|
THE KRAT BARON
one-eyed willie
Registered: 07/08/03
Posts: 42,409
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Prisoner#1]
#5773892 - 06/20/06 08:06 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
They have us greatly outnumbered.
-------------------- m00nshine is currently vacationing in Maui. Rumor has it he got rolled by drunken natives and is currently prostituting himself in order to pay for airfare back to the mainland but he's having trouble juggling a hairon addiction. He won't be back for a long while.
|
Jon
Registered: 06/28/03
Posts: 961
Last seen: 9 years, 1 month
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: THE KRAT BARON]
#5773981 - 06/20/06 08:28 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
They dont even need guns with that army. They can do enough damage with a grenade and a bottle of whiskey. Now thats war.
|
Vico
Grasshopper


Registered: 05/13/06
Posts: 107
Last seen: 17 years, 2 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Jon]
#5774169 - 06/20/06 09:17 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
America should nuke the north and south poles, as well as big glaciers, then invade Hawaii.
-------------------- Ill make you eat your parents.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: THE KRAT BARON]
#5774203 - 06/20/06 09:24 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
mattzdope said: They have us greatly outnumbered.
yeah, and if they all jump at the same time they can split the planet in half
imagine what it could for for the environment if 90 billion people died, fewer green house gasses, cheaper gas, free housing all over the place.
|
Snaggletooth
Stranger in a Strange Land


Registered: 10/24/05
Posts: 6,109
Loc: blinks stupidly
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Prisoner#1]
#5774570 - 06/20/06 10:51 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
This Parody thread is still going 
Though now I have a better idea who are the Communist and Socialist
Give it rest people
--------------------
Atheist Chat
|
d33p
Welcome to Violence

Registered: 07/12/03
Posts: 5,381
Loc: the shores of Tripoli
Last seen: 10 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Asante]
#5775071 - 06/21/06 12:57 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Wiccan_Seeker said: What the US military fails to see is that when you invade a country for whatever reason, and throw bombs and shells around wherever you go, that even the politically neutral locals will tend to be very biased against your little military adventure.
I dislike Israel's handling of their local situation, but surgically striking the cars of the ringleaders is a lot more humane than carpetbombing residential areas. Imagine the US in the early 1990s didnt drop more bombs than in the vietnam war in one single night, but rather had a stealth bomber or two smartbombing the houses, offices and cars containing the top-50 of Iraqi brass. It wouldve saved over a quarter million lives and not bombed the country's infrastructure, which the population has to pay for no matter what the outcome would be.
They have the satellites and the military intelligence as well as the capability to carry out such a feat. But the Bushes didn't go directly for the man, because they didnt want to set the precedent of attacking heads of state, and risk possibly being sniped at themselves. So they killed hundreds of thousands of people instead.
Who fed you this load of bullshit? Its completely false.
-------------------- I'm a nihilist. Lets be friends. bang bang
|
Economist
in training


Registered: 10/11/05
Posts: 1,285
Last seen: 16 years, 5 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Snaggletooth]
#5775287 - 06/21/06 02:10 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
So, I disagree with the initial post in this thread.
It's not that I think we need to invade any more countries, but, if we're going to (which I'd be willing to bet on), then North Korea would certainly be the place to go.
Think about the benefits: 1) No question about whether or not there is a WMD program, as the NK government has said upfront that they have a WMD program. 2) The population is slightly smaller than Iraq, so we'd have some idea of what to expect. 3) Any resistance could likely be bought off with meal bars, given numerous UN reports on starvation within the country. 4) South Korea would happily bear the brunt of the war's cost and manpower, and China, fearful of a mass of refugees (rather than the trickle they're alread tired of dealing with) will also likely contribute.
So, as far as I see it, we'd save money, manpower, and probably face less residual resistance than in any other prospect for invasion. Again, I'm not saying it's a good idea to invade, but if we're going to anyway, it's probably the best choice.
Also, to the posters in this thread who think the UN should intervene in Africa, can you point to even one success story post intervention?
Seriously, let's look at the places the UN has intervened without massive US support: East Timor, Sierra Leone, Angola, Haiti (yes the US was a massive supporter of the first mission, but not the second, when Brazil took the reigns).
Do any of those locations strike you as fairly developed/stable at this point. By comparison, nations that the US occupied for a period of time (Japan, South Korea, the Philippines) are all infinitely better off. This isn't to say the US should occupy everyone with trouble, it's just to say that the UN is no better than the US (and probably even a little worse) at nationbuilding.
|
MrSinister
Uncle T


Registered: 03/23/06
Posts: 4,252
Loc: Outworld
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Economist]
#5775347 - 06/21/06 02:31 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I say invade Samoa..
--------------------
"They look like psychos? Is that what they looked like? They were vampires. Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits 'em. I don't give a fuck how crazy they are!" "Eric Stratton.. Rush chairman.. Damn glad to meet you.."
|
cybrbeast
Up, then down, then...



Registered: 01/06/03
Posts: 4,777
Loc: event horizon
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: d33p]
#5775469 - 06/21/06 04:49 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
d33p said:
Quote:
Wiccan_Seeker said: What the US military fails to see is that when you invade a country for whatever reason, and throw bombs and shells around wherever you go, that even the politically neutral locals will tend to be very biased against your little military adventure.
I dislike Israel's handling of their local situation, but surgically striking the cars of the ringleaders is a lot more humane than carpetbombing residential areas. Imagine the US in the early 1990s didnt drop more bombs than in the vietnam war in one single night, but rather had a stealth bomber or two smartbombing the houses, offices and cars containing the top-50 of Iraqi brass. It wouldve saved over a quarter million lives and not bombed the country's infrastructure, which the population has to pay for no matter what the outcome would be.
They have the satellites and the military intelligence as well as the capability to carry out such a feat. But the Bushes didn't go directly for the man, because they didnt want to set the precedent of attacking heads of state, and risk possibly being sniped at themselves. So they killed hundreds of thousands of people instead.
Who fed you this load of bullshit? Its completely false.
This is a less than intelligent post. I mean if you say something like this you should elaborate. The US did use 'smartbombs' in Operation Iraqi Freedom, the only problem is that many of the bombs missed targets and hit civilians.
The biggest problem and this is the reason why the insurgency is so strong is the American Rules of Engagement in Iraq. If the troops get shot at by an insurgent they don't want to involve themselves in urban combat because that would mean more US casualties which would make Bush lose more support. So they call in artillery and air support. If said insurgent flees into a building the building will get shot at or airstiked even if civilians are inside. The rationale is that the civilians were harboring insurgents which is not true in many cases. So what the US is doing is trading in a few American lives for lots of Iraqi lives. This pisses people off. Would you join the insurgency if troops just obliterated a part of your family?
--------------------
futuretribe.space
|
spazbite
alcoholic panda

Registered: 10/02/05
Posts: 4
Loc: wonderland.
Last seen: 15 years, 4 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: ClammyJoe]
#5775586 - 06/21/06 06:18 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
TheMadConductor said: America needs to invade America. Goverment vs The People. Be-all, end-all, total full-out revolution.
Hehehe that would be quite interesting actually if that ever happened :P
-------------------- "Stan, you need to lay off the cough syrup. Alright? Seriously. I'm worried about you man." - Eric Cartman
|
Hanky
wiffle bat.

Registered: 08/30/03
Posts: 56,993
Loc: Great Southern Land.
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: spazbite]
#5775667 - 06/21/06 07:11 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Atleast they wouldn't have to lie about america having WMD's.
-------------------- Coaster is an idiot... [quote]Coaster said: but i thnk everything thats pure is white? [/quote]
|
EmperorKuzco
somewhatfamiliar

Registered: 02/13/06
Posts: 252
Last seen: 16 years, 10 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Hanky]
#5775747 - 06/21/06 08:13 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
"I have and idea of how we could have no enemys ever again. What if we took all that money we spend on nuclear weapons and defense, and instead used that money to feed and educate the poor of the world which it would pay for many times over not one human being excluded. We could as one race explore space, both inner and outer, forever." -Bill Hicks
--------------------
|
d33p
Welcome to Violence

Registered: 07/12/03
Posts: 5,381
Loc: the shores of Tripoli
Last seen: 10 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: cybrbeast]
#5776414 - 06/21/06 12:47 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
cybrbeast said:
Quote:
d33p said:
Quote:
Wiccan_Seeker said: What the US military fails to see is that when you invade a country for whatever reason, and throw bombs and shells around wherever you goDid the US military do this? No, however it appears wiccan was not being literal in this sentence. , that even the politically neutral locals will tend to be very biased against your little military adventure.
I dislike Israel's handling of their local situation, but surgically striking the cars of the ringleaders is a lot more humane than carpetbombing residential areas Did the US carpetbomb anything in Iraq? No. Did they use mostly surgical strikes to eliminate the head of the Iraqi military? Yes. Imagine the US in the early 1990s didnt drop more bombs than in the vietnam war in one single night, but rather had a stealth bomber or two smartbombing the houses, offices and cars containing the top-50 of Iraqi brass.Now, this sentence doesnt make perfect sense but im pretty sure about what wiccan meant. First of all in the gulf war the us didn't invade Iraq so the situation was quite different FYI. Second of all they did not drop more bombs in one night than in all of Vietnam. Did the US use stealth bombers to strike targets in Iraq? Yes. It wouldve saved over a quarter million lives and not bombed the country's infrastructure, which the population has to pay for no matter what the outcome would be. Show me evidence of the quarter million lives and infrastructure that would have been saved had we only used one or two stealth bombers and blew up ringleaders cars when we invaded Iraq. But you won't and why? Becuase that claim is complete bs. If we didnt try to cripple their command and control ability at the start as much as we could it would have given the military more time to oraganize and entrench in urban areas which would have led to more urban combat and lost lives on both sides. And what infrastructure were the US blowing up when they invaded Iraq? What 250,000 people are you talking about?
They have the satellites and the military intelligence as well as the capability to carry out such a feat. And we did carry out that feat but we decided to save time and iniative and use more than one or two stealth bombers. I pray to god you never head the US military....But the Bushes didn't go directly for the man, because they didnt want to set the precedent of attacking heads of state, and risk possibly being sniped at themselves. So they killed hundreds of thousands of people instead. So you are saying Bush should have assassinated Saddam before Congress gave the go ahead for war since Saddam would have been in hiding by the time we invaded? Im sure that would have gone over real well in the world and likely it would have gave people like you something to bitch about. And also considering how rapidly we crippled the Iraqi military during shock and awe, previously assassinating the head of state likely wouldn't have made much of a difference. And again, hundreds of thousands...........?
Who fed you this load of bullshit? Its completely false.
This is a less than intelligent post. I mean if you say something like this you should elaborate. The US did use 'smartbombs' in Operation Iraqi Freedom, the only problem is that many of the bombs missed targets and hit civilians.
The biggest problem and this is the reason why the insurgency is so strong is the American Rules of Engagement in Iraq. If the troops get shot at by an insurgent they don't want to involve themselves in urban combat because that would mean more US casualties which would make Bush lose more support. So they call in artillery and air support. If said insurgent flees into a building the building will get shot at or airstiked even if civilians are inside. The rationale is that the civilians were harboring insurgents which is not true in many cases. So what the US is doing is trading in a few American lives for lots of Iraqi lives. This pisses people off. Would you join the insurgency if troops just obliterated a part of your family?
Completely false pretty much summed up wiccan's post. The claim of bullshit was about as intelligent a reply to that drivel deserved.
And lol at the american rules of engagement in operation Iraqi freedom. That is not true at all. How about you try and source that pollicy? Or did you just make it up?
And if i was informed as much as i am on the situation, no i would not join. If i was just some ignorant Iraqi, maybe.
-------------------- I'm a nihilist. Lets be friends. bang bang
|
cybrbeast
Up, then down, then...



Registered: 01/06/03
Posts: 4,777
Loc: event horizon
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: d33p]
#5783125 - 06/23/06 07:06 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
futuretribe.space
|
d33p
Welcome to Violence

Registered: 07/12/03
Posts: 5,381
Loc: the shores of Tripoli
Last seen: 10 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: cybrbeast]
#5783471 - 06/23/06 10:58 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
cybrbeast said: http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=48180 There ya go
bzzzz, wrong. That trash article actually disproved what you where trying to say.
Quote:
The hiding places of the attackers -- houses, commercial shops, even mosques and schools -- essentially become automatic targets for attack. For the most part, rifles, tanks, and artillery are sufficient to eradicate the enemy, and air power is only called in as a last resort
Aside from the obvious sensationalism that was oozing from every word of the article, it states that for the most part ground troops were used to kill insurgents they have engaged with and air power is a last resort.
And even if the mil gets up to 150 air strikes in a month, that is still just 150 of out the 3,000 estimated engagements in a month from the article.
lame......
-------------------- I'm a nihilist. Lets be friends. bang bang
|
HELLA_TIGHT
Madge the Smoking Vag


Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 84,387
Loc: Afghanistan
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: Asante]
#5783537 - 06/23/06 11:32 AM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Wiccan_Seeker said:
Quote:
People in Iraq weren't being slaughtered by the thousands.
Umm, what's the bodycount on the Iraqi side again, as inflicted by father & son Bush?
Civilians reported killed by military intervention in Iraq Min Max 38475 42889
--------------------
|
cybrbeast
Up, then down, then...



Registered: 01/06/03
Posts: 4,777
Loc: event horizon
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: d33p]
#5792318 - 06/26/06 12:01 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
sorry for the late reply forgot about this thread.
Quote:
The hiding places of the attackers -- houses, commercial shops, even mosques and schools -- essentially become automatic targets for attack. For the most part, rifles, tanks, and artillery are sufficient to eradicate the enemy, and air power is only called in as a last resort
Shooting a building with guns, artillery and tanks is quite different and much more indiscriminate than actually going into a building and killing your targets. A tank or artillery firing on a building might not be as lethal as leveling a city block in an air-strike but it is still quite deadly to civilians.
--------------------
futuretribe.space
|
JoeCool
Some guy


Registered: 06/07/06
Posts: 197
Loc: Tennessee
Last seen: 12 years, 4 months
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: cybrbeast]
#5792335 - 06/26/06 12:12 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Ok so heres what I think America should do is get all the black people and put them on a boat and send them in the general direction of Africa and we will put a telephone on there which they can only use once and then put some chicken and some watermelon on the boat so theyll have something to eat there I said what everybody was thinking.
-------------------- Never think about the mistakes you made. Think about the mistakes you will make.
|
ivi


Registered: 01/30/03
Posts: 9,089
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: OJK]
#5792340 - 06/26/06 12:14 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Odiumjunkie said: (A) Afghanistan (Kabul) (AS) Albania (Tirane) (EU) Algeria (Algers) (AF) Andorra (Andorra la Vella) (EU) Angola (Luanda) (AF) Antigua and Barbuda (St. John's) (NA) Argentina (Buenos Aires) (SA) Armenia (Yerevan) (EU) Australia (Canberra) (AU) Austria (Vienna) (EU) Azerbaijan (Baku) (AS) dot (B) Bahamas (Nassau) (NA) Bahrain (Manama) (AS) Bangladesh (Dhaka) (AS) Barbados (Bridgetown) (NA) Belarus (Minsk) (EU) Belgium (Brussels) (EU) Belize (Belmopan) (NA) Benin (Port-Novo) (AF) Bhutan (Thimphu) (AS) Bolivia (Sucre) (SA) Bosnia and Herzegovina (Sarajevo) (EU) Botswana (Gaborone) (AF) Brazil (Brasilia) (SA) Brunei (Bander Seri Begawan) (AS) Bulgaria (Sofia) (EU) Burkina Faso (Ouagadougou) (AF) Burma/Myanmar (Yangon) (AS) Burundi (Bujumbura) (AF) dot (C) Cambodia (Phnom Penh) (AS) Cameroon (Yaounde) (AF) Canada (Ottawa) (NA) Cape Verde (Praia) (EU - Portugal) Central African Republic (Bangui) (AF) Chad (N'Djamena) (AF) Chile (Santiago) (SA) China (Beijing) (AS) Colombia (Bogota) (SA) Comoros (Moroni) (AF) Congo (Brazzaville) (AF) Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) (AF) Costa Rica (San Jose) (NA) Cote d'Ivoire/Ivory Coast (Yamoussoukro) (AF) Croatia (Zagreb) (EU) Cuba (Havana) (NA) Cyprus (Nicosia) (AS) and/or (EU) Czech Republic (Prague) (EU) dot (D) Denmark (Copenhagen) (EU) Djibouti (Djibouti) (AF) Dominica (Roseau) (NA) Dominican Republic (Santo Domingo) (NA) dot (E) East Timor (Dili) (AS) Ecuador (Quito) (SA) Egypt (Cairo) (AF) El Salvador (San Salvador) (NA) Equatorial Guinea (Malabo) (AF) Eritrea (Asmara) (AF) Estonia (Tallinn) (EU) Ethiopia (Addis Ababa) (AF) dot (F) Fiji (Suva) (AU - Oceania) Finland (Helsinki) (EU) France (Paris) (EU) dot (G) Gabon (Liberville) (AF) Gambia (Banjul) (AF) Georgia (Tbilisi) (EU) Germany (Berlin) (EU) Ghana (Accra) (AF) Greece (Athens) (EU) Grenada (St. George's) (NA) Guatemala (Guatemala City) (NA) Guinea (Conakry) (AF) Guinea-Bissau (Bissau) (AF) Guyana (Georgetown) (SA) dot (H) Haiti (Port-au-Prince) (NA) Honduras (Tegucigalpa) (NA) Hungary (Budapest) (EU) dot (I) Iceland (Reykjavik) (EU) India (New Delhi) (AS) Indonesia (Jakarta) (AS) Iran (Tehran) (AS) Iraq (Baghdad) (AS) Ireland (Dublin) (EU) Israel (Jerusalem) (AS) Italy (Rome) (EU) dot (J) Jamaica (Kingston) (NA) Japan (Tokyo) (AS) Jordan (Amman) (AS) dot (K) Kazakstan (Astana) (AS) Kenya (Nairobi) (AF) Kiribati (Bairiki) (AU - Oceania) Korea, North (Pyongyang) (AS) Korea, South (Seoul) (AS) Kuwait (Kuwait City) (AS) Kyrgyzstan (Bishkek) (AS) dot (L) Laos (Vientiane) (AS) Latvia (Riga) (EU) Lebanon (Beirut) (AS) Lesotho (Maseru) (AF) Liberia (Monrovia) (AF) Libya (Tripoli) (AF) Liechtenstein (Vaduz) (EU) Lithuania (Vilnius) (EU) Luxembourg (Luxembourg) (EU) dot dot (M) Macedonia (Skopje) (EU) Madagascar (Antananarivo) (AF) Malawi (Lilongwe) (AF) Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) (AS) Maldives (Male) (AS) Mali (Bamako) (AF) Malta (Valletta) (EU) Marshall Islands (Majuro) (AU - Oceania) Mauritania (Nouakchott) (AF) Mauritius (Port Louis) (AF) Mexico (Mexico City) (NA) Micronesia (Palikir) (AU - Oceania) Moldova (Chisinau) (EU) Monaco (Monaco) (EU) Mongolia (Ulan Bator) (AS) Morocco (Rabat) (AF) (including Western Sahara) Mozambique (Maputo) (AF) dot (N) Namibia (Windhoek) (AF) Nauru (no official capital) (AU - Oceania) Nepal (Kathmandu) (AS) Netherlands (Amsterdam, The Hague) (EU) New Zealand (Wellington) (AU) Nicaragua (Managua) (NA) Niger (Niamey) (AF) Nigeria (Abuja) (AF) Norway (Oslo) (EU) dot (O) Oman (Muscat) (AS) dot (P) Pakistan (Islamabad) (AS) Palau (Koror) (AU - Oceania) Panama (Panama City) (NA) Papua New Guinea (Port Moresby) (AU) Paraguay (Asuncion) (SA) Peru (Lima) (SA) Philippines (Manila) (AS) Poland (Warsaw) (EU) Portugal (Lisbon) (EU) dot (Q) Qatar (Doha) (AS) dot (R) Romania (Bucharest) (EU) Russian Federation (Moscow) (AS) Rwanda (Kigali) (AF) dot (S) Saint Kitts and Nevis (Basseterre) (NA) Saint Lucia (Castries) (NA) Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (Kingstown) (NA) Samoa (Apia) (AU - Oceania) San Marino (San Marino) (EU) Sao Tome and Principe (Sao Tome) (AF) Saudi Arabia (Riyadh) (AS) Senegal (Dakar) (AF) Seychelles (Victoria) (AF) Sierra Leone (Freetown) (AF) Singapore (Singapore City) (AS) Slovakia (Bratislava) (EU) Slovenia (Ljubljana) (EU) Solomon Islands (Honiara) (AU - Oceania) Somalia (Mogadishu) (AF) South Africa (Pretoria, Cape Town, Bloemfontein) (AF) Spain (Madrid) (EU) Sri Lanka (Colombo) (AS) Sudan (Khartoum) (AF) Suriname (Paramaribo) (SA) Swaziland (Mbabane) (AF) Sweden (Stockholm) (EU) Switzerland (Bern) (EU) Syria (Damascus) (AS) dot (T) Tajikistan (Dushanbe) (AS) Tanzania (Dodoma) (AF) Thailand (Bangkok) (AS) Togo (Lome) (AF) Tonga (Nuku'alofa) (AU - Oceania) Trinidad and Tobago (Port-of-Spain) (NA) Tunisia (Tunis) (AF) Turkey (Ankara) (AS) & (EU) Turkmenistan (Ashgabat) (AS) Tuvalu (Funafuti) (AU - Oceania) dot (U) Uganda (Kampala) (AF) Ukraine (Kiev) (EU) United Arab Emirates (Abu Dhabi) (AS) United Kingdom (London) (EU) Uruguay (Montevideo) (SA) Uzbekistan (Tashkent) (AS) dot (V) Vanuatu (Port-Vila) (AU - Oceania) Vatican City (na) (EU) Venezuela (Caracas) (SA) Vietnam (Hanoi) (AS) dot (Y) Yemen (Sana) (AS) Yugoslavia (now Serbia & Montenegro) (Belgrade) (EU) dot (Z) Zambia (Lusaka) (AF) Zimbabwe (Harare) (AF)
+Montenegro
--------------------
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: What countries should the US NOT Invade [Re: JoeCool]
#5792345 - 06/26/06 12:15 PM (17 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I was thinking we should do the same with all the white people, except no food on the boats
|
|