Home | Community | Message Board


Azarius
Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> The Ethnobotanical Garden

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop: San Pedro

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineEl_brujo
Stranger
Registered: 03/25/05
Posts: 47
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
Cactus Id again
    #4637033 - 09/09/05 08:10 AM (12 years, 3 months ago)

Hi,

I recently bought this unlabelled cactus, and I'm totally not sure if it's a Trich Peruvianus or some other kind of cactus (I've seen a look-a-like that's named Stetsonia corine). come on cactus experts, I need your help on this one! Thanks by advance!



And a top view:



I've cut off the borders of these pics, so you won't be able to see the longest spines of the cactus.(I can't seem to find another way to make my pics smaller than 200kb)


--------------------
Een fase van extase, laat me voelen en stralen, als een ster door de nacht zonder doel te behalen.


Edited by El_brujo (09/09/05 08:16 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineesin
cheesefondue
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/21/01
Posts: 1,275
Loc: Lysergia
Last seen: 8 years, 18 days
Re: Cactus Id again [Re: El_brujo]
    #4638597 - 09/09/05 05:50 PM (12 years, 3 months ago)

It's definitely not one of the three 'big actives' (pachanoi, peruvianus, bridgesii).

The areoles and the bulges above them kinda look like stetsonia, but the full body looks a bit off. There is one cereus species that resembles stetsonia that has been discussed here in the past, might also be it.
I'm sure someone more experienced can give you a positive ID.

But it prolly isn't active. Don't eat it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefaslimy
Dead Man
 User Gallery
Registered: 04/04/04
Posts: 3,436
Last seen: 1 year, 11 months
Re: Cactus Id again [Re: El_brujo]
    #4639232 - 09/09/05 08:35 PM (12 years, 3 months ago)

looks like juvenile form of T terscheckii, that specimen is in poor condition.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineEl_brujo
Stranger
Registered: 03/25/05
Posts: 47
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
Re: Cactus Id again [Re: faslimy]
    #4663814 - 09/15/05 08:28 AM (12 years, 2 months ago)

Hi, could it be a Trich pasacana? It's 20 centimeters in height, so definately not a juve. Jup it's in poor condition.  :frown:
Any replies would be helpfull


--------------------
Een fase van extase, laat me voelen en stralen, als een ster door de nacht zonder doel te behalen.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop: San Pedro

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> The Ethnobotanical Garden

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Loph ID? Photos Included. kadakuda 1,214 13 03/22/07 01:07 PM
by Dr. uarewotueat
* Phalaris ID (pics) Tinkal 4,827 16 08/01/05 04:01 PM
by pod3
* Cacti ID + seed pod question + lots of other garden pix! electrolite 1,682 15 05/08/09 01:54 AM
by Dr. uarewotueat
* cactus id help???
( 1 2 all )
cpw1971 2,363 20 10/16/06 02:32 PM
by deadheadjpc2000
* Cactus ID
( 1 2 all )
weiliiiiiii 2,838 34 03/22/09 05:11 PM
by Dr. uarewotueat
* My last cactus ID for a long time
( 1 2 all )
RipVanWinkle 3,003 27 07/03/07 10:59 PM
by highdroponics
* Cactus ID DannyGlick 333 2 05/04/09 02:59 PM
by DannyGlick
* Cacti Id.
( 1 2 all )
eve69 3,033 21 10/21/03 09:43 AM
by Funkey

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Magash, karode13, naum, Mostly_Harmless
723 topic views. 2 members, 10 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Avalon Magic Plants
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.015 seconds spending 0.002 seconds on 19 queries.