|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
baltazar
Quiet dreamer

Registered: 02/23/04
Posts: 746
|
|
LOLOL thats massive
Thanks for sharing
|
mushnoon
MushNoob

Registered: 05/13/06
Posts: 1,080
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
|
according to the site they will ship them anywhere. it would probably suck if they got caught going through customs though...
-------------------- I love the feeling when it falls apart. Im slow to finish but im quick to start.
|
UnderNose
all out of bubble gum


Registered: 03/04/06
Posts: 1,612
|
Re: largest grow eva? [Re: mushnoon]
#5955575 - 08/12/06 02:57 AM (17 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
You should read their legal documentation, These are some of the good bits.
Quote:
Psychoactive mushrooms not controlled by international conventions
According to the United Nations International Narcotics Control Board mushrooms containing psilocin and psilocybin are not controlled under the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substance. The INCB is of the opinion that consequently, preparations (e.g. decoctions) made of these plants are not under international control and, therefore, not subject to any of the articles of the 1971 Convention. The secretary of the board wrote on September 13, 2001:
The implication for the Netherlands is, that you can freely eat a fresh psilocybe mushroom in the streets. Smart shops keep them fresh in their refrigerators for you. However, as soon as you buy this mushroom dried or prepared in a cookie, you become punishable. If you sell or deliver this preparation to someone else, you will basically be risking a prison sentence of 8 years.
Unfortunately the Supreme Court of the United States recently decided otherwise. February 21, 2006 it ruled:
“The District Court found that the Convention (of 1971) does not cover ‘hoasca’(---) We do not agree. The Convention provides that ‘a preparation is subject to the same measures of control as the psychotropic substances which it contains and defines ‘preparation’ as ‘any solution or mixture, in whatever physical state, containing one or more psychotropic substances’ (---) Hoasca is a ‘solution or mixture’ containing DMT; the fact that it is made by the simple process of brewing plants in water, as opposed to some more advanced method, does not change that. To the extend the commentary suggests plants themselves are not covered by the Convention that is of no moment – the UDV seeks to import and use a tea brewed from plants, not the plants themselves, and the tea plainly qualifies as a ‘preparation’ under the Convention (appendix 3: Supreme Court of the United states, February 21, 2006, Uniao Do Vegetal, page 16/17).
National Legislation on Psychotropic Substances: the United Kingdom
The member states of the Convention of 1971 do not only have the right to adopt more strict or severe measures of control in their national jurisprudence; they can also introduce stricter regulations than those provided by the Convention in their legislation. They can do so, if ‘in its opinion, such measures are desirable or necessary for the protection of the public health and welfare’ (see, article 23 of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971). In the Netherlands such measures were never deemed necessary or desirable. Already in 2000, a State nominated Commission, the Coordination Centre for the Assessment and Monitoring of new drugs (CAM), carried out a risk assessment on psychotropic mushrooms containing the active substances psilocin and psilocybin. The CAM concluded that in comparison to other drugs for which CAM has carried out risk assessments (MBDB, MTA and GHB), paddos score relatively low on the risk scale. The risk to public health and order was judged to be low. In view of that, the CAM advised that paddos do not present any need for a statutory ban (appendix 4: Risk assessment report relating to paddos (psilocin and psilocybin, The Hague, February 2000). Later, the Cam advised the Dutch government similar on ‘ayahuasca’. Despite this internationally known Dutch CAM-study however, the United Kingdom adopted in 2005 new legislation in which fresh magic mushrooms were made a Class A drug. Before that moment the possession or selling of those mushrooms were not under any criminal enforcement in the U.K. This was done by simply inserting into Part I of Schedule 2 to the Misuse of Drug Act: ‘Fungus (of any kind) which contains Psilocin or an ester of Psilocin.
Constitutional right of intoxication?
The right of free development of the personality
In 1990, in Germany, the District Court of Lübeck declared the prohibition of cannabis unconstitutional exactly due to this kind of violation of civilian rights. The court called the prohibition of cannabis-use in violation with the principle of equality. It is an undisputed scientific fact, for example, that the use of alcohol or nicotine is a much bigger health risk for someone than the use of cannabis. Despite this fact, it is only cannabis that is officially prohibited by law. The court also argued that the constitutional right of self-determination and free development of personality includes the constitutional right of intoxication, of being high. The search for intoxication is, according to this District Court of Lübeck, a fundamental human desire that is constitutionally protected. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in the end, did not accept this far-reaching decision of the Lower Court of Lübeck.
If the right of the free development of personality has some meaning within our system, it is necessary to conclude that (.....) the norms that make the consumption of drugs a crime are clearly unconstitutional
the Convention on psychotropic substances itself, offers full opportunity for the use and selling of natural materials, plants or animals, which by nature contain hallucinogenic substances. When a safe social setting is guaranteed, or risk for public health is otherwise minimized, limitations by the government on the use of hallucinogenic substances should be defined as contrary to constitutional rights, such as freedom of conscience, self-determination, the free development of the personality and respect for one's private life
-------------------- LAGM 2.022  
Edited by UnderNose (08/12/06 03:07 AM)
|
papixx
trumz


Registered: 07/22/06
Posts: 455
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 13 years, 11 days
|
|
Quote:
TrippinTeddy said: MAN!!! I wish I knew someone in europe or canada that could purchase one of those and then send it to me here in the states
That was amazing
Canada? We are not allowed aswell eh...
-------------------- ''Nothing lasts but nothing is lost''
|
Drasman123
Male



Registered: 06/20/10
Posts: 248
Last seen: 11 years, 3 months
|
Re: largest grow eva? [Re: papixx]
#12944944 - 07/24/10 11:12 AM (13 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
That greenhouse set up was pretty legit. Anyone have pics to back up these 21,000g grows?
-------------------- “Falling in love is like eating mushrooms, you never know if it's the real thing until it's too late.” Nothing says morning like a cup of coffee and some mycology work!
|
k00laid
NEMO


Registered: 05/03/10
Posts: 19,636
Last seen: 6 months, 4 days
|
|
(3 years, 11 months ago)
-------------------- AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!
|
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a 7,157 topic views. 19 members, 136 guests and 35 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] |
|