Home | Community | Message Board


Shroom Supply
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineJOEBIALEK
Stranger
Registered: 06/03/05
Posts: 20
Last seen: 8 years, 9 months
Elective Office
    #4602887 - 08/31/05 10:53 AM (11 years, 3 months ago)

One of the ambitious proposals put forth by former Vice-President Al Gore was the "re-invention" of government. While the Clinton Administration may have made some progress towards promoting greater efficiency, the result was that government actually grew in size mainly because of bureaucratic self-perpetuation. No one in the United States would disagree that the reduction of government waste should be given top priority. However, before tackling such a problem, one must examine the root causes and not merely treat the symptoms.

When our founding fathers wrote the Constitution, they deliberately left out the "structural path" of elective office but were very clear on names of offices, branches of government, duties of elected officials etcetera. However, what they failed to foresee was the need for elective offices to follow a required path. For example, take the leader of the executive branch; if a person wants to be elected president of the United States, they must first serve as mayor of a city, commissioner of a county and then governor of a state. The two-term limit (eight years) should also be extended to include these lower chief executives as well.

The legislative branch should have a similar path. If one wants to be elected United States senator, they must first serve as a U.S. congressperson from that state. Before serving as a congressperson, they must serve as a councilperson of a city, representative of a state and then as a state senator. The two-term limit should apply here as well.

As for the judicial branch, a United States supreme court justice must serve as a municipal court judge of a city, common pleas court judge of a county, circuit court or district court judge of a state, appeals court judge and state supreme court judge. The two-term limit would apply here also.

Furthermore, the education of these candidates to-be should entail the equivalent of earning a bachelors degree, masters degree and a doctorate in philosophy degree. These degrees must be earned prior to running for elective office. Besides providing a focused academic training it will promote a greater maturity in our candidates before they experience the rigors of their first elective office.

Few could doubt that this path would provide good practical training for those seeking higher office while at the same time establishing a track record that voters could more easily analyze and understand. The two-term limit would allow greater participation because the office would be wide open every eight years. This would force the elected official to properly execute his/her duties and not be as influenced by the various special interest groups.

Government today is often seen as part of the problem rather than a solution to the problem. Perhaps if the United States would consider a path of development for its "philosopher kings" public trust would return and something may actually get done.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineJOEBIALEK
Stranger
Registered: 06/03/05
Posts: 20
Last seen: 8 years, 9 months
Re: Elective Office [Re: JOEBIALEK]
    #4632734 - 09/08/05 02:28 AM (11 years, 2 months ago)

good points


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinemuggzy
Stranger
Registered: 06/15/05
Posts: 10
Last seen: 9 years, 8 months
Re: Elective Office [Re: JOEBIALEK]
    #4633008 - 09/08/05 06:41 AM (11 years, 2 months ago)

That sounds good, but wouldn't we have a Californian or New York President every time though?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Who do you think will win the election?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
KingOftheThing 3,916 63 09/24/04 11:31 PM
by ekomstop
* How the Election was RIGGED!!!!
( 1 2 3 all )
Cornholio 2,949 44 06/29/03 03:38 PM
by somebodyelse
* Don?t Think the Bush Campaign Stole This Election? Think Again ekomstop 4,916 10 11/06/04 10:23 AM
by ekomstop
* How Obama lost the election
( 1 2 all )
lonestar2004 2,550 33 09/05/08 12:44 PM
by Coaster
* Anyone agree with this Judges decision? gettinjiggywithit 647 11 01/03/08 06:57 PM
by gettinjiggywithit
* Re-election idea
( 1 2 all )
SeussA 1,158 26 05/28/05 07:44 PM
by trendal
* Obama Closes Offices in 4 States... McCain Opens 50 in California! lonestar2004 926 9 09/23/08 07:45 PM
by pinkfloydms
* Hearings on Ohio voting put 2004 election in doubt fft2 298 0 11/19/04 04:44 AM
by fft2

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
293 topic views. 0 members, 2 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
MRCA Tyroler Gluckspilze
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.