Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Sports Forum
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 |  [ show all ]
NFL Draft 2007.
    #6416361 -

well... its already time to start speculating...

Oakland and Detriot have locked the #1 and #2 spots in this years draft.

have a pretty deep class... no reggie bushs' really.. atleast i dont think so..

you have 2 QB's, possibly 3 to watch for.. Brady Quinn, JaMarcus Russel, and Troy Smith.
also theres a pretty good OT out of Wisconsin, (forget his name but hes projected top 5)
also consider Calvin Johnson, best WR to come in a draft for awhile.
and you have Michigan CB Leon Hall.

Im just trying to figure if Oakland will go with Quinn seeing as they have brooks and walters.. and take the OT from Wisconsin to improve the line.. and then that would drop Quinn in the hands of the needy detriot lions.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6416581 -

Joe Thomas is the OT.

JaMarcus I think is staying for his senior year, and Brian Brohm might come out.
Mel Kiper has Brohm at the top of his "Big Board."

The first pick is almost definitely going to be a quarterback, becase Oakland got first pick, and they need a QB. Quinn, most likely.

Detroit's kind of up there, but they can't be stupid enough to draft another WR, they need a quarterback, but Kitna's not too bad. I reckon they might take Joe Thomas, OT from Wisconsin.

The Bucs'll be up there, but they think Chris Simms doesn't suck, so they won't go with a Q after dropping ten mill on Phil's boy.
Defender, I think they should go with, but Gruden's barely addressed the defense, draft-wise, so far. Leon Hall's an option, maybe some big guy to plug the gap, but I don't really know of anybody.
A good RB in Caddy, when he's got holes, a pretty good receiving core, when Clayton plays to snuff and Stovall is emerging, somewhat. The line and QB are the main problem, but Joseph and Trueblood will be pretty good next year. The offense has the tools, I think the hometown team needs to get rid of Gruden, despite his "offensive genius."

Who else is a top ten pick?
Houston, Washington, Cleveland, I'd guess.
Houston- O-line and RB, if Davis can't recover well.
Washington- Offensive Coordinator, defensive line
Cleveland- Defensive secondary


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6416601 -

washington- offensive coordinator= :rofl2: they def have the weapons to be good on offense.

Cleveland could use another good posession reciever.. maybe taking calvin johnson.. he'd be a great complement to jurverious and winslow.

I forgot about Brohm, hes very solid.. he might end up in Detroit... he'd def have an arsenal of WR's to throw too.. and they run a very similar offense to Louisville.. they really like that spread shotgun.. itd be a good fit for him.

I think Oakland needs to improve the o-line.. Brooks isnt THAT terrible of a QB.. you cant do shit when the defense is on top of you.. but then again, you cant blow a #1 pick on an OT, when you could use a QB.. perhaps they draft Quinn and trade him.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6416963 -

I think they take quinn, then an O-line guy or two, then build the linebackers.
Their defense is pretty decent, the pass rush is good, and their pass defense is one of the best in the league.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6416967 -

yeah oaklands defense isnt really that shitty at all... could use help on the d-line..


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6417013 -

Their d-line played all right this year, with Sapp having a resurgence, but they're all pretty old.

They've got a pretty good linebacker, but I can't remember his name, and they drafted a Thomas Howard out of UTEP who should be good.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6417152 -

thats what i was thinking... shit sapp has to be around 35.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6417254 -

draft sits here,

oakland, detriot, tampa bay, cleveland, arizona, washington, then
houston, miami, and minnesota (will depend on the breakdown, all with 6 wins)
then, buffalo, san francisco, atlanta (all with 7 wins)...
greenbay, carolina, st. louis, pittsburgh, cincy, jacksonville, tennesee (all with 8 wins)
denver (with 9 wins)

the rest will be decided after the playoffs.. but kinda gives a better idea.

forgot that tampa bay and arizona would be drafting in the top 5.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6417314 -

Cleveland would probably pick before the bucs, because the bucs beat them.

'Zona's got to pick an offensive linemen, their front five is terrible.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6417387 -

thats really all they need.. and maybe a younger RB of the future.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6417950 -

Aaron Brooks is hideous. Oakland will very likely take a QB. New Orleans couldn't wash their hands of him soon enough.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: ArcofaJourney]
    #6419136 -

im just saying, he'd be mediocre if he had any protection...

but i do agree.. they will most likely take a QB.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6422971 -

Jeff Samargera (sp?) if he decides to play professional football.. he is a senior, but already has been signed by the chicago cubs.. could play both sports though.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6422985 -

Some ESPN guy was saying he could drop, for fear that he'd not devote enough time to football, despite saying he wants to play in the NFL and baseball.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6423018 -

i mean, its really going to come down to which one he decides he wants to play more..

there havent been many athletes successful at 2 sports, esp straight out of college.

ive never followed him in baseball, but hes a hell of a WR.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6423027 -

He was drafted fifth round by the cubs, I believe.

If he signs he's guaranteed $7 mill.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6423030 -

They say his fastball is well into the nineties.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Pat Bateman, VP]
    #6423038 -

yeah 98 is what i heard, they showed some clips during the game.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: Banez]
    #6423179 -

Damn, after watching LSU destroy Notre Dame, I'd take Jamarcus Russell with that #1 pick. Brady Quinn doesn't have the arm strength for Al Davis' offense, but Russell sure does.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: NFL Draft 2007. [Re: belligerent]
    #6423247 -

its hard to agree, but i do.

LSU def has a much better O-line than ND,.. not to mention LSU has a much better pass rush than ND.. but yeah.. itd be a close toss up

JaMarcus def had the better game.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 |  [ show all ]

General Interest > Sports Forum
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The "Mock NFL Draft" Contest! cortex 740 3 02/12/10 04:13 PM
by GetTheFuckOut
* Is anyone gonna watch the NFL drafts?
( 1 2 all )		 Stein 8,686 38 04/24/19 02:49 PM
by psilocybinjunkie
* NFL Draft 2010
( 1 2 all )		 KillerPicklez 4,944 33 05/06/10 12:29 AM
by NormaPerry
* I L M's 2006 NFL draft first round predictions Pat Bateman, VP 4,054 18 04/16/06 08:50 PM
by Pat Bateman, VP
* NFL Draft--- less than 24 hours away.
( 1 2 all )		 Banez 3,598 31 04/30/07 09:18 PM
by Banez
* NFL Draft.. ohh boy
( 1 2 all )		 Banez 4,886 33 04/30/06 05:57 PM
by Hamstercut
* 2007 NFL Draft.. team by team picks. Banez 1,413 17 05/05/07 12:11 AM
by Banez
* with the 1st pick in the NFL Draft... Banez 2,348 15 04/28/06 08:14 PM
by Pat Bateman, VP

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: psilocybinjunkie, 13shrooms
7,254 topic views. 0 members, 6 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 16 queries.