|
Catalysis
EtherealEngineer

Registered: 04/23/02
Posts: 1,742
Last seen: 15 years, 10 months
|
Drudge: ABC Glitch Shows Foley Accuser was 18 at the Time of IMs
#6133737 - 10/04/06 07:50 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
This is somewhat interesting as ABC reported he was under 18 at the time of the specific exchange.
http://drudgereport.com/flashmfa.htm
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER
FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
Wed Oct 04 2006 20:32:06 ET
A posting on ABCNEWS.COM of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser.
The website PASSIONATE AMERICA detailed the startling exposure late Wednesday.
ABCNEWS said in a statement: "We go to great lengths to prevent the names of alleged sex crime victims from being revealed. On Friday there was a very brief technical glitch on our site which was overridden immediately. It is possible that during that very brief interval a screen name could have been captured. Reviews of the site since then show no unredacted screen names."
SEX CHAT WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
On Tuesday ABC news released a high-impact instant message exchange between Foley and, as ABC explained, a young man "under the age of 18."
ABC headlined the story: "New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote"
But upon reviewing the records, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, the young man was in fact over the age of 18 at the time of the exchange.
A network source explains, messages with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.
Developing...
|
AaronEvil
The GuitarVillain


Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 13 years, 13 days
|
Re: Drudge: ABC Glitch Shows Foley Accuser was 18 at the Time of IMs [Re: Catalysis]
#6134255 - 10/04/06 09:43 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Im sure then that the Fox news fuck up that said Foley was a democrat is to be believed as well. Tell you what, we'll let the detectives do the police work. Im pretty sure they wouldnt make a big deal about it if the kid was 18. Plus, if the kid was 18 dont you think FOLEY would have made a statement saying that? The drudge can say anything it wants, I will let the facts do the talking.
--------------------
There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.
|
Turn
Hey Its Free!

Registered: 12/14/04
Posts: 367
Loc: The fabled catbird seat
Last seen: 14 years, 1 month
|
Re: Drudge: ABC Glitch Shows Foley Accuser was 18 at the Time of IMs [Re: AaronEvil]
#6134451 - 10/04/06 10:13 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Oh yeah "Teachincal Glitch" those republicans are good
|
Catalysis
EtherealEngineer

Registered: 04/23/02
Posts: 1,742
Last seen: 15 years, 10 months
|
Re: Drudge: ABC Glitch Shows Foley Accuser was 18 at the Time of IMs [Re: AaronEvil]
#6136971 - 10/05/06 05:04 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
I will let the facts do the talking.
LMAO. His name is Jordan Edmund, he is now 21 and he was 18 when the highly publicized sex chat took place. That is not to say he didn't have other conversations. Who needs the FBI when you have the drudge report? lol If it makes you feel better, I think the guy is a sick perv.
|
AaronEvil
The GuitarVillain


Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 13 years, 13 days
|
Re: Drudge: ABC Glitch Shows Foley Accuser was 18 at the Time of IMs [Re: Catalysis]
#6137143 - 10/05/06 05:53 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Look, my only problem with him being of "legal age" at the time is that no one, even Foley, has said that he was legal. If he was of legal age why would anyone be making such a big deal about it, especially the Republicans.
Im not saying Foley is guilty, I just havent heard anyone directly involved say that the kid was of legal age. The Drudge report is not a primary source in my book. Once I hear it from Foley, the kid, the police, or a judge ruling nothing illegal took place, I will believe you. Until then, I go with what is presented as a fact by those involved, this has not yet been presented as a fact by ANYONE involved.
--------------------
There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.
|
|