|
Sherman901
Stranger
Registered: 08/17/05
Posts: 151
Last seen: 4 years, 19 days
|
Philosophy 'n' shit
#5405396 - 03/15/06 07:37 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Yes, very intelligent sounding title don't you think? I'm trying to expand my understanding of certain things. I'm trying to read more, become a little bit open minded, etc. Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn. Thanks.
|
dblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5405435 - 03/15/06 07:45 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
? I'm trying to expand my understanding of certain things. I'm trying to read more, become a little bit open minded, etc.
This is very good.
Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn.
Why, as it just so happens, philosophy has been discussed and debated for the past several millenia, and a few good books have indeed popped up here and there. What time period or branch of philosophy interests you? A superb starting place would be Plato's Republic, it discusses almost all branches of philosophy.
-------------------- "What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?" "Belief is a beautiful armor But makes for the heaviest sword" - John Mayer Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin. "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln
|
SkorpivoMusterion
Livin in theTwilight Zone...


Registered: 01/30/03
Posts: 9,954
Loc: You can't spell fungus wi...
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5405450 - 03/15/06 07:50 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn.
"Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology" - or if you prefer simpler books, "For the New Intellectual", "The Virtue of Selfishness" and "Philosophy: Who Needs It?"
-------------------- Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love.
|
SkorpivoMusterion
Livin in theTwilight Zone...


Registered: 01/30/03
Posts: 9,954
Loc: You can't spell fungus wi...
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: dblaney]
#5405463 - 03/15/06 07:52 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Hmm. I guess we should've asked if he was a "Platonist or Aristotlean", so to speak. Well, Sherman, what sayeth thou?
-------------------- Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love.
|
it stars saddam
Satan

Registered: 05/19/05
Posts: 15,571
Loc: Spahn Ranch
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5405483 - 03/15/06 07:55 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
A Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume
Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche would probably be an excellent starting point as well.
|
MushmanTheManic
Stranger

Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 4,587
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5405681 - 03/15/06 08:32 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Cosmic Trigger by Robert Anton Wilson
|
hot48yearolds
Dharmakaya

Registered: 09/21/04
Posts: 705
Loc: lazy river road
Last seen: 14 years, 5 months
|
|
I suggest you download some lectures by alan watts. If your not familiar with him, hes an English philosopher who studied eastern religion and philosphy, mostly Buddhism.
-------------------- "Truth is more in the process than in the result." - J. Krishnamurti "We ourselves are not an illusory part of Reality; rather are we Reality itself illusorily conceived." Wei Wu Wei
|
Gomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!


Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,888
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 10 months, 23 days
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5407169 - 03/16/06 06:30 AM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
..stop trying it, and do it!
|
Sherman901
Stranger
Registered: 08/17/05
Posts: 151
Last seen: 4 years, 19 days
|
|
Quote:
SkorpivoMusterion said: Hmm. I guess we should've asked if he was a "Platonist or Aristotlean", so to speak. Well, Sherman, what sayeth thou?
Haha, I have no idea. I'm new to everything. The only kind of books I have read are World War II books, mostly by Stephen Ambrose.
Edited by Sherman901 (03/16/06 08:29 AM)
|
dblaney
Human Being

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 7,894
Loc: Here & Now
|
|
I was searching around for a decent comparison of the ideas of both of them, and I came across this bit, what do you think of it?
Quote:
Plato held that the Ideas, the Forms of things, are self-existent, and not dependent upon the ever-changing objects of the senses. The noumenon, according to Plato, is the real, the phenomenon only appearance. Aristotle wrote extensively in criticism of Plato's doctrine of Ideas, affirming that "no universals exist over and above the individual objects and separate from them." He refused any substantial reality to "the unity which is predicated of many individual things." Universal principles, he held, are real, and are the objects of our reason, as distinguished from the physical objects of sense-perception. Yet universals are real only as they exist in individuals. "It is," he said, "apparently impossible that any of the so-called universals should exist as substance." This conflict between Plato and Aristotle on the subject of reality led to almost infinite controversy and confusion among later philosophers. To the extent that Aristotle endows universals with reality, he is Platonic in thought. His commentators have endeavored to interpret Aristotle according to their predilection. One writer maintains that "according to Aristotle, the formal aspect of universality is conferred by the mind, and therefore, the universal, as such, does not exist in individual things, but in the mind alone." (William Turner, History of Philosophy, p. 132.) Another points out that while both the Categories and the Metaphysics are based on the assumption of the reality of individual substances, "the Categories (cap. 5) admits that universal species and genera can be called substances, whereas the Metaphysics (Z 13) denies that a universal can be a substance at all." Yet Aristotle is constrained to regard as "substance" the universal essence of a species of substance, "because the individual essence of an individual substance really is that substance, and the universal essence of the whole species is supposed to be indivisible and therefore identical with the individual essence of any individual of the species." (Encyc. Brit., "Aristotle," 11th ed.)
In maintaining this Aristotle seems to invalidate all his arguments against the existence of universals independent of particulars. It was doubtless such difficulties in the comprehension of Aristotle's real meaning that led H.P.B. to remark upon the abstruse character of his writings, asking, "What do we know so certain about Aristotle?" (Isis Unveiled I, 320.) It seems that in spite of his demand for research into particulars, Aristotle was forced to return to the Platonic view of origins. This is indicated by H.P.B.'s explanation of his theory of Privation, Form and Matter. As Lange points out in his History of Materialism, Aristotle's admission of the reality of the universal, in things, "leads, in its logical consequences, little as Aristotle cared to trouble himself with these, to the same exaltation of the universal over the particular which we find in Plato. For if it is once conceded that the essence of the individual lies in the species, the most essential part of the species must again lie on a still higher plane, or, in other words, the ground of the species must lie in the genus, and so on." (I, 88.) Thus, as one of Aristotle's translators has observed, "he is ultimately driven back to the very standpoint he derides in Platonism." This writer, Hugh Tredennick, makes clear the internal contradictions in Aristotle's thought:
He is emphatic that form cannot exist in separation from matter; and yet the supreme reality turns out to be a pure form. He blames the Platonists for using metaphorical language, and yet when he comes to explain the ultimate method of causation he has to describe it in terms of love or desire. The truth is that Aristotle's thought is always struggling against Platonic influences, which nevertheless generally emerge triumphant in his ultimate conclusions. His great contribution to philosophy was on the side of method; but it was Plato, acknowledged or unacknowledged, who inspired all that was best in the thought of his great disciple. (Metaphysics, Introduction, I, xxx.)
- http://www.wisdomworld.org/additional/ancientlandmarks/PlatoAndAristotle.html
-------------------- "What is in us that turns a deaf ear to the cries of human suffering?" "Belief is a beautiful armor But makes for the heaviest sword" - John Mayer Making the noise "penicillin" is no substitute for actually taking penicillin. "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it." -Abraham Lincoln
|
Silversoul
Rhizome


Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5407885 - 03/16/06 11:33 AM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
If you want a good introduction to philosophy, I recommend The Simpsons and Philosophy.
--------------------
|
fireworks_god
Sexy.Butt.McDanger


Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 24,855
Loc: Pandurn
Last seen: 1 year, 12 days
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5408382 - 03/16/06 01:20 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sherman901 said: Yes, very intelligent sounding title don't you think? I'm trying to expand my understanding of certain things. I'm trying to read more, become a little bit open minded, etc. Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn. Thanks.
Striving to become open-minded and all, I would suggest randomly reading books pertaining to any subject, and beginning to form one's own philosophy. Philosophical literature is great, and probably essential to start with anyways, in order to understand what it is, in order to be able to start forming it, but the more encompassing worldview that you bathe in, the more understanding you will have access to. 
At the same time you are retrieving knowledge and taking on new perspectives, focus inward and start asking questions. Who are you?, What is creating my experience of life?, etc. etc. Become aware of your thoughts, and begin to exercise the ability to create new ones and make thinking a conscious act. This is quite truly the only way to become open-minded. 
 Peace.
--------------------
If I should die this very moment I wouldn't fear For I've never known completeness Like being here Wrapped in the warmth of you Loving every breath of you
|
Booby
Agent Mulder

Registered: 09/14/05
Posts: 3,781
Last seen: 14 years, 1 month
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5408632 - 03/16/06 02:13 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- Let it not be remembered That mycelium eats detritus and dies But that life in all it's glory Counts mycelium to be on it's side.
|
gettinjiggywithit
jiggy


Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7,469
Loc: Heart of Laughter
|
|
Quote:
fireworks_god said:
Quote:
Sherman901 said: Yes, very intelligent sounding title don't you think? I'm trying to expand my understanding of certain things. I'm trying to read more, become a little bit open minded, etc. Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn. Thanks.
Striving to become open-minded and all, I would suggest randomly reading books pertaining to any subject, and beginning to form one's own philosophy. Philosophical literature is great, and probably essential to start with anyways, in order to understand what it is, in order to be able to start forming it, but the more encompassing worldview that you bathe in, the more understanding you will have access to. 
At the same time you are retrieving knowledge and taking on new perspectives, focus inward and start asking questions. Who are you?, What is creating my experience of life?, etc. etc. Become aware of your thoughts, and begin to exercise the ability to create new ones and make thinking a conscious act. This is quite truly the only way to become open-minded. 
 Peace.
That was sweet and sound advise for him FG! 
-------------------- Ahuwale ka nane huna.
|
Sherman901
Stranger
Registered: 08/17/05
Posts: 151
Last seen: 4 years, 19 days
|
|
Quote:
fireworks_god said:
Quote:
Sherman901 said: Yes, very intelligent sounding title don't you think? I'm trying to expand my understanding of certain things. I'm trying to read more, become a little bit open minded, etc. Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn. Thanks.
Striving to become open-minded and all, I would suggest randomly reading books pertaining to any subject, and beginning to form one's own philosophy. Philosophical literature is great, and probably essential to start with anyways, in order to understand what it is, in order to be able to start forming it, but the more encompassing worldview that you bathe in, the more understanding you will have access to. 
At the same time you are retrieving knowledge and taking on new perspectives, focus inward and start asking questions. Who are you?, What is creating my experience of life?, etc. etc. Become aware of your thoughts, and begin to exercise the ability to create new ones and make thinking a conscious act. This is quite truly the only way to become open-minded. 
 Peace.
That's what I've been thinking of doing too. I'm planning on picking up a book by Marx or Lenin, a couple of these philosophy books that have been recommended like Nietzsche and I'm reading "To America" by Stephen Ambrose.
|
Fospher
Crime FightingMaster Criminal


Registered: 02/09/05
Posts: 2,033
Loc: The Netherlands
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5411040 - 03/17/06 01:05 AM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sherman901 said: That's what I've been thinking of doing too. I'm planning on picking up a book by Marx or Lenin, a couple of these philosophy books that have been recommended like Nietzsche and I'm reading "To America" by Stephen Ambrose.
No.
Dont read those books now. One, Communism is bullshit, two, you're confused enough as it is. Once you've got more or less a stable outlook on life, maybe start off with the Communist Manifesto and move on to Das Kapital. Right now though, it'll just leave you wandering more than when you came in.
Want a good book to read to give your life meaning?
I'm still taking it in right now, bits and pieces, and I can feel that it's making me a better and more positive person.
Also, there are two good book threads here, and in the Music, Art, and Lit forum. Search them.
|
eligal
Noobie


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 7,021
Loc: California
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5411137 - 03/17/06 01:41 AM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
One is all and all is one.
Think about that
-------------------- \m/ Spanksta \m/ "do you have the freedom to do with your nervous system what you want?" "MolokoMilkPlus said: I'll respect you if you let me give you a blow job" "tactik said: respect the can."
|
it stars saddam
Satan

Registered: 05/19/05
Posts: 15,571
Loc: Spahn Ranch
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Sherman901]
#5411575 - 03/17/06 07:29 AM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sherman901 said: I'm planning on picking up a couple of these philosophy books that have been recommended like Nietzsche
|
fireworks_god
Sexy.Butt.McDanger


Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 24,855
Loc: Pandurn
Last seen: 1 year, 12 days
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Fospher]
#5411626 - 03/17/06 07:49 AM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|

Dismiss a book because the man might be confused, only to propose The Bible within the same breath. 
As if someone who has never met another is in a position to assume where they are at mentally and what is proper and what is not for them to read. 
 Peace.
--------------------
If I should die this very moment I wouldn't fear For I've never known completeness Like being here Wrapped in the warmth of you Loving every breath of you
|
it stars saddam
Satan

Registered: 05/19/05
Posts: 15,571
Loc: Spahn Ranch
|
|
Quote:
fireworks_god said: As if someone who has never met another is in a position to assume where they are at mentally and what is proper and what is not for them to read. 
Quote:
Fospher said: I walk with cat's eyes baby, flowing in motion in the transcedental reality 99% of the population are too ignorant to acknowledge.
|
fireworks_god
Sexy.Butt.McDanger


Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 24,855
Loc: Pandurn
Last seen: 1 year, 12 days
|
|
I admit I am not too very well familiar with the phrase "cat's eyes". 
We are within the presence of a master of reality, it would thusly seem? 
 Peace.
--------------------
If I should die this very moment I wouldn't fear For I've never known completeness Like being here Wrapped in the warmth of you Loving every breath of you
|
Fospher
Crime FightingMaster Criminal


Registered: 02/09/05
Posts: 2,033
Loc: The Netherlands
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
|
Quote:
fireworks_god said: As if someone who has never met another is in a position to assume where they are at mentally and what is proper and what is not for them to read. 
Quote:
Anyone know of any good books? Preferably with philosphical literature or something that's worthwhile to know or learn. Thanks.
Yes, the right thing to do when someone asks for advice is to not give it to them at the risk of belittling them. Especially if I'm talking to them on an internet forum and have not met them in real life.
Quote:
Dismiss a book because the man might be confused, only to propose The Bible within the same breath.
Yeah man, after reading Das Kapital and a book that doomed one of the strongest countries, he will probably come out much more enlightened and level-headed than reading a book about human values that stood for over 2000 years. Those two will especially do since he(or she? who knows) was asking for books on philosophy and not on social political science.
|
Fospher
Crime FightingMaster Criminal


Registered: 02/09/05
Posts: 2,033
Loc: The Netherlands
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
|
Your retort to my response and this whole discussion is finding some old post of mine and posting it out of context? It's funny that basically in every thread I post, either OTD or here, you keep trying to find some way to offend me. Stop obsessing over me and find something worthwhile to do.
|
it stars saddam
Satan

Registered: 05/19/05
Posts: 15,571
Loc: Spahn Ranch
|
Re: Philosophy 'n' shit [Re: Fospher]
#5413740 - 03/17/06 04:56 PM (17 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
*in the fetal position crying, surrounded by pictures of Fospher, wearing lipstick and my own self-inflicted wounds*
|
Fospher
Crime FightingMaster Criminal


Registered: 02/09/05
Posts: 2,033
Loc: The Netherlands
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
|
Quote:
itstarssaddam said: *in the fetal position crying, surrounded by pictures of Fospher, wearing lipstick and my own self-inflicted wounds*
|
Sherman901
Stranger
Registered: 08/17/05
Posts: 151
Last seen: 4 years, 19 days
|
|
Okay...
|
|