Home | Community | Message Board


Kratom Eye
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
InvisibleRavus
Not an EggshellWalker
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/18/03
Posts: 7,991
Loc: Cave of the Patriarchs
Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda
    #3719732 - 02/02/05 05:24 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

Priming The Propaganda Mill
Posted by CN Staff on January 31, 2005 at 23:14:57 PT
By Steve Fox, AlterNet
Source: AlterNet

The federal government has spent over a billion dollars in recent years telling Americans what to think about marijuana and illegal drugs.

Much noise has been made, and rightly so, about the Bush administration's habit of secretly paying pundits and columnists to tout the White House line in the guise of independent journalism or commentary. But as we sound the alarm over covert propaganda, shouldn't we also be concerned about the overt kind?

The federal government spends enough scarce tax dollars on overt propaganda to make the $241,000 paid to Armstrong Williams look like chickenfeed, and that ought to be cause for real outrage. In a democracy, the people are supposed to tell the government what to think, not vice versa.

On just one issue ? our policy toward marijuana and illegal drugs ? the federal government has spent over a billion dollars in recent years telling Americans what to think. Every time a proposal to allow seriously ill patients to use marijuana for medical purposes under their doctors' supervision comes before voters or legislators, officials from the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) stream into town, repeating dire and often misleading warnings. That those warnings often have little effect (Montana voters ignored the White House and gave 62 percent approval to a medical marijuana proposal last November) does not make the practice any less inappropriate.

Perhaps even more pernicious are those ONDCP anti-drug ads on television, radio and in print. Though officially aimed at curbing teen drug abuse, independent evaluations of the campaign have consistently failed to find any such effect. Business Week got it right last October when it reported, "The ads' main focus is anti-marijuana messages aimed at state ballot initiatives for drug-policy reform."

Here the White House is having it both ways: Overt propaganda aimed at kids that also serves as covert political propaganda targeting adults. Worse, the ads are misleading and very likely counterproductive.

In recent years ONDCP's commercials have focused overwhelmingly, almost obsessively, on marijuana. But marijuana is well documented to be far less toxic or addictive than alcohol and tobacco, much less cocaine, heroin or methamphetamine. A scientific review by Oxford University researcher Leslie Iversen in the February issue of Current Opinion in Pharmacology concludes, "Overall, by comparison with other drugs used mainly for 'recreational' purposes, cannabis could be rated a relatively safe drug."

But you would never know that from those government ads, which suggest that if you smoke a joint you will shoot your friends, run down little girls on bicycles and end up a homeless derelict. Far more dangerous substances are rarely mentioned in this ad blitz, whose government origins are typically disclosed in a minimal, easy-to-miss fashion.

There are clear signs that this distorted emphasis, driven by politics instead of science, is hurting our kids. According to the latest federally funded Monitoring the Future survey of American teenagers, adolescent use of marijuana declined slightly last year while use of potentially lethal inhalants and cocaine went up. And teens rated occasional use of marijuana as being more dangerous than trying crack cocaine, drinking nearly every day or taking LSD regularly.

Amazingly, White House drug czar John Walters called the survey's results "good news for American parents and teens." One can only wonder what he thinks bad news would look like.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) is preparing to introduce legislation requiring all government-purchased ads to state that they were bought at taxpayer expense. Such truth-in-labeling is an essential step in the right direction. An even better idea is for the government to get out of the propaganda business entirely.

Steve Fox is director of government relations for the Marijuana Policy Project. -- http://www.mpp.org/
http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread20183.shtml


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleblacksabbathrulz
 User Gallery
Registered: 05/22/02
Posts: 2,511
Re: Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda [Re: Ravus]
    #3719839 - 02/02/05 05:42 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

I think they should buy 1,000,000,000 dollars of weed instead, and then give it to me to smoke. Either way, its wasted taxpayer dollars.


--------------------
.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleLe_Canard
Slightly Nutty

Registered: 05/17/03
Posts: 93,701
Loc: Earthfarm 1 Flag
Re: Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda [Re: Ravus]
    #3719855 - 02/02/05 05:44 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

Welcome to Bush's Amerika. Hang on, it's gonna be an interesting ride!  :shocked:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleblink
eye of horus
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 11,343
Loc: Geographic Location (Stat...
Re: Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda [Re: Le_Canard]
    #3719943 - 02/02/05 06:05 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

ToiletDuk said:
Welcome to Bush's Amerika. Get out now, he's driving drunk again! :blush:




--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleLe_Canard
Slightly Nutty

Registered: 05/17/03
Posts: 93,701
Loc: Earthfarm 1 Flag
Re: Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda [Re: blink]
    #3719967 - 02/02/05 06:09 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

:lol:!


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinelonestar2004
Live to party,work to affordit.
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/03/04
Posts: 8,978
Loc: South Texas
Last seen: 5 years, 11 months
Re: Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda [Re: Le_Canard]
    #3720228 - 02/02/05 07:20 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

they need to stop spending the money.

i remember D.A.R.E. came to my school. a cop showed us all these different types of drugs. my friends and i were thinking, wow this is cool!


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCatalysis
EtherealEngineer

Registered: 04/23/02
Posts: 1,742
Last seen: 8 years, 8 months
Re: Feds Spend $1,000,000,000 on Anti-Drug Propaganda [Re: Le_Canard]
    #3720357 - 02/02/05 07:59 PM (12 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

ToiletDuk said:
Welcome to Bush's Amerika. Hang on, it's gonna be an interesting ride!  :shocked:




Heh, as if this is a new thing.  :rolleyes:

From 1997

Quote:

CLINTON DRUG POLICY

All Things Considered, February 25, 1997 ? President Clinton unveiled details today of his domestic anti-drug strategy for the next fiscal year. He emphasizes a television ad campaign that he hopes the private sector will help pay for. NPR's Chitra Ragavan reports the campaign will be aimed at persuading young people of the dangers of drugs. Mr. Clinton plans to spend a total of 350- million dollars of federal and donated private money on the ads. His overall domestic anti-drug strategy for fiscal year 1998 carries a price tag of 16- billion dollars.




NPR

That money would sure buy a lot of drug rehab but im not sure it will prevent drug use how they are going to use it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* the anti drug Psilocybeingzz 734 16 07/07/03 04:44 PM
by toned3f
* Anti-Drug War superior court judge becomes Libertarian Party 40oz 519 2 04/28/03 05:54 AM
by 40oz
* Study: Teen anti-drug ads make impact (CNN)
( 1 2 all )
grib 1,471 31 06/19/03 12:35 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* Drug busts are big business for small towns JaguarWarrior101 1,727 11 05/20/05 03:02 AM
by JaguarWarrior101
* A vote for Obama / Biden is a vote for the war on drugs.
( 1 2 all )
THE KRAT BARON
2,100 26 09/23/08 01:00 AM
by johnm214
* School Drug Raid
( 1 2 all )
d33p 1,601 33 11/12/03 11:07 PM
by Bhairabas
* Bush torturing almost 1,000,000 Americans
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Swami 4,532 77 12/18/03 12:29 PM
by medicinebag
* The War on Drugs is Forcing Human Evolution icesickill 665 14 02/27/03 07:00 AM
by Azmodeus

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
725 topic views. 6 members, 3 guests and 5 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:

Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.043 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 14 queries.