|
capliberty
Stranger


Registered: 04/23/06
Posts: 1,949
Last seen: 14 years, 5 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: Banez]
#6065725 - 09/15/06 06:16 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
so what he posted a little better numbers in a losing effort, in week one, what is the point?
look our receving individually aren't going to have the greatest numbers because we win by committee, that is what makes us so good, we don't need a single guy making all the catches, where defenses can zero in on that particular guy and shut air attack down, that is how teams go far in the playoffs, the patriots were no different when they won the superbowl 3 times.
|
despisedicon
Stranger

Registered: 06/16/06
Posts: 8,361
Loc:
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: capliberty]
#6065769 - 09/15/06 06:34 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: SweetLeaf]
#6065885 - 09/15/06 07:15 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
again. you can talk all you want now, and say i dont know what im talkin about. but come the end of the season. we'll see.. ill make a "i told you so" thread around the end of december.
|
SweetLeaf
"33"


Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 476
Loc: wa
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: Banez]
#6066049 - 09/15/06 08:04 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Well shit, if you think being able to say "I told you so" makes you knowledgable about football, you really should start using your head.
-------------------- Ph.dizzle
|
capliberty
Stranger


Registered: 04/23/06
Posts: 1,949
Last seen: 14 years, 5 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: SweetLeaf]
#6066550 - 09/15/06 10:38 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
despisedicon said: thx OFL, Officals Football League
How dare you corrupt this tread with such vile disgusting filth, we're talking about football here we're not talking about the fairytale world that only exists in the Pittsburgh
|
despisedicon
Stranger

Registered: 06/16/06
Posts: 8,361
Loc:
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: capliberty]
#6066664 - 09/15/06 11:29 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I don't even wanna argue with you and my "vile disgusting filth" and your clever misquote.
intstead I'm just gonna tell you to stop your
|
capliberty
Stranger


Registered: 04/23/06
Posts: 1,949
Last seen: 14 years, 5 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: despisedicon]
#6066939 - 09/16/06 05:08 AM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
look you don't have to argue, Bill Leavy made that argument for you,
You know how gay the NFL is, you know I would like to see a fair and square rematch in this regular season, but the NFL didn't put Pittsburgh on our schedule, put us in fair game and we'd destroy Pittsburgh, but I can understand, our team being better is not enough these days, its about something else, I don't know what it is.
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: SweetLeaf]
#6067016 - 09/16/06 07:30 AM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
SweetLeaf said: Well shit, if you think being able to say "I told you so" makes you knowledgable about football, you really should start using your head.
im pretty sure if ur saying "i told you so" because your predictions are correct.. im pretty sure that means u do know what you're talkin about
|
SweetLeaf
"33"


Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 476
Loc: wa
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: Banez]
#6072360 - 09/17/06 09:48 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
No...that means I'm a fan.
Saying I told ya' so for 1-16 odds is a hell of a lot different then saying so for 15-16 odds.
-------------------- Ph.dizzle
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: SweetLeaf]
#6072513 - 09/17/06 10:43 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
its not really 1-16.. like in betting odds its not.. cauz there are probably 6-8 teams that can be ruled out. IMO
sure the odds are in my favor, but a true fan would put his money where his mouth is.
|
capliberty
Stranger


Registered: 04/23/06
Posts: 1,949
Last seen: 14 years, 5 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: Banez]
#6074505 - 09/18/06 03:41 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
What were you saying about me being stupid about discarding carliona as a super bowl contender, they suck, and our team showed how much they suck, you suck that hard without coming out of it with deflated your confidence, if you remember, these guys thought they we really good after beating Chicago in the playoffs, but when we destroyed them, they realized they suck, and they're not going to recover,
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: capliberty]
#6074567 - 09/18/06 04:10 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
even at 0-2 i still think they are in the hunt, they have been without Steve Smith who is their offense.
i think they will rebound and still be a contender.
|
SweetLeaf
"33"


Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 476
Loc: wa
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
|
Re: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SHRINE [Re: Banez]
#6078811 - 09/19/06 04:43 PM (17 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Rebound, yes, contender, I dunno. What Pittsburgh(and Carolina) did with the road wins was an anomoly, and I don't see it happening again. Homefield adv. is going to be big in the NFC this year.
This season is looking much like 04-05' for the Panthers.
-------------------- Ph.dizzle
|
|