Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Feminized Cannabis Seeds   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  [ show all ]
OfflineYthanA
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/08/97
Posts: 18,774
Loc: NY/MA/VT Borderlands Flag
Last seen: 8 hours, 51 minutes
Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW
    #5573967 - 04/30/06 12:44 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)
Log in to view attachment

Edit: See below for proper link.

Pretty funny video, he says a lot of stuff to the president's face that may surprise you. My favorite part is the shocked, lukewarm reaction from the audience. I think it went over like a ton of bricks which just makes me give him more props.

Starts around minute 55 of the video.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinebarfightlard
tales of theinexpressible
Male

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/29/03 Happy 21st Shroomiversary!
Posts: 8,670
Loc: Canoodia
Last seen: 14 years, 1 month
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5573977 - 04/30/06 12:46 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

"The selected file cannot be found. Maybe it wasn't uploaded correctly.

Please use your back button to return to the previous page."


--------------------

"What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, say, think, who I fuck, what I take into my body - as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet?" - Bill Hicks


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineYthanA
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/08/97
Posts: 18,774
Loc: NY/MA/VT Borderlands Flag
Last seen: 8 hours, 51 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: barfightlard]
    #5573986 - 04/30/06 12:49 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Hrmm try this instead:

http://www.mininova.org/get/296239


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePhred
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 18 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5573992 - 04/30/06 12:52 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

The reason Colbert's act went over like a lead balloon is that he broke the unwritten rule, not because the room was full of Bush supporters. The tradition is that politicians get up and make fun OF THEMSELVES. Taking shots at others is a no-no. Even the members of the Washington press corps (who absolutely loathe Bush) understand this. Too bad none of them thought to tell Colbert.



Phred


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisible1stimer
Religion=Rape
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1,280
Loc: Amerika
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5574001 - 04/30/06 12:54 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I dont care that he didnt play by their rules.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineYthanA
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/08/97
Posts: 18,774
Loc: NY/MA/VT Borderlands Flag
Last seen: 8 hours, 51 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5574007 - 04/30/06 12:56 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Yeah I know, Colbert must too. That's why I think he has balls, anyone would say that stuff at a roast.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePhred
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 18 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5574076 - 04/30/06 01:27 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Ah, but that's the whole point -- it is NOT a "roast". At a roast some guy is targeted and speakers take shots at them.

As for "balls", if he really knew (and I agree with you that he did in fact know -- he's not a fool) how the event works then what he did shows not "balls", but crassness. It takes exactly zero "balls" to criticize Bush. It's the national pastime, for cryin' out loud. It's not as if Colbert were in any danger of being hussled off to a locked room to have the soles of his feet beaten with rubber truncheons. Or even of having his job at Comedy Central vanish. Or even having anyone in the mainstream press say anything the least bit negative about his behavior. No, the only negative consequence he suffered for his breach of protocol was that his act bombed. Not a unique occurrence for a comedian, you have to admit.

What truly could be considered ballsy would be some Iraqi pulling the same stunt on Saddam Hussein at a dinner in Baghdad a few years back.



Phred


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineYthanA
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/08/97
Posts: 18,774
Loc: NY/MA/VT Borderlands Flag
Last seen: 8 hours, 51 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5574130 - 04/30/06 01:49 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

See I do think the move could hurt him professionally. Nobody wants to hire a person who won't play ball. Yeah he probably won't lose his Comedy Central gig over this, but really how long will that last? And from now on he'll be the dick who lambasted the president at the White House correspondents dinner. Of course it would take more balls to do in Iraq. It would also be a certain death sentence. I kind of thought from the context it was clear I meant balls in a "mocking the leader of the free world" kind of way, not balls in the "staring torture and death in the face" kind of way. You want to talk balls he's got nothing on the thousands of servicemen over in the middle east right now. He's a comedian dude, I meant as a comedian.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBaby_Hitler
Errorist
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 27,587
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 9 hours, 46 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5574187 - 04/30/06 02:08 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Unwritten rules are the reason the system is broken.

Journalists who follow unwritten rules aren't real journalists. Commedians are the closest thing we have to real journalists these days.


--------------------
Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
(•_•)
<) )~  ANTIFA
/ \
\(•_•)
( (>    SUPER
/ \
(•_•)
<) )>    SOLDIERS
  / \


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Baby_Hitler]
    #5574204 - 04/30/06 02:12 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

i thought it was the coolest thing ive seen on news in a long long time.


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAaronEvil
The GuitarVillain
Male

Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5574348 - 04/30/06 03:02 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I commend him for what he did. Its not just the fact he attacked the Presidents policies and views, but the fact he put the media on the spot too. Calling them out on all their flaws in covering stories and important issues.

Spot on.


--------------------


There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: AaronEvil]
    #5574431 - 04/30/06 03:32 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

the whole time i just kept thinking.. man, i bet jon stewart is crying inside.

anyways here are the good links:

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcIRXur61II&search=colbert%20bush

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN0INDOkFuo

Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJvar7BKwvQ&search=colbert%20bush


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Edited by kotik (04/30/06 03:33 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: kotik]
    #5574458 - 04/30/06 03:43 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

From the almost perfect Jeff Goldstein at Protein Wisdom

"My thoughts: the fawning reaction coming from many on the anti-Bush bandwagon is, unfortunately, par for the course these days?as is the celebration of Colbert?s ?bravery,? especially when there are no real consequences for engaging in meanspirited political humor other than, say, being thought a dick."
http://www.proteinwisdom.com/index.php/weblog/entry/20238/#comments

If a room full of Bush haters want to take a day off from whacking at Bush's low hanging fruit, as it were, and somebody brings the lazy man's schtick, yet again, they're not going to be impressed. Or amused, apparently.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: kotik]
    #5574460 - 04/30/06 03:44 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

From the almost perfect Jeff Goldstein at Protein Wisdom

"My thoughts: the fawning reaction coming from many on the anti-Bush bandwagon is, unfortunately, par for the course these days?as is the celebration of Colbert?s ?bravery,? especially when there are no real consequences for engaging in meanspirited political humor other than, say, being thought a dick."
http://www.proteinwisdom.com/index.php/weblog/entry/20238/#comments

If a room full of Bush haters want to take a day off from whacking at Bush's low hanging fruit, as it were, and somebody brings the lazy man's schtick, yet again, they're not going to be impressed. Or amused, apparently.

Whah happened?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574464 - 04/30/06 03:44 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Something weird is going on.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBaby_Hitler
Errorist
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 27,587
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 9 hours, 46 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574531 - 04/30/06 04:09 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

With the board you mean?

After I posted my reply I went to another forum or two, when I came back my previous response was still sitting in the Quick Reply box.

That was weird, but I'm waiting for some other weird shit to happen before I report anything.


--------------------
Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
(•_•)
<) )~  ANTIFA
/ \
\(•_•)
( (>    SUPER
/ \
(•_•)
<) )>    SOLDIERS
  / \


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Baby_Hitler]
    #5574619 - 04/30/06 04:37 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I had a post get cut off after the first line. Twice.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574628 - 04/30/06 04:38 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

some transcripts / articles on it:

http://tinyurl.com/hbo8m

http://tinyurl.com/epmuf


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574660 - 04/30/06 04:52 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

zappaisgod said:
From the almost perfect Jeff Goldstein at Protein Wisdom

"My thoughts: the fawning reaction coming from many on the anti-Bush bandwagon is, unfortunately, par for the course these days




I'm going to try again.

http://www.proteinwisdom.com/index.php/weblog/entry/20238/#comments

"My thoughts: the fawning reaction coming from many on the anti-Bush bandwagon is, unfortunately, par for the course these days?as is the celebration of Colbert?s ?bravery,? especially when there are no real consequences for engaging in meanspirited political humor other than, say, being thought a dick."


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574666 - 04/30/06 04:53 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I think Jeffy might be restricting his citation length. Or the Shroomery is. Or something.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRedstorm
Prince of Bugs
Male

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 3 months, 11 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5574677 - 04/30/06 04:56 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Who gives a shit about "unwritten rules"? He's a comedian, and a political one at that. If anyone was suprised he would take potshots at the president, they must not have seen his show before.

I don't see what the big deal is. Someone didn't bend down and fellate the president. Big whoop. These big, lavish types of parties are a joke anyways, and a waste of tax-payer money.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Redstorm]
    #5574697 - 04/30/06 05:05 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I don't think taxpayers pay for these particular soirees. And the President appears out of courtesy.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRedstorm
Prince of Bugs
Male

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 3 months, 11 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574710 - 04/30/06 05:08 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Regardless, if the man can't take a little humorous criticism, I think he's better fit for a lower-pressre job. I didn't watch the video (goddamn dial-up), but I would guarantee this didn't phase Bush at all. People need to chill out and realize humor, even depreciating humor, is a good thing. I have a feeling the Bush fans were far more angry than Bush was.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Redstorm]
    #5574721 - 04/30/06 05:14 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

i think the pres had more balls than anyone last night


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: kotik]
    #5574735 - 04/30/06 05:23 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Redstorm, my friend, do you have any idea what this occasion is? They are supposed to make fun of themselves. And Bush did. He took the stage and made fun of himself. Colbert seemed to not understand, which is why even a room full of Bush haters didn't think he was funny. Because he was inappropriate. Go to the link I can't seem to quote from and read it. It's a very excellent blog in general anyway. My favorite, in fact.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineEquilibriuM
dream stalker

Registered: 07/17/05
Posts: 2,323
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: kotik]
    #5574739 - 04/30/06 05:25 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

That took balls. What did the president do that was so amazing? He just sat there, he did the exact same thing when planes crashed into the world trade center buildings.


--------------------
HELP!!!!!!!!!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe_Red_Crayon
Exposer of Truth
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/13/03
Posts: 13,673
Loc: Smokey Mtns. TN Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5574747 - 04/30/06 05:28 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

holy shit everyone stop the presses, Stephen Colbert said something inappropriate about Bush.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: EquilibriuM]
    #5574754 - 04/30/06 05:30 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

Colbert seemed to not understand




with all due respect, sir, i believe you are the one who is failing to understand the situation.  :blush:


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleVvellum
Stranger

Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5574794 - 04/30/06 05:46 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

so, publicly criticizing Bush is a cake walk? Maybe you should ask the dixie chicks or kayne west.

jesus, are you always a shill for bush?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAaronEvil
The GuitarVillain
Male

Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 1,706
Loc: California
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574830 - 04/30/06 05:58 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

zappaisgod said:
Redstorm, my friend, do you have any idea what this occasion is? They are supposed to make fun of themselves. And Bush did. He took the stage and made fun of himself. Colbert seemed to not understand, which is why even a room full of Bush haters didn't think he was funny. Because he was inappropriate. Go to the link I can't seem to quote from and read it. It's a very excellent blog in general anyway. My favorite, in fact.




I must say, I dont hate Bush (nor do I like him) and I thought it was very amusing. People in the audience were just shocked which is why they werent laughing.


--------------------


There is not a lot of difference between a fox hole and a grave; but knowing that you dug your ditch and climbed in anyway.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineEquilibriuM
dream stalker

Registered: 07/17/05
Posts: 2,323
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: kotik]
    #5574837 - 04/30/06 06:03 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

kotik said:
Quote:

Colbert seemed to not understand




with all due respect, sir, i believe you are the one who is failing to understand the situation.  :blush:




hey, thats not fair, I didnt say that


--------------------
HELP!!!!!!!!!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinevintage_gonzo
Stranger

Registered: 04/08/06
Posts: 457
Last seen: 15 years, 11 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Vvellum]
    #5574922 - 04/30/06 06:43 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

bi0 said:
so, publicly criticizing Bush is a cake walk? Maybe you should ask the dixie chicks or kayne west.

jesus, are you always a shill for bush?




zappaisgod and phred are on their knees for bush all the time. its pretty sad/lame.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOJK
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 06/08/03
Posts: 10,629
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5574968 - 04/30/06 06:59 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

zappaisgod said:
Redstorm, my friend, do you have any idea what this occasion is? They are supposed to make fun of themselves. And Bush did. He took the stage and made fun of himself. Colbert seemed to not understand, which is why even a room full of Bush haters didn't think he was funny. Because he was inappropriate. Go to the link I can't seem to quote from and read it. It's a very excellent blog in general anyway. My favorite, in fact.




If you're someone who takes a principled opposition to the current president and what he stands for, making that point heard is a damn sight more important than a room full of people thinking you're being innapropriate. Regardless of whether or not you agree with Colbert, I would expect people to realise that when a person believes someone is seriously harming the country they govern and is indirectly responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of people, that person will take any platform they can to voice those views and ask the public, or indeed the press, to examine their own views and loyalties, and reassess what is important.

It's kind of like when Michael Moore recieved an Oscar, and was clapped on to the stage. He then made some kind of anti-war statement, and was booed, and critized for "politicising" the event. He was being recognised for a body of work that was, in part, concerned with being opposed to the Iraq war, so of course he would use a public platform to give additional exposure to those views.

Similarly, Colbert's current work is entirely anti-bush and anti-press cowardice, so, of course, he used a public platform to express those views, because he believed them to be more important than him looking a bit of a fool, or a bit "innapropriate".

Bravo to him, I say.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLearyfanS
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 34,086
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 5 hours, 12 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: OJK]
    #5575146 - 04/30/06 07:52 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Big props to Stephen Colbert. It was very well done. He really gave it to Bush and the conservative media as well.









--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month:  The Apple-Glass Cyndrome - Someday



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBaby_Hitler
Errorist
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 27,587
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 9 hours, 46 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Learyfan]
    #5575299 - 04/30/06 08:45 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

They're not conservative in my opinion. They're just ingratiated to the status quo.

If Adolf Hitler or Osama Bin Laden were president they would be clapping politely and chuckleing graciously at their adorable little jokes about incinerating jews and beheading infadels.


--------------------
Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
(•_•)
<) )~  ANTIFA
/ \
\(•_•)
( (>    SUPER
/ \
(•_•)
<) )>    SOLDIERS
  / \


Edited by Baby_Hitler (04/30/06 08:50 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBasilides
Servent ofWisdom
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/10/06
Posts: 7,059
Loc: Crown and Heart
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Learyfan]
    #5575323 - 04/30/06 08:51 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I think Colbert went over the line. He basically hurt Bush's feelings


--------------------


"Have you found the beginning, then, that you are looking for the end? You see, the end will be where the beginning is. Congratulations to the one who stands at the beginning: that one will know the end and will not taste death."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBaby_Hitler
Errorist
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 27,587
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 9 hours, 46 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Basilides]
    #5575342 - 04/30/06 08:56 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Boo fucking hoo.

I would have been happy if someone had just stood up and said "SHUT UP, IDIOT!".


--------------------
Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
(•_•)
<) )~  ANTIFA
/ \
\(•_•)
( (>    SUPER
/ \
(•_•)
<) )>    SOLDIERS
  / \


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBasilides
Servent ofWisdom
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/10/06
Posts: 7,059
Loc: Crown and Heart
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Baby_Hitler]
    #5575364 - 04/30/06 09:02 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I despise Bush as much as the next man, but something in me felt sorry for him while Colbert was taking shots at him.


--------------------


"Have you found the beginning, then, that you are looking for the end? You see, the end will be where the beginning is. Congratulations to the one who stands at the beginning: that one will know the end and will not taste death."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineFospher
Crime FightingMaster Criminal
Male

Registered: 02/09/05
Posts: 2,033
Loc: The Netherlands
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5575568 - 04/30/06 10:00 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Bush is completely ignorant, but the video shows that he can still laugh at his follies, and that lightheartedness is only allowed with accompanied strength.

Colbert didn't do anything shocking either, in fact he did the exact same thing that he was expected to. Comedy Central was the reason that Kerry's ratings were so high, humour, and especially satire has an immense effect on the opinion of the masses. Did they expect him to go on stage and tell a bunch of cheesy republican jokes that would only be laughed at out of pity and out of the phony politeness of the nature of this kind of party?

He was invited specifically for his radical views, (or more correctly put, say what everyone is already thinking but is afraid to say) and that's what he gave. No surprise there!

:shrug:


--------------------
010001100100001001000101!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedaimyo
Monticello

Registered: 05/13/04
Posts: 7,751
Last seen: 12 years, 22 hours
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5575643 - 04/30/06 10:26 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Fuck Bush. Running from service, surrounding himself with draft dodging pieces of shit, motherfucker.


--------------------
"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleGijith
Daisy Chain Eater

Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5575711 - 04/30/06 10:43 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I read his routine. I thought it was hit and miss, but definitely funnier than anyone else on the podium that night.

To hell with a press corps that's gonna gasp and hiss whenever someone does something that they'd get fired for.

Every single person needs one day a year of uncensored roasting. If someone had done this in the midst of blowjobgate 8 years ago, the audience would have had the same reaction, but it would have gone down in history as one of the greatest things ever. Colbert's bits weren't that great, but he put in a solid effort.

It's amazing that he kept his cool.


--------------------
what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?


Edited by Gijith (04/30/06 10:57 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleKingOftheThing
the cool fool
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/17/02
Posts: 27,397
Loc: USA
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: daimyo]
    #5575718 - 04/30/06 10:45 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

i love this man colbert. he really stuck it to america's worst president. i love all these funless republicans. part of the last 32% who actually like bush. waaaaaah sum1 made fun of our hero waaaah waaah waaahh :bitch: :bitch: :bitch: :bitch: :bitch:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblezorbman
blarrr
Male

Registered: 06/04/04
Posts: 5,952
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5575978 - 05/01/06 12:19 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

he broke the unwritten rule, not because the room was full of Bush supporters. The tradition is that politicians get up and make fun OF THEMSELVES. Taking shots at others is a no-no.

Where have you been?

Invited speakers have been taking shots at the President and other politicians at this event for years now. I would certainly call that a "tradition". The event may have been more restrained decades ago, but lately it has taken on the tone of a roast. And that's a GOOD thing. The man is our President, not our King and SHOULD hear things he finds rude occasionly because that is what is being said outside of his bubble and it's GOOD for him to hear it.


--------------------
“The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.”  -- Rudiger Dornbusch


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zorbman]
    #5576358 - 05/01/06 04:52 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

hey, thats not fair, I didnt say that




im lazy... and I ALWAYS use the quick reply.. so ya,  :thumbup:


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineViveka
refutation bias
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5577640 - 05/01/06 03:23 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I was at a friends and he flipped to CSPAN just in time for us to catch where Colbert was playing the president or the press secretary, I'm not sure, and he was being berrated by the press and turning down the volume knob on them. Then he was being chased by this old lady. This was towards the end because then he was shaking hands with people after the presentation, it looked looked he shook hands with Bush but upon closer inspection, it looked like a guy dressed up in a bush costume. Was this from the same event you guys are talking about. And how was this Bush impersonator involved?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinegluke bastid
Stinky Bum
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/20/00
Posts: 3,322
Loc: Charm City
Last seen: 5 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: KingOftheThing]
    #5577758 - 05/01/06 03:59 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

KingOftheThing said:
i love this man colbert. he really stuck it to america's worst president. i love all these funless republicans. part of the last 32% who actually like bush. waaaaaah sum1 made fun of our hero waaaah waaah waaahh :bitch: :bitch: :bitch: :bitch: :bitch:




:thumbup:
The only thing funnier than watching Colbert simultaneously mock the president and the media is laughing at people who think it was another example of some sort of "trend" of Bush-bashing, as if it is unthinkable that hatred for him and his media protection from voices of dissent could be genuine. Some people have no clue  :rolleyes:


--------------------
:hst:
Society in every form is a blessing,
but government at its best is but a necessary evil
 
- Thomas Paine


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineguri
Master of theimprobablitydrive

Registered: 01/10/04
Posts: 576
Loc: PNWish.
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Viveka]
    #5577763 - 05/01/06 04:01 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

yeah its the same event. basicly before colbert went on stage, Bush was on stage with an impersonater at the same time. they would alternate back and fourth with the impersonator speaking what george was thinking in his at at the time and then george actually saying something diffrent outloud. for example one time steve bridges(the impersonator) kept reminding himself on how to pronounce nuclear properly. of course when bush went to say the word he completly messed it up. it was actually rather funny.


--------------------
"If you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, then go home and burn all your records, all your tapes, and all your CDs because every one of those artists who have made brilliant music and enhanced your lives? The Beatles were so fucking high, they let Ringo sing a few songs." --Bill Hicks


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Viveka]
    #5577769 - 05/01/06 04:02 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

You guys still just don't fucking get it. These guys are at each other's throats 24/7. This is supposed to be an occasion where that is all put aside and they laugh at themselves and each other. It's supposed to be a tension reducer. The press corps knows that, the politicians know that. That's why he bombed to THAT audience. If not for the tradition of light-hearted self deprecation this little soiree wouldn't even exist. It's supposed to be a night when they check their guns at the door and hoot an holler together a little. Colbert was inappropriate FOR THE OCCASION. The people there knew it. The people who don't know it are you guys. It's not your party. If I was them, and I mean ALL of them, I wouldn't stop having it but I would stop letting it be taped. Too many dopes don't understand what it is supposed to be. This party IS NOT FOR YOU.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblenewuser1492
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5577806 - 05/01/06 04:12 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

This country still recognizes free speech doesn't it? If they didn't like what he was going to say they shouldn't have fucking invited him. Anyone who watches The Colbert Report would have known he wasn't going to be a complete pussy like most of the other reporters.

As someone above said. Bush isn't our King, if a majority of the populace believes he's doing a bad job then he should be reminded of that at all times.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: newuser1492]
    #5577886 - 05/01/06 04:28 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

You still don't fucking get it. Utterly hopeless. This is a PRIVATE PARTY. HIS BEHAVIOUR WAS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THOSE HAVING THE PARTY. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FREE SPEECH.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5577971 - 05/01/06 04:42 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

yes, well he was INVITED to SPEAK at the PRIVATE PARTY.


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineguri
Master of theimprobablitydrive

Registered: 01/10/04
Posts: 576
Loc: PNWish.
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5577977 - 05/01/06 04:44 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

how do you propose he should have acted then? to be honest im pretty sure whoever booked him at that event probably was familiar with his style of comedy and should have known what they where getting themselves into.

yes what he said at times was probably hurtful to bush and what he said was probably not appropriate for the occasion, but i dont see him acting any other way


--------------------
"If you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, then go home and burn all your records, all your tapes, and all your CDs because every one of those artists who have made brilliant music and enhanced your lives? The Beatles were so fucking high, they let Ringo sing a few songs." --Bill Hicks


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinegluke bastid
Stinky Bum
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/20/00
Posts: 3,322
Loc: Charm City
Last seen: 5 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5578068 - 05/01/06 05:01 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

You may be right that the event is supposed to have a theme but if it really was a PRIVATE PARTY then why was it BROADCAST ON TELEVISION for all of us "dopes" who aren't in the press to watch?


--------------------
:hst:
Society in every form is a blessing,
but government at its best is but a necessary evil
 
- Thomas Paine


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSchwip
Never sleeps.
 User Gallery

Registered: 06/27/05
Posts: 3,937
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5578128 - 05/01/06 05:15 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I sort of stopped reading after the fourth page.....I also didnt watch the video or see this on tv.....

But what exactly was the point of this broadcast? was it supposed to be some sort of feel good fucking show? or a fundraiser? what?

Anyone else not really think this sort of thing is something bush should be participating in? Here he is a wartime president, trying to crack jokes and such...har har..good times.......all the while HIS war is being fought far away.....

Maybe im missing something here? Just see this as kind of odd...


--------------------
--------------------------------

" If the sky were to suddenly open up there would be no law. There would be no rule. There would only be you and your memories... the choices you've made, and the people you've touched. If this world were to end there would only be you and him and no-one else. "

..............

"MAN! You know there aint no such thing as left over crack!"



Edited by Schwip (05/01/06 05:20 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedaimyo
Monticello

Registered: 05/13/04
Posts: 7,751
Last seen: 12 years, 22 hours
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Schwip]
    #5578143 - 05/01/06 05:19 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

You're not missing anything. Bush, and the media, are a bunch of pole smokers and Colbert "ruined" their good time, jack each other off party.

And in case you didn't know, Rove planned for all of this to happen to make lefties look even more distasteful than they already do.


--------------------
"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSchwip
Never sleeps.
 User Gallery

Registered: 06/27/05
Posts: 3,937
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: daimyo]
    #5578174 - 05/01/06 05:28 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

lol....a big PR thing then?


--------------------
--------------------------------

" If the sky were to suddenly open up there would be no law. There would be no rule. There would only be you and your memories... the choices you've made, and the people you've touched. If this world were to end there would only be you and him and no-one else. "

..............

"MAN! You know there aint no such thing as left over crack!"



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblezorbman
blarrr
Male

Registered: 06/04/04
Posts: 5,952
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5578205 - 05/01/06 05:37 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

If that was a "private party" it has to be the only one I've ever heard of where millions of people were invited to tune in over the public airwaves. Puh-lease.

As for Colbert's routine being considered inappropriate by some, why did they invite him?? Anyone in the world can watch his show and see that he is not a fan of the President! I, for one, am assuming the event organizers, like most people, own a tv set and invited the man on purpose.

Let's face it, like it or not this event has taken on the tone of a celebrity roast over the years- and yes, politicians NEED to be reminded occasionly that they work for US, not the other way around! They need to have their bubbles popped and be taken to the woodshed now and then.

It's a GOOD thing.
(If a bit painful).

BTW, the level of pain perceived from this type of humor is in direct proportion to the size of the ego which explains a lot.


--------------------
“The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.”  -- Rudiger Dornbusch


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinedaimyo
Monticello

Registered: 05/13/04
Posts: 7,751
Last seen: 12 years, 22 hours
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Schwip]
    #5578208 - 05/01/06 05:38 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

:yesnod:

He's pulling out all the stops before he gets arrested.


--------------------
"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePhred
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 18 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: newuser1492]
    #5578209 - 05/01/06 05:38 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

This country still recognizes free speech doesn't it? If they didn't like what he was going to say they shouldn't have fucking invited him.




And you still don't get it. They didn't like what he had to say, so they didn't laugh. That's the total extent of the "punishment" he'll receive for his "bravery" -- a lukewarm response from the audience.

Colbert wasn't criticized, or threatened, or given a dressing down afterwards, or anything even close to that. All that happened was that he got perfunctory applause. Bush and the impersonator got laughs (and Colbert didn't) because --

1) they respected the spirit the of the event and Colbert didn't

2) they were funny and Colbert wasn't

Now that the transcripts of the event are available, it's plain that the lack of applause for Colbert wasn't due just to audience discomfort at his crassness, but because his material and delivery weren't all that funny. Some of the stuff reads no differently than a standard rant at the Daily Kos or Democratic Underground. Most of the rest of it rises maybe to the level of Margaret Cho (which - for those who have never seen Margaret Cho perform - is no compliment). Yeah, there were a few chuckles in there, but for a professional comedian that was pretty lame stuff. Maybe he does better on the Daily Show (I have no TV so have never seen the Daily Show), but if what he delivered at that gig is representative of his usual work, he'd do well to hire better writers.



Phred


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleGijith
Daisy Chain Eater

Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5578221 - 05/01/06 05:42 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I've got a new idea on why Colbert didn't get laughs. Anyone wanna take a guess as to the average age of the audience?


--------------------
what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineThe_Red_Crayon
Exposer of Truth
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/13/03
Posts: 13,673
Loc: Smokey Mtns. TN Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5578358 - 05/01/06 06:30 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

The fact that this thread is over 7 pages and other more intelligent debates in this forum have no replies. This is one of the reasons P&L is going down the shitter.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: The_Red_Crayon]
    #5578373 - 05/01/06 06:37 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

It's the American Idol of PA&L


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleKingOftheThing
the cool fool
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/17/02
Posts: 27,397
Loc: USA
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zappaisgod]
    #5579096 - 05/01/06 09:23 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

zappaisgod said:
:bitch::bitch::bitch::bitch::bitch:




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLearyfanS
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 34,086
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 5 hours, 12 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: gluke bastid]
    #5579265 - 05/01/06 09:47 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)
Log in to view attachment

Quote:

gluke bastid said:
The only thing funnier than watching Colbert simultaneously mock the president and the media is laughing at people who think it was another example of some sort of "trend" of Bush-bashing, as if it is unthinkable that hatred for him and his media protection from voices of dissent could be genuine. Some people have no clue  :rolleyes:




^^






--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month:  The Apple-Glass Cyndrome - Someday



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinegluke bastid
Stinky Bum
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/20/00
Posts: 3,322
Loc: Charm City
Last seen: 5 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5581311 - 05/02/06 12:27 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
They didn't like what he had to say, so they didn't laugh. That's the total extent of the "punishment" he'll receive for his "bravery" -- a lukewarm response from the audience.

Colbert wasn't criticized, or threatened, or given a dressing down afterwards, or anything even close to that. All that happened was that he got perfunctory applause. Bush and the impersonator got laughs (and Colbert didn't) because --

1) they respected the spirit the of the event and Colbert didn't

2) they were funny and Colbert wasn't

Now that the transcripts of the event are available, it's plain that the lack of applause for Colbert wasn't due just to audience discomfort at his crassness, but because his material and delivery weren't all that funny. Some of the stuff reads no differently than a standard rant at the Daily Kos or Democratic Underground. Most of the rest of it rises maybe to the level of Margaret Cho (which - for those who have never seen Margaret Cho perform - is no compliment). Yeah, there were a few chuckles in there, but for a professional comedian that was pretty lame stuff. Maybe he does better on the Daily Show (I have no TV so have never seen the Daily Show), but if what he delivered at that gig is representative of his usual work, he'd do well to hire better writers.

Phred




Actually I agree with you 100%, especially about Margaret Cho. She has yet to make me crack a smile. Colbert's routine, if you watch the footage, comes across as pretty tired and uncreative.


--------------------
:hst:
Society in every form is a blessing,
but government at its best is but a necessary evil
 
- Thomas Paine


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekotik
fuckingsuperhero
 User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/29/04
Posts: 3,531
Last seen: 4 years, 24 days
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: gluke bastid]
    #5581346 - 05/02/06 12:39 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

this board is tired and uncreative.


--------------------
No statements made in any post or message by myself should be construed to mean that I am now, or have ever been, participating in or considering participation in any activities in violation of any local, state, or federal laws. All posts are works of fiction.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSporetacus
Swashbuckler

Registered: 04/19/06
Posts: 152
Last seen: 17 years, 8 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Basilides]
    #5584425 - 05/03/06 03:07 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

Basilides said:
I despise Bush as much as the next man, but something in me felt sorry for him while Colbert was taking shots at him.




I feel more sorry for the soldiers who are getting potshots taken at them for the Bush Admins' money-making agenda.


--------------------
I'm Sporetacus!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineebass
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/15/06
Posts: 387
Last seen: 11 years, 1 month
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Phred]
    #5588595 - 05/04/06 12:22 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
Ah, but that's the whole point -- it is NOT a "roast". At a roast some guy is targeted and speakers take shots at them.

As for "balls", if he really knew (and I agree with you that he did in fact know -- he's not a fool) how the event works then what he did shows not "balls", but crassness. It takes exactly zero "balls" to criticize Bush. It's the national pastime, for cryin' out loud. It's not as if Colbert were in any danger of being hussled off to a locked room to have the soles of his feet beaten with rubber truncheons. Or even of having his job at Comedy Central vanish. Or even having anyone in the mainstream press say anything the least bit negative about his behavior. No, the only negative consequence he suffered for his breach of protocol was that his act bombed. Not a unique occurrence for a comedian, you have to admit.

What truly could be considered ballsy would be some Iraqi pulling the same stunt on Saddam Hussein at a dinner in Baghdad a few years back.



Phred



He was trying to prove a point that there is no liberal media. Mission accomplished.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineViveka
refutation bias
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: ebass]
    #5589573 - 05/04/06 10:52 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Does anyone else feel that the terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are right on the edge of slipping into the abyss of sheer hyperbole, or are they there already? 'Liberal media' in what sense? Liberal as in promoting liberty or liberal as in increasing the scope of federal government? Both definitions have been applied to the word liberal, yet they are diametrically opposed.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineYthanA
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Male User Gallery

Registered: 08/08/97
Posts: 18,774
Loc: NY/MA/VT Borderlands Flag
Last seen: 8 hours, 51 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Viveka]
    #5592300 - 05/04/06 11:53 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Not really, you need a big powerful government to provide "liberties" like welfare, food stamps and medicare. Neither right nor left is that concerned with real liberties, like leaving people the fuck alone. The liberals spend all your money and the conservatives legislate morality. That's why I don't vote, so I can complain the system doesn't adequately represent me and use that to further justify my lack of participation (to paraphrase Calvin). Actually I don't vote so I don't have to deal with jury duty.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineViveka
refutation bias
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5608412 - 05/09/06 11:51 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Welfare, food stamps and medicare aren't "liberties", they're privileges. Big government cannot provide liberty, it can only refrain from taking it away.

You can say "liberals" spend all your money and while historically that may be true, today the people you would label conservatives like the current administration are spending more money than any administration in history.

You can say conservatives legislate morality but remember that panel of senators wives back in the 80's, the PMRC, that insisted that Zappa and other musicians were corrupting his own and everyone else's children and then used their husbands' influence and money to institute legislation attempting to censor modern music? Were those "conservatives" or "liberals" legislating morality?

You have to admit these terms have become almost meaningless rhetoric.
They are more inflammatory than informative and they do more to hinder real communication than to foster it. They imply that everything is polarized and all of a person's ideas can be neatly collected under one heading like iron filings on the end of a magnet.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleJonnyOnTheSpot
Sober Surfer
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/27/02
Posts: 11,527
Loc: North Carolina
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5608496 - 05/09/06 12:13 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

i don't think the bush camp understood that colbert is a satirist whenever they invited him.

whatever though, it was hilarious.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinegluke bastid
Stinky Bum
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/20/00
Posts: 3,322
Loc: Charm City
Last seen: 5 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Viveka]
    #5608785 - 05/09/06 01:26 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

EvilEye? said:
Does anyone else feel that the terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are right on the edge of slipping into the abyss of sheer hyperbole, or are they there already? 




:yesnod:

I would go as far as to say that left vs. right politics are no longer a representation of the American people, and that basically what we have instead of a dynamic political system is a spectacle put on by the media and the RNC and the DNC. Instead of either party ever really getting anything done, they simply find a typically meaningless issue in which a debate can be polarized between right and left. Then they trot out their respective pit bulls to argue, and the media covers the whole thing and the public swallows the debate and then go home and argue over the same meaningless issue with whoever they can find on the other side.


--------------------
:hst:
Society in every form is a blessing,
but government at its best is but a necessary evil
 
- Thomas Paine


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblezorbman
blarrr
Male

Registered: 06/04/04
Posts: 5,952
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: gluke bastid]
    #5608991 - 05/09/06 02:28 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I agree. This is a do-nothing government. Real issues are not being addressed and there are urgent matters that need to be addressed before they bloom into full-grown crises.

The difference between the two parties in terms of how they actually govern is not nearly as wide as their rhetoric would lead you to believe. The ideological rhetoric is just red meat for the clueless faithful.

The sad truth is that over time, national politics has become a wholly owned subsidiary of Corporate America. A handful of large corporations own and control the major media outlets and the two political parties. They have ensured that no matter who wins they win.

So the public gets its nightly tv dinner consisting of missing-pretty-young-white-female, harrowing police chases, out of control brush fires, celebrity gossip, and shiny objects with an occasional helping of watered-down news to keep them occupied.

Bread and circuses.

Then every four years voters are offered a choice between Coke and Pepsi.
You decide.


--------------------
“The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.”  -- Rudiger Dornbusch


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAKtoker
Shibby

Registered: 03/08/05
Posts: 200
Last seen: 11 years, 3 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: zorbman]
    #5609135 - 05/09/06 03:01 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

http://files.ww.com/download.html?id=13904

heres a good link to the video. 15 mins and 10mb in wma format


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinequillini
one meanmotorscooter
Male

Registered: 04/18/06
Posts: 255
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Ythan]
    #5609534 - 05/09/06 05:05 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Rock on Stephen Colbert!  Oh my fucking great god!  That was a riot!

Whoever didn't think that was the funniest shit ever, my god I can't stop laughing.  All I'm thinking is, someone needed to say it!

I can't believe what I saw.  Bush got SHUT DOWN, clubbed like a baby seal.  You know, the bit with the impersonator made me kinda like Bush for a second.  I thought, you know, he's actually pretty funny.  But in the back of my mind I'm thinking, yeah, he's also a sonofabitch.

Then Colbert takes the stage.  And he speaks the truth that no one in the room wanted to hear.  I'm not saying it took "balls" or "courage", because there were no serious consequences.  But it did take nerves of steel.  I mean, you could be courageous but still not maintain your composure, and being courageous is certainly more honorable than having nerve.

But HOT DAMN does Colbert have some nerve! :spank:


--------------------
No; truth, being alive, was not halfway between anything. It was only to be found by continuous excursions into either realm, and though proportion is the final secret, to espouse it at the outset is to insure sterility.

Only connect...


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineDarcho
PhysicallyDetermined

Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 426
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: The_Red_Crayon]
    #5610088 - 05/09/06 07:41 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

The_Red_Crayon said:
The fact that this thread is over 7 pages and other more intelligent debates in this forum have no replies. This is one of the reasons P&L is going down the shitter.




I may be tripping, but isn't this thread only 4 pages in length?

I am confused, what happened to the other 3 pages?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineguri
Master of theimprobablitydrive

Registered: 01/10/04
Posts: 576
Loc: PNWish.
Last seen: 15 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Darcho]
    #5611402 - 05/10/06 01:50 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

they are chilling with the wmds...



actually he probably just has his pages set to display a fewer amount of posts and that in turn increases his page count for a thread.


--------------------
"If you don't believe drugs have done good things for us, then go home and burn all your records, all your tapes, and all your CDs because every one of those artists who have made brilliant music and enhanced your lives? The Beatles were so fucking high, they let Ringo sing a few songs." --Bill Hicks


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleafoaf
CEO DBK?
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: guri]
    #5612384 - 05/10/06 12:00 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I love all the whining about the appropriateness from the
people who traditionally decry whiners.

funny is funny.


--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleVvellum
Stranger

Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: afoaf]
    #5619338 - 05/11/06 10:38 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

here's a good editoral on cobert:
http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/hottype/060512/

Quote:

Laugh Riot

Stephen Colbert's speech at the White House press corps dinner threw the gap between the old and new media into stark relief.

In blog time Stephen Colbert’s speech at the April 29 White House correspondents dinner is ancient history, though its glory will live forever. By mainstream-media standards Colbert spoke just the other day, but nothing he said was worth reporting.

The AP story on the dinner that both the Tribune and the Sun-Times carried was a model of mainstream-media construction. Reporter Elizabeth White focused on the royalty instead of the rabble—jokes that President Bush told on himself were the news, not what some professional jester said about him. “President Bush and a lookalike, soundalike sidekick poked fun at the president and fellow politicians,” White reported. It was “twice the fun” for the audience of journalists and guests.

Ten paragraphs in, White reported perfunctorily on the “featured entertainer,” Colbert: “‘I believe that the government that governs best is a government that governs least, and by these standards we have set up a fabulous government in Iraq,’ Colbert said in a typical zinger. He also paid mock tribute to Bush as a man who ‘believes Wednesday what he believed Monday, despite what happened Tuesday.’”

The Sun-Times trimmed the AP story by editing out Colbert’s quotes, reducing him to a passing reference. It was classic MSM thinking: hey, space is tight, and where’s the news value in a comedian’s quips? But in the blogosphere, where space is infinite and communal wisdom decides what matters, MSM economies garner the contempt Matthew would have been due if his report on the Sermon on the Mount had blown off the beatitudes.

In the days that followed, the Sun-Times, like the Tribune, printed not another word on Colbert—though Sun-Times Washington reporter Lynn Sweet acknowledged him online. When she asserted in her blog that Colbert had disappointed her—“Given the potential material, I expected better”—bloggers’ condemnation rained down. “It was the most electric and searing comic performance in a decade. You are insensate inside.” And “Come clean, Lynn. America is BEGGING for honest journalism.”

To its credit, the Sun-Times slapped together a Colbert package for its Sunday, May 7, Controversy section—an edited text of Colbert’s talk ran alongside an essay by TV critic Doug Elfman, who acknowledged the “blogstorm” and suggested a “newsworthy lead” that MSM reporters (like Elizabeth White—and Sweet, for that matter) hadn’t been sharp enough to write: “It was perhaps the first time in Bush’s tenure that the president was forced to sit and listen to any American cite the litany of criminal and corruption allegations that have piled up against his administration.”

In another part of the paper Paige Wiser weighed in with her usual ingenuous acuity, observing that “what should have been an occasion for laughter has become a political hot button, a media frenzy, a national scandal. Nothing has been taken more seriously than this guy’s little standup routine. . . . Can’t anybody take a joke?”

That media frenzy had produced a new Web site, thankyoustephencolbert.org, a 37 percent jump in ratings for Comedy Central’s The Colbert Report, and an announcement on Yahoo’s “buzz log” last Sunday that searches for Colbert had jumped 5,625 percent in the previous week and were still “picking up speed.” But if you hadn’t been online you saw none of it. Stoutly maintaining its obliviousness to Colbert mania right up to the mania’s sell-by date, the Tribune produced a Sunday Perspective section that was all about Chicago’s bid for the 2016 Olympics. This was the sort of editor-driven team journalism the Internet remains incapable of, and frankly, I was happy to read about something besides Colbert. Even so, he’d come and gone, and the Tribune had barely noticed. The Week in Review section of the Sunday New York Times was also Colbert free. The Times left Colbert out of its original coverage of the dinner, carried a piece on the blogstorm on May 3, and then forgot about him. Colbert returned to the Times May 8 in its business pages: C-SPAN, which had aired the dinner live and was marketing the DVD for $24.95, was telling other Web sites that had posted the video of the speech to take it down.

If this skirmish between old media and new had spent itself, never was the line between the two so clear. The old offers coverage, the new conversation. The old doesn’t like being part of the story and shrinks from characters like Colbert who insist it is. The new—like a colony of ants swarming over a dead wren—can’t separate its rapt attention to a story from the story. If the AP had written the story the bloggers were collectively ratifying, it could have begun like this: “Truth was finally spoken to power Saturday night in Washington D.C., humiliating a fitfully laughing audience that consisted of the president of the United States and hundreds of squirming journalists. Power had no comment afterward.”

The Opinionator is a New York Times-maintained blog that hailed Colbert as it drew withering fire on the Times itself. “Stephen Colbert’s remarks were so scathing,” said one contributor, “that none of the sycophants amongst the assembled would have dared to laugh for fear of being demoted or marginalized. The comedic tension he created simply blew the room away. It wasn’t a high score on the laff-o-meter he sought. Nope, he had a loftier ambition. (TO TELL THE TRUTH.)”

This comment touched on a crucial point: Colbert didn’t leave ’em rolling in the aisles. Which is why, when virtually overnight the Internet exploded, the original subject wasn’t truth and power. It was whether Colbert was actually funny.

Did Colbert deliver Swiftian irony or leaden sarcasm? Did a craven press corps laugh less than it should have or as much as Colbert deserved? Was the laughter tepid because the press corps was also the target of Colbert’s irony/sarcasm or because it felt embarrassed for President Bush, Colbert’s main target, sitting just a few feet away? Was their embarrassment gallant, or did it betray the corps’ toady status?

And by the way, why was Antonin Scalia laughing so hard? And George Clooney not laughing at all?

Big questions. Questions ultimately transcended but never settled, not even by the gawker.com poll that saw Colbert’s performance called “one of the most patriotic acts I’ve witnessed of any individual” by 87.9 percent of people who voted and “not really that funny” by the rest.

But they were questions posed by the new media and ignored by the old. This schism may call for another C.P. Snow, a scientist and author who made a career along the last century’s cultural fault line. “A good many times I have been present at gatherings of people who, by the standards of the traditional culture, are thought highly educated and who have with considerable gusto been expressing their incredulity at the illiteracy of scientists,” he wrote. “Once or twice I have been provoked and have asked the company how many of them could describe the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The response was cold: it was also negative. Yet I was asking something which is about the scientific equivalent of: ‘Have you read a work of Shakespeare’s?’”

The law of entropy was founded on the observation that dis-equilibriums resolve themselves. Hot things cool off. Cold things get tepid. Concentrations of energy disperse and diffuse. This Monday the Newspaper Association of America reported that, according to the most recent figures, daily circulation had dropped by another 2.5 percent but visits to the papers’ Web sites had climbed by 8 percent. Energy is shifting. A new equilibrium is out there somewhere in the future.

When Washington Post political reporter Dana Milbank fielded questions online on May 5, most were about Colbert. Except they weren’t questions—they were pronouncements. The first had the press sitting idly by as Colbert was “revealing the truth about their complicity with the White House.” Another had the Post “and the rest of the White house lap dogs [sweeping] Republican shenanigans under the rug.” Milbank tried to give as good as he got, replying that he’d forward the latter complaint “to my colleagues Sue Schmidt, who won the Pulitzer last month for the Abramoff story, and to Dana Priest, who won the Pulitzer for exposing the administration’s secret prisons.”

Unfortunately, Milbank thought Colbert “wasn’t terribly funny.” Someone in Chicago set him straight. “It’s not whether Colbert was funny or not. . . . It’s that either way, nobody in the media reported it. THAT’s what’s troubling—sound, intelligent dissent going down the memory hole.”

As if.





Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineArcofaJourney
Internaltransportationdevice
 User Gallery
Registered: 10/05/05
Posts: 582
Loc: your imagination
Last seen: 6 years, 7 months
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Vvellum]
    #5619413 - 05/11/06 11:00 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

waaaah waaaah oh man you bushies sound like such crybabies... WAAH WAAH Colbert broke an unwritten rule WAAH WAAAH ....The scary thing is that you know what he said was right and true, the truth always hurts the biggest liars the worst.....


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleVvellum
Stranger

Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: ArcofaJourney]
    #5619734 - 05/12/06 12:09 AM (17 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

The scary thing is that you know what he said was right and true, the truth always hurts the biggest liars the worst.....




:thumbup:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,460
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 2 hours, 56 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Vvellum]
    #5623114 - 05/12/06 10:21 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I love Colbert, however, I do think his performance was not that good.


Lewis Black is the man, in my opinion, for the best political humor!!!!!!


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleVvellum
Stranger

Registered: 05/24/04
Posts: 10,920
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: SirTripAlot]
    #5629785 - 05/14/06 07:56 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

I think you missed the point...


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSirTripAlot
Semper Fidelis
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 7,460
Loc: Harmless (Mostly)
Last seen: 2 hours, 56 minutes
Re: Stephen Colbert talking shit to GW [Re: Vvellum]
    #5632544 - 05/15/06 01:16 PM (17 years, 8 months ago)

What point? That a commentator/ comedian made fun of the president directly in his presence?


Who couldnt do that?


And by the way, that video that Colbert showed was not funny or clever at all..........


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  [ show all ]

Shop: PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Feminized Cannabis Seeds   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Stephen Colbert Murex 1,281 14 01/22/07 01:51 PM
by wookie
* GW Bush is disappointed that same-sex marriage wasn't banned
( 1 2 3 all )
daussaulit 6,187 56 07/28/04 08:23 PM
by Zahid
* Time's man of the year = GW Bush!
( 1 2 all )
Great_Satan 2,549 28 12/23/04 04:52 AM
by uno
* One of the heroes I was talking about
( 1 2 all )
Aldous 1,532 24 04/04/03 10:49 PM
by Skikid16
* The anti-Yanks are all talk, no action
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Ellis Dee 6,443 88 10/26/02 01:43 PM
by Innvertigo
* America gone to shit
( 1 2 all )
DellComputers 2,879 27 08/04/03 01:22 PM
by GernBlanston
* N. Korea talking "pre-emptive strike" LearyfanS 1,015 17 02/09/03 04:33 AM
by Phluck
* What is Wesley Clark doing with NED? (Weird shit)
( 1 2 all )
PsiloKitten 2,872 32 10/15/03 07:28 PM
by luvdemshrooms

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
4,705 topic views. 4 members, 1 guests and 27 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.055 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 14 queries.