Theorys [Re: RandalFlagg]
#7396081 - 09/11/07 12:25 PM (16 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
RandalFlagg said:
Quote:
trippindad82 said: Hmm...A bomb going off in 93 wasn't enough to get reaction. They needed deaths and a lot of them. I believe that terrorists flew planes into the buildings.
Wait...several large commercial airliners loaded with passengers and being flown into heavily populated office buildings was not enough to ensure a high death count?
???
That is more than enough to kill a lot of people and make a shocking statement. Why add the unnecessary risk of unraveling the whole government conspiracy by setting up bombs? It just seems stupid.
At the same time: Cost to Larry Silversteen. Those buildings were a biological disaster and needs to be taken down, but he couldn't get approved for demolition as for the asbestos within the building. His answer? Plant some bombs in his own buildings and use 9/11 as an opportunity to get rid of his disaster (or the port authority's). There is a lot of history on those buildings and from my understanding were an investment disaster.
-------------------- Trying to explain a journey to someone who has never experienced it is like trying to explain what a zebra looks like to blind person who has never seen a horse. ^^^The above matter may be a complete fantasy that I concocted out of possible boredom.^^^ --------------------------------------
|
|