Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
law may be the man trying to get you down, he say you cannot eat this. It looks like food. I may eat it? NO YOU MAY NOT! but why? BECAUSE IT IS NOT SAFE. Why is it not safe? IT MAY CAUSE HARM. How? EAT TOO MUCH AND YOU WILL DIE. But is that not true with all things? Exceding amounts are just that, more than necessary. I SAY WHAT IS NECESSARY. But if i think i can handle something is it not best said that experience is the key? I HAVE EXPERIENCE. I AM EXPERIENCE. I AM MORE THAN YOU. YOU MAY CONTRIBUTE ACCORDING TO PROTOCOL.
find a way to get around protocol, thats the real key to law. anything else i may try to say is bullshit.
Law is something that can be very vast and imposing, but it in truth is not. If you are arrested doing something you shouldnt be doing, you will be duly processed, and corrective measurements will be taken to ensure that the Law will be Obeyed.
That is law. it is what should be done. guidlines, and just that. to be understood by few interpreted by many.
Remember that although not always logic, Law is elementally a logic machine. LAW is trying to keep you safe. this is generally true. but standards matter. what i say is safe is what i say is safe. i as an individual would like to individualize. flower. be. i understand that at times i must outwit LAW. but first and foremost understand. It is basic knowledge. it is taken with a grain of sand. it is what should be a basic guidline.
What is youre candy? well, i like sweet things. lucy is sweet, beautiful. daimonds are beatiful. the sky is beautiful.
So you like acid? you call, LSD? No, i have never used said substance in my life. as far as you are concerned, that may be not at all, i have no relation or affiliation with lysergic acid diethylamide.
I can prove you have used this. What is proof? No you cannot.
-------------------- You can get a power chord tangled up in a blanket pretty good. you just gotta pull it out.
True law is in the hearts of men and not on paper, though the written law was penned to protect the weak and maintain justice (and oft it does in civil matters) it was written by greedy and closedminded men.
Law is the backbone of mainstream culture and it is a culture shaping engine. Before written law it was a verbal tribal law....but before that the true law was where it still is, in mens' hearts.
The fact that something can go from unlawful to lawful in a a swift movement shows just how contrived and unjust the law is. Certain incontrvertable elements which are those held in the heart are a part of the written law; things like murder and paedophilia. These are taboo under the law of any just man and reign down whether written or not. However the classifying and reclassifying of substances and their production rights is not true law, or else it would be immovable like a rock....it is a racket and a means of cultural control.
Of course since these laws are made in the interest of systems control and maintenance, to those who may wish to hold the status quo they are of course fundamental law. These laws are systems codes.
To those of us happy to be free spirited and to let society morph into the future.....these so called laws are the work of the greedy status quo-ists as they desperately try to maintain their system, or even regress down the path of puritanicalism.
All this leads to the queer state of affairs that I can sum up with this example:
In the UK psilocybin containing mushrooms have been legal until just the other day so long as they are unprepared. People were using their right under the law to consume and hold and do business with these legal shrooms. This action was described by government as exploitation of a loophole in the law.....
There was no loophole, the law was quite clear and so no one abused it, people merely exercised their right. In the whole time people have exercised this right there have been no cases to hit the headlines and no casualties (as opposed to say alchohol). The legal shroom was benign and unassuming and unharming...
No with no evidence to the contrry it has been elevated to the highest category of illegality in some kind of wierd knee jerk to what? To nothing.
The knee jerk was in fear to the potential....not for harm, but for change. The knee jerk was to help preserve the status quo....it is not real law of the heart. Just law of the piggy system.
So a UK citizen is in the crazy situation that holding a mushroom last week was totally legal and acceptable, now this week punishable by a 20 odd year stretch inside.
This is not the law, this is the corruption of the greedy and the fearful as they desperately try to maintain their system.
Crock of shit
but I never break the law - the law tells us what is right and wrong. Obviously the mushroom is WRONG all of a sudden. That's kool, I bow before the wisdom of justice.
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil 520 topic views. 4 members, 2 guests and 5 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]