|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
who would you go with?
#5950614 - 08/10/06 01:31 PM (17 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
1) Chad Johnson or Terell Owens
2) Daunte Culpepper or Donovan McNabb
3) Kobe Bryant or LeBron James
you can either base it on their character, stats, whatever.. just who would u pick.
|
Infrared
sleeping


Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 12,988
Loc: Chicago, USA
Last seen: 2 years, 4 days
|
Re: who would you go with? [Re: Banez]
#5950650 - 08/10/06 01:43 PM (17 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
1) TO cause chad johnson is even more of a little bitch. he cries and acts like a kid.. TO may be a distraction and full of himself. but at least he isnt a little fag boy
2) donovan... cause he grew up in my area.. and daunte is mr interception.. besides wtf kind of name is daunte anyways
3) lebron .. just cause
-------------------- When chemistry is outlawed.. Only outlaws have chemistry
|
Pat Bateman, VP
Dr. House's Inspiration


Registered: 10/15/04
Posts: 50,876
Loc: Inconceivable opulence
|
Re: who would you go with? [Re: Banez]
#5950752 - 08/10/06 02:23 PM (17 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
1. Johnson, because TO's an annoying twat, and at least chad's funny 2. D-Nabb, he's just better 3. LBJ- he's a god in the making (pretty far along in the making, too)
-------------------- Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor. No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God. No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone. I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture. - Andrew Ryan
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
|
1) Chad Johnson.. even thou dallas is my team.. Chad has a much better personality, and is just as good
2) Culpepper.. ur forgettin.. McNabb has no recievers.. Culpepper is down in Miami now with ronnie brown at RB who recieves, and chris chambers.
3) Lebron. period.
|
Pat Bateman, VP
Dr. House's Inspiration


Registered: 10/15/04
Posts: 50,876
Loc: Inconceivable opulence
|
Re: who would you go with? [Re: Banez]
#5951010 - 08/10/06 04:22 PM (17 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
mcnabb doesn't have one star receiver, like chris chambers but he has a couple good receivers mcmichael is a damn good TE, but philly's not bad in that area and westbrook is way better catching out of the back field than brown, or most anybody, for that matter (save LT)
-------------------- Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor. No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God. No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone. I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture. - Andrew Ryan
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
|
Quote:
I le magnifique said: and westbrook is way better catching out of the back field than brown, or most anybody, for that matter (save LT)
very true. i guess i just think miami and culpepper will be better than mcnabb and the eagles
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs



Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 3 months, 11 days
|
Re: who would you go with? [Re: Banez]
#5961151 - 08/13/06 11:39 PM (17 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Johnson McNabb Lebron
|
|