Home | Community | Message Board

Myco Supply
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1

Registered: 02/15/05
Posts: 1,296
Court Blocks TV Anti-Piracy Tech Rules
    #4143463 - 05/06/05 07:37 PM (13 years, 1 month ago)

from: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050506/ap_on_hi_te/digital_tv_piracy


WASHINGTON - People buying the next generation of digital televisions will be able to record and then watch their favorite shows later, after all.

A federal appeals court on Friday threw out government rules requiring built-in, anti-piracy technology to let broadcasters and studios prevent digital shows from being copied.

The three-judge panel for the
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the
Federal Communications Commission had exceeded its authority in requiring such technology in digital televisions and consumer devices sold after July 1.

"This opens up the future for consumers to have more wide-ranging video experiences," said Art Brodsky, a spokesman for Washington-based Public Knowledge, a consumers group. "They will be able to take advantage of new products and features that won't be dictated to them by the entertainment industry."

Congress may get the last word. The appeals court panel said lawmakers could change the law to require the anti-copying technology on new products. An aggressive lobbying effort by entertainment companies is already anticipated.

"People will cry to Congress," said Gary Shapiro, head of the Consumer Electronics Association, the trade group for device-makers.

The court's decision illustrates the complexity of applying copyright laws to forthcoming technology. The ruling narrowly hinged on whether the
FCC under a 1934 law could regulate new digital TV and video-playback devices once the programs they receive are already in the home.

The court said the FCC's arguments that it had such authority were "strained and implausible."

Consumer groups and library associations challenged the new rules after they were announced in 2003. Their lawyers complained that the FCC requirement would drive up prices of digital television devices and prevent consumers from recording and viewing programs in ways permitted under copyright laws.

The appeals court panel said there is a "substantial probability" the anti-copying technology would interfere with libraries legally transmitting clips of television broadcasts over the Internet for educational purposes.

The technology, known as the broadcast flag, would have been required after July 1 for televisions equipped to receive new digital signals, many personal computers and VCR-type recording devices. It would permit entertainment companies to designate, or flag, programs to prevent viewers from copying shows or distributing them online.

Most digital TV sets and recording devices already accommodate the anti-copying technology, so the court's decision will have little immediate effect. Major television manufacturers design their products up to 18 months before they hit retail stores and have been preparing for the upcoming July deadline.

Some manufacturers, however, could choose to market TVs, computers and VCRs as unrestricted.

"Courts are right to be wary when government institutions seek to regulate the specific features and functions of safe, useful consumer technology," said Shapiro.

His trade group did not challenge the FCC rules in court because some member companies agreed with the requirement. Shapiro said he was "personally gratified the court took a narrow view over how government can regulate products."

Entertainment companies said the technology was needed to block viewers from recording high-quality, digital versions of television shows and films and distributing them free online. The Motion Picture Association of America and the National Association of Broadcasters warned that companies may choose not to air their best programs over local television if the shows couldn't be protected.

"If the broadcast flag cannot be used, program providers will have to weigh whether the risk of theft is too great over free, off-air broadcasting and could limit such high quality programming to only cable, satellite and other more secure delivery systems," said Dan Glickman, MPAA's chief executive.

The FCC acknowledged it had never before tried to impose regulations affecting television broadcasts after such programs are beamed into households. But it maintained that it was permitted to do so under the 1934 Federal Communications Act since Congress didn't explicitly tell the commission not to do it.

"We categorically reject that suggestion," the appeals panel said.

There were clear signals for Friday's ruling.

During earlier courtroom arguments, U.S. Circuit Judge Harry T. Edwards told the FCC's lawyer the agency had "crossed the line" by requiring the new anti-piracy technology for next-generation television devices and rhetorically asked whether the FCC also intended to regulate household appliances.

"You've gone too far," Edwards said. "Are washing machines next?"

Finally a good decision keeping the FCC in check. But how long will it last?

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
 User Gallery

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
Re: Court Blocks TV Anti-Piracy Tech Rules [Re: moog]
    #4143712 - 05/06/05 08:47 PM (13 years, 1 month ago)

until sony finds enough congressmen that can be bought.

All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* supreme court strikes down anti-sodomy laws Anonymous 669 11 06/27/03 06:12 PM
by Anonymous
* Disney has blocked Micheal Moore's new film
( 1 2 all )
carbonhoots 1,960 39 06/01/04 09:40 PM
by Learyfan
* Anti-Freedom List
( 1 2 3 all )
mntlfngrs 3,367 51 08/14/03 11:54 AM
by Innvertigo
* ANTI ~NWO~ RESISTANCE MEET UP 2003 cleaner 727 11 05/10/03 05:42 PM
by johnnyfive
* February 15 Anti-War Demonstrations....
( 1 2 all )
Angry Mycologist 3,578 33 02/16/03 04:36 PM
by Angry Mycologist
* UK: Parents cry foul as 'anti-social' teenagers are named an wingnutx 406 0 10/12/03 12:18 AM
by wingnutx
* anti war Lenore 946 6 10/16/01 05:13 AM
by MokshaMan
* The anti-Yanks are all talk, no action
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Ellis Dee 4,773 88 10/26/02 03:43 PM
by Innvertigo

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
363 topic views. 1 members, 1 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 19 queries.