Home | Community | Message Board

Out-Grow.com - Mushroom Growing Kits & Supplies
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
InvisibleSkorpivoMusterion
Livin in theTwilight Zone...
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/30/03
Posts: 9,954
Loc: You can't spell fungus wi...
Clarifications on my part.
    #5510455 - 04/12/06 11:03 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

I've noticed the recent insurgence of variants in definitions of what many see me arguing & debating against here in this forum: Mysticism.
In light of such, I feel compelled to step forth and rectify any possible confusion or misinterpretation in my philosophical stances.

First and foremost, I will address the definition of mysticism that I do not have any conflicts with:
[From Dictionary.com]

Immediate consciousness of the transcendent or ultimate reality or God.
If by "God", one means the archetypal template of higher cognition whereby enlightened behavior is sustained, then I've not a single quarrel with this definition.

I've noticed this is more or less somewhat in a similar vein to what Fireworks discussed in his thread, "Experience, Awareness is Mystical".

In this context, IMO, the word mystical is interchangeable with spiritual or even transcendental. On a side tangent, when I once went scuba-diving in the ocean in Florida, that was one of the most spiritual experiences I've ever had.

Now I will address the meaning of mysticism that I do oppose and argue against here in this forum. But rather than quote a trite, brief quote from the dictionary, I will simply point out the ultimate consequences or final characteristics of the mysticism/mystics with which I engage in philosophical war in pursuit and illustration of Truth.

1)Those who believe that consciousness has primacy over existence; that existence is manipulatable by the power of their whims and desires, i.e., prayers.

2)Those who hold humility as a virtue, and pride as a vice.

3)Those who hold self-sacrifice as a virtue, and selfishness as a vice.

4)Those who think Capitalism as a political-economic system is inherently evil and detrimental to society.

5)Those who subordinate reason to faith.

6)Those who hold emotions as tools of cognition.

7)Those who believe the mind is a tool of distortion.

8)Those who hold altruism is the higher-good, and collectivism as a moral political-economical system.

9)Those who promote the blind acceptance of premises that are against [or apart] from the evidence provided by our senses.

10)Those who behave as if it is a virtue to live with one's eyes half-closed, in a dimly lit cerebral focus, but a sin to live with one's eyes wide opened, in clear intellectual focus.

11)Those who unknowingly promote the hindrance, destruction and torture of what is mankind's greatest asset: The mind.


If you feel I've addressed you in the above list, then you are that mystic.

Now, going back to the other variants of the contextually differing word in question: spiritual & transcendental; It is unfortunate that the mystics have burdened these two words -transcendence & spirituality- with negative stigma as a result of a great many evils of ignorance abound in contradictory philosophy, faulty cognition and malevolent premises.
Due to such blunders that tore asunder a rational, secular, this-worldly, earthly and practical definition of what is a very natural aspect of human nature, people have been led to believe such aspects of human existence must be super-natural, mystical in nature or other-worldly.

As such, the mystics have perpetrated a great injustice on all of mankind. Many are not even privvy to it, because not many people excercise their natural capacity to think through the consequences of their actions, of their premises, of their mind. In short, they are conceptually short-sighted. What is this great evil that these blind, ignorant deviates of rationality and reason have committed against humanity? I will answer that question by addressing the ultimate consequence of such injustice: the hindrance, destruction and torture against man's mind.

Ergo, if we are to emancipitate ourselfs from such arbitrary slavery, we must abolish these mystics by annihilating mysticism, pertinently defined. What is accomplished to carry out such a feat? One need not excercise force - such would only backfire, not to mention it would be hypocritical and outright defiant of Rationality. All one needs to do is Think; doing the right thing is natural leadership, doing things right is natural management.



--------------------
Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Clarifications on my part. *DELETED* [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5510471 - 04/12/06 11:07 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Post deleted by Paradigm

Reason for deletion: Better safe than sorry



--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineTemptress
Butterfly
Female

Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 143
Loc: Texas - where else?
Last seen: 17 years, 9 months
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5510499 - 04/12/06 11:14 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

:ban:


--------------------
i have less ego than you do!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Temptress]
    #5510503 - 04/12/06 11:15 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

why?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineTemptress
Butterfly
Female

Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 143
Loc: Texas - where else?
Last seen: 17 years, 9 months
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5510511 - 04/12/06 11:17 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

your post is personal and off-topic, is it not?


--------------------
i have less ego than you do!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMushmanTheManic
Stranger

Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,587
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5510512 - 04/12/06 11:17 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

If you don't have anything nice to say... :nono:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Temptress]
    #5510516 - 04/12/06 11:17 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Temptress said:
deviate's post is personal and off-topic, is it not?



What does Deviate have to do with this?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: MushmanTheManic]
    #5510519 - 04/12/06 11:18 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

MushmanTheManic said:
If you don't have anything nice to say... :nono:



Make a thread about it and claim to be objective.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMushmanTheManic
Stranger

Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,587
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5510522 - 04/12/06 11:19 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

4)Those who think Capitalism as a political-economic system is inherently evil and detrimental to society.

Marxists can be considered mystics?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5510698 - 04/12/06 11:56 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

1)Those who believe that consciousness has primacy over existence; that existence is manipulatable by the power of their whims and desires, i.e., prayers.



This is really a two-parter, and I only care to address the first part. It is not that consciousness precedes existence. Rather, it is inherent in existence.

Quote:

2)Those who hold humility as a virtue, and pride as a vice.



Virtue and vice are concepts defined subjectively. Those societies that hold such values as described above have traditionally been more humane than those that believe the opposite.

Quote:

3)Those who hold self-sacrifice as a virtue, and selfishness as a vice.



See above

Quote:

4)Those who think Capitalism as a political-economic system is inherently evil and detrimental to society.



Capitalism is not inherently evil, but it has historically caused much suffering and injustice. It may be a better system than socialism, mercantilism, or feudalism, but that doesn't mean it's the best possible system.

Quote:

5)Those who subordinate reason to faith.



Hardly better than those who have blind faith in reason.

Quote:

6)Those who hold emotions as tools of cognition.



Without emotion, there can be no morality.

Quote:

7)Those who believe the mind is a tool of distortion.



So you mean that when I saw Christ on acid, my mind wasn't distorting anything?

Quote:

8)Those who hold altruism is the higher-good, and collectivism as a moral political-economical system.



I had this debate with you before, and you conveniently redefined altruism so as to be utterly meaningless as a concept.

Quote:

9)Those who promote the blind acceptance of premises that are against [or apart] from the evidence provided by our senses.



My senses tell me things that your senses don't. What you're really saying is that I should trust your senses over mine.

Quote:

10)Those who behave as if it is a virtue to live with one's eyes half-closed, in a dimly lit cerebral focus, but a sin to live with one's eyes wide opened, in clear intellectual focus.



This statement is really nothing other than ridicule. I frankly see you and other "rationalist" as being guilty of this much more than many so-called "mystics" here.

Quote:

11)Those who unknowingly promote the hindrance, destruction and torture of what is mankind's greatest asset: The mind.



It's ok. I forgive you.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBasilides
Servent ofWisdom
Male User Gallery

Registered: 02/10/06
Posts: 7,059
Loc: Crown and Heart
Last seen: 12 years, 8 months
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5510731 - 04/13/06 12:05 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Then you're basically engaging yourself in an endurance match you cannot win. You cannot destroy awakening and enlightenment(how you define it too is a little strange, with your socio-economic and political references) because for every awakened being who passes on, another will have the same underlaying Reality exposed to them. Likewise, there will always be those who will be consumed (and ultimately lost forever) in matter. It is sad, for only in the last moments of consciousness will they fully realize that they did not recall the pearl of their being, and that it is about to vanish in nothingness. There might even be a glimpse of the Mystery, but there will be too much individualism for it to be penetrated by then. Non-existence forever, after that. I hope you fare the voyage into the abyss smoothly, because in such a position I know I would be terrified of the mystery instead of embracing it like a warm bath.

Peace


--------------------


"Have you found the beginning, then, that you are looking for the end? You see, the end will be where the beginning is. Congratulations to the one who stands at the beginning: that one will know the end and will not taste death."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMushmanTheManic
Stranger

Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,587
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5510782 - 04/13/06 12:23 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

MushmanTheManic said:
If you don't have anything nice to say... :nono:



Make a thread about it and claim to be objective.




Touche!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblegettinjiggywithit
jiggy
Female User Gallery

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7,469
Loc: Heart of Laughter
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5510816 - 04/13/06 12:37 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

MushmanTheManic said:
If you don't have anything nice to say... :nono:



Make a thread about it and claim to be objective.




Funniest one liner of the week! :wink:

:peace: :heart:


--------------------
Ahuwale ka nane huna.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMushmanTheManic
Stranger

Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,587
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: gettinjiggywithit]
    #5510824 - 04/13/06 12:40 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

If I had a "funniest one liner of the week award", I'd give it to Paradigm. Unfortunately, all I have is lint collected in my navel.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSkorpivoMusterion
Livin in theTwilight Zone...
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/30/03
Posts: 9,954
Loc: You can't spell fungus wi...
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5510830 - 04/13/06 12:44 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

This is really a two-parter, and I only care to address the first part. It is not that consciousness precedes existence. Rather, it is inherent in existence.

Arbitrary. Consciousness is an attribute of various existents with a brain and/or nervous system. To claim that a rock has consciousness is absurd and without merit - and an egregious commitment of the fallacy of context-dropping.


Those societies that hold such values as described above have traditionally been more humane than those that believe the opposite.

Examples of both, please.


Hardly better than those who have blind faith in reason.

Non-sequitur. Reason, by its very nature, requires no blind faith. Of course, feel free to engage in irrational skepticism.


Without emotion, there can be no morality.

And volition. This doesn't change the fact that emotions are not tools of cognition.
To act rationally means to act in accordance with the facts of reality. What you feel tells you nothing about the facts; it merely tells you something about your estimate of the facts. Emotions are the result of your value judgments; they are caused by your basic premises, which you may hold consciously or subconsciously, which may be right or wrong. Note that I do not claim we should ignore or repress them. Simply, one should only know their place.


So you mean that when I saw Christ on acid, my mind wasn't distorting anything?

You are aware that you digested hallucinogenics, yet ask this question? Hello?


I had this debate with you before, and you conveniently redefined altruism so as to be utterly meaningless as a concept.

To you. Regardless, I further elaborated thereafter - from a different approach, as obviously my previous one wasn't getting through to you. Later on, Phred provided a quote that captured the essence of what I was precisely trying to say.


My senses tell me things that your senses don't. What you're really saying is that I should trust your senses over mine.

Incorrect. There are things that exist which other people have percieved through their senses, yet which I've not. Despite this, the fact remains that such existents which these other people have percieved are -in principle- clear and open for me [and every other ordinary human being with a working set of perceptual organs] to percieve. Furthermore -and this is important- these people can provide solid, rational proof of such an existence that goes beyond the mere fact that they have experienced/percieved such things. Case in point: hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash.
The same cannot be said for those who believe in things for which there is no sensory evidence or rational proof - only one's "creative" imagination.


This statement is really nothing other than ridicule. I frankly see you and other "rationalist" as being guilty of this much more than many so-called "mystics" here.

Says the Christian mystic, of course.


It's ok. I forgive you.

Nice try. I do not need forgiveness for thinking, but I appreciate the gesture.





--------------------
Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5510933 - 04/13/06 01:59 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Arbitrary.



As is the notion that reality exists independently of the observer.

Quote:

Examples of both, please.



Humility is a pretty high priority in Buddhist societies, which tend to care for their citizens and live peacefully, seeing as how humility and compassion go hand in hand. Meanwhile, pride has always been a defining aspect of barbarian war-like peoples, such as the Vikings or the Mongols.

The second one is a bit trickier, as it depends on what the self-sacrifice is directed at. Obviously, self-sacrifice to the state was a big part of fascism. But self-sacrifice for one's fellow man, as practiced by people such as Mother Theresa, has enriched the world incalculably. Meanwhile, a society based on selfishness is the very laissez-faire capitalist society which you so naively glorify. Read Dickens sometime.

Quote:

Non-sequitur. Reason, by its very nature, requires no blind faith. Of course, feel free to engage in irrational skepticism.



Similarly, feel free to go on blindly believing in naive realism.

Quote:

And volition. This doesn't change the fact that emotions are not tools of cognition.
To act rationally means to act in accordance with the facts of reality. What you feel tells you nothing about the facts; it merely tells you something about your estimate of the facts. Emotions are the result of your value judgments; they are caused by your basic premises, which you may hold consciously or subconsciously, which may be right or wrong. Note that I do not claim we should ignore or repress them. Simply, one should only know their place.



You're putting reason up on a pedestal. The history of philosophy is filled with extremely rational men, all bitterly disagreeing with one another. Reason is not a straight line from a to b, no matter how much you pretend it is. It's as much a product of your basic premises as emotions are.

Quote:

You are aware that you digested hallucinogenics, yet ask this question? Hello?



You're the one who denies that the mind distorts things. Not I.

Quote:

To you. Regardless, I further elaborated thereafter - from a different approach, as obviously my previous one wasn't getting through to you. Later on, Phred provided a quote that captured the essence of what I was precisely trying to say.



And yet, Phred's quote said nothing about whether or not altruism is bad. Thus, it was off-topic.

Quote:

Incorrect. There are things that exist which other people have percieved through their senses, yet which I've not. Despite this, the fact remains that such existents which these other people have percieved are -in principle- clear and open for me [and every other ordinary human being with a working set of perceptual organs] to percieve. Furthermore -and this is important- these people can provide solid, rational proof of such an existence that goes beyond the mere fact that they have experienced/percieved such things. Case in point: hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash.
The same cannot be said for those who believe in things for which there is no sensory evidence or rational proof - only one's "creative" imagination.



So in other words, I shouldn' trust my senses. Thanks for clearing that up.

Quote:

Says the Christian mystic, of course.



At least I have no illusions about what I am.

Quote:

Nice try. I do not need forgiveness for thinking, but I appreciate the gesture.



You're forgiven for your tunnel vision, sir.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineBlueCoyote
Beyond
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 6,697
Loc: Between
Last seen: 3 years, 16 days
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5511201 - 04/13/06 05:54 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Once again, ignorance about what is not perceivable by default :shake:


--------------------
Though lovers be lost love shall not  And death shall have no dominion
......................................................
"Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men."Martin Luther King, Jr.
'Acceptance is the absolute key - at that moment you gain freedom and you gain power and you gain courage'


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineJacquesCousteau
Being.
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/10/03
Posts: 7,825
Loc: Everywhere, Everytime.
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: Silversoul]
    #5511300 - 04/13/06 07:15 AM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

MushmanTheManic said:
If you don't have anything nice to say... :nono:



Make a thread about it and claim to be objective.




:thumbup:  :smirk:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleMushmanTheManic
Stranger

Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,587
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: SkorpivoMusterion]
    #5512714 - 04/13/06 03:40 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Reason, by its very nature, requires no blind faith.

Reason ? la carte can be considered blind faith. Coherence does not determine truth nor can it be considered evidence. Get a Jesuit in here and have him explain Transubstantiation. He'll provide you with more 'reason' than you can stomach.

Quote:

MushmanTheManic said:
For example, its logically possible for me to be bald. With rationalism, we can rule out the possibility that I am bald and not-bald, but whether I am actually bald or not, logic cannot decide. And thus, we admire the real hero of verification and understanding, empiricism.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineblaze2
The Witness
Male

Registered: 12/20/02
Posts: 1,883
Loc: San Antonio, TX
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
Re: Clarifications on my part. [Re: JacquesCousteau]
    #5512719 - 04/13/06 03:43 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Wow you say you want to argue with these mystics(I am one of them by the way) but you obviously dont. Oh well your loss. peace

blaze2


--------------------
"Religion without science is blind, Science without religion is lame." Albert Einstein

"peace is not maintained through force it is acheived through intelligence." Albert Einstein

"Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."
Thomas Jefferson

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." --Thomas Jefferson


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Does altruism exist?
( 1 2 all )
Sclorch 2,334 23 09/16/03 01:19 AM
by TaoinShrrom
* Try This At Home: More Neurological Evidence Refuting The Existence Of A Soul
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
DiploidM 5,808 92 08/03/05 04:04 PM
by deff
* Altruism
( 1 2 all )
dblaney 2,139 27 07/24/07 11:31 AM
by Veritas
* Altruism
( 1 2 all )
Fospher 1,779 23 05/15/06 04:09 PM
by MushmanTheManic
* Epistemology and the Primacy of Existence
( 1 2 3 all )
SkorpivoMusterion 3,332 48 01/30/06 07:55 PM
by blaze2
* God Exists
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Zahid 11,597 113 03/18/03 03:57 PM
by falcon
* Alturism The_Walrus 1,829 17 03/16/05 09:32 PM
by MarkostheGnostic
* why should we love God? (if He exists)
( 1 2 all )
chodamunky 4,936 36 07/09/02 05:27 PM
by greypoe

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,558 topic views. 0 members, 10 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.