Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
Re: Understanding others, and writing them off [Re: backfromthedead]
    #7301755 -

A network of interconnectedness is a non-concept. I was just making a little jibe on the side to that effect, but since you reaaally want to debate it...

The internet is a network of computers. Social networks are networks of friends. The components of these things are interconnected, and they form a network, but they are not a network of interconnectedness. Your car is not a car of vehicleness. Your present annoyance and confusion are not "an annoyance of peevishness" and a "confusion of befuddlement".

Interconnectedness is not a tangible property, and only serves to indicate the very same concept that "network" indicates in the first place anyway. Poetry (if that's what your little... things are) is about density of prose, not redundancy of redundancy of redundancy of redundancy, because enough redundancy makes something hollow and nonsensical, much like networks of interconnectedness.

Hence the very tiny bit of humor I derived from it, and hence my tiny little comment about how silly the phrase is. And now, hence my excessively-long defense of my righteous (but small and well-intended) giggle at your expense.

Good?


--------------------
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Understanding others, and writing them off [Re: figgusfiddus]
    #7302359 -

Good.
Giggle.
You're fun.

"Your car is not a car of vehicleness."

Oh it is so.
It is entirely vehicley and vehicular, have you seen/smelled/heard it??
It wreaks of vehicleness.
When you pull up to a light it growls pure vehicleness.

The computers and the friends are nodes or components of a network.
The interaction between nodes and the efficiency of information transfer, the soundness... Ability to communicate...
Cables, wires, plugs, engagements, dates, agreements

Interconnectedness.
Why not??
At least for now??
Just this thread??

"Allostery, Network Robustness and Connectivity
Allosteric communication is an example of propagation of information transmitting signals from one functional site to another. Here, we represent protein structures as networks of interacting residues, where amino acids are the vertices and their contacts the edges. Our network model of protein structures resembles a robust communication system, where the removal of most of the nodes, with their corresponding edges, does not affect significantly the network’s interconnectedness as described by the characteristic path length."
http://3dsig.weizmann.ac.il/

How could you remove the nodes that 'define the network' and still be measuring interconnectedness??:what:

I know you know what I meant.

"A network of interconnectedness is a non-concept."

Well when you are not specifically referring to the nodes that make up the network...??
Why not just call it all interconnectedness??
Or to please the sticklers out there...
Should I have referred to pouring your essence into a reality network's interconnectedness?? This is rather silly either way you slice it. But fitting, to me, of course either or!!
Which really only meant following another's logical or faith based belief system.  Their thought.  Their own interconnectedness among nodes??  Come on now.
Trying it on for size/fit...  Like a smoking jacket, glove, or cardigan sweater.
The image is still the same to me, captain.
:shrug:

Glad you are keeping us all honest!!:crazy2:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Circle Of Understanding? fireworks_godS 1,907 11 03/14/04 09:52 AM
by psyka
* Thomas's writings, brother of jesus.
( 1 2 all )		 Fliquid 3,223 26 04/07/13 08:19 AM
by liquidlounge
* Deity vs Formless nature of "God" leery11 369 0 04/13/07 01:38 PM
by leery11
* open your mind
( 1 2 all )		 OOISI 2,075 31 07/21/04 05:56 AM
by OOISI
* Sensing a grand design on nitrous oxide, examining N2O Lightningfractal 2,804 11 10/27/03 06:12 AM
by Seuss
* The misinterpretation of god and understanding Glacius 977 6 11/20/02 09:13 PM
by ShpongleIsGod
* Regarding the formless void Rhizoid 714 3 05/13/03 08:45 AM
by Rhizoid
* Theists and their understanding of Existentialism
( 1 2 3 all )		 Sclorch 6,477 45 10/28/02 10:56 AM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
3,703 topic views. 0 members, 66 guests and 12 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 16 queries.