|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
AliceDee
-L S D-

Registered: 08/10/03
Posts: 3,957
|
Surface Area vs. Depth
#5248673 - 01/31/06 08:55 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
so what yeilds the most? a substrate that is 5 inches deep, or a substrate 2 inches deep, both with the same about of nutrients.
|
xxanxx
Mycophile


Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 343
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: AliceDee]
#5248705 - 01/31/06 09:00 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
There are a lot of other variables involved but I'm inclined to say the substrate that's 5 inches deep. Of course other factors come in to play.....
-------------------- "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."
-Hunter S. Thompson, RIP
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: AliceDee]
#5248707 - 01/31/06 09:00 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
under identical conditions they should yeild the same
|
kilgore_trout
Stranger
Registered: 10/17/03
Posts: 1,607
Last seen: 16 years, 6 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: AliceDee]
#5248719 - 01/31/06 09:03 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
its usually best to increase surface area as long as you won't be laying shit too thin. if you fill your surface space and have more shit to work with, go deeper.
so yeah, fill available surface are and then go deeper after that point.
its the same volume of water/nutes, but one is deeper and another has more surface area. more suface area means more space for mushrooms to grow off of. deeper usually means bigger mushrooms. more surface area usually yeilds more total weight.
-------------------- "I didnt fight a secret war in nicaragua so you could walk these streets of freedom bad-mouthing lady america in your damn mirrored sunglasses."
|
Snaggletooth
Stranger in a Strange Land


Registered: 10/24/05
Posts: 6,109
Loc: blinks stupidly
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Prisoner#1]
#5248777 - 01/31/06 09:14 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: under identical conditions they should yeild the same
Really....I don't doubt you. But I would have thought 5' would produce bigger then a smaller one. I don't think there would be more or less either way.
--------------------
Atheist Chat
|
fortunatefarmer
Stranger
Registered: 01/30/06
Posts: 19
Last seen: 18 years, 10 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Snaggletooth]
#5248807 - 01/31/06 09:20 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Rev. Paul AKA the man says that mushrooms can draw nutrients from up to 2 ft deep in the casing! Deeper casings make bigger mushrooms, but increaced chances of contam's during colonization.
|
Jaeger
Dreamer
Registered: 10/01/05
Posts: 960
|
|
Snag, they are saying that you use the same volume of substrate, just at a different thickness so more surface area is available.
|
Snaggletooth
Stranger in a Strange Land


Registered: 10/24/05
Posts: 6,109
Loc: blinks stupidly
Last seen: 7 years, 8 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Jaeger]
#5248906 - 01/31/06 09:40 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
DUH.......thanks I missed that  
--------------------
Atheist Chat
|
scatmanrav
Brainy Smurf

Registered: 05/08/04
Posts: 11,483
Loc:
Last seen: 12 years, 15 days
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Snaggletooth]
#5248942 - 01/31/06 09:47 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Surface Area! It has always been my favorite. All you need is 2 inches to get dense mushroom growth like this:

This will always be an arguable debate, but thats my personal preference, when I have more poo, I spread it out more..
|
kilgore_trout
Stranger
Registered: 10/17/03
Posts: 1,607
Last seen: 16 years, 6 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: scatmanrav]
#5248959 - 01/31/06 09:51 PM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
like i said, go for surface area first unless you go below like 2 inches of poo. once you max out surface area, go deeper.
-------------------- "I didnt fight a secret war in nicaragua so you could walk these streets of freedom bad-mouthing lady america in your damn mirrored sunglasses."
|
xxanxx
Mycophile


Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 343
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
|
^^I'd have to agree with that. And, don't feel bad Snaggletooth, I made the same mistake!
-------------------- "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."
-Hunter S. Thompson, RIP
|
skeletor
the dude
Registered: 09/06/05
Posts: 1,235
Loc: heaven on earth
Last seen: 18 years, 4 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: xxanxx]
#5249505 - 02/01/06 12:00 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
the advantage of surface area is that it should take less number of flushes to use all the nutrients. this means that there is less total time spent fruiting and therfor less chance of contams. however if you are going for big fruits requite deep substrait. but again both should yeild the same when all is said and done.
-------------------- im sorry about your mother. She was a terrible attrative woman.
Get back to nature; hunting burgers and gathering fries.
|
scatmanrav
Brainy Smurf

Registered: 05/08/04
Posts: 11,483
Loc:
Last seen: 12 years, 15 days
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: skeletor]
#5249513 - 02/01/06 12:03 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Thats a good point, I go to get all my harvest in the first flush primarily, and a little in the second. If you add up all the flushes, of both, youd probably get about the same...I like 1-2 flushes though.
And do make sure you go at least the 2 inches, maybe a bit over doesnt hurt, especially if you mix your horse poo with coir, chunky verm, perlite and such non nutritious things to beef it up..but 2-3" works for me.
|
Premedman1
Assistant to the insistent


Registered: 12/21/05
Posts: 2,376
Loc: South of Sanity
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: scatmanrav]
#5249532 - 02/01/06 12:07 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
scatmanrav said: Surface Area! It has always been my favorite. All you need is 2 inches to get dense mushroom growth like this:

Absolutely beautiful fruits, and look at that pinset. Picture perfect Scat. I'm going 2" from now on. If it's good enough for Scat and good enough for my girlfriend it's good enough for me.
-------------------- Build a man a fire, he is warm for the night. Set a man on fire, he is warm for the rest of his life.
|
Orranis
Getting there


Registered: 01/07/06
Posts: 119
Last seen: 12 years, 27 days
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth *DELETED* [Re: Premedman1]
#5249604 - 02/01/06 12:21 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by OrranisReason for deletion: had to
-------------------- Life is a pill which none of us can bear to swallow without gilding.
|
24hoursago
Stranger
Registered: 01/19/06
Posts: 65
Last seen: 18 years, 9 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Orranis]
#5249937 - 02/01/06 01:48 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Those two trays won't be the same volume..?
I say surface area for sure, so long as the substrate is ~2" deep, you're fine for 3-4 flushes.
|
Orranis
Getting there


Registered: 01/07/06
Posts: 119
Last seen: 12 years, 27 days
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth *DELETED* [Re: 24hoursago]
#5250083 - 02/01/06 04:17 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by OrranisReason for deletion: had to
-------------------- Life is a pill which none of us can bear to swallow without gilding.
|
hyphae
born to grow


Registered: 12/13/02
Posts: 6,228
Loc: the rain forests
Last seen: 13 years, 8 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Orranis] 1
#5250197 - 02/01/06 06:12 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Surface area everytime will out produce in the real world.
-------------------- Getting the most out of your casings!, A pinning strategy.
Oyster Shell "Flour" $2 for 1lb. a hell of a deal
Not what is overlay but rather what overlay is
Gas Exchange vs. FAE
"We all have priorities. I used a closet once setup a nice little lab trouble was all the shit that was in there ended up in the bedroom that pissed off the GF then I ended up dumping her as she was getting in the way of my sterile culture technique! Ya I got priorities too!!!"
|
Omnicracker
Crusted Trolltivator

Registered: 09/18/05
Posts: 1,421
Loc: Wal-Merica
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: hyphae]
#5250307 - 02/01/06 08:04 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
regardless of Pauls findings, ive always read not to go deeper than 4in. in my experience, yeilds were almost the same with 1in. to 5in. of substrate. the only big difference was the size of the fruits. i think its safe to say that there is a correlation between depth and mushroom size.
|
Hengman
Small timeGrower


Registered: 05/05/05
Posts: 250
Loc: Northeast
Last seen: 17 years, 8 months
|
Re: Surface Area vs. Depth [Re: Omnicracker]
#5250476 - 02/01/06 09:43 AM (18 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
i think a substrate with more depth will give u bigger and more flushes, but not as many shrooms as one with a wider surface area
the bigger surface area probably will have less flushes, and slightly smaller fruits.
however, since they are equal in volume, in the end, they should harvest the same weight.
so i think its just a matter of how many flushes u want.
--------------------
The beautiful Cambodian Psilocybin Cubensis.
Feel the colors. See the sound.
My Personal Setup
|
|