Quote:

If we're looking at the highlights of human development, you have to look at the evolution of the organism and then at the development of its interaction with the environment. Evolution of the organism will begin with the evolution of life perceived through the hominid coming to the evolution of mankind. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man. Now, interestingly, what you're looking at here are three strings: biological, anthropological -- development of the cities -- and cultural, which is human expression.

Now, what you've seen here is the evolution of populations, not so much the evolution of individuals. And in addition, if you look at the time scales that are involved here -- two billion years for life, six million years for the hominid, 100,000 years for mankind as we know it -- you're beginning to see the telescoping nature of the evolutionary paradigm. And then when you get to agricultural, when you get to scientific revolution and industrial revolution, you're looking at 10,000 years, 400 years, 150 years. Uou're seeing a further telescoping of this evolutionary time. What that means is that as we go through the new evolution, it's gonna telescope to the point we should be able to see it manifest itself within our lifetime, within this generation.

The new evolution stems from information, and it stems from two types of information: digital and analog. The digital is artificial intelligence. The analog results from molecular biology, the cloning of the organism. And you knit the two together with neurobiology. Before on the old evolutionary paradigm, one would die and the other would grow and dominate. But under the new paradigm, they would exist as a mutually supportive, noncompetitive grouping. Okay, independent from the external.

And what is interesting here is that evolution now becomes an individually centered process, emanating from the needs and desires of the individual, and not an external process, a passive process where the individual is just at the whim of the collective. So, you produce a neo-human, okay, with a new individuality and a new consciousness. But that's only the beginning of the evolutionary cycle because as the next cycle proceeds, the input is now this new intelligence. As intelligence piles on intelligence, as ability piles on ability, the speed changes. Until what? Until we reach a crescendo in a way could be imagined as an enormous instantaneous fulfillment of human, human and neo-human potential. It could be something totally different. It could be the amplification of the individual, the multiplication of individual existences. Parallel existences now with the individual no longer restricted by time and space.

And the manifestations of this neo-human-type evolution, manifestations could be dramatically counter-intuitive. That's the interesting part. The old evolution is cold. It's sterile. It's efficient, okay? And its manifestations of those social adaptations. We're talking about parasitism, dominance, morality, okay? Uh, war, predation, these would be subject to de-emphasis. These will be subject to de-evolution. The new evolutionary paradigm will give us the human traits of truth, of loyalty, of justice, of freedom. These will be the manifestations of the new evolution. And that is what we would hope to see from this. That would be nice.

---

blaze2 said:

90s to the left(internet boom), 2000's to the right(bush conservative crap).

---

It is interesting to see this progression that you describe reach the point where the cycle alternates between conservative and liberal nearly every day.

I predict that we will soon impeach George W. Bush and reinstate him in office a week later.


Peace.

blaze2 said:

if you really find it interesting that the cycle is coming to a point, perhaps you should ask yourself what comes next.

---

Transcendence.


Peace.

fireworks_god said:

blaze2 said:

if you really find it interesting that the cycle is coming to a point, perhaps you should ask yourself what comes next.

---

Transcendence.

---

dr0mni said:

But this paradigm only sees it going in one direction and assumes that it is constant. What about the universes tendency to fluctuate? Like waves being pushed together into one crest. It doesn't mean that there will be some supercrest at some point from all the waves being pushed infinitely together.

You will get a peak... and it will subside...


the word travels in waves.

---

exclusive58 said:

Ya, to me that word is bull's eye. I didn't think that you were one to agree with such an idea though. Did you just say that as a sarcastic joke?

---

What exactly have I done to convey that I would not be one to agree with such an idea? I don't question whether every statement you make is just a sarcastic joke. In fact, statements I have already made in this thread should provide ample context to suggest that I had no ulterior motive in the utterance of that word.


Peace.

fireworks_god said:

exclusive58 said:

Ya, to me that word is bull's eye. I didn't think that you were one to agree with such an idea though. Did you just say that as a sarcastic joke?

---

What exactly have I done to convey that I would not be one to agree with such an idea? I don't question whether every statement you make is just a sarcastic joke. In fact, statements I have already made in this thread should provide ample context to suggest that I had no ulterior motive in the utterance of that word.

---

blaze2 said:

yea fireworks when put the lol smiley at the end of sentence it tends to come off liek your makign a sarcastic joke....

---

I never did any such thing.


Peace.