|
Irishdrunk
Democracy? We Deliver!!!
Registered: 09/12/03
Posts: 24,201
|
Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension
#4148269 - 05/07/05 08:46 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
We the community of Shroomery ask politely that the Administration give Hanky one final chance and reduce his ban to a suspension. He has shown remorse and will follow the rules of the forum. We understand he has broken rules multiple times in the past but given one last chance he will not let you down.
--------------------
|
Silversoul
Rhizome
Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Irishdrunk]
#4148274 - 05/07/05 08:47 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Chicken are people, too! Free hanky!
--------------------
|
MovingTarget
Registered: 10/04/04
Posts: 4,825
Loc: temporary
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Silversoul]
#4148291 - 05/07/05 08:56 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Where the broody hell did the earlier hanky poll go?
--------------------
|
Irishdrunk
Democracy? We Deliver!!!
Registered: 09/12/03
Posts: 24,201
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: MovingTarget]
#4148297 - 05/07/05 08:58 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
there was an earlier poll? oh oh...
please dont delete this one mods we want to see the outcome
--------------------
|
HELLA_TIGHT
Madge the Smoking Vag
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 84,387
Loc: Afghanistan
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Irishdrunk]
#4148301 - 05/07/05 08:59 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I don't agree with a permaban. The most he should have got was a 24 hour ban, but even that would be wrong IMO. Hanky is a valued asset to this community. Fer real.
--------------------
|
MovingTarget
Registered: 10/04/04
Posts: 4,825
Loc: temporary
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Irishdrunk]
#4148302 - 05/07/05 09:00 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
Gijith
Daisy Chain Eater
Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Irishdrunk]
#4148327 - 05/07/05 09:07 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I agree with permabanning users for threatening people, endangering peoples' privacy, trying to sell drugs, spamming, scamming,(most) puppeteering and disagreeing with me.
But not for posting a pic of a dude and a chicken having sex. Especially when it's posted by a very beloved user, in a forum that is not visible to unreged visitors, is at the bottom of the boards and is clearly labeled with a warning about disturbing material.
Come on, Banno, lighten up.
-------------------- what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?
|
Irishdrunk
Democracy? We Deliver!!!
Registered: 09/12/03
Posts: 24,201
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Gijith]
#4148399 - 05/07/05 09:28 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I totally agree with Gijith
I know Anno is reasonable and will see by so many threads and bitching that Hanky is a big part of OTD and shouldnt be banned. Come on Anno dont let me down bro I know you can do us this one favor ....he will be good from now on he promised.
Also I would like to suggest the mods consider only taking action when someone complains about the picture....I mean no one in there was really offended and the thread would have died eventually. I would only take action when people complain but this refers only to OTD.
--------------------
|
Smallworlds
Trippin' fool -Merry Prankster
Registered: 03/12/05
Posts: 4,207
Last seen: 18 years, 5 months
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Gijith]
#4148402 - 05/07/05 09:30 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
very well said! I'll sign that!
-------------------- Through the excercise of patience, one may learn humility.. Smoke plenty of green, and eat fungus!!!! Trip Report
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Gijith]
#4148536 - 05/07/05 10:10 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Gijith said: I agree with permabanning users for threatening people, endangering peoples' privacy, trying to sell drugs, spamming, scamming,(most) puppeteering and disagreeing with me.
But not for posting a pic of a dude and a chicken having sex. Especially when it's posted by a very beloved user, in a forum that is not visible to unreged visitors, is at the bottom of the boards and is clearly labeled with a warning about disturbing material.
Come on, Banno, lighten up.
Every time I see you post I always seem to agree with you.
Edited by Redstorm (05/07/05 10:42 PM)
|
Psychoslut
The Mother Fucking Bear-o-dactyl
Registered: 12/10/02
Posts: 20,917
Loc: all up in ya
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Redstorm]
#4148617 - 05/07/05 10:34 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Redstorm said:
Quote:
Gijith said: I agree with permabanning users for threatening people, endangering peoples' privacy, trying to sell drugs, spamming, scamming,(most) puppeteering and disagreeing with me.
But not for posting a pic of a dude and a chicken having sex. Especially when it's posted by a very beloved user, in a forum that is not visible to unreged visitors, is at the bottom of the boards and is clearly labeled with a warning about disturbing material.
Come on, Banno, lighten up.
Every time I say you post I always seem to agree with you.
Free hanky!!!
The pick is far less offensive to me than people being turned inside out, and the std's.
-------------------- [quote]KristiMidocean said: Good now thats clear.WHO FUCKING CARES. If I am fat u all keep pointing it out like its suppose to be a secret.LIke u really have nothing better to do then make fat jokes. If o know its like I do I know yall can come up with NEW AND BETTER SHIT . This shit is old and boring . I left in the first place cause this shit got boring not because of the fat jokes . Fat jokes dont bother me but seriously its old[/quote]
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Gijith]
#4148704 - 05/07/05 11:01 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Gijith said: I agree with permabanning users for threatening people, endangering peoples' privacy
can we go retroactively on this one?
Quote:
But not for posting a pic of a dude and a chicken having sex.
was it consentual?
Quote:
Especially when it's posted by a very beloved user, in a forum that is not visible to unreged visitors, is at the bottom of the boards and is clearly labeled with a warning about disturbing material.
? No posting of bestiality/scat pics/shock pics/underage nudity. -- A link to shock images is ok, with an appropriate warning, but underage nudity will not be tolerated under any circumstances.
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Prisoner#1]
#4148715 - 05/07/05 11:04 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I understand, and in some ways agree, with a ban. The length of it is where I can not agree with what the admins did.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Psychoslut]
#4148717 - 05/07/05 11:04 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Psychoslut said: The pick is far less offensive to me than people being turned inside out, and the std's.
I'll keep that in mind as I'm viewing threads, how do you feel about goatse?
|
MovingTarget
Registered: 10/04/04
Posts: 4,825
Loc: temporary
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Prisoner#1]
#4148718 - 05/07/05 11:05 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
That doesnt explain the permanent ban, it justifies a week ban at most.
'Was it consentual?'
ER..... I myself did not notice hanky raping a chicken.
--------------------
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Prisoner#1]
#4148724 - 05/07/05 11:07 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Goatse is sacred. If people start getting bans for posting that in OTD, I'm out of here.
|
Gijith
Daisy Chain Eater
Registered: 12/04/03
Posts: 2,400
Loc: New York
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Prisoner#1]
#4148727 - 05/07/05 11:09 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Yes, fine, ban him. Don't permaban him.
-------------------- what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Gijith]
#4148732 - 05/07/05 11:09 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Amen.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Redstorm]
#4148735 - 05/07/05 11:10 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Redstorm said: I understand, and in some ways agree, with a ban. The length of it is where I can not agree with what the admins did.
at what point would you get fed up with it, lets say it's a 1 week cap on posting scat/beastiality pics, how many times do you feel a single user can get a 1 week ban before you feel that their whole purpose is simply to piss you off.
I heard 'you could have warned me' regarding KoTT and the photo of my wife and I, well, KoTT was warned when he posted Alakonas pics, Sykos and a couple of others did he need a warning for each event, each person or were the ones he recieved plenty
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 44,175
Last seen: 5 months, 9 days
|
Re: Petition to have Hanky's ban reduced to suspension [Re: Prisoner#1]
#4148740 - 05/07/05 11:12 PM (18 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I think the ban would have to be longer than one week to deter the member from doing it over and over. I'd say 3 weeks max on petty offenses.
About your warning question, I'd say one warning would cover all of those offenses at once. I would have banned him if he continued after I warned him.
|
|