Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale, Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder, Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US
    #6167273 - 10/13/06 09:42 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

all thats needed is a cargo ship


theyre sneaky fuckers

making everyone focus on how they can't possibly deliver a nuke from the air via missiles and even having failed attempts televised/announced is throwing people of the scent imo

my idea is to sink any NK heroin smuggling cargo ships we can find in international waters :thumbup:

id fucking love to see my west provoke something for once instead of being reactionaries


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRosettaStoned
Stranger

Registered: 05/29/06
Posts: 540
Loc: North America
Last seen: 16 years, 2 months
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6167354 - 10/13/06 10:18 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

What would they gain by nuking us? Seeing their own cities reduced to dust? Wow I can totally understand such motivations  :cuckoo:

Paranoid delusional comes to mind.


--------------------
"Government big enough to provide you with all you need is also big enough to take everything you have." ~ Thomas Jefferson

"Without stupid, faggy potheads we wouldn't have wars." - Zappa

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: RosettaStoned]
    #6167384 - 10/13/06 10:31 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

hey fool,im not the one making threats NK is

what did alqueda gain from 911?
a dust storm

if you cant see what type of nasty people nkoreans are(they love their leaders)you are an idiot


i hope people like you are fished out and hunted down too


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebarfightlard
tales of theinexpressible
Male

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/29/03
Posts: 8,670
Loc: Canoodia
Last seen: 14 years, 4 months
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6167385 - 10/13/06 10:32 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

"id fucking love to see my west provoke something for once instead of being reactionaries "

Iraq....


--------------------

"What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, say, think, who I fuck, what I take into my body - as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet?" - Bill Hicks

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: RosettaStoned]
    #6167395 - 10/13/06 10:36 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

oh yeah and i dont consider you an american,
a wetback maybe but american no


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: barfightlard]
    #6167398 - 10/13/06 10:37 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

reaction...


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6167491 - 10/13/06 11:04 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

Do you really believe that Korea wants to attack America?


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: niteowl]
    #6167496 - 10/13/06 11:08 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

:lol:
nah they love america,they say it all the time

do you think the world should be held to ransom by an insane lunatic?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6167517 - 10/13/06 11:16 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

Who is being held for ransom?

I don't recall any ransom being mentioned by anyone.


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: niteowl]
    #6167547 - 10/13/06 11:23 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

:lol:
"let our ships into your ports and trade with us or we will burn you"~nth korea

i cant be bothered proving something with links if you cant read between the lines  of the last 5 years events dealing with NK

if someone held a gun to your head and said,"buy my goods or sell me some or else"
you wouldnt think that was a threat?

if you cant see that thats holding the world to ransom as a threatof war then youre a bigger moron than that rosetta idiot


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6167650 - 10/14/06 12:16 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

quiver said:
:lol:
"let our ships into your ports and trade with us or we will burn you"~nth korea

i cant be bothered proving something with links if you cant read between the lines  of the last 5 years events dealing with NK




You are right, providing a link and expecting someone to "read between the lines" and jump to the same conclusion you did is futile.
Reading between the lines is not always accurate.......kinda like assuming something.

If you are going to take a stance on an issue, you need to be able to back up your position rather than get all defensive about it when your idea is challenged.


Quote:

if someone held a gun to your head and said,"buy my goods or sell me some or else"
you wouldnt think that was a threat?




When did Korea ever do that?

Didn't America threaten Korea first when they called them an "axis of evil" along with Iraq and Iran. Then they invaded Iraq.

Wouldn't a good leader make an effort to protect his country?
That is what Kim did, made an effort to prevent America from invading his country.

Quote:

if you cant see that thats holding the world to ransom as a threatof war then youre a bigger moron than that rosetta idiot




Way to go.
You can't provide any valid argument for your point of view so you start flaming people.

I fully understand your inability to rationally debate this subject. The idea of Korea attacking the U.S. is a media driven concept......and you have been watching too much TV. Your opinion was fed to you thru a television signal. You blindly accept it and believe it "because I saw it on TV".

You cant rationally back up your media fed beliefs because you yourself don't truly understand why you believe it.



N. Korea testing a nuke was a show of power to the U.S.
They felt threatened by an American invasion.

Interesting how the media spins the issue 180 degrees to make it look like they are going to attack America
:whatever:

Stop believing this entertainment driven "news" and think about what and why something is placed on TV.


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Edited by niteowl (10/14/06 12:17 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblequiver
freedrug
Male

Registered: 10/25/05
Posts: 8,047
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: niteowl]
    #6167944 - 10/14/06 02:07 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

:lol:
you work at the north korean embassy or something?

thats the only thing i can think of why people like you dont understand when someone hates and wants to kill you,your ways.your culture and expect to be thanked for it



so its ok for NK to 'flex their muscle' and threaten war on the world unless we feed them (we dont need nothin from them so who needs who really?)but we should all hold hands and sing 'give peace a chance' when we get threatened?

dont think so sunnyboy



links wouldnt matter with people like you

you'd spit in the truths face anyway


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6168039 - 10/14/06 02:58 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

When did N Korea ever threaten America or any one else for that matter?

You truly do live in your own little fantasy world dont ya.


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDiploidM
Cuban

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6168305 - 10/14/06 08:55 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

quiver,

Personalisms, insults, and name calling are irrelevant to the debate and against the rules of this forum. Debate the points presented and leave the person making the point out of the discussion.

Thanks for understanding.


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebarfightlard
tales of theinexpressible
Male

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/29/03
Posts: 8,670
Loc: Canoodia
Last seen: 14 years, 4 months
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: quiver]
    #6168452 - 10/14/06 10:03 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

quiver said:
reaction...




wrong, Iraq never threatend the US. Thats an aggressor move.


--------------------

"What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, say, think, who I fuck, what I take into my body - as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet?" - Bill Hicks

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: barfightlard]
    #6168488 - 10/14/06 10:19 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

True. Neither Afghanistan nor Iraq ever threatened the U.S., neither has Korea.

America is the only nation running around threatening, and invading, nations.

And people actually wonder why Korea developed a nuke of their own.


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePhred
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: niteowl]
    #6168813 - 10/14/06 11:54 AM (17 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Neither Afghanistan nor Iraq ever threatened the U.S...




You remember, do you not, how Afganistan had been taken over by theocratic thugs -- i.e. the Taliban. You must also remember there were just three -- that's right, count 'em, three -- governments in the entire world (out of 191) who recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afganistan.

When the United Nations authorized (you do remember that the invasion of Afghanistan is a United Nations operation, don't you?) action in Afghanistan by a coalition of UN member nations, it was not Afghanistan who was being attacked, but the rogue theocratic group who had hijacked Afganistan. The current democratically elected government of Afghanistan is a legitimately recognized government.

As for the Taliban "threatening" the US while they still held the reigns of power, it was not that the Taliban per se represented a threat, but that the terrorist organization they were protecting did. You do remember, don't you, that not only did the Taliban refuse to turn over Al Qaeda for justice, not only did they refuse to even just step aside and not interfere with the coalition forces going after Al Qaeda within Afghanistan's borders, they trumpeted to the world they would launch a terrible jihad against not just those forces who set foot in Afghanistan, but also against any and every country neighboring Afghanistan who had allowed those forces passage.

Surely you are not arguing at this late date that the UN-sponsored action in Afghanistan was illegitimate, are you? If so, I'd be very interested in hearing why you think so.

As for Iraq never having threatened the US, does sending a hitman after the president of the United States not count as a threatening action in your eyes? How about firing on US (and UK) overflights of the No-Fly Zone on a regular basis? You of course remember these overflights were (once again) authorized by the United Nations. How about harboring terrorists who had carried out operations against the US (as in the WTC 1993 bombing)?



Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinenakors_junk_bag
Lobster Bisque
Male User Gallery

Registered: 11/23/04
Posts: 2,415
Loc: ethereality
Last seen: 16 years, 1 month
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: Phred]
    #6168863 - 10/14/06 12:08 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

soem people simply can't be reasoned with.


--------------------
Asshole

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: Phred]
    #6168961 - 10/14/06 12:47 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
You remember, do you not, how Afghanistan had been taken over by theocratic thugs -- i.e. the Taliban. You must also remember there were just three -- that's right, count 'em, three -- governments in the entire world (out of 191) who recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afganistan.




Your point being? The country was still invaded.......regardless who was running the country.

Quote:

When the United Nations authorized (you do remember that the invasion of Afghanistan is a United Nations operation, don't you?) action in Afghanistan by a coalition of UN member nations, it was not Afghanistan who was being attacked,




:rolleyes:
Riiiight.....we didn't bomb Afghanistan......innocent civilians weren't killed......just the people running the country.
:whatever:
If we didn't want to attack Afghanistan and its citizens (only it's ruling party) why not try a diplomatic solution first rather than invade a country, killing innocent people in the process?

Quote:

Surely you are not arguing at this late date that the UN-sponsored action in Afghanistan was illegitimate, are you? If so, I'd be very interested in hearing why you think so.




Just because there were other countries who supported us out of sympathy after 9-11, doesn't mean that invading Afghanistan was the right choice. America would have invaded Afghanistan regardless of UN support or not (see Iraq).

Waving the UN flag and saying that the war was a just one is simply wrong. America HAD to attack someone after 9-11. OBL was reported to be in Afghanistan so that is the country they started with.

The whole point in going to Afghanistan was to get OBL.
Remember the posters "Wanted OBL....Dead or Alive"?
Where is he now? Oh yea I remember, GWB morphed OBL into Saddam and said that he was not concerned with OBL shortly after the war started.

Quote:

As for Iraq never having threatened the US, does sending a hit-man after the president of the United States not count as a threatening action in your eyes?




Hasn't the U.S. government done the very same thing with leaders it doesn't like? If not directly then indirectly supporting other countries who have done this (hint Israel)

Should those countries then have the right to invade the U.S?

Quote:

How about firing on US (and UK) overflights of the No-Fly Zone on a regular basis? You of course remember these overflights were (once again) authorized by the United Nations. How about harboring terrorists who had carried out operations against the US (as in the WTC 1993 bombing)?




Again how is attempting to protect your country (by attacking an invading army) the same as threatening one?

Iraq never made a direct threat on America. Neither did Afghanistan. Yet we invaded them because they had policies we didn't agree with. Couldn't a diplomatic solution work......Oh wait we didn't try a diplomatic solution.......we just attacked them.

Now.......can you see why I fully understand why N. Korea got themselves a nuke.

I would like your opinion on this thread


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSeussA
Error: divide byzero

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 04/27/01
Posts: 23,480
Loc: Caribbean
Last seen: 3 months, 8 days
Re: NK doesnt need a missile to hit the US [Re: niteowl]
    #6169719 - 10/14/06 06:34 PM (17 years, 7 months ago)

> Iraq never made a direct threat on America. Neither did Afghanistan.

I will agree with you on Iraq, but not Afghanistan. The Afghan goverment, at the time, choose to protect a militia that attacked the US. As a result, in my mind, the Afghan government was fair game for retaliation. Had they handed over the militia that attacked the US, rather than protecting them, then I would agree with you instead.

If the roles were swapped and a bunch of mercenaries from the US attacked Russia and destroyed the Kremlin, and if the US decided to protect those mercenaries rather than hand them over to Russia, then I feel that Russia would be justified in retaliating against the US.

Before somebody tosses in the "what about Bob" scenario... I am talking about militias being protected by a state, not individuals.

> Now.......can you see why I fully understand why N. Korea got themselves a nuke.

Nope. I cannot fathom why a country would starve its own people in the pursuit of weapon technology.


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale, Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder, Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* High-Ranking Army Officer - Missile Hit Pentagon
( 1 2 3 all )
usefulidiot 4,734 50 08/29/05 04:55 PM
by Los_Pepes
* Chinese-made Cruise Missile Hits Kuwait Senor_Doobie 673 13 03/29/03 09:06 AM
by zeronio
* The Betrayal of Afghanistan Xochitl 1,928 12 09/24/03 02:18 PM
by JonnyOnTheSpot
* Afghanistan update
( 1 2 all )
Phred 2,805 21 08/03/04 12:43 PM
by Xlea321
* Moore hits back
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Edame 5,365 62 10/02/03 07:29 AM
by Anonymous
* The betrayal of Afghanistan Xlea321 695 3 11/03/03 01:21 PM
by Azmodeus
* Afghanistan & Oil
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Anonymous 5,229 63 04/09/03 09:48 AM
by Xlea321
* Polish Troops in Iraq find recently produced French Missiles
( 1 2 all )
wingnutx 2,666 32 10/05/03 01:11 AM
by Xlea321

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,998 topic views. 2 members, 3 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.031 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.