Home | Community | Message Board

RVF Garden Supply
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/08/01
Posts: 19,488
Loc: By The Lake
Bigger than Bioterrorism
    #546165 - 02/10/02 12:05 AM (15 years, 10 months ago)

I found this article reading yesterdays newspaper and thought some might like to read it... It puts things in a pretty good perspective on things to come and things that should be...

Bigger Than Bioterror

Times Headlines

Budget Blues: Are Critics Crying Wolf or Foul?

Volunteerism's Grinch

Solar Finally Gets Practical

Leadership Door Revolves

Federal Subsidies Are Home on the Range

more >

No one wants to die of anthrax or smallpox or any disease cooked up in a lab by some sociopath. But as the threat of terrorism joins earthquakes and hurricanes as a part of the nation's ever-present background anxiety, people are going to remember that complications of childbirth, or cancer, can leave a person no less dead. Then they probably will look askance at President Bush's new budget, which showers public health officials with a whopping $11 billion over the next two years to protect against bioterrorism while depriving them of money to offer basic medical services to the nation's poor.

Polls show that Americans consider health care to be a critically important election issue. Congress should take note and press Bush to move some of the money from the crucial task of fighting bioterrorism to the equally imperative job of bolstering a health system that effectively fights the diseases already undermining public well-being and morale. If the president resists, legislators will need to take the initiative. For starters, they should reverse his proposed cutbacks of $57 million from the money the Centers for Disease Control now get to prevent chronic diseases like cancer and diabetes. They should also add money to help states with the soaring costs of Medicaid coverage for the poor and to roll back the $184 million in cutbacks the administration proposes next year for California hospitals serving low-income individuals and the uninsured.

To understand where Bush's apparently sincere thinking on this subject goes off course, consider how he unveiled his plan. He had just toured a university hospital's computerized biodefense network. The network is a way to track patterns in hospital databases--an outbreak of rashes or respiratory distress, say--that might signify a bioterrorist attack. Bush predicted that such systems, which he wisely wants to fund, will become as indispensable in detecting such assaults as the radar-based "distant early warning" system was at sounding the alarm about approaching Soviet aircraft during the Cold War. What was apparently lost on him was that the urban hospitals that serve the most people in America are so broke and behind the times they still keep patient records in file cabinets.

Bush won't be able to win the war against terrorism with high-tech devices alone. He will need to invest not only in next-generation computers but also on old-fashioned outreach like well-staffed community health clinics. In addition, he will need to begin seriously grappling with health care costs, which are now soaring at 10 times the overall inflation rate. The current Bush budget doesn't acknowledge, much less address, the cost problem.

Health care is a vital area where Bush could put his commitment to compassionate conservatism to the test. One reason Bill Clinton beat Bush's father in 1992 was because the challenger made health care a cornerstone of his campaign. Given the younger Bush's great popularity, he has an opportunity to do something Clinton couldn't pull off--create a health care system that is conservative in controlling costs and compassionate in guaranteeing that even the poor will receive at least a measure of good care.


FAMM.ORG          C8.com                    http://www.beatsopjefiets.com/   

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Male User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/01
Posts: 2,387
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
Re: Bigger than Bioterrorism [Re: GabbaDj]
    #550005 - 02/13/02 01:59 PM (15 years, 10 months ago)

The whole idea of bioterrorism is just stupid. 11 billion added to the 80 billion from the WOD wasted. God our government loves to fuck us over.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* My father crapped bigger ones than George Bush fft2 603 3 06/17/04 10:44 PM
by Anonymous
* Bigger than Watergate wingnutx 295 0 10/10/03 01:31 PM
by wingnutx
* Who is the bigger traitor?
( 1 2 all )
friartuck 822 22 04/16/03 11:11 PM
by Innvertigo
* The Bigger Issue - rights
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
germin8tionn8ion 3,434 84 05/23/04 02:57 PM
by BleaK
* Bigger Threat to the World : Iran or Saudi Arabia?
( 1 2 all )
Dexter_Morgan 1,601 25 08/30/06 08:56 PM
by Asante
* bigger presidential pimp, clinton or kennedy? BrAiN 913 13 09/20/06 08:56 AM
by Seuss
* We are starving but we can field a 1mm MAN ARMY
( 1 2 3 all )
LordMorham 2,810 53 09/24/02 07:24 PM
by Rono
* Senate Bill 1873 kotik 230 0 09/04/06 01:42 PM
by kotik

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
613 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Avalon Magic Plants
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.025 seconds spending 0.002 seconds on 19 queries.