Quote:

---

Ginseng1 said:
The only place American needs to go to is Africa.

---

Totally agree 
But they won't go to Africa quickly because they don't have much strategic interest in the area. Rwanda is happening all over again in Sudan. After the war ends and the final death count comes in the whole world will be saying never again AGAIN.

Quote:

---

cybrbeast said:

Quote:

---

Ginseng1 said:
The only place American needs to go to is Africa.

---

Totally agree 

---

Quote:

---

Papaver said:
The US should NOT invade Canada. Leave the little Canadians alone...

---

Quote:

---

Canadians are peaceful critters by nature. Being ruminants and herbivores...

---

Quote:

---

Prisoner#1 said:

Quote:

---

Canadians are peaceful critters by nature. Being ruminants and herbivores...

---

they certainly do make good burgers

---

Quote:

---

Papaver said:
The US should NOT invade Canada. Leave the little Canadians alone...

---

I dont know about that, they make me nervous sitting up there, with there duel language, and maple syrup......

and that red maple looks a lot like the red star 

Battle plain Canadian Bacon 

Quote:

---

Shroomism said:
We should not invade any fucking countries.

---

Quote:

---

DrunkenAttempt said:
If the US tried to invade Canada, no one would even notice

---

Quote:

---

Snaggletooth said:
The following countries should NEVER be invaded no mater what!!!!

N. Korea,
we been there for 50yr and it has done NO GOOD, the should take over Korea and unify there own country, at any cost, 

Iran,
If anything we should give them a reactor and let then wipe Israel off the map killing million's in the process, retake Iraq, and start the Great Islamic Empire!

Sudan
Let them kill millions of their own people, after all it's just Africa, who cares, the UN does not,

We should pull our military of out every country and then disband it.


What other countries should have a free pass?



OR

---

Quote:

---

Prisoner#1 said:

Quote:

---

Papaver said:
The US should NOT invade Canada. Leave the little Canadians alone...

---

thats why Iran is on the invasion menu
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/1169/iranadapol948ca.jpg

Quote:

---

Canadians are peaceful critters by nature. Being ruminants and herbivores...

---

they certainly do make good burgers

---

and are easy to raise too..  i had a few as a kid, but mom made me get rid of em because i wouldnt keep their cage clean 


but seriously ..
we should build a wall around the entire country....  deny any immagrants  and keep to ourselves.

when we do help another country we arent appreciated  and the country seems to resent us, so FUCK EM, let the world fend for itself.

if all the money put into the current war was put into our schools, helping the homeless, and our social security program ( lol ok, im getting old and starting to worry ),  then things in the U.S.  would be a lil better then it is now

Quote:

---

People in Iraq weren't being slaughtered by the thousands.

---

Quote:

---

Wiccan_Seeker said:
US policy STINX.

---

Quote:

---

Jon said:
US should stay out of china, ever see romper stomper?

---

Quote:

---

mattzdope said:
They have us greatly outnumbered.

---

Quote:

---

Wiccan_Seeker said:
What the US military fails to see is that when you invade a country for whatever reason, and throw bombs and shells around wherever you go, that even the politically neutral locals will tend to be very biased against your little military adventure.

I dislike Israel's handling of their local situation, but surgically striking the cars of the ringleaders is a lot more humane than carpetbombing residential areas. Imagine the US in the early 1990s didnt drop more bombs than in the vietnam war in one single night, but rather had a stealth bomber or two smartbombing the houses, offices and cars containing the top-50 of Iraqi brass. It wouldve saved over a quarter million lives and not bombed the country's infrastructure, which the population has to pay for no matter what the outcome would be.

They have the satellites and the military intelligence as well as the capability to carry out such a feat. But the Bushes didn't go directly for the man, because they didnt want to set the precedent of attacking heads of state, and risk possibly being sniped at themselves.
So they killed hundreds of thousands of people instead.

---

Quote:

---

d33p said:

Quote:

---

Wiccan_Seeker said:
What the US military fails to see is that when you invade a country for whatever reason, and throw bombs and shells around wherever you go, that even the politically neutral locals will tend to be very biased against your little military adventure.

I dislike Israel's handling of their local situation, but surgically striking the cars of the ringleaders is a lot more humane than carpetbombing residential areas. Imagine the US in the early 1990s didnt drop more bombs than in the vietnam war in one single night, but rather had a stealth bomber or two smartbombing the houses, offices and cars containing the top-50 of Iraqi brass. It wouldve saved over a quarter million lives and not bombed the country's infrastructure, which the population has to pay for no matter what the outcome would be.

They have the satellites and the military intelligence as well as the capability to carry out such a feat. But the Bushes didn't go directly for the man, because they didnt want to set the precedent of attacking heads of state, and risk possibly being sniped at themselves.
So they killed hundreds of thousands of people instead.

---

Who fed you this load of bullshit? Its completely false.

---

Quote:

---

TheMadConductor said:
America needs to invade America. Goverment vs The People. Be-all, end-all, total full-out revolution.

---

Quote:

---

cybrbeast said:

Quote:

---

d33p said:

Quote:

---

Wiccan_Seeker said:
What the US military fails to see is that when you invade a country for whatever reason, and throw bombs and shells around wherever you goDid the US military do this? No, however it appears wiccan was not being literal in this sentence. , that even the politically neutral locals will tend to be very biased against your little military adventure.

I dislike Israel's handling of their local situation, but surgically striking the cars of the ringleaders is a lot more humane than carpetbombing residential areas Did the US carpetbomb anything in Iraq? No. Did they use mostly surgical strikes to eliminate the head of the Iraqi military? Yes. Imagine the US in the early 1990s didnt drop more bombs than in the vietnam war in one single night, but rather had a stealth bomber or two smartbombing the houses, offices and cars containing the top-50 of Iraqi brass.Now, this sentence doesnt make perfect sense but im pretty sure about what wiccan meant. First of all in the gulf war the us didn't invade Iraq so the situation was quite different FYI. Second of all they did not drop more bombs in one night than in all of Vietnam. Did the US use stealth bombers to strike targets in Iraq? Yes. It wouldve saved over a quarter million lives and not bombed the country's infrastructure, which the population has to pay for no matter what the outcome would be. Show me evidence of the quarter million lives and infrastructure that would have been saved had we only used one or two stealth bombers and blew up ringleaders cars when we invaded Iraq. But you won't and why? Becuase that claim is complete bs. If we didnt try to cripple their command and control ability at the start as much as we could it would have given the military more time to oraganize and entrench in urban areas which would have led to more urban combat and lost lives on both sides. And what infrastructure were the US blowing up when they invaded Iraq? What 250,000 people are you talking about?

They have the satellites and the military intelligence as well as the capability to carry out such a feat. And we did carry out that feat but we decided to save time and iniative and use more than one or two stealth bombers. I pray to god you never head the US military....But the Bushes didn't go directly for the man, because they didnt want to set the precedent of attacking heads of state, and risk possibly being sniped at themselves.
So they killed hundreds of thousands of people instead. So you are saying Bush should have assassinated Saddam before Congress gave the go ahead for war since Saddam would have been in hiding by the time we invaded? Im sure that would have gone over real well in the world and likely it would have gave people like you something to bitch about. And also considering how rapidly we crippled the Iraqi military during shock and awe, previously assassinating the head of state likely wouldn't have made much of a difference. And again, hundreds of thousands...........?

---

Who fed you this load of bullshit? Its completely false.

---

This is a less than intelligent post. I mean if you say something like this you should elaborate.
The US did use 'smartbombs' in Operation Iraqi Freedom, the only problem is that many of the bombs missed targets and hit civilians.

The biggest problem and this is the reason why the insurgency is so strong is the American Rules of Engagement in Iraq. If the troops get shot at by an insurgent they don't want to involve themselves in urban combat because that would mean more US casualties which would make Bush lose more support. So they call in artillery and air support. If said insurgent flees into a building the building will get shot at or airstiked even if civilians are inside. The rationale is that the civilians were harboring insurgents which is not true in many cases.
So what the US is doing is trading in a few American lives for lots of Iraqi lives. This pisses people off. Would you join the insurgency if troops just obliterated a part of your family?

---

Quote:

---

cybrbeast said:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=48180
There ya go

---

Quote:

---

The hiding places of the attackers -- houses, commercial shops, even mosques and schools -- essentially become automatic targets for attack. For the most part, rifles, tanks, and artillery are sufficient to eradicate the enemy, and air power is only called in as a last resort

---

Quote:

---

Wiccan_Seeker said:

Quote:

---

People in Iraq weren't being slaughtered by the thousands.

---

Umm, what's the bodycount on the Iraqi side again, as inflicted by father & son Bush?

---

Quote:

---

The hiding places of the attackers -- houses, commercial shops, even mosques and schools -- essentially become automatic targets for attack. For the most part, rifles, tanks, and artillery are sufficient to eradicate the enemy, and air power is only called in as a last resort

---

Quote:

---

Odiumjunkie said:
(A)
Afghanistan (Kabul) (AS)
Albania (Tirane) (EU)
Algeria (Algers) (AF)
Andorra (Andorra la Vella) (EU)
Angola (Luanda) (AF)
Antigua and Barbuda (St. John's) (NA)
Argentina (Buenos Aires) (SA)
Armenia (Yerevan) (EU)
Australia (Canberra) (AU)
Austria (Vienna) (EU)
Azerbaijan (Baku) (AS)
dot
(B)
Bahamas (Nassau) (NA)
Bahrain (Manama) (AS)
Bangladesh (Dhaka) (AS)
Barbados (Bridgetown) (NA)
Belarus (Minsk) (EU)
Belgium (Brussels) (EU)
Belize (Belmopan) (NA)
Benin (Port-Novo) (AF)
Bhutan (Thimphu) (AS)
Bolivia (Sucre) (SA)
Bosnia and Herzegovina (Sarajevo) (EU)
Botswana (Gaborone) (AF)
Brazil (Brasilia) (SA)
Brunei (Bander Seri Begawan) (AS)
Bulgaria (Sofia) (EU)
Burkina Faso (Ouagadougou) (AF)
Burma/Myanmar (Yangon) (AS)
Burundi (Bujumbura) (AF)
dot
(C)
Cambodia (Phnom Penh) (AS)
Cameroon (Yaounde) (AF)
Canada (Ottawa) (NA)
Cape Verde (Praia) (EU - Portugal)
Central African Republic (Bangui) (AF)
Chad (N'Djamena) (AF)
Chile (Santiago) (SA)
China (Beijing) (AS)
Colombia (Bogota) (SA)
Comoros (Moroni) (AF)
Congo (Brazzaville) (AF)
Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) (AF)
Costa Rica (San Jose) (NA)
Cote d'Ivoire/Ivory Coast (Yamoussoukro) (AF)
Croatia (Zagreb) (EU)
Cuba (Havana) (NA)
Cyprus (Nicosia) (AS) and/or (EU)
Czech Republic (Prague) (EU)
dot
(D)
Denmark (Copenhagen) (EU)
Djibouti (Djibouti) (AF)
Dominica (Roseau) (NA)
Dominican Republic (Santo Domingo) (NA)
dot
(E)
East Timor (Dili) (AS)
Ecuador (Quito) (SA)
Egypt (Cairo) (AF)
El Salvador (San Salvador) (NA)
Equatorial Guinea (Malabo) (AF)
Eritrea (Asmara) (AF)
Estonia (Tallinn) (EU)
Ethiopia (Addis Ababa) (AF)
dot
(F)
Fiji (Suva) (AU - Oceania)
Finland (Helsinki) (EU)
France (Paris) (EU)
dot
(G)
Gabon (Liberville) (AF)
Gambia (Banjul) (AF)
Georgia (Tbilisi) (EU)
Germany (Berlin) (EU)
Ghana (Accra) (AF)
Greece (Athens) (EU)
Grenada (St. George's) (NA)
Guatemala (Guatemala City) (NA)
Guinea (Conakry) (AF)
Guinea-Bissau (Bissau) (AF)
Guyana (Georgetown) (SA)
dot
(H)
Haiti (Port-au-Prince) (NA)
Honduras (Tegucigalpa) (NA)
Hungary (Budapest) (EU)
dot
(I)
Iceland (Reykjavik) (EU)
India (New Delhi) (AS)
Indonesia (Jakarta) (AS)
Iran (Tehran) (AS)
Iraq (Baghdad) (AS)
Ireland (Dublin) (EU)
Israel (Jerusalem) (AS)
Italy (Rome) (EU)
dot
(J)
Jamaica (Kingston) (NA)
Japan (Tokyo) (AS)
Jordan (Amman) (AS)
dot
(K)
Kazakstan (Astana) (AS)
Kenya (Nairobi) (AF)
Kiribati (Bairiki) (AU - Oceania)
Korea, North (Pyongyang) (AS)
Korea, South (Seoul) (AS)
Kuwait (Kuwait City) (AS)
Kyrgyzstan (Bishkek) (AS)
dot
(L)
Laos (Vientiane) (AS)
Latvia (Riga) (EU)
Lebanon (Beirut) (AS)
Lesotho (Maseru) (AF)
Liberia (Monrovia) (AF)
Libya (Tripoli) (AF)
Liechtenstein (Vaduz) (EU)
Lithuania (Vilnius) (EU)
Luxembourg (Luxembourg) (EU)
dot
dot (M)
Macedonia (Skopje) (EU)
Madagascar (Antananarivo) (AF)
Malawi (Lilongwe) (AF)
Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) (AS)
Maldives (Male) (AS)
Mali (Bamako) (AF)
Malta (Valletta) (EU)
Marshall Islands (Majuro) (AU - Oceania)
Mauritania (Nouakchott) (AF)
Mauritius (Port Louis) (AF)
Mexico (Mexico City) (NA)
Micronesia (Palikir) (AU - Oceania)
Moldova (Chisinau) (EU)
Monaco (Monaco) (EU)
Mongolia (Ulan Bator) (AS)
Morocco (Rabat) (AF) (including Western Sahara)
Mozambique (Maputo) (AF)
dot
(N)
Namibia (Windhoek) (AF)
Nauru (no official capital) (AU - Oceania)
Nepal (Kathmandu) (AS)
Netherlands (Amsterdam, The Hague) (EU)
New Zealand (Wellington) (AU)
Nicaragua (Managua) (NA)
Niger (Niamey) (AF)
Nigeria (Abuja) (AF)
Norway (Oslo) (EU)
dot
(O)
Oman (Muscat) (AS)
dot
(P)
Pakistan (Islamabad) (AS)
Palau (Koror) (AU - Oceania)
Panama (Panama City) (NA)
Papua New Guinea (Port Moresby) (AU)
Paraguay (Asuncion) (SA)
Peru (Lima) (SA)
Philippines (Manila) (AS)
Poland (Warsaw) (EU)
Portugal (Lisbon) (EU)
dot
(Q)
Qatar (Doha) (AS)
dot
(R)
Romania (Bucharest) (EU)
Russian Federation (Moscow) (AS)
Rwanda (Kigali) (AF)
dot
(S)
Saint Kitts and Nevis (Basseterre) (NA)
Saint Lucia (Castries) (NA)
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (Kingstown) (NA)
Samoa (Apia) (AU - Oceania)
San Marino (San Marino) (EU)
Sao Tome and Principe (Sao Tome) (AF)
Saudi Arabia (Riyadh) (AS)
Senegal (Dakar) (AF)
Seychelles (Victoria) (AF)
Sierra Leone (Freetown) (AF)
Singapore (Singapore City) (AS)
Slovakia (Bratislava) (EU)
Slovenia (Ljubljana) (EU)
Solomon Islands (Honiara) (AU - Oceania)
Somalia (Mogadishu) (AF)
South Africa (Pretoria, Cape Town, Bloemfontein) (AF)
Spain (Madrid) (EU)
Sri Lanka (Colombo) (AS)
Sudan (Khartoum) (AF)
Suriname (Paramaribo) (SA)
Swaziland (Mbabane) (AF)
Sweden (Stockholm) (EU)
Switzerland (Bern) (EU)
Syria (Damascus) (AS)
dot
(T)
Tajikistan (Dushanbe) (AS)
Tanzania (Dodoma) (AF)
Thailand (Bangkok) (AS)
Togo (Lome) (AF)
Tonga (Nuku'alofa) (AU - Oceania)
Trinidad and Tobago (Port-of-Spain) (NA)
Tunisia (Tunis) (AF)
Turkey (Ankara) (AS) & (EU)
Turkmenistan (Ashgabat) (AS)
Tuvalu (Funafuti) (AU - Oceania)
dot
(U)
Uganda (Kampala) (AF)
Ukraine (Kiev) (EU)
United Arab Emirates (Abu Dhabi) (AS)
United Kingdom (London) (EU)
Uruguay (Montevideo) (SA)
Uzbekistan (Tashkent) (AS)
dot
(V)
Vanuatu (Port-Vila) (AU - Oceania)
Vatican City (na) (EU)
Venezuela (Caracas) (SA)
Vietnam (Hanoi) (AS)
dot
(Y)
Yemen (Sana) (AS)
Yugoslavia (now Serbia & Montenegro) (Belgrade) (EU)
dot
(Z)
Zambia (Lusaka) (AF)
Zimbabwe (Harare) (AF)

---

Quote:

---

cybrbeast said:
I think sometimes there is a real need for intervention. In the case of genocide or power gone out of control, like WWII.

---

Quote:

---

JoeCool said:
Yeah but then if we do that then itll just be the chinese and the mexicans and I didn't know if they got along very well.

---

Quote:

---

JoeCool said:
Nobody needs to invade America seriously I don't want to die.

---

Quote:

---

JoeCool said:
hmmmm so are you talking about starting a riot?

---

Quote:

---

Redstorm said:
As if anyone could invade the US anyways.

---

I imagine China and Russia could probably tag-team us pretty damn good.

Enough to make shopping at Walmart an inconvienience.