A few minor things..
Race means very little in America. Rather than race, the real problem is socio-economic standing. The problem for minorities in America isn't their race, it's their starting economic position.
You all scream the 'starving child' card, but how many stories do you see about women on welfare that barely feed their child and use the money in ridiculous ways. It IS a handout that feeds the lazy, unwilling people of this country. I agree that poor single mothers deserve help, but paying them for having a kid every 3 years is stupid. I saw a report where they intervied this single mother in south Dallas about some new welfare laws that were upping the requirement for welfare ot having a child under 3 years old instead of under 5 years old. You know what this lady said? She said, "Well now I have to have a new kid every 3 years instead of every 5." That is irresponcible and stupid.
At the least, welfare should require that the mother be working a job atleast 20 hours a week and providing additonal help - in the form of food stamps - for the rest of it. Welfare should not be providing a mother with cable television, a nice TV, and a computer. It should be in the form of food stamps for food, and maybe 'children dollars' for children's clothing and goods.
People who don't attempt to work, don't deserve to be paid. Look at all the of illegal immigrants who line up along roads and work for 3$ an hour and support themselves and their families in Mexico. That's capitalism, and people willing to work coming together.
On the whole worker value-added argument. What kind of skills does it take to work a cash register? You barely have to know math. Any retard off the street can do it, so you offer the job to the person willing to work for the least amount of pay. You get to more difficult jobs, where you require training and such, and you offer more pay. Most hard manual labor jobs that require skill, such as carving and such, are done by machine in today's world. All of the 'training' is educational, so the well-paying jobs are the jobs that fewer people are qualified for. It would be a good thing to have more education, because it would increase competition for these jobs, and the salaries would drop, so overall business costs would drop, and prices would drop as well.
But now, you have a problem. The top earners in America pay 40+% of their income yearly to the Federal government. Middle earners (30-40k) pay more like 10%. This makes the income-to-benefit curve a logarithmic type curve where as income grows, benefit/income decreases. This harms incentives to get to the top, so only the most ambitious and interested work toward the top -- the people who can make the most out of it. This is a problem as we get more people who want to take advantage of the system since there are not alot of 'qualified' people for the position, and additionally, pumps their salaries up in an attempt to attract more people to these positions. On the other end of this, you have welfare where people don't have to do jack but fuck each other and have kids to get paid. The current welfare doesn't ensure that they take care of the kids.
...
This is a longass post, and i'm getting tired and can't remember everything I wanted to address. But, here's a summary of what I think.
America's problem is not racial, but socio-economical. We encourage people to be poor with a generous welfare system without having safe-checks to ensure that this money is well-spent. We discourage people from climbing to the very top because that marginal benefit just isn't worth the additonal marginal effort for most people. Our schools are a mess due to many many many reasons, and simply throwing more money at them isn't going to fix it.
Oh, one more rant. The government should NEVER bail companies out. Examples: Chysler, the airlines.. It's just bad for everybody but the airline employees, who are overpaid for their jobs due to the ending of government regulation of prices. Inefficient companies SHOULD fail.
|