Home | Community | Message Board

MRCA Tyroler Gluckspilze
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
Invisible1stimer
Religion=Rape
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1,280
Loc: Amerika
Eliminating the filibuster
    #4194850 - 05/19/05 10:15 AM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Is there actually anybody that supports the extremist notion of doin away with filibustering. That extremist radical nazi george bewsh is at it again, trying to destroy our constitution.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAdviapacis
Revisiting

Registered: 05/18/05
Posts: 58
Loc: South Park, CO
Last seen: 18 years, 10 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: 1stimer]
    #4194885 - 05/19/05 10:24 AM (18 years, 10 months ago)

I think eliminating the filibuster should help Palpatine Bush gain more power which he needs to advance his designs. By all means eliminate the filibuster, republics are over-rated.


--------------------
Respect my authority!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineJesusChrist
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Adviapacis]
    #4195049 - 05/19/05 11:15 AM (18 years, 10 months ago)

I didn't know the filibuster was part of the constitution. I also didn't know that George Bush was a member of the Senate. What an amazing man.


--------------------
Tastes just like chicken

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAdviapacis
Revisiting

Registered: 05/18/05
Posts: 58
Loc: South Park, CO
Last seen: 18 years, 10 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: JesusChrist]
    #4195611 - 05/19/05 01:02 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

JesusChrist said:
I didn't know the filibuster was part of the constitution.



The filibuster is not in the constitution, but it has been part of our legislative system since the eighteenth century. It is also embodied in the Senate's own rules. The filibuster serves an important purpose as a means of protecting minority opinions, giving them a chance to be heard and allowing for a method of extending debate on those things which may be passed too hastily without such a device.

Quote:

I also didn't know that George Bush was a member of the Senate. What an amazing man.



Who made a claim that George Bush was a member of the senate? What an amazing conclusion you have drawn.


--------------------
Respect my authority!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Adviapacis]
    #4195930 - 05/19/05 02:06 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

Adviapacis said:Who made a claim that George Bush was a member of the senate? What an amazing conclusion you have drawn.


1stimer did by saying Bush is going to eliminate the filibuster. He then said that it will "destroy the constitution" but as you stated its not in the constitution it is a senate rule.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: DieCommie]
    #4196137 - 05/19/05 02:51 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

There is no proposal to eliminate the filibuster for anything other than executive and judicial appointments. Legislation will not be effected.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlined33p
Welcome to Violence

Registered: 07/12/03
Posts: 5,381
Loc: the shores of Tripoli
Last seen: 10 years, 10 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Adviapacis]
    #4196384 - 05/19/05 03:40 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

Adviapacis said:
Quote:

JesusChrist said:
I didn't know the filibuster was part of the constitution.



The filibuster is not in the constitution, but it has been part of our legislative system since the eighteenth century. It is also embodied in the Senate's own rules. The filibuster serves an important purpose as a means of protecting minority opinions, giving them a chance to be heard and allowing for a method of extending debate on those things which may be passed too hastily without such a device.





The filibuster does serve an important purpose and should not be eliminated but there is just something that irks me when people are speaking for 24 hours plus and begin to read recipes for meatloaf just to delay. And remember that this can also be used for the bad. It kept segregation intact for longer than if filibusters were not allowed.


--------------------
I'm a nihilist. Lets be friends.

bang bang

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: d33p]
    #4196445 - 05/19/05 03:48 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

d33p said:
Quote:

Adviapacis said:
Quote:

JesusChrist said:
I didn't know the filibuster was part of the constitution.



The filibuster is not in the constitution, but it has been part of our legislative system since the eighteenth century. It is also embodied in the Senate's own rules. The filibuster serves an important purpose as a means of protecting minority opinions, giving them a chance to be heard and allowing for a method of extending debate on those things which may be passed too hastily without such a device.





The filibuster does serve an important purpose and should not be eliminated but there is just something that irks me when people are speaking for 24 hours plus and begin to read recipes for meatloaf just to delay. And remember that this can also be used for the bad. It kept segregation intact for longer than if filibusters were not allowed.



Yes, Strom Thurmond's filibuster on the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the longest in US history, but he still lost. If America can survive that filibuster, it can survive this one too. I'd say that on balance, keeping the filibuster around does more good than harm.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRoseM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 22,518
Loc: Mod not God Flag
Last seen: 1 year, 7 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Silversoul]
    #4196477 - 05/19/05 03:56 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

I agree.

If the Filibuster is eliminated, it will bite the Republicans in the ass eventually.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Rose]
    #4196550 - 05/19/05 04:18 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Once again and with more gusto THERE IS NO PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE THE FILIBUSTER FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE APPOINTMENTS. LEGISLATION IS NOT EFFECTED. Thank you.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4196567 - 05/19/05 04:24 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE APPOINTMENTS MATTER,TOO. LOOK AT ME! I CAN USE ALL CAPS TOO!!!!


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblevampirism
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 8,120
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Silversoul]
    #4196572 - 05/19/05 04:25 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

HOORAH!

BUT DOES THAT MEAN SOMEONE COULD FILIBUSTER A CANDIDATE TILL THE NEXT TERM?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleSilversoul
Rhizome
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: vampirism]
    #4196574 - 05/19/05 04:26 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

THEORETICALLY, YES. BUT IT WOULD PROBABLY MEAN POLITICAL SUICIDE, AS THE VOTERS WOULD BE UNLIKELY TO STAND FOR IT.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRoseM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 22,518
Loc: Mod not God Flag
Last seen: 1 year, 7 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4196580 - 05/19/05 04:27 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

THIS IS ABOUT ONE THING AND ONE THING ONLY. FUTURE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES. LET'S NOT PRETEND IT IS SOMETHING ELSE.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Rose]
    #4196592 - 05/19/05 04:30 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

QUITE RIGHT. IT HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH LEGISLATION OR A GENERAL ELIMINATION OF THE FILIBUSTER. LIKE I SAID.

Can we go back to whispering now since you all finally seem to have gotten the point?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRoseM
Devil's Advocate
Female User Gallery

Registered: 09/24/03
Posts: 22,518
Loc: Mod not God Flag
Last seen: 1 year, 7 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4196617 - 05/19/05 04:38 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

YES!

Now, if this JUDICIAL Filibuster-breaker passes... it is only a matter of time before it bites the Republicans in the ass.

It may be helpful to them NOW, but says it will still serve them in 6 years?

Also, changing the rules RIGHT BEFORE new Supreme Court Justices are named is SHITTY Politics, no matter what side of the aisle you are on.


--------------------
Fiddlesticks.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Rose]
    #4196629 - 05/19/05 04:42 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

It probably wouldn't have come up if the dopes had picked their fights better.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineDivided_Sky
Ten ThousandThings

Registered: 11/02/03
Posts: 3,171
Loc: The Shining Void
Last seen: 15 years, 9 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4196649 - 05/19/05 04:53 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

I'm not really a fan of the Republicans, but the Democrats have been abusing Senate rules and breaking 200+ years of tradition for their own partisan purposes. I think using fillabusters to overide the demcratic process of majority rule is destructive and below the belt. They are refusing to allow even a vote on these nominees.
I see the Republicans rule highly necesssasry to return any semblance of a functioning government. Sure, it might have some blowback, but it's probobly better than no judges by a president of either party ever nominated because of political fanatics.

Bottom line, Democrats brought it on themselves by abusing the system with their self-absorbed partisanship. It's too bad it came to this.


--------------------
1. "After an hour I wasn't feeling anything so I decided to take another..."
2. "We were feeling pretty good so we decided to smoke a few bowls..."
3. "I had to be real quiet because my parents were asleep upstairs..."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblevampirism
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/14/04
Posts: 8,120
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: Divided_Sky]
    #4196660 - 05/19/05 04:59 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

???

Filibusters are what keep politicians from DOING something really really controversial. Fuck that. In an ideal government, nothing would be done. Nothing.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineKalix
'Head

Registered: 03/20/05
Posts: 1,504
Last seen: 18 years, 3 months
Re: Eliminating the filibuster [Re: vampirism]
    #4196673 - 05/19/05 05:06 PM (18 years, 10 months ago)

Republicans have filibustered judges in the 60's... There's no 200 yrs of tradition.. Also, filibustering may not be mentioned in the constitution per say, but they are a system of checks and balances so one majority party can not dominate legislature, or judiciary, and appoint judges that stand in opposition to main-stream thought.


--------------------


My Unitarian Jihad Name is: The Shotgun of Sweet Reason

Edited by Kalix (05/19/05 05:09 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Let's re-write the constitution to suit these whining Dems. luvdemshrooms 1,012 9 08/18/03 10:27 AM
by silversoul7
* Iraqi Constitution ratification halts terrorism?
( 1 2 3 all )
Swami 4,624 44 10/17/05 07:10 PM
by Prosgeopax
* A Material Breach of the Constitution Ellis Dee 1,107 7 02/19/03 05:44 PM
by BowlKiller
* Senator Harry Reid filibuster on CSPAN
( 1 2 all )
PsiloKitten 2,409 23 11/12/03 09:17 PM
by Evolving
* "Constitution" Restoration Act.... A new low in Act naming.. FrankieJustTrypt 987 5 11/08/04 07:09 AM
by Phred
* obama to eliminate don't ask don't tell
( 1 2 3 4 all )
djmako7 4,608 69 10/22/09 12:42 PM
by Issun
* The Constitution and the Right to Privacy silversoul7 463 0 10/19/04 07:12 PM
by silversoul7
* Bush on the Constitution: "It's just a goddamned piece of paper"
( 1 2 3 all )
Solutarch 2,563 44 12/15/05 12:25 AM
by rickpsfuckyou

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,350 topic views. 0 members, 5 guests and 17 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.