March 3, 2007 - dailynews.com Judge to decide if pot case 'vindictive'
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge has asked the U.S. attorney here to submit all trial preparation memorandums in the case against a leading advocate of medical marijuana so that the court can determine if the government has been pursuing a "vindictive prosecution."
The judge, Charles R. Breyer, ordered the review at the request of lawyers for Ed Rosenthal, a spokesman in the effort to legalize marijuana who has been in a legal battle with the government.
At a motion hearing in U.S. District Court here on Friday, defense lawyers for Rosenthal urged Breyer to dismiss an array of federal drug, money laundering and tax evasion charges against their client, saying an appellate court judge had overturned his conviction in a nearly identical case last year.
The new charges, outlined in a federal grand jury indictment issued in October, accuse Rosenthal of 14 felonies, including conspiracy to grow and sell marijuana for medical use, laundering $1,850 and failing to report income from the sale of crop plants on his tax returns.
The overall charges are nearly identical to a 2003 state case against Rosenthal, which ended with a one-day prison sentence after members of the jury disavowed the verdict, having learned belatedly that Rosenthal was growing marijuana legally for the city of Oakland.
"We are outraged that the prosecutor continues to pursue this case," said Shari L. Greenberger, a lawyer for Rosenthal. "The vindictive nature of the prosecutor is clear-cut and utterly shocking."
Despite the short sentence in the 2003 case, Rosenthal challenged the fairness of his trial, and in April, a federal judge with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the marijuana growing conviction, citing jury misconduct. The decision punctuated a contentious, three-year volley of legal appeals and cross complaints that were given a second wind on Friday, with the start of the new case.
The U.S. attorney, George Beven, declined to answer questions about the case, citing an office policy. But at Friday's hearing he agreed to provide Breyer with all interoffice memorandums pertaining to his office's decision to seek another trial and expanded charges.
The federal government has continued to come down hard on medical marijuana advocates in California. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office, Luke Macaulay, has said previously that federal law supersedes state law. Although using marijuana for medicinal purposes is permitted in the state under Proposition 215 - the ballot initiative that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in 1996 - under federal law, marijuana is illegal.
"This is really about a collision between state and federal law," said Douglas Horngrad, a defense lawyer for many advocates of medical marijuana.
Breyer has promised to rule on the motion to dismiss within the week. But he signaled in court on Friday that the case would probably proceed in some form, because he intended to review the new evidence only in relation to some of the 14 felony charges.
Rosenthal, an author and columnist, would face no more than a one-day jail sentence if convicted on the marijuana charges, per an agreement the prosecutor made with the court.
"The issue of punishment is no longer an issue," Beven said. "I accept the sentencing, and I will not ask for additional punishment."
|