Black holes 'do not exist' - Science and Technology

Home | Community | Message Board

You are not signed in.
New Account

Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Science and Technology

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop:

Red Vein Kratom

Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Cultivation Supplies

Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post

Pages: 1

Silversoul
Rhizome

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades

Black holes 'do not exist'

#4103830 - 04/27/05 05:53 PM (18 years, 11 months ago)

link

Black holes 'do not exist'

Philip Ball

Black holes are staples of science fiction and many think astronomers have observed them indirectly. But according to a physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, these awesome breaches in space-time do not and indeed cannot exist.

Over the past few years, observations of the motions of galaxies have shown that some 70% the Universe seems to be composed of a strange 'dark energy' that is driving the Universe's accelerating expansion.

George Chapline thinks that the collapse of the massive stars, which was long believed to generate black holes, actually leads to the formation of stars that contain dark energy. "It's a near certainty that black holes don't exist," he claims.

Black holes are one of the most celebrated predictions of Einstein's general theory of relativity, which explains gravity as the warping of space-time caused by massive objects. The theory suggests that a sufficiently massive star, when it dies, will collapse under its own gravity to a single point.

But Einstein didn't believe in black holes, Chapline argues. "Unfortunately", he adds, "he couldn't articulate why." At the root of the problem is the other revolutionary theory of twentieth-century physics, which Einstein also helped to formulate: quantum mechanics.

In general relativity, there is no such thing as a 'universal time' that makes clocks tick at the same rate everywhere. Instead, gravity makes clocks run at different rates in different places. But quantum mechanics, which describes physical phenomena at infinitesimally small scales, is meaningful only if time is universal; if not, its equations make no sense.

This problem is particularly pressing at the boundary, or event horizon, of a black hole. To a far-off observer, time seems to stand still here. A spacecraft falling into a black hole would seem, to someone watching it from afar, to be stuck forever at the event horizon, although the astronauts in the spacecraft would feel as if they were continuing to fall. "General relativity predicts that nothing happens at the event horizon," says Chapline.

Quantum transitions

However, as long ago as 1975 quantum physicists argued that strange things do happen at an event horizon: matter governed by quantum laws becomes hypersensitive to slight disturbances. "The result was quickly forgotten," says Chapline, "because it didn't agree with the prediction of general relativity. But actually, it was absolutely correct."

This strange behaviour, he says, is the signature of a 'quantum phase transition' of space-time. Chapline argues that a star doesn't simply collapse to form a black hole; instead, the space-time inside it becomes filled with dark energy and this has some intriguing gravitational effects.

Outside the 'surface' of a dark-energy star, it behaves much like a black hole, producing a strong gravitational tug. But inside, the 'negative' gravity of dark energy may cause matter to bounce back out again.

If the dark-energy star is big enough, Chapline predicts, any electrons bounced out will have been converted to positrons, which then annihilate other electrons in a burst of high-energy radiation. Chapline says that this could explain the radiation observed from the centre of our galaxy, previously interpreted as the signature of a huge black hole.

He also thinks that the Universe could be filled with 'primordial' dark-energy stars. These are formed not by stellar collapse but by fluctuations of space-time itself, like blobs of liquid condensing spontaneously out of a cooling gas. These, he suggests, could be stuff that has the same gravitational effect as normal matter, but cannot be seen: the elusive substance known as dark matter.

--------------------

Edited by Paradigm (04/27/05 10:41 PM)

Extras:

Similar Threads	Poster	Views	Replies	Last post
Hawking cracks black hole paradox	MAIA	1,382	6	07/27/04 09:50 AM by MAIA
wow, well it looks like black holes can kill stars.	amyloid	1,340	9	02/23/04 11:08 PM by FrankieJustTrypt
I wonder what the black stuff/space is made off.	Fliquid	1,851	13	03/06/03 02:28 AM by TheHateCamel
Big Bang Theory Put To Test	Jackal	958	6	06/19/03 08:18 PM by whiterasta
Am I missing something? Or is the big bang bullshit? ( 1 2 3 all )	Flux	8,496	47	01/29/04 04:48 PM by Shmoppy McGillicuddy
Nothing exists	MushyMay	1,206	8	03/11/03 10:23 AM by iconoclast
Zone Alarm vs. Black Ice ( 1 2 all )	Lana	8,004	30	02/09/03 04:48 AM by skabbo
Is a time machine possible? ( 1 2 all )	daba	4,609	28	12/08/03 12:43 PM by cyrus