Home | Community | Message Board

MRCA Tyroler Gluckspilze
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Sexual Heretic

Registered: 10/21/04
Posts: 10,579
Loc: Tokyo, Japan
Last seen: 12 years, 11 months
Those O so tolerant Dutch!
    #3349186 - 11/11/04 11:57 PM (13 years, 5 months ago)

Let the witch hunts begin!

AMSTERDAM ? The populist LPF has reacted with amazement to the news its chairman has been arrested for sending the party a bogus threatening letter.

The public prosecutor's office has confirmed Sergej Moleveld, 33, is being investigated for allegedly sending the LPF parliamentary party a fax which threatened both himself and party leader Mat Herben.

The fax was written in such a way to suggest it was sent by an Islamic group. After it was received, Moleveld reported the "threat" to police.

He faces a charge of wasting police time by filing a false report.

The bizarre incident is the latest in a series of embarrassing episodes of party infighting which has consumed the party's time since the murder of its founder, Pim Fortuyn, in May 2002.

In August, Herben and the party's seven other members broke away from the LPF, claiming it could not be reformed. Later, Herben agreed to return as leader to work on healing the rift.

Responding to news about the fake threat, the leaders of the MP's group, Gerard van As, said the "idiotic move confirmed the decision to leave the LPF had been the correct one".

"It evidences a total breakdown in judgement in these tense times to throw oil on the fire. Moreover, it wrongly shows the Islamic community in a bad light," Van As said.



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Error: divide byzero

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 04/27/01
Posts: 23,480
Loc: Caribbean
Last seen: 22 days, 20 hours
Re: Those O so tolerant Dutch! [Re: zahudulallah]
    #3350302 - 11/12/04 07:42 AM (13 years, 5 months ago)

> The fax was written in such a way to suggest it was sent by an Islamic group.

Perhaps if Islam was not so tarnished with all of the violence in the last few years, they would have used an extremist Christian group instead. Karma is an artifact of duality.

Just another spore in the wind.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
prophet of God
 User Gallery

Registered: 09/05/04
Posts: 953
Re: Those O so tolerant Dutch! [Re: zahudulallah]
    #3350519 - 11/12/04 09:51 AM (13 years, 5 months ago)

November 10, 2004, 4:20 p.m.
The Killers
The Dutch hit crisis point.

by Michael Ledeen
National Review Magazine

Mohammed B., the man accused of killing Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam last week, was born and bred in the Netherlands, "known as a relaxed, friendly and intelligent young man," a good student, a volunteer social worker, and a serious student of Information Technology. He came from a close family, and the death of his mother three years ago hit him very hard. He began to devote more time to religious studies, and in the last year became increasingly fanatic. He abandoned his social work because he refused to serve alcohol, and because the foundation where he volunteered organized events where both sexes were present. He was on welfare when he killed van Gogh.

We have seen this sort before; Mohammed B. is the Dutch-Moroccan version of the British-Pakistani killer of Daniel Pearl. Both came from good families that had to all appearances successfully assimilated into Western society. Both were well educated and upwardly mobile. Both had money and opportunity. Neither suffered unusual discrimination. Both lived in politically correct, meticulously tolerant societies that permitted no intrusion on their private lives. There was no apparent reason, either psychological or sociological, why either should have become a killer. Yet each freely chose ? freely chose ? to become a terrorist.

Each also chose to perform a ritual murder. Both beheaded (or, in the van Gogh killing, all-but-beheaded) their victims. This has long been a trademark of radical Islamist terrorists, whose videos of beheadings were used recruit new jihadists to their ranks long before they were broadcast around the world. The recruits join the jihad precisely because they want to behead the infidels and crusaders who are the objects of their hatred. Mohammed B. added a macabre twist: he left a message of hatred for Jews, Christians, Europeans and Americans impaled to van Gogh's chest with the murder weapon, a bloody dagger.

Mohammed B. was no lone wolf; within a few days, Dutch police had arrested seven other members of what they claimed was a terrorist group, and Spanish authorities said they believed the order for the ritual murder had come from terrorist leaders in their country. If that is correct, the van Gogh slaughter wasn't merely the result of local circumstances, but rather the product of a continental network of like-minded fanatics.

As the outstanding Italian journalist Magdi Allam sadly noted in the Corriere della Sera a few days after the event, the murder of van Gogh probably marked the end of Europe's multicultural utopian dream, because it forces politically correct Europeans to face an identity crisis that is eerily symmetrical with the same sort of crisis that has been afflicting Muslims for the past 30 years. Both were provoked by Western victories: The humiliation of Arab armies by Israel in 1967, and the defeat and dissolution of the Soviet Empire.

The Six-Day War and the ensuing collapse of the dream of a pan-Arab empire catalyzed a resurgence of fundamentalist Islam and its intense intolerance of social, religious and political freedoms. In Allam's neat formulation, al Qaeda represents the privatization and globalization of Islamic terrorism in its crudest and most hateful form. Yet it appeals to many Muslims, including some living and even born in the West, because they find it spiritually fulfilling, and also because there is no spiritual force in Europe capable of challenging it.

As things stand, the Europeans are so enthralled by cultural relativism and political correctness that they are totally unwilling to challenge any idea, even the jihadists' program of creating a theocratic state within Western civil society. The terrorist groups consider themselves autonomous, a community of believers opposed to the broader community of unbelievers and apostates.

The killing of Theo van Gogh is a textbook case of what happens when a tolerant but confused society takes political correctness to its illogical extreme. For Mohammed B. did not choose terrorism all by himself. He was indoctrinated and recruited in a mosque where he was pumped full of the Wahabbi doctrine "predominant in Saudi Arabia." The murder of van Gogh was an instant replay of the many murders carried out by Zarqawi and his followers in Iraq, extolled by fanatical Muslim Imams. As Allam reminds us, not all mosques are fundamentalist, extremist, or terrorist, but all the fundamentalists, extremists, and terrorists got that way in mosques.

The Dutch ? like every other European society I know ? were unwilling to recognize that they had potentially lethal enemies within, and that it was necessary to impose the rules of civil behavior on everyone within their domain. The rules of political correctness made it impossible even to criticize the jihadists, never mind compel them to observe the rules of civil society. Just look at what happened the next day: An artist in Rotterdam improvised a wall fresco that consisted of an angel and the words "Thou Shalt Not Kill." The local imam protested, and local authorities removed the fresco.

That's what happens when a culture is relativized to the point of suicide. As Daniel Patrick Moynihan once remarked of an American politician, "he can no longer distinguish between our friends and our enemies, and so he has ended by adopting our enemies' view of the world." This has now befallen Europe, which cannot distinguish between free societies ? their natural friends ? like the United States and Israel, and has ended by embracing enemies such as the radical Islamist regimes and elevating Yasser Arafat to near beatific stature.

The process by which the Europeans arrived at this grave impasse has been going on ever since the late 19th century, when the intelligentsia revolted against "bourgeois society" and its values, and sought for deeper meaning in acts of nihilistic violence, in fascism and communism, and in vast wars that engulfed the rest of the world. The Europeans might have confronted their spiritual crisis after the Second World War (some brave souls, like Albert Camus, tried), but the Cold War tamped it down. With a huge enemy on their borders, the Europeans finessed the issue, opted for a soulless materialism (that has given them a nanny state and a birth rate that promises to extinguish them in relatively short order), and pretended that the core of Western civilization was irrelevant to their lives.

When the Cold War ended, the crisis was still there, but they projected it onto us. The United States "needed an enemy," they scoffed, because otherwise we could not define our mission. But they were the ones who had lost their enemy, and thus had to face their own terrible contradictions and moral failures. Now they deride us because of our presumed archaic faith. They even equate American religion with the fundamentalism that now menaces them inside their model cities and threatens their enormously self-satisfied secular utopia.

Holland is now in the grips of violent reaction. Mosques and religious schools are firebombed. Emergency measures have been enacted. The Dutch are groping for a "solution," but they are still ducking the real problem, which, to their consternation, we are dealing with more effectively and far more self-confidently. "The multicultural crisis," Magdi Allam wisely reminds us, "should teach us that only a West with a strong religious, cultural and moral identity can challenge and open itself to the 'others' in a constructive and peaceful way. And that the goal must be a system of shared values within a common identity."


Edited by Great_Satan (11/12/04 09:53 AM)

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Dutch terrorize Muslims
( 1 2 all )
Great_Satan 1,763 25 11/10/04 11:30 PM
by zahudulallah
* Jihad wrecks Dutch race harmony Great_Satan 527 2 11/08/04 10:05 PM
by usefulidiot
* Suspect in Dutch filmmaker's murder makes dramatic court room confession lonestar2004 1,122 11 10/22/05 11:39 AM
by Los_Pepes
* Multiculturalism has fanned the flames of Islamic extremism lonestar2004 623 2 07/18/05 01:54 PM
by moog
* Bush is in Amsterdam Today BrAiN 821 19 05/08/05 06:14 PM
by Le_Canard
* Canadian Terrorists Catalysis 1,202 12 01/21/07 09:31 AM
by Luddite
* The Dutch, how compassionate!!!!!!!!!!!!
( 1 2 all )
SirTripAlot 2,483 23 03/14/06 05:55 AM
by TLG
* Multiculturalism
( 1 2 3 4 ... 11 12 all )
Ravus 8,421 220 03/04/11 08:43 AM
by Phred

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
558 topic views. 4 members, 2 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.04 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 19 queries.