Home | Community | Message Board

Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Registered: 07/28/04
Posts: 538
Last seen: 1 year, 11 months
City forces out 2 downtown businesses
    #4368605 - 07/04/05 05:01 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)


Last week's U.S. Supreme Court ruling approving a Connecticut city's plan to take private land by eminent domain may seem far away.

But to John Revelli, whose family has operated a tire shop near downtown Oakland for decades, the implications hit home on Friday.

A team of contractors hired by the city of Oakland packed the contents of his small auto shop in a moving van and evicted Revelli from the property his family has owned since 1949.

"I have the perfect location; my customers who work downtown can drop off their cars and walk back here," said Revelli, 65, pointing at the nearby high- rises. "The city is taking it all away from me to give someone else. It's not fair."

The city of Oakland, using eminent domain, seized Revelli Tire and the adjacent property, owner-operated Autohouse, on 20th Street between Telegraph and San Pablo avenues on Friday and evicted the longtime property owners, who have refused to sell to clear the way for a large housing development.

The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision last week paved the way for local governments to buy out unwilling property owners, demolish homes and businesses, and turn that land over to new owners for development. Last week's ruling expanded on earlier decisions that allowed agencies to take property only if it is considered "blighted" or run-down.

"The city thinks I cause 'economic blight' because I don't produce enough tax revenue,'' Revelli said. "We thought we'd win, but the Supreme Court took away my last chance."

The two properties, which total 6,500 square feet, were being forced to move or sell because their businesses are on a larger section of land that is slated for the Uptown Project, a city-subsidized real estate development that is expected to include nearly 1,200 apartments and condominiums.

The project's wedge-shaped lot, just west of the 19th Street BART Station, includes several blocks roughly bounded by 20th Street, 17th Street, Telegraph Avenue and San Pablo Avenue.

Both Revelli Tire and Autohouse, owned and operated by Tony Fung, are on the northern edge of the project in the 400 block of 20th Street, which is also called Thomas L. Berkley Way.

The eviction came as no surprise to Revelli and Fung. The city has designated their block as a redevelopment area for about 20 years. Before approving the Uptown Project last year, the city considered putting in a shopping mall, then an arena for the Golden State Warriors and later a ballpark for the Oakland Athletics.

The decision to build market-rate housing on the site, subsidized by $61 million in city redevelopment funds, is the keystone in Mayor Jerry Brown's plan to revitalize downtown Oakland by putting in homes for 10,000 new residents there.

"This is the part of redevelopment everyone hates," said Hamid Gami, who is coordinating the relocation for Oakland's Community and Economic Development Agency.

"It's tough. They're good people. We've offered them fair compensation, and we hope to come to an agreement. But this is a really important new development. The city has been trying to do this for years. It's good for all of Oakland. It's going to be a great project."

Gami said he hopes to work out a settlement with Revelli and Fung.

The business owners said they clung to hopes that the eminent domain decision might be overturned in court or that they could persuade the city to build the project and leave them alone.

"All those new residents will need someone to work on their cars," said Revelli, who has been working in the shop since he was in third grade helping his dad and uncle. "I don't want their money. I don't want to move. I just want to work right here."

Most of the other businesses closed their doors and left in the past two years. The only other holdout, Chef Edward's Barbeque, is expected to reopen about a block and a half away.

Fung and Revelli said the money offered by the city, about $100 per square foot plus relocation costs, was insufficient, saying the real estate boom has priced them out of nearby properties. They own their properties outright and have operated with low overhead.

"John works alone; I have one technician working with me -- that's it, '' said Fung, who bought his 2,500-square-foot shop in 1993. "The cost of buying or leasing a new site is prohibitive. The money the city offered me does not cover it."

Revelli, who has worked alone for the past 35 years, said no other location is as good as what he is losing.

"My customers are mainly women who work in the offices downtown. They can take BART if they have to leave their cars overnight," Revelli said. "There's really no equivalent location around here."

Both men said Friday that losing their businesses was like losing a piece of themselves.

"I've worked here full time since 1959, and I looked forward to coming to work every day," Revelli said. "I'm not ready to retire, but the city forced me into this. I don't have many options."

Fung, who is in his late 40s and raising his children, said retirement is not an option.

"I'm an immigrant from China, and this has been the fulfillment of my American dream," Fung said. "I worked hard. I played by the rules. But now it's all gone. I've got to start all over."

I don't really get what you're free to do in America anymore.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: Anisotropic]
    #4368903 - 07/04/05 10:06 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

I can't tell if it's public housing (section 8) or if it's
going to be residential property.

either way it's pretty shitty.

new housing is arguable, but to tear down their
businesses to put up section 8 housing is a tragedy.

...talk about blight...

All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
The Duk Abides

Registered: 05/17/03
Posts: 94,392
Loc: Earthfarm 1 Flag
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: Anisotropic]
    #4368905 - 07/04/05 10:08 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

Shit, where will all this end up? I'm truly concerned for this country.....

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Registered: 05/28/05
Posts: 2,746
Loc: Classified
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: Le_Canard]
    #4368918 - 07/04/05 10:21 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

The rich get richer, the poor get poorer.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: afoaf]
    #4368936 - 07/04/05 10:39 AM (12 years, 9 months ago)

new housing is arguable

There is nothing to argue. It's his land and that's that.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Registered: 07/28/04
Posts: 538
Last seen: 1 year, 11 months
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: newuser1492]
    #4369184 - 07/04/05 01:07 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

There is nothing to argue. It's his land and that's that.

Not any more it's not.

I would suggest not buying any property close to citys. Rent if you can.

I guess in order to keep you're land you have to have land that no one else with more money wants now.

I guess in the end thats it. In america, if you have money you have rights. The more money, the more rights.

Micheal Jackson gets to rape little kids, these people don't get to keep there own property.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBaby_Hitler Happy Birthday
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 23,004
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 2 hours, 45 minutes
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: Anisotropic]
    #4369856 - 07/04/05 06:13 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

I hope someone burns whatever they put on that property.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Registered: 07/28/04
Posts: 538
Last seen: 1 year, 11 months
Re: City forces out 2 downtown businesses [Re: Baby_Hitler]
    #4369878 - 07/04/05 06:27 PM (12 years, 9 months ago)

I don't really understand how these people would deal with this at all.

I would be so pissed.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* property rights and imminent domain afoaf 574 6 09/28/04 08:18 PM
by hound
* The Negro Project!!! Ellis Dee 715 5 04/09/02 01:38 AM
* the Project for a New American Century
( 1 2 all )
iglou 1,819 26 05/02/03 10:53 AM
by Madtowntripper
* high school shroom project greenplato 1,638 18 07/14/01 01:59 PM
by hunterthompson
* Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons ekomstop 958 14 06/20/12 06:09 PM
by fain693
* The Marijuana Policy Project's strategy for this year Lothar121 758 3 02/13/04 01:35 AM
by The_Red_Crayon
* Project for New American Century - global military dominance
( 1 2 all )
enotake2 2,666 30 02/21/04 09:07 PM
by TheOneYouKnow
* Minding Your Own Business
( 1 2 3 all )
Autonomous 2,021 57 09/12/03 03:49 PM
by shakta

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
582 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 6 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Avalon Magic Plants
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 19 queries.