Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
OfflineThe_Red_Crayon
Exposer of Truth
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/13/03
Posts: 13,673
Loc: Smokey Mtns. TN Flag
Last seen: 7 years, 12 days
Playing with War.
    #6016041 - 08/31/06 05:30 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/

PLAYING WITH WAR by john robb.

The western way of war in the 21st century is a pale shadow of the warfare it waged in the 20th. The reason is simple: for western societies war is no longer existential. Instead, it's increasingly about smoothing market flows and tertiary moral concerns/threats. As a result of this diminishment of motivation, western warfare is now afflicted with the following:
Operations of low lethality. Western militaries do not have the desire, nor the sanction, to conduct the high casualty operations typically associated with real wars. Technology has been leveraged to increase the precision of attacks to limit collateral damage and save the lives of soldiers. The corollary to this is that western militaries are also fiercely protective of the lives of their soldiers. Warfare, increasingly, is supposed to be costless. What this means is that we will not see Sherman's 'March to the Sea' or Hama in the near future - and - the loss of a hundred soldiers in southern Lebanon will be enough to stop the Israeli army.
Marginal placement within national priorities. Militaries are increasingly professional (with a trend towards the use of mercenaries) and conscription has become impossible. This drastically limits the number of soldiers that can be applied to any conflict. In addition, to retain competitive positioning on the global stage, states and their economies are operated as if war is not going on. To wit: military budgets are considered just another line item on a more complex national budget. Gone are the days of massive mobilization and economic restructuring for war.
Muddled objectives. Given the lack of the cohesive and singular reason for war -- the survival of the state and its people through the elimination of its enemies -- the reasons for warfare will drift. This translates into a constantly shifting landscape of military objectives, where current objectives recede in favor of replacements before they can be reached. The result is confusion, mission creep, and conflict escalation.
Playing with War

The upshot of this diminishment of warfare is that wars will become increasingly difficult to win. The reasons are straightforward:
Asymmetric motivation. In almost all instances, the opposition will approach the conflict as an existential war. This motivation both allows them to fight harder and longer than those western forces sent against it. The only aspects of warfare left in the west's favor are training and technology.
New methods of warfare will emerge to level (flatten) the playing field Since warfare is a conflict between minds, its natural to expect that as the rest of the world gains capacity through globalization, the delta in training and technology will diminish. We have already seen this in the emergence of open source warfare (Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, and more) and 4GW light infantry (Hezbollah).
Proliferation of opposition. As we have often seen, as western militaries apply violence, they often destroy the structures that hold together societies. This results in the proliferation of groups that adopt violence. Much, if not all, of that violence will eventually be directed at the western militaries themselves.
Learning to Live with Limits

Ultimately, western societies will need to learn to live within the limits of this new framework. It is not possible for us to reverse the clock on this trend. Any mass mobilization for war that lifts existing limitations will be severely punished by both global markets and opinion (both domestically and abroad) if it ever was attempted. Given the inevitability of the limited nature of western warfare from now and into the future, we should avoid the following traps:
Nation-building as a global social policy. Historically, counter-insurgency against an established enemy has almost never worked (and when it has, it usually involves bloody exterminations). Any attempt to build a nation will likely, particularly in the current environment of globalization, yield an opponent that will be impossible to defeat through limited means. Further, the durations of these conflicts will exceed the capacity of the western states to maintain a cohesive set of objectives -- they will shift with opinion polls and political winds.
Collapsing rogue states. In almost all instances, despite how easy it is to collapse a weak state with modern weapons, those wars launched to collapse rogue states will not yield positive results. The collapse will necessitate calls for revival (see item one). Unless states are willing to live with partial collapse without resolution, they should not undertake the action in the first place.
Escalation of tension. Given an inability to resolve conflicts through nation-building and state collapse, western states should endeavor to deescalate conflicts rather than ignite them. Escalation is a false God that promises a return of the motivational clarity found in the wars of the 20th Century. It cannot deliver this. The only thing it provides is a widening and deepening of the conflict through the proliferation of opposition.




What does P&L Think.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleLunarEclipse
Enlil's Official Story
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 21,407
Loc: Building 7
Re: Playing with War. [Re: The_Red_Crayon]
    #6016054 - 08/31/06 05:36 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I think it's funny I just said the Iraq war, war on terrorism, war on drugs and Afghanistan campaign were all unwinnable in another thread.

I agree, how can you truly win a war in someone else's country with limited means? Sure we can occupy Iraq indefinitely and the people there will not be able to defeat us militarily but can we say that we can truly win anything over there with so much civil conflict in addition to our occupation? I think not.


--------------------
Anxiety is what you make it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe_Red_Crayon
Exposer of Truth
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/13/03
Posts: 13,673
Loc: Smokey Mtns. TN Flag
Last seen: 7 years, 12 days
Re: Playing with War. [Re: LunarEclipse]
    #6016116 - 08/31/06 05:58 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Iraq is a money war. Its fought for O.I.L. Oil,Israel,Logistics.
The amount of contracts being handed out at the cost of the government is astounding. http://www.defenselink.mil/contracts/

Quote:

Contingency Response Services, LLC, Irving, Texas, is being awarded a maximum $450,000,000 (guaranteed minimum of $100,000)




Quote:

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems (NGSS), Pascagoula, Miss., is being awarded a $95,892,863 cost-plus-award-fee/cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class destroyer detail design




Quote:

American Science & Engineering, Billerica, Mass., is being awarded a $46,490,587 firm-fixed-price service contract for service and maintenance support for 67 Z-Backscatter Systems, associated manuals, and spare parts. Work will be performed in various locations within the countries of Iraq and Afghanistan,




The criminal elements of our government are surely responsible for this COMPLETE lack of hindsight into the damages this will put on our war effort and economy.

This will be our ultimate undoing.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedr0mni
My Own Messiah
 User Gallery

Registered: 08/21/04
Posts: 2,921
Loc: USF Tampa, Fl
Last seen: 16 years, 11 months
Re: Playing with War. [Re: The_Red_Crayon]
    #6016521 - 08/31/06 08:00 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

that is a fantastic article! Thank you for sharing!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe_Red_Crayon
Exposer of Truth
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/13/03
Posts: 13,673
Loc: Smokey Mtns. TN Flag
Last seen: 7 years, 12 days
Re: Playing with War. [Re: dr0mni]
    #6016677 - 08/31/06 08:56 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

dr0mni said:
that is a fantastic article! Thank you for sharing!




I appreciate your kind words. When i get good feedback it means alot to me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* does anyone see civil war in the US
( 1 2 all )
Cosm 2,628 35 01/20/05 09:46 PM
by mrhowdy
* Who and What drove the US to war? retread 512 0 10/07/04 05:49 PM
by retread
* Why Arabs Lose Wars
( 1 2 all )
wingnutx 3,843 24 05/03/18 05:08 PM
by Murzelpfrumpft
* Arm yourself with info- 60 reasons we shouldnt be at war
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
PsiloKitten 11,212 93 11/02/13 08:08 PM
by Yogi1
* The Case Against War EchoVortex 1,139 3 10/31/02 06:24 PM
by Anonymous
* the war is a fraud - 1,411 10 11/27/01 10:59 PM
by Senor_Doobie
* Lies and War: Leo Strauss, the Neocons, and Iraq Zahid 578 1 10/22/03 07:28 AM
by Zahid
* Rape 'a weapon' in Sudan war
( 1 2 all )
question_for_joo 2,208 20 07/20/04 04:59 AM
by Innvertigo

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
698 topic views. 3 members, 4 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.025 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 14 queries.